Loading...
Agenda Packet TC 05/02/2011Town Council Trophy Club Entities Meeting Agenda 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 Svore Municipal Building Boardroom6:00 PMMonday, May 2, 2011 Call to order and announce a quorum. REGULAR SESSION EXECUTIVE SESSION - 6:00 P.M. 1.2011-219-T Pursuant to Texas Government Code, Annotated, Section 551.074(a)(1) "Personnel Matters," the Council will enter into Executive Session to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee relating to: A. The annual evaluation of Town Manager Mike Slye RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGES Pledge of allegiance to the American Flag. Pledge of allegiance to the Texas Flag. "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible." 2.2011-220-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Executive Session. CITIZEN PRESENTATIONS This is an opportunity for citizens to address the Council on any matter whether or not it is posted on the agenda. The Council is not permitted to take action on or discuss any presentations made to the Council at this time concerning an item not listed on the agenda. The Council will hear presentations on specific agenda items prior to the Council addressing those items. You may speak up to three (3) minutes or the time limit determined by the Mayor or presiding officer. To speak during this item you must complete the Speaker's form that includes the topic(s) of your statement. Topics of presentation should be limited to matters over which the Council has authority. PROCLAMATIONS Town Council 1 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 May 2, 2011Town Council Meeting Agenda 3.2011-222-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Proclamation declaring May 15 - May 21, 2011 as National EMS Week 2011 with May 18, 2011 set aside as Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Day. PRO 2011-06 Emergency Medical Services Week.pdfAttachments: 4.2011-223-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Proclamation declaring May 15 - May 21, 2011 as National Police Week. PRO 2011-07 National Police Week.pdfAttachments: CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed as Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Town Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will not be a separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered separately. 5.2011-163-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Minutes dated March 21, 2011. March 21 2011 Minutes.pdfAttachments: 6.2011-192-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Minutes dated March 29, 2011 (Regional Joint Council Workshop). March 29, 2011 Regional Joint Council Workshop.pdfAttachments: 7.2011-231-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article 16 entitled "Citizens Financial Advisory Board" of Chapter 1 entitled "Administration" of the Code of Ordinances to further clarify the duties of the CFAB; and providing an effective date. ORD 2011-16 CFAB Amendment.pdfAttachments: PUBLIC HEARING 8.2011-183-T Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a Specific Use Permit for a restaurant, located in Planned Development No. 13 - Village Shopping Center, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190, for the sale of mixed beverages by a food and beverage certificate holder. Applicant: Howard Tseung on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. Staff Report - TC.pdf Application.pdf Fish & Knife Alcohol Service Policy.pdf Public Hearing Notice - Newspaper.pdf Property Owner Notification.pdf Property Owners within 200 ft.pdf Attachments: Town Council 2 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 May 2, 2011Town Council Meeting Agenda 9.2011-187-T Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for Northwest Independent School District's Byron Nelson High School to expand the parking lots. Applicant: M. J. Thomas Engineering on behalf of Northwest ISD. SP-11-014 Staff Report - TC- Byron Nelson HS.pdf NISD Written Acknowledgment.pdf Newspaper Public Hearing Notice.pdf Attachments: 10.2011-213-T Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance amending Article 3 "Establishment of Districts" and Article 5 "Sale of Alcoholic Beverages" of Chapter 13 "Zoning" of the Code or Ordinances to provide regulations for the sale of alcohol for off-premises consumption in the Town of Trophy Club; providing a penalty not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. Staff Report - TC 050211 - Liquor Store.pdf ORD 2011-17 PZ.pdf Commercial_Properties_Map.pdf Attachments: RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION 11.2011-184-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding a request for approval of a Specific Use Permit for a restaurant, located in Planned Development No. 13 - Village Shopping Center, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190, for the sale of mixed beverages by a food and beverage certificate holder. Applicant: Howard Tseung on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. 12.2011-188-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding a request for approval of a revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for Northwest Independent School District's Byron Nelson High School to expand the parking lots. Applicant: M. J. Thomas Engineering on behalf of Northwest ISD. SP-11-014 13.2011-214-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article 3 "Establishment of Districts" and Article 5 "Sale of Alcoholic Beverages" of Chapter 13 "Zoning" of the Code or Ordinances to provide regulations for the sale of alcohol for off-premises consumption in the Town of Trophy Club; providing a penalty not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. 14.2011-211-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article XV "Swimming Pools" of Chapter 3 "Buildings and Construction" of the Code of Ordinances relative to the draining of swimming pools; providing for a penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. txr040000.pdf Minutes from 2008.pdf ORD 2011-18 (Option A).pdf ORD 2011-18 (Option B).pdf Attachments: Town Council 3 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 May 2, 2011Town Council Meeting Agenda 15.2011-210-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, amending Resolution No. 2010-22 appointing citizens to the Boards and Commissions; providing for the appointments of citizen volunteers to serve on the Citizens Financial Advisory Board and the Ethics Commission; designating terms of service; and providing an effective date. CFAB Applicants.pdf Ethics Applications.pdf RES 2011-08 Amending 2010-22.pdf Attachments: 16.2011-224-T Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution ratifying the Trophy Club Reserve Police Force Program and the appointment of the Reserve Force by the Chief of Police; and providing an effective date. Reserve Ratification Memo.pdf RES 2011-11 Reserve Ratification.pdf Attachments: 17.2011-227-T Town Manager Slye's update regarding the following; discussion of the same. - Independence Park East Landscape Plan Update - Roundabout Funding Update - Finance Director Position Update - TML IEBP Conference, May 11 - 14, 2011 18.2011-226-T Town Council Liaison Updates; discussion of same: - April 19, 2011 TCMUD No. 1 Meeting - Mayor Pro Tem Rose - April 25, 2011 EDC 4A Meeting - Council member Cantrell 19.2011-228-T Mayor and Council Updates regarding training opportunities, educational sessions, and regional meetings; discussion of same. - Metroport Cities Partnership Meeting - April 21, 2011 - Bubbles of Love - April 25, 2011 - North Texas Commission - April 26, 2011 - Arbor Day Celebration - April 30, 2011 20.2011-229-T Items for Future Agendas. Future Agenda Items List.pdfAttachments: This item allows Council to request the placement of items on upcoming agendas when the topic of discussion requires research and review that cannot be accomplished in the time frame between regular Council meetings. However, a Council Member may request that an item be placed on the next regularly scheduled meeting without first placing that item on the Future Agenda Items list. All requests for agenda items must comply with Charter requirements. ADJOURN * The Town Council may convene into executive session to discuss posted items as allowed by the Texas Open Meeting Act, LGC.551.071 Town Council 4 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 May 2, 2011Town Council Meeting Agenda CERTIFICATION I certify that the above notice was posted on the front window of the Svore Municipal Building, 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, Texas, on Friday, April 29, 2011 by 5:00 P.M. in accordance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. _______________________________ Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please contact the Town Secretary’s Office at 682-831-4600, 48 hours in advance, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by this Board was removed by me from the front window of the Svore Municipal Building, 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, Texas, on the __________ day of ______________________, 2011. ________________________________, Title: ___________________________ Town Council 5 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-219-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Pursuant to Texas Government Code, Annotated, Section 551.074(a)(1) "Personnel Matters," the Council will enter into Executive Session to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee relating to: A. The annual evaluation of Town Manager Mike Slye Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Pursuant to Texas Government Code, Annotated, Section 551.074(a)(1) "Personnel Matters," the Council will enter into Executive Session to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee relating to: A. The annual evaluation of Town Manager Mike Slye Town Council 6 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-220-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Executive Session. Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Executive Session. Town Council 7 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-222-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Proclamation declaring May 15 - May 21, 2011 as National EMS Week 2011 with May 18, 2011 set aside as Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Day. Attachments:PRO 2011-06 Emergency Medical Services Week.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Proclamation declaring May 15 - May 21, 2011 as National EMS Week 2011 with May 18, 2011 set aside as Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Day. Town Council 8 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS PROCLAMATION NO 2011- 06 MAY 15 - 21, 2011 Emergency Medical Services Week WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public service; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consists of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators and others; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, whether career or volunteer, engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of emergency medical services providers by designating Emergency Medical Services Week; now THEREFORE, I Connie White, Mayor of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, in recognition of this event do hereby proclaim the week of May 15-21, 2011, as EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK with May 18, 2011 set aside as EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN (EMSC) DAY. With the theme, EMS: Everyday Heroes, I encourage the community to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies and activities. PROCLAIMED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas this 2nd day of May, 2011. _______________________________ ________________________________ Connie White, Mayor Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 9 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-223-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Proclamation declaring May 15 - May 21, 2011 as National Police Week. Attachments:PRO 2011-07 National Police Week.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Proclamation declaring May 15 - May 21, 2011 as National Police Week. Town Council 10 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS PROCLAMATION NO. 2011-07 May 15-21, 2011 as National Police Week WHEREAS, The Congress and President of the United States have designated May 15 – 21, 2011 as National Police week; and WHEREAS, the members of the law enforcement agency of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas play an essential role in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of Town of Trophy Club, Texas; and WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens know and understand the duties, responsibilities, hazards, and sacrifices of their law enforcement agency, and that members of our law enforcement agency recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against violence and disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression; and WHEREAS, the members of the law enforcement agency of Town of Trophy Club, Texas unceasingly provide a vital public service; NOW, THEREFORE, I, MAYOR CONNIE WHITE, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM and call upon all citizens of Town of Trophy Club, Texas and upon all patriotic, civic and educational organizations to observe the week of May 15 – 21, 2011, as National Police Week with appropriate ceremonies and observances in which all of our people may join in commemorating law enforcement officers, past and present, who, by their faithful and loyal devotion to their responsibilities, have rendered a dedicated service to their communities and, in so doing, have established for themselves an enviable and enduring reputation for preserving the rights and security of all citizens. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas this 2nd day of May 2011. _______________________________ ________________________________ Connie White, Mayor Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 11 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-163-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:3/28/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:4/4/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Minutes dated March 21, 2011. Attachments:March 21 2011 Minutes.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Minutes dated March 21, 2011. NOTE The minutes state presentations are included in the minutes. This packet does not include the presentations; the presentations will be included in the permanent minute file when posted online. Town Council 12 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 MINUTES FROM REGULAR SESSION TOWN COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB LOCATION: 100 MUNICIPAL DRIVE, TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS Monday, March 21, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. Svore Municipal Building Boardroom The Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, met in Regular Session on Monday, March 21, 2011. The meeting was held within the boundaries of the Town and was open to the public. STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Connie White Mayor Bill Rose Mayor Pro Tem Margi Cantrell Council Member Larry Hoover Council Member JD Stotts Council Member Glenn Strother Council Member arrived at 6:06 p.m. STAFF AND GUEST(S) PRESENT: Mike Slye Town Manager Stephen Seidel Assistant Town Manager Shannon DePrater Town Secretary Patricia Adams Town Attorney Scott Kniffen Police Chief Danny Thomas Fire Chief Michael Aguilera Interim Finance Director Carolyn Huggins Community Development Director Adam Adams Parks & Recreation Director April Reiling PIO / Marketing Manager Chris King Building Inspector Mayor White announced the date of March 21, 2011; called the workshop to order and announced a quorum at 6:02 p.m. Council member Strother arrived at 6:06 p.m. WORKSHOP SESSION - 6:00 P.M. 1. PID Disbursement Presentation and Council Question and Answer Session. Mitch Mosesman, representative of the Town's PID Administrator, David Taussig and Associates, presented the PID Disbursement Review. Julie Partain, Bond Counsel from Vinson and Elkins, was in attendance and responded to questions. Details regarding budgeted items paid with PID funds are outlined in the presentation. Mosesman clarified that there are funds in the budget to pay for the remaining costs attributable to the PID. Overruns on PID projects were covered by contingency and interest earnings from bond proceeds on the unspent project funds. The projects remaining for completion are the water tower and roundabout. There also appears to be $270,738 remaining in the budget for park improvements, and staff is in the process of reviewing that budget to determine how much of those funds are available for continued use on park improvements given some outstanding invoices. The review showed that not all procedures for tracking of the funds were followed, but PID funds are currently available for the construction of the remaining projects required by the PID agreement. Town Council 13 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Julie Partain stated that based upon the review by Mitch Mosesman, she is comfortable that the bond proceeds were expended on properly approved PID projects and therefore compliant with state law. Presentation included in the minutes. 2. Discussion of agenda items posted for consideration on the Regular Session Council Agenda for March 21, 2011. CONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION - START TIME 7:10 P.M. The Invocation was offered by Council member Hoover. The Pledges were led by Council member Cantrell. Citizen Presentations: This is an opportunity for citizens to address the Council on any matter whether or not it is posted on the agenda. The Council is not permitted to take action on or discuss any presentations made to the Council at this time concerning an item not listed on the agenda. The Council will hear presentations on specific agenda items prior to the Council addressing those items. You may speak up to three (3) minutes or the time limit determined by the Mayor or presiding officer. To speak during this item you must complete the Speaker's form that includes the topic(s) of your statement. Topics of presentation should be limited to matters over which the Council has authority. No citizen presentations were made. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed as Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Town Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will not be a separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered separately. Mayor White removed both agenda items from the consent agenda. 3. Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Minutes dated March 7, 2011. Motion made by Council member Cantrell, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Rose, to approve the March 7, 2011 minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimously without further discussion. 4. Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article VIII, "Tree Preservation and Removal" of Chapter 12, "Subdivision Rules and Regulations" and also amending Article I, "Parks and Recreation Board" of Chapter 9, "Parks and Recreation" of the Code of Ordinances in order to authorize the Parks and Recreation Board to serve as the Tree Board, providing duties and responsibilities to be performed by the Parks and Recreation Board; removing all references to the Tree Board as a separate Board; and providing an effective date. Motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Rose, seconded by Council member Cantrell, to approve Ordinance 2011-06 amending Section 8.02(B) by adding item #7 Ensure that Tree City USA Application for recertification is submitted annually and to obtain the Sterling Tree City USA Designation. Parks and Recreation Director Adam Adams expressed he was in favor of ensuring that the Tree City USA Application for recertification is submitted annually. Adams relayed that 187 trees will be planted Town Council 14 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 this year and that the Town could not surpass that number in future years; the Town would not meet the requirements of the Sterling Tree City USA Recognition. Mayor Pro Tem Rose moved to remove “obtain the Sterling Tree City USA Designation” from his motion; Council member Cantrell seconded. Motion passed 5:1:0 with Mayor White, Mayor Pro Tem Rose, Council members Cantrell, Hoover, and Strother voting for and Council member Stotts voting against. Motion carried unanimously to approve Ordinance 2011-06 amending Section 8.02(B) to add “7. Ensure the Tree City USA Application for recertification is submitted annually.” REGULAR SESSION 5. Mayor White to present an annual state of the Town message, including a statement of needs and goals for the Town; discussion of same. Mayor White presented the Annual State of the Town Message. Presentation included in the minutes. 6. Discuss and take appropriate action regarding a requested proposal to enlarge the buffer zone between Independence East and Community Pool Complex and the Royal Troon Neighborhood. The following residents expressed their concerns regarding traffic, parking, trail drainage and access, and the buffer zone between the Royal Troon Neighborhood and Independence East Facility. Charles Boedeker, 2422 Lilyfield Drive Sue Fitzgerald, 2421 Lilyfield Drive Mike Fitzgerald, 2421 Lilyfield Drive Scott Folley, 2407 Lilyfield Drive Julie Folley, 2407 Lilyfield Drive Dolores Ziluca, 2412 Lilyfield Drive Deb Derderian, 2428 Lilyfield Drive Sherry Thiltgen, 2411 Lilyfield Drive James Jarazewski, 2417 Lilyfield Drive Mike Buck, 2401 Lilyfield Drive Jeanne Buck, 2401 Lilyfield Drive Jesus Monroy, 2423 Lilyfield Drive The following residents spoke in favor of keeping the current buffer zone intact: David Johnson, 6 Meadow Ridge Drive Steve Gregory, 205 Pebble Beach Drive Larry Lentzner, 303 Ridge View Lane Matt Fenton, 15 Jamie Court Town Manager Slye presented a time line of the Community Pool/Independence Park East events beginning with December 2001 Town Council direction to the Parks & Recreation Committee on reviewing and drafting a plan to build a community pool through the November 2010 Town Council meeting approving the site plan and replat/final plat of Independence Park East/Community Pool. Council discussed many of the comments addressed by residents. Town Council 15 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Council suggested that Town Manager Slye work with Staff and residents and come back with to the Council with a proposal. Slye asked the residents of Royal Troon to organize and appoint a spokesperson to meet with him and Staff. The following residents spoke: Mike Fitzgerald, 2421 Lilyfield Drive Julie Folley, 2407 Lilyfield Drive Sherry Thiltgen, 2411 Lilyfield Drive Scott Folley, 2407 Lilyfield Drive Charles Boedeker, 2422 Lilyfield Drive Sue Fitzgerald, 2421 Lilyfield Drive Steve Gregory, 205 Pebble Beach Drive Jeanne Buck, 2401 Lilyfield Drive Mayor White asked Town Manager Slye and Staff to work with the Royal Troon spokesperson or committee and to bring the item back if a Council decision is needed. Council took a short break and resumed at 10:15 p.m. 7. Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article VIII “International Energy Conservation Code” of Chapter 3, “Buildings and Construction” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town by adopting the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code regulations for certain structures, excluding one-family and two-family residential dwellings; providing a penalty; and providing an effective date of April 1, 2011. Motion made by Council member Cantrell, seconded by Council member Stotts, to approve Ordinance 2011-10 amending Article VIII “International Energy Conservation Code” of Chapter 3, “Buildings and Construction” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town by adopting the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code regulations for certain structures, excluding one-family and two-family residential dwellings; providing a penalty; and providing an effective date of April 1, 2011. Motion carried unanimously without further discussion. 8. Consider and provide input regarding regulations related to the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption. Mayor White stated the purpose of the discussion is to review the current Town regulations regarding alcohol sales; not to advocate for or against the sale of alcoholic beverages for the local option proposition on the May 14, 2011 ballot. Any proposed amendments to the Town’s regulations on retail liquor sales for off-premise consumption are not intended to be punitive or advantageous to any particular business. They are intended to ensure that the Town can provide proper application procedures and governance for retail liquor sales within the community. Direction only, no action taken. 9. Consider and provide input regarding a Special Events Ordinance. Council considered a first draft of regulations pertaining to special events on November 15, 2010. Based on feedback and suggestions from Council, the draft regulations have been revised and are presented to Council for their discussion. Staff is seeking input from Council so that we can finalize the ordinance for approval at the next meeting. Due to the time, Mayor White asked Council to send their comments to Staff for review. Town Council 16 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Motion made by Council member Stotts, seconded by Council member Hoover to table agenda items 10 and 11. Motion carried unanimously without further discussion. 10. Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution of the Town Council authorizing the Creation of a Keep Trophy Club Beautiful Committee comprised of various citizen volunteers; and providing an effective date. Town Manager Slye will approach EDC 4A, EDC 4B or Parks and Recreation Board to provide necessary infrastructure for the initiative. 11. Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution of the Town Council authorizing the Creation of a Sustainability Committee comprised of various citizen volunteers; and providing an effective date. Town Manager Slye indicated that current staff would take this responsibility and that we would include any interested volunteers. 12. Consider and take appropriate action regarding financial and variance report dated February 2011. Motion made by Council member Cantrell, seconded by Council member Strother, to approve the financial and variance report dated February 2011 as amended. Motion carried unanimously without further discussion. 13. Town Council Liaison Updates; discussion of same: - March 8, 2011 Parks & Recreation Board - Council Member Hoover - March 10, 2011 TCMUD No. 1 - Mayor Pro Tem Rose - March 14, 2011 EDC 4B - Council Member Strother Council liaisons gave a brief update of the meetings and addressed questions. No action taken, update only. 14. Town Manager Slye's update regarding the following; discussion of the same. - PID Voting on MUD Proposition - RFP for Financial Software Town Manager Slye updated the Council and addressed questions. No action taken, update only. 15. Mayor and Council Updates regarding training opportunities, educational sessions, and regional meetings; discussion of same. - Tarrant County Obesity Prevention Meeting - pioneering healthier communities through physical activities and the nutritious foods work groups - Northwest Communities Partnership Monthly Meeting - Byron Nelson High School Techno Expo - Council Retreat - Metroport Cities Partnership Monthly Meeting Mayor White and Council members gave a brief update of the meetings they attended since the last Council meeting. No action taken, update only. Town Council 17 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 16. Items for Future Agendas. This item allows Council to request the placement of items on upcoming agendas when the topic of discussion requires research and review that cannot be accomplished in the time frame between regular Council meetings. However, a Council Member may request that an item be placed on the next regularly scheduled meeting without first placing that item on the Future Agenda Items list. All requests for agenda items must comply with Charter requirements. Council member requested Item #7, Communication Plan, be removed. No items were added. ADJOURN Motion made by Council member Hoover, seconded by Council member Cantrell to Adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 11:50 p.m. _____________________________ ________________________________ Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Connie White, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town of Trophy Town Council 18 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-192-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Consent Agenda File created:In control:4/7/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:4/18/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Minutes dated March 29, 2011 (Regional Joint Council Workshop). Attachments:March 29, 2011 Regional Joint Council Workshop.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding the Minutes dated March 29, 2011 (Regional Joint Council Workshop). NOTE The minutes state presentations are included in the minutes. This packet does not include the presentations; the presentations will be included in the permanent minute file when posted online. Town Council 19 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 MINUTES FROM REGIONAL COUNCIL JOINT WORKSHOP FOR THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB LOCATION: Byron Nelson High School Library (East Door Entrance) 2775 Bobcat Boulevard Trophy Club, Texas 76262 Tuesday, March 29, 2011 7:00 PM The Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, March 29, 2011. The meeting was held within the boundaries of the Town and was open to the public. STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Connie White Mayor Bill Rose Mayor Pro Tem Larry Hoover Council Member JD Stotts Council Member Glenn Strother Council Member TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Margi Cantrell Council Member STAFF AND GUEST(S) PRESENT: Mike Slye Town Manager Shannon DePrater Town Secretary Patricia Adams Town Attorney Scott Kniffen Police Chief Adam Adams Parks & Recreation Director April Reiling PIO / Marketing Manager Mayor White announced the date of March 29, 2011; called the workshop to order and announced a quorum of the Trophy Club Town Council at 7:07 p.m. Mayor Wheat noted a quorum of Town of Westlake Council and Mayor Gierisch announced a quorum of City of Roanoke Council. 1. Welcome (Trophy Club Town Manager Slye) - Overview - Expectations - Benefits Trophy Club Town Manager Mike Slye welcomed everyone and provided a brief outline and purpose of the joint meeting. Presentation included in the minutes. 2. Discussion of a proposed Memorandum of Understanding for HWY 114 and HWY 170 Corridor Development (Westlake Town Manager Brymer) Town of Westlake Town Manager Tom Brymer provided a presentation and summary of the Memorandum of Understanding’s purpose of establishing a defined framework between the cities, clarifying that the agreement is non binding. Brymer also listed possible areas of cooperation, including Planning & Zoning, Parks and Recreation, trails and public facilities. Town Council 20 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town of Westlake Public Works Director Jarrod Greenwood gave an overview of the HWY 114 and HWY 170 project. Presentation included in the minutes. 3. Discussion of Proposed Trail Connector Project Town of Westlake Facilities and Recreation Director Troy Meyer provided an overview of the possibility of connecting the existing trail systems within each Town. 4. Discussion of a proposed Memorandum of Understanding for regional park access and use Each Council discussed the prospect of joining together to create regional park access. Discussion included the possibility of collectively allowing residents to utilize the neighboring facilities and how to divide costs. 5. Community Update (5 minutes each) - Roanoke Mayor Gierisch announced that the construction of Hawaiian Falls is on schedule and will open Memorial Day, Hard 8 BBQ has begun turning dirt, and incentives have been approved for both Fuzzy Tacos and Hard 8. Mayor Gierisch stated that development is continuing daily. - Trophy Club Mayor White announced the construction plans for the Trophy Club Drive and Trophy Lake Drive Roundabout with a water wall, invited all to the upcoming Parks and Recreation Events including Trek & Toss, and the Frisbee Golf course opening, Camp Out and Easter Egg hunt. Mayor White also shared 87 new home permits have been issued. - Westlake Mayor Wheat shared Deloite was moving furniture into the buildings and would have a soft opening in July with a September/October grand opening, Westlake Academy was expanding from 520 to 630 students and invited everyone to the Arbor Days event on April 23. Mayor Wheat offered a suggestion to conduct a regional strategic planning session to try and build a “shared vision” of the metroport region. 6. Discussion of future meetings - Frequency - Location Councils agreed to allow the town managers coordinate and schedule future meetings. Mayor Gierisch stated Roanoke could hold the next meeting. ADJOURN Mayor White adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. _____________________________ ________________________________ Connie White, Mayor Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 21 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-231-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/27/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article 16 entitled "Citizens Financial Advisory Board" of Chapter 1 entitled "Administration" of the Code of Ordinances to further clarify the duties of the CFAB; and providing an effective date. Attachments:ORD 2011-16 CFAB Amendment.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article 16 entitled "Citizens Financial Advisory Board" of Chapter 1 entitled "Administration" of the Code of Ordinances to further clarify the duties of the CFAB; and providing an effective date. Town Council 22 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE 2011-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLE XVI, ENTITLED “CITIZENS FINANCIAL ADVISORY BOARD” OF CHAPTER 1 ENTITLED “ADMINISTRATION”, SUBSECTION “A” ENTITLED “ADVISORY CAPACITY TO COUNCIL” OF SECTION 16 ENTITLED “POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD”; PROVIDING FOR THE INCORPORATION OF PREMISES; PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club, Texas is a home rule municipality acting under its Charter and state law; and WHEREAS, on January 3, 2011, the Town Council adopted an ordinance creating the Citizens Financial Advisory Board (“CFAB”) to perform various functions under the direction of the Town Council, which ordinance was codified in Article XVI of Chapter 1 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined it necessary and appropriate to amend Section 16.03 (A) entitled “Powers and Duties of the Board” to further clarify the duties and powers of the CFAB; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that the amendment to Section 16.03 (A) as set forth below serves the best interests of the Town and should be approved; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF PREMISES The above and foregoing premises having been found by the Town Council to be true and correct are incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT - ADOPTION OF ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER XV 2.01 Subsection “A” entitled “Advisory Capacity to Council” of Section 16 entitled “Powers and Duties of the Board” of Article XVI entitled “Citizens Financial Advisory Board” of Chapter 1 entitled “Administration” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby amended and shall read in its entirety as follows: Town Council 23 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Section 16.03 Powers and Duties of the Board “A. Advisory Capacity to Council. The Board shall act principally in an advisory capacity to the Town Council and Town staff in Budget matters. The Board shall only accomplish those tasks directed or approved by Council.” SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE REPEALER This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other Ordinances of the Town affecting the boards and commissions, finance, and the Citizens Financial Advisory Board and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such Ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those Ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance; whether such Ordinances are codified or uncodified, and all other provisions of the Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, codified or uncodified, not in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining of the Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to engross and enroll this Ordinance in accordance with the Town Charter and by filing this Ordinance in the Ordinance records of the Town. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its date of passage in accordance with law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, this 2nd day of May, 2011. Town Council 24 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Connie White, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas [SEAL] ATTEST: Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas APPROVED TO AS FORM: Patricia A. Adams , Town Attorney Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 25 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-183-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/2/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a Specific Use Permit for a restaurant, located in Planned Development No. 13 - Village Shopping Center, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190, for the sale of mixed beverages by a food and beverage certificate holder. Applicant: Howard Tseung on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. Attachments:Staff Report - TC.pdf Application.pdf Fish & Knife Alcohol Service Policy.pdf Public Hearing Notice - Newspaper.pdf Property Owner Notification.pdf Property Owners within 200 ft.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning & Zoning Commission4/7/2011 1 TITLE Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a Specific Use Permit for a restaurant, located in Planned Development No. 13 - Village Shopping Center, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190, for the sale of mixed beverages by a food and beverage certificate holder. Applicant: Howard Tseung on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. EXPLANATION: The applicant, Howard Tseung, on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc., wishes to serve alcoholic beverages in the “Fish & Knife Japanese Restaurant” which they will be opening soon in Planned Development No. 13 “Village” Shopping Center at Highway 114 and Trophy Club Drive. Town of Trophy Club regulations require approval by the Town Council, after consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, of a specific use permit for alcohol sales. The Planning and Zoning Commission met on April 7, 2011, to consider this request and the Commission, by a 6-0 vote (Vice Chairman Stephens was absent) recommend approval. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal #2: Business-Friendly Economic Development Create effective working relationships with businesses and developers Retain / Develop existing businesses Promote new commercial opportunities RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: Staff, and specifically the Chief of Police, evaluated this request with regard to public safety and analysis of services provided to the community (for example, a unique food category not currently available as a restaurant in Trophy Club, heavy traffic flow patterns during particular times of day). Theapplicant has met the requirementsset forth by the Town’s ordinances. Staff recommends approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. Town Council 26 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN COUNCIL May 2, 2011 SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a Specific Use Permit for a restaurant, located in Planned Development No. 13 – Village Shopping Center, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190, for the sale of mixed beverages by a food and beverage certificate holder. Applicant: Howard Tseung on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. APPLICANT: Howard Tseung 1830 E. Abram Street Arlington, TX 76010 PROPERTY OWNER: Okeechobee P.B. Holdings c/o Grace Development Inc. 3309 Fairmont Drive Nashville, TN 37203 BUSINESS OWNER: Fish & Knife Japanese Restaurant Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190 Trophy Club, TX 76262 PERMITTED USES: Fish & Knife will occupy approximately 2,000 sq. ft. of space in Tract 1 of Planned Development No. 13 – Village Shopping Center. Tract 1 allows a wide range of retail uses, including the applicant’s business: a restaurant with alcoholic beverage sales; alcoholic beverages sales subject to Town approval. Town Council 27 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 ADJACENT ZONING/EXISTING LAND USES: North: R-11/residential (property owners within 200-ft. were notified of this request) South: State Highway 114/Town of Westlake East: PO/undeveloped (Beck owned property at Trophy Club Dr/114) West: R-9/residential (property owners on Straight Creek Ct. were notified) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 13 – VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER Town Council 28 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 29 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 30 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 STAFF COMMENTS: To obtain a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for the sale of alcoholic beverages in a restaurant, the following is required:  The applicant must comply with applicable licensing and permit provisions of the TABC. TABC requires proof of Town approval prior to issuing a license and permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages. If Town Council approval is given, the applicant then completes his application with TABC and once a TABC license has been issued the applicant returns to the Town for issuance of a Town permit.  The applicant shall demonstrate that the granting of the SUP would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and/or welfare of the citizens of the Town; and  The applicant shall, at all times, provide an adequate number of employees for security purposes to adequately control the establishment premises to prevent incidents of drunkenness, disorderly conduct and raucous behavior. The applicant shall consult with the Chief of Police/Director of Public Safety who shall act in an advisory capacity to determine the number of qualified employees necessary to meet his/her obligation hereunder. The applicant consulted with Police Chief Kniffen and reviewed the staffing and operating procedures of the restaurant and received approval. The applicant has indicated that employee training will be implemented and will be on-going to protect and safeguard public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Town. The applicant indicated that the security of patrons will be a high priority of the establishment. A specific use permit runs with the property and is not affected by a change in the owner or lessee of a permitted establishment. A specific use permit may be discontinued if the use for which the SUP was granted ceases to be operated at the permitted location for a minimum period of six (6) continuous months. Public Hearing As required by ordinance, a notice of public hearing was published in the local newspaper and property owners within 200-ft. of the shopping center were notified of this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff, and specifically the Chief of Police, evaluated this request with regard to public safety and analysis of services provided to the community (i.e., a unique food category not currently available as a restaurant in Trophy Club, heavy traffic flow patterns during particular times of day). The applicant has met the requirements set forth by the Town’s ordinances. Staff recommends approval. Town Council 31 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this request on April 7, 2011. At public hearing, Nick Sanders, on behalf of Economic Development Corporation 4B, spoke in favor of granting this SUP. The Planning and Zoning Commission made the following motion: Commissioner Sheridan made a motion recommending approval of a Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages in the Fish & Knife Japanese Restaurant, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Davidson. Ayes: Hill, Reed, Davidson, Richert, Sheridan, Forest (Stephens was absent) Nays: None Action: 6-0, Approved (ch) Attachments: Application Fish & Knife Alcohol Service Policy Public Hearing – Newspaper Property Owner Notification List of Property Owners within 200-ft. Town Council 32 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 T o w n C o u n c i l 3 3 o f 2 0 6 M e e t i n g D a t e : M a y 2 , 2 0 1 1 FISH & KNIFE JAPANESE CUISINE 2001 HWY. 114 , SUITE 190 TROPHY CLUB, TX 76262 ALCOHOLIC POLICY The main goal of the restaurant is to provide Japanese cuisine to customers for their enjoyment. Serving alcoholic beverage is only to supplement customer's enjoyment of their food. The restaurant will have a small bar area that can seat only five people and also serve as a waiting area. The restaurant will emphasis on the sale of Japanese cuisine and not the sale of alcoholic beverage. The working hours of the restaurant is: Sunday through Thursday: 11 am to 2:30 pm (Lunch), 4:30 pm to 9:30 pm (Dinner). Friday and Saturday: 11 am to 2:30 pm (Lunch), 4:30 pm to 10:30 pm (Dinner). STAFFING Number of wait staff for Lunch hours will be six and five for Dinner hours. Beside the wait staff, there will be a manager and a hostess helping out during rush hours. TABC CERTIFICATION All wait staff will be required to obtain TABC certification for serving alcoholic beverage. Any wait staff who are under the age of 21 will be prohibited to serve alcoholic beverage. Management will conduct weekly staff meeting to emphasis the importance of following the alcoholic serving policy set up by TABC. INTOXICATION AND UNRULY CONDUCT PREVENTION Manager and wait staff will monitor customer intoxication level based on the training they receive from the TABC certification class. Any customer that appeared to be intoxicated will be prohibited from purchasing more alcoholic beverages. POLICE INTERVENTION In the discretion of the management, if customers who are intoxicated or unruly and cannot be handled by wait staff or management, police will be called to alleviate the situation. Town Council 34 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town of Trophy Club Department of Planning & Zoning 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 TO: Alliance Regional Newspapers / Classifieds Dept. DATE: March 21, 2011 FROM: Carolyn Huggins PAGES: 1 RUN DATE: 1 Time: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 SUBJECT: Public Hearing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Thursday, April 7, 2011 TOWN COUNCIL Monday, May 2, 2011 A Public Hearing will be held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Trophy Club in the Boardroom of the Municipal Utility District Building, 100 Municipal Drive, at 7:00 p.m., Thursday, April 7, 2011, to consider Amending Ordinance No. 95- 20, PD Planned Development District No. 13, Exhibit “C” Development Standards to grant a Specific Use Permit for a Japanese restaurant, Fish and Knife Japanese Cuisine) to sell mixed beverages in the restaurant; and, other miscellaneous changes to PD-13 as related to this request as deemed necessary. The Town Council will hear the above item on Monday, May 2, 2011 in the Boardroom of the Municipal Utility District Building, 100 Municipal Drive, at 7:00 p.m. Town Council 35 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 T o w n C o u n c i l 3 6 o f 2 0 6 M e e t i n g D a t e : M a y 2 , 2 0 1 1 T o w n C o u n c i l 3 7 o f 2 0 6 M e e t i n g D a t e : M a y 2 , 2 0 1 1 Larry Blancett 1109 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Jeffrey Demiceli 1122 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Seven Eleven Inc. 2711 N. Haskell Avenue #1 Dallas, TX 75204-2911 Kurt & Natalie Henry 1111 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Larry & Norma Smith 1124 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Texas National Bank 3205 E. Northwest Parkway Southlake, TX 76092-6092 David & Barbara Gray 1112 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Re: 1126 Sunset Dr. Richard Sparks P.O. Box 1790 Trophy Club, TX 76262 Grace Development Inc. 3309 Fairmont Dr. Nashville, TX 37203 Robert & Sandee Clark 1113 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 George Truitt 1031 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Oakmont Ent. Inc. 336 Watermere Dr. Southlake, TX 76092-8113 Michael & Marolyn Zugay Family Trust 1114 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Ted Neidenberger 1033 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 St2 Tc Building Lp Attn: Scott Trickey 1123 Wade Hampton St. Benbrook, TX 76126-3519 Luther & Jaunita Bruce 1115 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Roger Sessions 1100 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Wesley & Leeann Nickodam 1101 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Charles Mohon & Amanda Pogue 1116 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Re: 1 Straight Creek Ct., Trophy Club, TX Teresa Marsteller c/o Paul Drown 3701 W. Morton Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85051 Alvin & Annette Miller 5 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 7626 Brandon & Kayla Sargent 1117 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Amanda & Chad Gundersen 2 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Daniel & Jami Penick 6 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 David & Joan White 1118 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Barbara Metzler 3 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Paul & Stephanie Thurston 7 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Milton Smith 1120 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Re: 4 Straight Creek Ct., Trophy Club, TX Robert & Barbara Moss 27 W. Hillside Place Roanoke, TX 76262 Re: 8 Straight Creek Ct., Trophy Club, TX Kahn Living Trust Monroe & Margaret Kahn 7702 Colgate Ave. Westminster, CA 92683-6218 Town Council 38 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Re: 9 Straight Creek Ct., Trophy Club, TX Robert & Laura Matkin 3618 Igo St. San Antonio, TX 78230-2305 Mark & Denise Lester 10 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Linda Rohloff 11 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Carl Megow 12 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Stephen Fischer 14 Straight Creek Ct. Trophy Club, TX 76262 John & Barbara Colwell 1102 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Karen Nichols & William Jarboe 1103 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Robert & Elizabeth Johnson 1104 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Gary & Margi Cantrell 1105 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Joseph Pagano 1106 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Re: 1107 Sunset Dr., Trophy Club, TX Larry Baker 89 Preswick Park Dr. Newnan, GA 30265-2026 Kathe Johnsson 1108 Sunset Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Re: 1110 Sunset Dr., Trophy Club, TX Margaret Tripton 9226 Independence Way Fort Myers, FL 33913-7077 Town Council 39 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-187-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/2/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for Northwest Independent School District's Byron Nelson High School to expand the parking lots. Applicant: M. J. Thomas Engineering on behalf of Northwest ISD. SP-11-014 Attachments:Staff Report - TC- Byron Nelson HS.pdf NISD Written Acknowledgment.pdf Newspaper Public Hearing Notice.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning & Zoning Commission4/7/2011 1 TITLE Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for Northwest Independent School District's Byron Nelson High School to expand the parking lots. Applicant: M. J. Thomas Engineering on behalf of Northwest ISD. SP-11-014 EXPLANATION: The school district wishes to expand the parking capacity at Byron Nelson High School. They anticipate that with the addition of seniors in Fall 2011, most of whom will drive a car to school, there will not be enough parking spaces available for teachers and students on the campus. The school district is requesting approval of a revised site plan that adds 778 additional parking spaces which will double the existing parking. Additional landscaping will be added and additional parking lot lights will be added. The school district is asking for four waivers as outlined in the staff report and the engineering. Mickey Thomas, M. J. Thomas Engineering, can give details regarding each waiver being requested. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal #2: Business-Friendly Economic Development Create effective working relationships with businesses and developers Retain / Develop existing businesses Promote new commercial opportunities RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: Can be provided by Mehran Aghili, NISD. Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. Town Council 40 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT May 2, 2011 Site Plan Revision - SP-11-014 Byron Nelson High School 2775 Bobcat Blvd. SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider a request for approval of a revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for Northwest Independent School District’s Byron Nelson High School to expand the parking lots. Applicant: M. J. Thomas Engineering on behalf of Northwest ISD. SP-11-014 The applicant, M.J. Thomas Engineering, on behalf of Northwest ISD is requesting approval of a revised site plan for Byron Nelson High School. The school district wishes to expand parking at the high school, which is located on approximately 83 acres of Lot 1, Block 1 of the plat filed in Denton County as “NISD High School No. 2”. The Town of Trophy Club Site Plan regulations require that changes to a site plan which will “reduce the yards provided at the boundary of the site as indicated on the approved site plan” shall be approved by the Town Council, after recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A public hearing, advertised in the newspaper, is required. Property owner notification is not required. History and Existing Site: This property was zoned PD-28 on March 5, 2007. The Final Site Plan was approved by the Town Council on September 9, 2007. The site is developed and is located on the north and east sides of Bobcat Blvd. It is zoned Planned Development District No. 28 (PD-28), Northwest High School No. 2, with the underlying zoning of Neighborhood Service. The plat for Byron Nelson High School consists of four (4) lots:  Lot 1, Block 1 consists of 82.859 acres and the school buildings and auxiliary uses such as athletic fields and a stadium are located on this lot.  A water tower will be located on Lot 2, Block 1.  Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 are open areas created when Bobcat Blvd. was constructed. This request involves Lot 1, Block 1, only. In 2009 the school opened offering freshman and sophomore classes. In August 2010, juniors were added to the school and in August 2011, seniors will be added. During the past two years of the school’s existence, the parking lots have been full during regular school weeks. There is Town Council 41 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 inadequate parking when sporting events are held on the school property. With the addition of seniors in August 2011, NISD anticipates that each senior will drive a car to the high school campus which will result in inadequate parking. The Town parking regulations require 1 space for every 3 persons (students/teachers). When the original site plan was considered, 800 spaces were required for the 2,200 students and 200 staff. NISD is requesting an additional 778 parking spaces, of which 18 will be ADA. 2007 Site Plan Approval: 725 spaces 2011 Site Plan Requested: 778 spaces Total: 1,503 spaces PD-28 (NS) allows a maximum impervious surface of 80%. Currently, the impervious surface for the high school is 38%. The proposed increase in parking expansion would bring the impervious surface to 42%. A minimum of 20% open space is required in the NS District. This proposed expansion does not appear to reduce that percentage of open space. There is proposed parking on top of an existing 12-inch public waterline. Town/MUD policy is to avoid pavement on top of water lines. Staff asked for written acknowledgement from NISD that repair or replacement of the paving is NISD responsibility if the pavement is damaged or destroyed if the water line(s) must be repaired or replaced. NISD has provided written acknowledgement (attached) that NISD will repair or replace pavement if damaged or destroyed when the Town repairs or replaces the waterline. Landscaping: The proposed expansion identifies losing 177 canopy trees and 35 ornamental trees. NISD is replacing these lost trees by replanting 179 canopy trees and 42 evergreen trees/shrubs. They have also increased the number of trees along the eastern property line in order to provide more buffering of the high school fields from the residential area of Neighborhood 1 in The Highlands. WAIVERS REQUESTED 1. PD-28, Section B, 1. (a) states that planter islands or berms must be located no further apart than every 24 parking spaces and at the terminus of all rows of parking. On sheet C-2, Site Plan, the proposed northern parking areas show a section of “New Parking (34 spaces)” in which there are 27 parking spaces before a planter island occurs. In order to provide a planter island at 24 spaces, a fire hydrant would need to be relocated. The applicant requests a waiver allowing one instance of 27 spaces before a planter island occurs. 2. The proposed parking lot on the northwest corner of the site, adjacent to Bobcat Blvd. that states “New Parking (42 spaces)” has approximately six (6) spaces in the 30-ft. building setback. The applicant asks for a waiver to allow parking in the building setback in this location on the high school campus. Town Council 42 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 3. On the east side of the high school site, the applicant is proposing “New Parking (89 spaces)”. There is a 40-ft. landscape buffer required adjacent to residential and the 89 new parking spaces encroach into the 40-ft. landscape buffer. However, since there is an 80-ft. wide creek separating the NISD property from the residentially zoned district to the south/southeast, NISD requests a waiver for the 40-ft. landscape buffer in order to place parking in that area. 4. Photometrics: Town regulations require that parking lot lights shall provide illumination within the parking facility not to exceed one foot-candle at ground level and shall distribute not more than two-tenths (0.2) of one foot-candle of light upon any adjacent residentially zoned district. There are a number of locations within the site where the parking lot lights exceed one-foot candle at ground level and these locations were granted a waiver by the Town Council in 2007. The applicant asks that this waiver continue. The plans meet the requirement that illumination shall distribute not more than two-tenths (0.2) of one-foot candle of light upon any adjacent residentially zoned district. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this request on April 7, 2011, and made the following motion: Commissioner Davidson made a motion recommending approval of the revised Site Plan for Byron Nelson High School with the following stipulations: 1) Grant a waiver to allow one instance of 27 parking spaces rather than 24 spaces, before a planter island occurs; the 27 spaces to be located on the northern end of the campus; and 2) Grant a waiver to allow approximately six (6) parking spaces to be placed in the 30-ft. building setback, the location to be on the west side of the campus along Bobcat Blvd.; and 3) Grant a waiver to allow parking in the 40-ft. landscape buffer to the east of the site as there is an 80-ft. creek separating NISD property from the residentially zoned district to the south/southeast; and 4) Grant continuation of waiver granted by Council in 2007 that parking lot lighting exceeds one-foot candle at ground lever, but does not exceed two-tenths of one-foot candle of light upon any adjacent residentially zoned district. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Reed. Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Davidson, Richert, Sheridan, Forest Nays: None Action: 7-0-, Approved ch Attachment: Application NISD Written Acknowledgement Public Hearing Newspaper Notice Hard Copy (rolled plans) – Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Lighting Town Council 43 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 44 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 45 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town of Trophy Club Department of Planning & Zoning 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 TO: Alliance Regional Newspapers / Classifieds Dept. DATE: March 21, 2011 FROM: Carolyn Huggins PAGES: 1 RUN DATE: 1 Time/ March 23, 2011 SUBJECT: Site Plan – Byron Nelson High School NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 7, 2011 Town Council May 2, 2011 A Public Hearing will be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Trophy Club in the Council Chambers, 100 Municipal Drive, at 7:00 PM, THURSDAY, April 7, 2011, to consider revisions to the Site Plan for Byron Nelson High School, located in Planned Development No. 28, located in the 2700-2800 Block of Bobcat Blvd. The Applicant is requesting the addition of approximately 800 parking spaces to the site. Applicant: MJ THOMAS ENGINEERING, LLC on behalf of NORTHWEST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. The Town Council will hear this request on MONDAY, May 2, 2011, in the Council Chambers at 100 Municipal Drive at 7:00 p.m. Town Council 46 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-213-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/15/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance amending Article 3 "Establishment of Districts" and Article 5 "Sale of Alcoholic Beverages" of Chapter 13 "Zoning" of the Code or Ordinances to provide regulations for the sale of alcohol for off-premises consumption in the Town of Trophy Club; providing a penalty not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. Attachments:Staff Report - TC 050211 - Liquor Store.pdf ORD 2011-17 PZ.pdf Commercial_Properties_Map.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning & Zoning Commission4/19/2011 1 TITLE Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance amending Article 3 "Establishment of Districts" and Article 5 "Sale of Alcoholic Beverages" of Chapter 13 "Zoning" of the Code or Ordinances to provide regulations for the sale of alcohol for off- premises consumption in the Town of Trophy Club; providing a penalty not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. EXPLANATION: On May 14, 2011, Trophy Club residents will vote on a local option to permit the sale of liquor for off-premise consumption. If the option is approved by votes, the Council wishes to have zoning regulations and application procedures for a liquor store on the books in order to ensure good governance of retail liquor store establishments within the community. The ordinance, for Council consideration this evening, proposes allowing a liquor store in “CG” Commercial General zoning and a Specific Use Permit will be required that will be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal #1: Safe and secure community. Maintain low crime rate Increase citizen awareness and involvement in crime prevention Provide superior Emergency Services Improve data security Goal #2: Business-Friendly Economic Development Create effective working relationships with businesses and developers Retain / Develop existing businesses Promote new commercial opportunities Goal # 3: Strong Partnerships and Community Involvement Create a positive regional identity Foster a well informed community Enhance citizen volunteer opportunities Expand and promote recreational / active live style opportunities for all ages Forge collaborative relationships with other governmental and public entities RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: Planning and Zoning Commission held public hearings and discussion of this item on April 7 and April 19, 2011, and their Town Council 47 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 File #: 2011-213-T, Version: 1 recommendations are attached. Town Council 48 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT May 2, 2011 Retail Sale of Alcoholic Beverages for Off-Premise Consumption SUBJECT: Consider and take appropriate action regarding regulations related to the sale of alcohol for off-premise consumption. Due to the local option to permit the sale of liquor for off-premise consumption on the May 14, 2011, ballot, the Town of Trophy Club is considering zoning regulations and application procedures for a liquor store in order to ensure good governance of retail liquor store establishments within the community. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission With proper TABC licensing and inspections, a liquor store establishment in the State of Texas is allowed to be open Monday through Saturday from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. A liquor store is required to be closed on Sundays, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year’s Day per TABC regulations. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission held public hearings and discussion on this item on April 7, 2011 and April 19, 2011. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended some changes that have not been incorporated into the proposed ordinance. Changes not included in the ordinance are as follows:  Prohibit window signage and painted windows for liquor stores Signs are regulated by the Town’s sign regulations contained in Chapter 5- General Land Use of the Code of Ordinances and the regulations currently prohibit some window signage (such as neon window signs). Signs allowed or disallowed in windows should be uniformly applied to all businesses.  Place a maximum square footage restriction on liquor stores The Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 13) applies square footage minimums to zoning districts, but does not apply square footage maximums to individual businesses. Staff does not recommend placing a limitation on the size of a particular type of business. Town Council 49 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011  Disallow a liquor store in Village Center of Planned Development No. 27 Specifically disallowing a liquor store in Village Center of PD-27 is not necessary as a liquor store currently is not allowed in Village Center. The owners of the Village Center property in Planned Development No. 27 would be required to bring a request for a change of use before the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council to allow a liquor store. In addition, if the proposed ordinance is approved, a specific use permit would be required.  Limit the location of liquor stores to Highway 114 access The regulations the Council is considering will restrict the locations of liquor stores to a specific zoning district and give the Council discretion to approve or deny a SUP at any location. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the following and these recommendations are reflected in the proposed ordinance:  Delete reference to Gourmet Food The Commission could not come to an agreement on a definition for “gourmet food”. The Commission also stated that the Town does not regulate content of other retail businesses and therefore they could not support encouraging or requiring gourmet food in a liquor store  Allow a liquor store in “CG” Commercial General zoning district The ordinance proposes allowing a liquor store in “CG” Commercial General zoning. There are also four commercial planned development districts: PD-13, PD-21, PD-25, and PD-27. For a liquor store to be allowed in any of the planned development districts, the property owner would be required to bring a request for a change of use before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council.  Require a specific use permit for a liquor store with Council discretion to approve or deny based on development conditions. The ordinance proposes requiring a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a liquor store. The SUP must be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation to the Town Council. The Council has authority to approve or deny the SUP based on the development conditions provided by the applicant as outlined in the ordinance and the SUP application. Attachments: Ordinance 2011-XX P&Z Commercial Property Map Town Council 50 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2011-17 P&Z AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS AMENDING ARTICLE 3 ENTITLED “ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS” OF CHAPTER 13 ENTITLED “ZONING” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND AMENDING ARTICLE 5 ENTITLED “SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES” OF CHAPTER 13 ENTITLED “ZONING” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE REGULATIONS FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION AS MORE FULLY SET FORTH IN THE ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE INCORPORATION OF PREMISES; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on January 21, 2011, the Town of Trophy Club, Texas (hereinafter referred to as “Town”) was presented with a petition for a Local Option Election to legalize the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption; and WHEREAS, upon receipt and verification of the petition for Local Option Election, the Town Council ordered that a Local Option Election be held on May 14, 2011; and WHEREAS, the current Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the Town does not provide for these types of sales or establishments, the Town Council wishes to modify the Zoning Ordinance in order to provide for the regulation of liquor stores that sell alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption; and WHEREAS, all legal notices, requirements and conditions having been complied with, the case to amend the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance came before the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Town Council; and WHEREAS, after public notices were given in compliance with State Law and public hearings were conducted, and after considering the information submitted at those public hearings and all other relevant information and materials, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town has recommended to the Town Council the adoption of the amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as set forth in this Ordinance; and Town Council 51 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS: SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF PREMISES The above and foregoing premises are true and correct and are incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2. AMENDMENTS 2.01 Subsection “G” entitled “Retail” of Section 3.02 entitled “Classification of New and Unlisted Properties” of Article 3 entitled “Establishment of Districts” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby amended to add a classification for Liquor Store which shall be and read in its entirety as follows and all other sections and subsections of 3.02(G) shall remain the same. Article 3, Section 13 – Use Table is amended as follows: District Classifications Permitted Uses R- 15 R- 12 R- 11 R- 10 R- 9 R- 8 R- FV R- TT R- OH R- OHP R-S MH CG CR NS PO GU G. Retail Liquor Store S 2.02 Subsection “A” entitled “Definitions” of Section 5.02 entitled “Sale of Alcoholic Beverages” of Article 5 entitled “Supplementary District Regulations” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby amended to add a definition for “Liquor Store” which shall be placed in alphabetical order and shall be and read in its entirety as follows and all other sections and subsections of 5.02(A) shall remain the same. “Liquor Store: A business that sells alcoholic beverages for consumption off-premises. For the purposes of this Ordinance, the term “Liquor Store” shall exclude grocery stores or convenience stores in which beer and/or wine is offered for sale as a minor part of an overall larger inventory of goods. It shall also exclude a restaurant that is otherwise operating in accordance with its’ approved liquor license and all other provisions of this Ordinance.” 2.03 The first paragraph of Subsection 3 entitled “Compliance with Town Codes and Ordinances – On-Premises Sale and Consumption” of Section “F” entitled “Specific Use Permit” of Section 5.02 entitled “Sale of Alcoholic Beverages” of Article 5 entitled “Supplementary District Regulations” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Town Council 52 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby repealed and a new first paragraph of Subsection 3 of Section “F” is hereby adopted and shall be and read in its entirety as follows and all other sections and subsections of 5.02(F)(3) shall remain the same. “F. Specific Use Permit. 3. Compliance - On-Premises Sale and Consumption. Compliance with Town Codes and Ordinances for on-premises sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages as follows: 2.04 Subsection “F” entitled “Specific Use Permit” of Section 5.02 entitled “Sale of Alcoholic Beverages” of Article 5 entitled “Supplementary District Regulations” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby amended to add Subsection 4 which is hereby adopted and shall be and read in its entirety as follows: “F. Specific Use Permit. 4. Compliance - Off-Premises Consumption. Compliance with Town Codes and Ordinances is required for sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption in a Liquor Store, and the Specific Use Permit (SUP) application shall show documentation of compliance with the following: a. Liquor Store: i. That a SUP application for a Liquor Store is submitted in its entirety, without omissions, and ii. That the application is officially filed with the payment of applicable fees; and ii. That the application complies with all provisions of this and all applicable ordinances; and iv. That the application complies with the following development conditions: a. A Liquor Store shall not have walk-up window access, and shall not have drive-through or drive-up access. Town Council 53 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 b. A Liquor Store shall operate in a premise that is not physically completely separate from any other business and the exterior design of the store shall show evidence of coordination with contextual influences of neighboring properties in regard to building setbacks, orientation, and relationship of structures to each other and to the street. The layout of the site shall respect and build upon the arrangement of buildings, open spaces and landscape elements of adjacent sites. b. Additional Development Conditions: The Council may attach additional development conditions to the Specific Use Permit that the Council, in its discretion, determines are appropriate for buffering, safety, security, and compatibility for and to adjacent properties.” 2.05 The heading of Subsection “G” entitled “Criteria and Processing of SUP” of Section 5.02 entitled “Sale of Alcoholic Beverages” of Article 5 entitled “Supplementary District Regulations” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby amended so that the heading of Subsection “G” shall be and read as follows: “G. Criteria and Processing of SUP. The following general conditions apply to all Specific Use Permits (SUP) allowing: 1) the sale of beer and wine for off premises consumption only, or 2) the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption only, or 3) the sale of mixed beverages by food and beverage certificate holders only: 2.06 Subsection G(8) of Section 5.02 entitled “Sale of Alcoholic Beverages” of Article 5 entitled “Supplementary District Regulations” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby repealed in its entirety. “8. Town Council may deny a SUP if it affirmatively determines that the issuance of such SUP is: a. Incompatible with the surrounding uses or property or b. Detrimental or offensive to the neighborhood or contrary to the health, safety, and general welfare of the Town and its inhabitants.” 2.07. Section 5.02 entitled “Sale of Alcoholic Beverages” of Article 5 entitled “Supplementary District Regulations” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby amended to add a new Section H entitled “Denial of SUP” which shall be and read in its entirety as follows: Town Council 54 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 H. Denial of SUP. Town Council may deny an SUP if it affirmatively determines that the issuance of such SUP: 1. a. Is Incompatible with the surrounding uses or property; or b. Is Detrimental or offensive to the neighborhood or contrary to the health, safety, and general welfare of the Town and its inhabitants; or c. Is found to be in non-compliance with the development conditions outlined in the “SUP Application-Liquor Store”, is found to be in non- compliance with the requirements established by the Town Council pursuant to Section 5.02(F)(4)(b) of this Article, or is found to be in non- compliance with any other Town ordinances, including without limitation failure to comply with any one or more of the provisions of Section 5.02(F)(4). 2.08 Section 5.02 entitled “Sale of Alcoholic Beverages” of Article 5 entitled “Supplementary District Regulations” of Chapter 13 entitled “Zoning” of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby amended to re-alphabetize the following Sections, and all substantive provisions of each of the following sections shall remain the same in their entirety: Section “H” entitled “Methods for Determining Distance Measurements” shall be re-alphabetized to Section “I” entitled “Methods for Determining Distance Measurements” Section “I” entitled “Exception to Distance Requirements” shall be re-alphabetized to Section “J” entitled Exception to Distance Requirements” Section “J” entitled “Exemption From SUP Process for Existing Private Club Operations” shall be re-alphabetized to Section “K” entitled “Exemption From SUP Process for Existing Private Club Operations”. Section “K” entitled “Possession or Consumption Prohibited in Certain Areas” shall be re-alphabetized to Section “L” entitled “Possession or Consumption Prohibited in Certain Areas”. Section “L” entitled “Miscellaneous Provisions” shall be re-alphabetized to Section “M” entitled “Miscellaneous Provisions”. SECTION 3. SAVINGS That all rights and remedies of the Town of Trophy Club are expressly saved to any and all violations of the provisions of any Ordinance affecting beer & wine sales (off premise consumption only), the sale of mixed beverages in restaurants by food and beverage certificate holders only, and/or the sale of alcoholic beverages for off- Town Council 55 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 premises consumption which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such Ordinances, same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 4. CUMULATIVE REPEALER That this Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other Ordinances and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such Ordinances except for those instances where there are direct conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance. Ordinances or parts thereof in force at the time this Ordinance shall take effect and that are inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with this Ordinance. Provided however, that any complaint, action, claim or lawsuit which has been initiated or has arisen under or pursuant to such Ordinance on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall continue to be governed by the provisions of that Ordinance and for that purpose the Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. PENALTY It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Ordinance, and any person violating or failing to comply with any provision of this Ordinance shall be fined, upon conviction, not less than One Dollar ($1.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), and a separate offense shall be deemed committed each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. SECTION 7. PUBLICATION The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to publish the Caption, Penalty and Effective Date of this Ordinance as required by Section 52.011 of the Texas Local Government Code. Town Council 56 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 SECTION 8. ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to engross and enroll this Ordinance by copying the exact Caption, Penalty and Effective Date in the minutes of the Town Council and by filing this Ordinance in the Ordinance records of the Town. SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its date of adoption and publication as provided by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, this _____ day of _____________, 2011. Connie White, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas Effective Date: [SEAL] ATTEST: Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas APPROVED TO AS FORM: Patricia A. Adams, Town Attorney Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 57 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 To w n Co u n c i l 58 of 20 6 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-184-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/2/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding a request for approval of a Specific Use Permit for a restaurant, located in Planned Development No. 13 - Village Shopping Center, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190, for the sale of mixed beverages by a food and beverage certificate holder. Applicant: Howard Tseung on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning & Zoning Commission4/7/2011 1 TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding a request for approval of a Specific Use Permit for a restaurant, located in Planned Development No. 13 - Village Shopping Center, 2001 Highway 114, Suite 190, for the sale of mixed beverages by a food and beverage certificate holder. Applicant: Howard Tseung on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc. EXPLANATION: The applicant, Howard Tseung, on behalf of Feng Chen Enterprise, Inc., wishes to serve alcoholic beverages in the “Fish & Knife Japanese Restaurant” which they will be opening soon in Planned Development No. 13 “Village” Shopping Center at Highway 114 and Trophy Club Drive. Town of Trophy Club regulations require approval by the Town Council, after consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, of a specific use permit for alcohol sales. The Planning and Zoning Commission met on April 7, 2011, to consider this request and the Commission, by a 6-0 vote (Vice Chairman Stephens was absent) recommend approval. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal #2: Business-Friendly Economic Development Create effective working relationships with businesses and developers Retain / Develop existing businesses Promote new commercial opportunities RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: Staff, and specifically the Chief of Police, evaluated this request with regard to public safety and analysis of services provided to the community (for example, a unique food category not currently available as a restaurant in Trophy Club, heavy traffic flow patterns during particular times of day). The applicant has met the requirements set forth by the Town’s ordinances. Staff recommends approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. Town Council 59 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-188-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding a request for approval of a revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for Northwest Independent School District's Byron Nelson High School to expand the parking lots. Applicant: M. J. Thomas Engineering on behalf of Northwest ISD. SP-11-014 Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning & Zoning Commission4/7/2011 1 TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding a request for approval of a revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for Northwest Independent School District's Byron Nelson High School to expand the parking lots. Applicant: M. J. Thomas Engineering on behalf of Northwest ISD. SP-11-014 EXPLANATION: The school district wishes to expand the parking capacity at Byron Nelson High School. They anticipate that with the addition of seniors in Fall 2011, most of whom will drive a car to school, there will not be enough parking spaces available for teachers and students on the campus. The school district is requesting approval of a revised site plan that adds 778 additional parking spaces which will double the existing parking. Additional landscaping will be added and additional parking lot lights will be added. The school district is asking for four waivers as outlined in the staff report and the engineering. Mickey Thomas, M. J. Thomas Engineering, can give details regarding each waiver being requested. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal #2: Business-Friendly Economic Development Create effective working relationships with businesses and developers Retain / Develop existing businesses Promote new commercial opportunities RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: Can be provided by Mehran Aghili, NISD. Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. Town Council 60 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-214-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/15/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article 3 "Establishment of Districts" and Article 5 "Sale of Alcoholic Beverages" of Chapter 13 "Zoning" of the Code or Ordinances to provide regulations for the sale of alcohol for off-premises consumption in the Town of Trophy Club; providing a penalty not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning & Zoning Commission4/19/2011 1 TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article 3 "Establishment of Districts" and Article 5 "Sale of Alcoholic Beverages" of Chapter 13 "Zoning" of the Code or Ordinances to provide regulations for the sale of alcohol for off-premises consumption in the Town of Trophy Club; providing a penalty not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. EXPLANATION: [Enter explanation here.] TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): [Enter goal(s) here.] RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: [Enter recommendation here.] Town Council 61 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-211-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/13/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action: Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article XV "Swimming Pools" of Chapter 3 "Buildings and Construction" of the Code of Ordinances relative to the draining of swimming pools; providing for a penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. Attachments:txr040000.pdf Minutes from 2008.pdf ORD 2011-18 (Option A).pdf ORD 2011-18 (Option B).pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding an Ordinance amending Article XV "Swimming Pools" of Chapter 3 "Buildings and Construction" of the Code of Ordinances relative to the draining of swimming pools; providing for a penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars for each violation; and providing an effective date. EXPLANATION: Staff has developed an application form for residents to use to obtain a Compliance Permit as specified in the Ordinance. The compliance permit application was not approved as part of the Ordinance but is a form that staff may administratively amend and revise as it determines necessary. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal #4: Picturesque and Environmentally Sound Maintain neat and tidy appearance Improve property maintenance standards and code enforcement Develop / Enhance environmental and sustainability standards and programs RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: Please refer to Town Manager Slye's comments during the meeting. Town Council 62 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 63 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 2 TCEQ GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER TXR040000 RELATING TO STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS Table of Contents Part I. Definitions and Terminology .............................................................................................. Page 3 A. Definitions .................................................................................................................Page 3 B. Commonly Used Acronyms....................................................................................... Page 8 Part II. Permit Applicability and Coverage ................................................................................... Page 9 A. Small MS4s Eligible for Authorization by General Permit....................................... Page 9 B. Allowable Non-Storm Water Discharges .................................................................. Page 9 C. Limitations on Permit Coverage.............................................................................. Page 11 D. Obtaining Authorization.......................................................................................... Page 13 E. Permitting Options................................................................................................... Page 19 F. Waivers.................................................................................................................... Page 20 Part III. Storm Water Management Program (SWMP)............................................................. Page 21 A. Minimum Control Measures.................................................................................... Page 22 B. General Requirements.............................................................................................. Page 28 Part IV. Recordkeeping and Reporting ........................................................................................ Page 28 A. Recordkeeping......................................................................................................... Page 28 B. Reporting ................................................................................................................. Page 29 Part V. Standard Permit Conditions ............................................................................................. Page 31 Part VI. Authorization for Municipal Construction Activities ................................................... Page 32 A. Eligible Construction Sites ...................................................................................... Page 32 B. Discharges Eligible for Authorization..................................................................... Page 32 C. Limitations on Permit Coverage.............................................................................. Page 34 D. Numeric Effluent Limitations.................................................................................. Page 34 E. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3)..................................................... Page 34 F. Effective Date of Coverage...................................................................................... Page 35 G. Deadlines for SWP3 Preparation and Compliance.................................................. Page 35 H. Plan Review and Making Plans Available............................................................... Page 35 I. Keeping Plans Current............................................................................................. Page 35 J. Contents of SWP3.................................................................................................... Page 35 K. Additional Retention of Records ............................................................................. Page 41 Attachment 1 Construction Site Notice.......................................................................................... Page 42 Attachment 2 Discharge Monitoring Report for Concrete Batch Plants........................................ Page 43 Town Council 64 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 3 Part I. Definitions and Terminology A. Definitions Best Management Practices (BMPs) - Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, structural controls, local ordinances, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control runoff, spills or leaks, waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage areas. Classified Segment - refers to a water body that is listed and described in Appendix A or Appendix C of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards, at 30 TAC ' 307.10. Clean Water Act (CWA) - The Federal Water Pollution Control Act or Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Pub.L. 92-500, as amended Pub. L. 95-217, Pub. L. 95-576, Pub. L. 96-483 and Pub. L. 97-117, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et.seq. Common Plan of Development or Sale - A construction activity that is completed in separate stages, separate phases, or in combination with other construction activities. A common plan of development or sale is identified by the documentation for the construction project that identifies the scope of the project, and may include plats, blueprints, marketing plans, contracts, building permits, a public notice or hearing, zoning requests, or other similar documentation and activities. Construction Site Operator - The person or persons associated with a small or large construction project that meets either of the following two criteria: (a) the person or persons that have operational control over construction plans and specifications (including approval of revisions) to the extent necessary to meet the requirements and conditions of this general permit; or (b) the person or persons that have day-to-day operational control of those activities at a construction site that are necessary to ensure compliance with a storm water pollution prevention plan for the site or other permit conditions (e.g. they are authorized to direct workers at a site to carry out activities required by the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan or comply with other permit conditions). Conveyance - Curbs, gutters, man-made channels and ditches, drains, pipes, and other constructed features designed or used for flood control or to otherwise transport storm water runoff. Daily Maximum - For the purposes of compliance with the numeric effluent limitations contained in this permit, this is the maximum concentration measured on a single day, by grab sample, within a period of one calendar year. Discharge - When used without a qualifier, refers to the discharge of storm water runoff or certain non-storm water discharges as allowed under the authorization of this general permit. Town Council 65 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 4 Final Stabilization - A construction site where either of the following conditions are met: (a) All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and a uniform (e.g, evenly distributed, without large bare areas) perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70% of the native background vegetative cover for the area has been established on all unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent structures, or equivalent permanent stabilization measures (such as the use of riprap, gabions, or geotextiles) have been employed. (b) For individual lots in a residential construction site by either: (1) the homebuilder completing final stabilization as specified in condition (a) above; or (2) the homebuilder establishing temporary stabilization for an individual lot prior to the time of transfer of the ownership of the home to the buyer and after informing the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, final stabilization. (c) For construction activities on land used for agricultural purposes (e.g. pipelines across crop or range land), final stabilization may be accomplished by returning the disturbed land to its preconstruction agricultural use. Areas disturbed that were not previously used for agricultural activities, such as buffer strips immediately adjacent to a surface water and areas which are not being returned to their preconstruction agricultural use must meet the final stabilization conditions of condition (a) above. Ground Water Infiltration - For the purposes of this permit, groundwater that enters a municipal separate storm sewer system (including sewer service connections and foundation drains) through such means as defective pipes, pipe joints, connections, or manholes. Illicit Connection - Any man-made conveyance connecting an illicit discharge directly to a municipal separate storm sewer. Illicit Discharge - Any discharge to a municipal separate storm sewer that is not entirely composed of storm water, except discharges pursuant to this general permit or a separate authorization and discharges resulting from emergency fire fighting activities. Indian Country - Defined in 18 USC Section (') 1151, means (a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation; (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a state, and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same. This definition includes all land held in trust for an Indian tribe. Industrial Activities - manufacturing, processing, material storage, and waste material disposal areas (and similar areas where storm water can contact industrial pollutants related to the industrial activity) at an industrial facility described by the TPDES Multi Sector General Permit, TXR050000, or by another TCEQ or TPDES permit. Town Council 66 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 5 Large Construction Activity - Construction activities including clearing, grading, and excavating that result in land disturbance of equal to or greater than five (5) acres of land. Large construction activity also includes the disturbance of less than five (5) acres of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb equal to or greater than five (5) acres of land. Large construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, and original purpose of a ditch, channel, or other similar storm water conveyance. Large construction activity does not include the routine grading of existing dirt roads, asphalt overlays of existing roads, the routine clearing of existing right-of-ways, and similar maintenance activities. Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) - The technology-based discharge standard for municipal separate storm sewer systems to reduce pollutants in storm water discharges that was established by CWA ' 402(p). A discussion of MEP as it applies to small MS4s is found at 40 CFR ' 122.34. MS4 Operator – For the purpose of this permit, the public entity, and/ or the entity contracted by the public entity, responsible for management and operation of the small municipal separate storm sewer system that is subject to the terms of this general permit. Notice of Change (NOC) - Written notification from the permittee to the executive director providing changes to information that was previously provided to the agency in a notice of intent. Notice of Intent (NOI) - A written submission to the executive director from an applicant requesting coverage under this general permit. Notice of Termination (NOT) - A written submission to the executive director from a permittee authorized under a general permit requesting termination of coverage under this general permit. Outfall - For the purpose of this permit, a point source at the point where a municipal separate storm sewer discharges to waters of the United States (U.S.) and does not include open conveyances connecting two municipal separate storm sewers, or pipes, tunnels, or other conveyances that connect segments of the same stream or other waters of the U.S. and are used to convey waters of the U.S. Permittee - The MS4 operator authorized under this general permit. Permitting Authority - For the purposes of this general permit, the TCEQ. Point Source - (from 40 CFR ' 122.22) any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to, any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, landfill leachate collection system, vessel or other floating craft from which pollutants are or may be discharged. This term does not include return flows from irrigated agriculture or agricultural storm water runoff. Pollutant(s) of Concern - Include biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), sediment or a parameter that addresses sediment (such as total suspended solids, turbidity or siltation), pathogens, oil and grease, and any pollutant that has been identified as a cause of impairment of any water body that will receive a discharge from an MS4. (Definition from 40 CFR ' 122.32(e)(3)). Town Council 67 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 6 Redevelopment - Alterations of a property that changed the Afootprint@ of a site or building in such a way that there is a disturbance of equal to or greater than one (1) acre of land. This term does not include such activities as exterior remodeling. Small Construction Activity - Construction activities including clearing, grading, and excavating that result in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one (1) acre and less than five (5) acres of land. Small construction activity also includes the disturbance of less than one (1) acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb equal to or greater than one (1) and less than five (5) acres of land. Small construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, and original purpose of a ditch, channel, or other similar storm water conveyance. Small construction activity does not include the routine grading of existing dirt roads, asphalt overlays of existing roads, the routine clearing of existing right-of-ways, and similar maintenance activities. Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) – refers to a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains): (i) Owned or operated by the United States, a state, city, town, borough, county, district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, storm water, or other wastes, including special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization, or a designated and approved management agency under ' 208 of the CWA; (ii) Designed or used for collecting or conveying storm water; (iii) Which is not a combined sewer; (iv) Which is not part of a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR ' 122.2; and (v) Which was not previously authorized under a NPDES or TPDES individual permit as a medium or large municipal separate storm sewer system, as defined at 40 CFR §§122.26(b)(4) and (b)(7). This term includes systems similar to separate storm sewer systems at military bases, large hospital or prison complexes, and highways and other thoroughfares. This term does not include separate storm sewers in very discrete areas, such as individual buildings. For the purpose of this permit, a very discrete system also includes storm drains associated with certain municipal offices and education facilities serving a nonresidential population, where those storm drains do not function as a system, and where the buildings are not physically interconnected to an MS4 that is also operated by that public entity. Storm Water and Storm Water Runoff - Rainfall runoff, snow melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage. Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity - Storm water runoff from an area where there is either a large construction activity or a small construction activity. Storm Water Management Program (SWMP) - A comprehensive program to manage the quality of discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer system. Structural Control (or Practice) - A pollution prevention practice that requires the construction of a device, or the use of a device, to capture or prevent pollution in storm water runoff. Structural controls and practices may include but are not limited to: wet ponds, bioretention, infiltration basins, storm water wetlands, silt fences, earthen dikes, drainage swales, vegetative lined ditches, vegetative filter strips, sediment traps, check dams, subsurface drains, storm drain inlet protection, rock outlet protection, reinforced soil retaining systems, Town Council 68 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 7 gabions, and temporary or permanent sediment basins. Surface Water in the State - Lakes, bays, ponds, impounding reservoirs, springs, rivers, streams, creeks, estuaries, wetlands, marshes, inlets, canals, the Gulf of Mexico inside the territorial limits of the state (from the mean high water mark (MHWM) out 10.36 miles into the Gulf), and all other bodies of surface water, natural or artificial, inland or coastal, fresh or salt, navigable or nonnavigable, and including the beds and banks of all water-courses and bodies of surface water, that are wholly or partially inside or bordering the state or subject to the jurisdiction of the state; except that waters in treatment systems which are authorized by state or federal law, regulation, or permit, and which are created for the purpose of waste treatment are not considered to be water in the state. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) - The total amount of a substance that a water body can assimilate and still meet the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards. Urbanized Area (UA) - An area of high population density that may include multiple MS4s as defined and used by the U.S. Census Bureau in the 2000 decennial census. Waters of the United States - (from 40 CFR ' 122.2) Waters of the United States or waters of the U.S. means: (a) all waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; (b) all interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; (c) all other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds that the use, degradation, or destruction of which would affect or could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters: (1) which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; (2) from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce; or (3) which are used or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce; (d) all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition; (e) tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this definition; (f) the territorial sea; and Town Council 69 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 8 (g) wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this definition. Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of CWA (other than cooling ponds as defined in 40 CFR ' 423.11(m) which also meet the criteria of this definition) are not waters of the United States. This exclusion applies only to manmade bodies of water which neither were originally created in waters of the United States (such as disposal area in wetlands) nor resulted from the impoundment of waters of the United States. Waters of the United States do not include prior converted cropland. Notwithstanding the determination of an area=s status as prior converted cropland by any other federal agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the final authority regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with EPA. B. Commonly Used Acronyms BMP Best Management Practice CFR Code of Federal Regulations CGP Construction General Permit, TXR150000 CWA Clean Water Act DMR Discharge Monitoring Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency FR Federal Register IP Implementation Procedures MCM Minimum Control Measure MSGP Multi-Sector General Permit, TXR050000 MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System NOC Notice of Change NOD Notice of Deficiency NOI Notice of Intent NOT Notice of Termination (to terminate coverage under a general permit) NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System SWMP Storm Water Management Program Town Council 70 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 9 SWP3, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP TAC Texas Administrative Code TCEQ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TPDES Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System TWC Texas Water Code Part II. Permit Applicability and Coverage This general permit provides authorization for storm water and certain non-storm water discharges from small municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4) to surface water in the state. The general permit contains requirements applicable to all small MS4s that are eligible for coverage under this general permit. A. Small MS4s Eligible for Authorization by General Permit 1. Small MS4s Located in an Urbanized Area A small MS4 that is fully or partially located within an urbanized area, as determined by the 2000 Decennial Census by the U.S. Bureau of Census, must obtain authorization for the discharge of storm water runoff and is eligible for coverage under this general permit. 2. Designated Small MS4s A small MS4 that is outside an urbanized area that is Adesignated@ by TCEQ based on evaluation criteria as required by 40 CFR ' 122.32(a)(2) or 40 CFR ' 122.26(a)(1)(v) and adopted by reference in Title 30, Texas Administrative Code (TAC), ' 281.25, is eligible for coverage under this general permit. Following designation, operators of small MS4s must obtain authorization under this general permit or apply for coverage under an individual TPDES storm water permit within 180 days of notification of their designation. The portion of the small MS4 that is required to meet the conditions of this general permit are those portions that are located within the urbanized area, as well as any portion of the small MS4 that is designated. B. Allowable Non-Storm Water Discharges The following non-storm water sources may be discharged from the small MS4 and are not required to be addressed in the small MS4's Illicit Discharge and Detection or other minimum control measures, unless they are determined by the permittee or the TCEQ to be significant contributors of pollutants to the small MS4: Town Council 71 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 10 1. water line flushing (excluding discharges of hyperchlorinated water, unless the water is first dechlorinated and discharges are not expected to adversely affect aquatic life); 2. runoff or return flow from landscape irrigation, lawn irrigation, and other irrigation utilizing potable water, groundwater, or surface water sources; 3. discharges from potable water sources; 4. diverted stream flows; 5. rising ground waters and springs; 6. uncontaminated ground water infiltration; 7. uncontaminated pumped ground water; 8. foundation and footing drains; 9. air conditioning condensation; 10. water from crawl space pumps; 11. individual residential vehicle washing; 12. flows from wetlands and riparian habitats; 13. dechlorinated swimming pool discharges; 14. street wash water; 15. discharges or flows from fire fighting activities (fire fighting activities do not include washing of trucks, run-off water from training activities, test water from fire suppression systems, and similar activities); 16. other allowable non-storm water discharges listed in 40 CFR ' 122.26(d)(2)(iv)(B)(1); 17. non-storm water discharges that are specifically listed in the TPDES Multi Sector General Permit (MSGP) or the TPDES Construction General permit (CGP); and 18. other similar occasional incidental non-storm water discharges, unless the TCEQ develops permits or regulations addressing these discharges. Town Council 72 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 11 C. Limitations on Permit Coverage 1. Discharges Authorized by Another TPDES Permit Discharges authorized by an individual or other general TPDES permit may be authorized under this TPDES general permit only if the following conditions are met: (a) the discharges meet the applicability and eligibility requirements for coverage under this general permit; (b) a previous application or permit for the discharges has not been denied, terminated, or revoked by the executive director as a result of enforcement or water quality related concerns. The executive director may provide a waiver to this provision based on new circumstances at the regulated small MS4; and (c) the executive director has not determined that continued coverage under an individual permit is required based on consideration of an approved total maximum daily loading (TMDL) model and implementation plan, anti-backsliding policy, history of substantive non-compliance or other 30 TAC Chapter 205 considerations and requirements, or other site-specific considerations. 2. Discharges of Storm Water Mixed with Non-Storm Water Storm water discharges that combine with sources of non-storm water are not eligible for coverage by this general permit, unless either the non-storm water source is described in Part II.B or Part VI.B. of this general permit or the non-storm water source is authorized under a separate TPDES permit. 3. Compliance with Water Quality Standards Discharges to surface water in the state that would cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards or that would fail to protect and maintain existing designated uses are not eligible for coverage under this general permit. The executive director may require an application for an individual permit or alternative general permit to authorize discharges to surface water in the state if the executive director determines that an activity will cause a violation of water quality standards or is found to cause or contribute to the impairment of a designated use of surface water in the state. The executive director may also require an application for an individual permit considering factors described in Part II.E.2. 4. Discharges to Water Quality-Impaired Receiving Waters New sources or new discharges of the constituent(s) of concern to impaired waters are not authorized by this permit unless otherwise allowable under 30 TAC Chapter 305 and applicable state law. Impaired waters are those that do not meet applicable water quality standard(s) and are listed on the Clean Water Act ' 303(d) list. Constituents of concern are those for which the water body is listed as impaired. Town Council 73 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 12 Discharges of the constituent(s) of concern to impaired water bodies for which there is a TMDL implementation plan are not eligible for this general permit unless they are consistent with the approved TMDL and the implementation plan. Permitted MS4 operators must incorporate the limitations, conditions and requirements applicable to their discharges, including monitoring frequency and reporting required by TCEQ rules, into their SWMP in order to be eligible for permit coverage. For discharges not eligible for coverage under this general permit, the discharger must apply for and receive an individual TPDES permit prior to discharging. 5. Discharges to the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone Discharges of storm water from regulated small MS4s, and other non-storm water discharges, can not be authorized by this general permit where those discharges are prohibited by 30 TAC Chapter 213 (relating to Edwards Aquifer). New discharges located within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone, or within that area upstream from the recharge zone and defined as the Contributing Zone, must meet all applicable requirements of, and operate according to, 30 TAC Chapter 213 (Edwards Aquifer Rule) in addition to the provisions and requirements of this general permit. For existing discharges, the requirements of the agency-approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan under the Edwards Aquifer Rules are in addition to the requirements of this general permit. BMPs and maintenance schedules for structural storm water controls, for example, may be required as a provision of the rule. All applicable requirements of the Edwards Aquifer Rule for reductions of suspended solids in storm water runoff are in addition to the effluent limitation requirements found in Part VI.D. of this general permit. A copy of the agency-approved Water Pollution Abatement Plans that are required by the Edwards Aquifer Rule must either be attached as a part of the SWMP or referenced in the SWMP. For discharges located on or within ten stream miles upstream of the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone, applicants must also submit a copy of the NOI to the appropriate TCEQ regional office. Counties: Contact: Comal, Bexar, Medina, Uvalde, TCEQ and Kinney Water Program Manager San Antonio Regional Office 14250 Judson Road San Antonio, Texas 78233-4480 (210) 490-3096 Williamson, Travis, and Hays TCEQ Water Program Manager Austin Regional Office 1921 Cedar Bend Drive, Suite 150 Austin, Texas 78758-5336 (512) 339-2929 Town Council 74 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 13 6. Discharges to Specific Watersheds and Water Quality Areas Discharges of storm water from regulated small MS4s and other non-storm water discharges can not be authorized by this general permit where prohibited by 30 TAC Chapter 311 (relating to Watershed Protection) for water quality areas and watersheds. 7. Protection of Streams and Watersheds by Home Rule Municipalities This general permit does not limit the authority of a home-rule municipality provided by ' 401.002 of the Texas Local Government Code. 8. Indian Country Lands Storm water runoff from MS4s or construction activities occurring on Indian Country lands are not under the authority of the TCEQ and are not eligible for coverage under this general permit. If discharges of storm water require authorization under federal NPDES regulations, authority for these discharges must be obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 9. Other Nothing in Part II of the general permit is intended to negate any person’s ability to assert the force majeure (act of God, war, strike, riot, or other catastrophe) defenses found in 30 TAC ' 70.7. This permit does not transfer liability for the act of discharging without, or in violation of, a NPDES or a TPDES permit from the operator of the discharge to the permittee(s). D. Obtaining Authorization 1. Application for Coverage When submitting an NOI and Storm Water Management Program (SWMP) as described in Parts II.D.3., II.D.4, and Part III for coverage under this general permit, the applicant must follow the public notice and availability requirements found in Part II.D.12. of this section. Applicants seeking authorization to discharge under this general permit must submit a completed NOI, on a form approved by the executive director, and a SWMP as described in Part III. The NOI and SWMP must be submitted to the TCEQ Water Quality Division, at the address specified on the form. Discharge authorization begins when the applicant is notified by TCEQ that the NOI and SWMP have been administratively and technically reviewed and the applicant has followed the public participation provisions in Part II.D.12. Following review of the NOI and SWMP, the executive director may determine that: 1) the submission is complete and confirm coverage by providing a notification and an authorization number, 2) the NOI and/or SWMP are incomplete and deny coverage until a complete NOI and/or SWMP are submitted, 3) approve the NOI and/or SWMP with revisions and provide a written description of the required revisions along with any compliance schedule(s), or 4) Town Council 75 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 14 deny coverage and provide a deadline by which the MS4 operator must submit an application for an individual permit. Denial of coverage under this general permit is subject to the requirements of 30 TAC ' 205.4(c). Application deadlines are as follows: (a) Small MS4s Located in an Urbanized Area Operators of small MS4s described in Part II.A.1 must submit an NOI and SWMP within 180 days following the effective date of this general permit. (b) Designated Small MS4s Operators of small MS4s described in Part II.A.2 must submit an NOI and SWMP within 180 days of being notified in writing by the TCEQ of the need to obtain permit coverage. 2. Late Submission of the NOI and SWMP An NOI and SWMP are not prohibited from being submitted late or after the deadlines provided. If a late NOI and SWMP is submitted, authorization is only for discharges that occur after permit coverage is obtained. The TCEQ reserves the right to take appropriate enforcement actions for any unpermitted discharges. 3. Storm Water Management Program (SWMP) A SWMP must be developed and submitted with the NOI for eligible discharges that will reach waters of the United States (U.S.), including discharges from the regulated small MS4 to other MS4s or privately-owned separate storm sewer systems that subsequently drain to waters of the U.S. according to the requirements of Part III of this general permit and submitted with the NOI. The SWMP must include a time line that demonstrates a schedule for implementation of the program throughout the permit term. The program must be completely implemented within five years of the issuance date of this general permit, or within five years of being designated for those small MS4s which are designated following permit issuance. Implementation of the SWMP is required immediately following receipt of written authorization from the TCEQ. Changes may be made to the SWMP during the permit term. Changes that are made to the SWMP before the NOI is approved by the TCEQ must be submitted in a letter providing supplemental information to the NOI. Changes to the SWMP that are made after TCEQ approval of the NOI and SWMP may be made following written approval of the changes from the TCEQ, except that written approval is not required for the following changes: (a) Adding components, controls, or requirements to the SWMP; or replacing a BMP with an equivalent BMP, may be made by the permittee at any time upon submittal of a notice of change (NOC) form to the address specified on the form to the TCEQ. (b) Replacing a less effective or infeasible BMP specifically identified in the SWMP with an alternate BMP may be requested at any time. Changes must be submitted on Town Council 76 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 15 an NOC form to the address specified on the form. Unless denied in writing by the TCEQ, the change shall be considered approved and may be implemented by the permittee 60 days from submitting the request. Such requests must include the following: (1) an explanation of why the BMP was eliminated; (2) an explanation of the effectiveness of the replacement BMP; and (3) an explanation of why the replacement BMP is expected to achieve the goals of the replaced BMP. 4. Contents of the NOI The NOI must contain the following minimum information: (a) MS4 Operator Information (1) the name, mailing address, telephone number, and fax number of the MS4 operator; and (2) the legal status of the MS4 operator (e.g., federal government, state government, county government, city government, or other government). (b) Site Information (1) the name, physical location description, and latitude and longitude of the approximate center of the regulated portion of the small MS4; (2) county or counties where the small MS4 is located; (3) an indication if all or a portion of the small MS4 is located on Indian Country Lands; (4) if the applicant develops a seventh minimum control measure to obtain authorization for construction activities, the boundary within which those activities will occur; (5) the name, mailing address, telephone number, and fax number of the designated person(s) responsible for implementing or coordinating implementation of the SWMP; (6) a certification that a SWMP has been developed according to the provisions of this permit; (7) a statement that the applicant will comply with the Public Participation requirements described in Part II.D.12.; Town Council 77 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 16 (8) the name of each classified segment that receives discharges, directly or indirectly, from the small MS4. If one or more of the discharge(s) is not directly to a classified segment, then the name of the first classified segment that those discharges reach shall be identified; (9) the name of any MS4 receiving the discharge prior to discharge into surface water in the state; and (10) the name of all surface water(s) receiving discharges from the small MS4 that are on the latest EPA-approved CWA ' 303(d) list of impaired waters. 5. Notice of Change (NOC) If the MS4 operator becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts, or submitted incorrect information in the NOI, the correct information must be provided to the executive director in a NOC within 30 days after discovery. If any information provided in the NOI changes, an NOC must be submitted within 30 days from the time the permittee becomes aware of the change. Any revisions that are made to the SWMP must be made in accordance with Part II.D.3. above. Changes that are made to the SWMP following NOI approval must be made using an NOC form, in accordance with Part II.D.3. above. 6. Change in Operational Control of a Small MS4 If the operational control of the regulated small MS4 changes, the present operator must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) and the new operator must submit a NOI and SWMP. The NOT and NOI must be submitted concurrently no greater than 10 days after the change occurs. 7. Notice of Termination (NOT) A permittee may terminate coverage under this general permit by providing a Notice of Termination (NOT) on a form approved by the executive director. Authorization to discharge terminates at midnight on the day that an NOT is postmarked for delivery to the TCEQ. If TCEQ provides for electronic submission of NOTs during the term of this permit, authorization to discharge terminates 24 hours following confirmation of receipt of the electronic NOT form by the TCEQ. An NOT must be submitted within 30 days after the MS4 operator obtains coverage under an individual permit. 8. Signatory Requirement for NOI, NOT, NOC, and Waiver Forms NOI, NOT, NOC, and Waiver forms must be signed and certified consistent with 30 TAC ' 305.44(a) and (b) (relating to Signatories to Applications). Town Council 78 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 17 9. Fees An application fee of $100 must be submitted with each NOI. A fee is not required for submission of a waiver form, an NOT, or an NOC. A permittee authorized under this general permit must pay an annual Water Quality fee of $100 under Texas Water Code, ' 26.0291 and 30 TAC Chapter 205 (relating to General Permits for Waste Discharges). 10. Permit Expiration (a) This general permit is effective for five years from the date of issuance. Authorizations for discharge under the provisions of this general permit may continue until the expiration date of the general permit. This general permit may be amended, revoked, or canceled by the commission or renewed by the commission for an additional term or terms not to exceed five years. (b) If the Executive Director proposes to reissue this general permit before the expiration date, the general permit shall remain in effect after the expiration date for those existing discharges covered by the general permit in accordance with 30 TAC, Chapter 205. The general permit shall remain in effect for these dischargers until the date on which the commission takes final action on the proposal to reissue this general permit. No new NOIs will be accepted and no new authorizations will be processed under the general permit after the expiration date. (c) Upon issuance of a renewed or amended general permit, all permittees, including those covered under the expired general permit, may be required to submit an NOI according to the requirements of the new general permit or to obtain a TPDES individual permit for those discharges. (d) If the commission does not propose to reissue this general permit within 90 days before the expiration date, permittees must apply for authorization under a TPDES individual permit or an alternative general permit. If the application for an individual permit is submitted before the expiration date, authorization under this expiring general permit remains in effect until the issuance or denial of an individual permit. 11. Suspension of Permit Coverage The executive director may suspend an authorization under this general permit for the reasons specified in 30 TAC ' 205.4(d) by providing the discharger with written notice of the decision to suspend that authority, and the written notice will include a brief statement of the basis for the decision. If the decision requires an application for an individual permit or an alternative general permit, the written notice will also include a statement establishing the deadline for submitting an application. The written notice will state that the authorization under this general permit is either suspended on the effective date of the commission's action on the permit application, unless the commission expressly provides otherwise, or Town Council 79 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 18 immediately, if required by the executive director. 12. Public Participation An applicant under this general permit must adhere to the following procedures: (a) The applicant must submit the NOI and a SWMP to the executive director. (b) After the applicant receives written instructions from the TCEQ=s Office of Chief Clerk, the applicant must publish notice of the executive director=s preliminary determination on the NOI and SWMP. (c) The notice must include: (1) the legal name of the MS4 operator; (2) identify whether the NOI is for a new small MS4 or is a renewal of an existing operation; (3) the address of the applicant; (4) a brief summary of the information included in the NOI, such as the general location of the small MS4 and a description of the classified receiving waters that receive the discharges from the small MS4; (5) the location and mailing address where the public may provide comments to the TCEQ; (6) the public location where copies of the NOI and SWMP, as well as the executive director's general permit and fact sheet, may be reviewed; and (7) if required by the executive director, the date, time, and location of the public meeting. (d) This notice must be published at least once in the newspaper of largest circulation in the county where the small MS4 is located. If the small MS4 is located in multiple counties, the notice must be published at least once in the newspaper of largest circulation in the county containing the largest resident population. This notice shall provide opportunity for the public to submit comments on the NOI and SWMP. In addition, the notice shall allow the public to request a public meeting. A public meeting will be held if the TCEQ determines that there is significant public interest. (e) The public comment period begins on the first date the notice is published and ends 30 days later, unless a public meeting is held. If a public meeting is held, the comment period will end at the closing of the public meeting. The public may submit written comments to the TCEQ Office of Chief Clerk during the comment period detailing how the NOI or SWMP for the small MS4 fails to meet the Town Council 80 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 19 technical requirements or conditions of this general permit. (f) If significant public interest exists, the executive director will direct the applicant to publish a notice of the public meeting and to hold the public meeting. The applicant must publish notice of a public meeting at least 30 days before the meeting and hold the public meeting in a county where the small MS4 is located. TCEQ staff will facilitate the meeting. (g) If a public meeting is held, the applicant shall describe the contents of the NOI and SWMP. The applicant shall also provide maps and other data on the small MS4. The applicant shall provide a sign in sheet for attendees to register their names and addresses and furnish the sheet to the executive director. A public meeting held under this general permit is not an evidentiary proceeding. (h) The applicant must file with the Chief Clerk a copy and an affidavit of the publication of notice(s) within 60 days of receiving the written instructions from the Office of Chief Clerk. (i) The executive director, after considering public comment, shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the NOI based on whether the NOI and SWMP meet the requirements of this general permit. (j) Persons whose names and addresses appear legibly on the sign in sheet from the public meeting and persons who submitted written comments to the TCEQ will be notified by the TCEQ=s Office of Chief Clerk of the executive director=s decision regarding the authorization. E. Permitting Options 1. Authorization Under the General Permit An operator of a small MS4 is required to obtain authorization either under this general permit, or under an individual TPDES permit if it is located in an urbanized area or if it is designated by the TCEQ. Multiple small MS4s with separate operators must individually submit an NOI to obtain coverage under this general permit, regardless of whether the systems are physically interconnected, located in the same urbanized area, or are located in the same watershed. Each regulated small MS4 will be issued a distinct permit number. These MS4 operators may combine or share efforts in meeting any or all of the SWMP requirements stated in Part III of this general permit. MS4 operators that share SWMP development and implementation must meet the following conditions: (a) Participants The SWMP must clearly list the name and permit number for each MS4 operator that contributes to development or implementation of the SWMP, and provide confirmation that the contributing MS4 operator has agreed to contribute. If a contributing MS4 has submitted an NOI and SWMP to TCEQ, but has not yet Town Council 81 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 20 received written notification of approval, along with the accompanying permit authorization number, a copy of the submitted NOI form must be made readily available or included in the SWMP. (b) Responsibilities Each permittee is entirely responsible for meeting SWMP requirements within the boundaries of its MS4. Where a separate MS4 operator is contributing to implementation of the SWMP, the SWMP must clearly define the contribution and clearly identify the contributing MS4 operator. 2. Alternative Coverage under an Individual TPDES Permit An MS4 operator eligible for coverage under this general permit may alternatively be authorized under an individual TPDES permit according to 30 TAC Chapter 305 (relating to Consolidated Permits). The executive director may require an MS4 operator, authorized by this general permit, to apply for an individual TPDES permit because of: the conditions of an approved TMDL or TMDL implementation plan; a history of substantive non-compliance; or other 30 TAC Chapter 205 considerations and requirements; or other site-specific considerations. F. Waivers The TCEQ may waive permitting requirements for small regulated MS4 operators if the criteria are met for Waiver Option 1 or 2. To obtain Waiver Option 1, the MS4 operator must submit the request on a waiver form provided by the executive director. To obtain Waiver Option 2, the MS4 operator must contact the executive director and coordinate the activities required to meet the waiver conditions. A provisional waiver from permitting requirements begins two days after a completed waiver form is postmarked for delivery to the TCEQ. Following review of the waiver form, the executive director may: 1) determine that the waiver form is complete and confirm coverage under the waiver by providing a notification and a waiver number, 2) determine that the waiver form is incomplete and deny the waiver until a completed waiver form is submitted, or 3) deny the waiver and require that permit coverage be obtained. If the conditions of either waiver are not met by the MS4 operator, then the MS4 operator must submit an application for coverage under this general permit or a separate TPDES permit application. The TCEQ can, at any time, require a previously waived MS4 operator to comply with this general permit or another TPDES permit if circumstances change so that the conditions of the waiver are no longer met. Changed circumstances can also allow a regulated MS4 operator to request a waiver at any time. 1. Waiver Option 1: The system serves a population of less than 1,000 within an urbanized area and meets the following criteria: (a) the system is not contributing substantially to the pollutant loadings of a physically interconnected MS4 that is regulated by the NPDES / TPDES storm water program Town Council 82 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 21 (40 CFR ' 122.32(d)); and (b) if the system discharges any pollutant(s) that have been identified as a cause of impairment of any water body to which the small MS4 discharges, storm water controls are not needed based on wasteload allocations that are part of an EPA approved or established "total maximum daily load" (TMDL) that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern. 2. Waiver Option 2: The system serves a population under 10,000 and meets the following criteria: (a) the TCEQ has evaluated all waters of the United States, including small streams, tributaries, lakes, and ponds, that receive a discharge from the small MS4; (b) for all such waters, the TCEQ has determined that storm water controls are not needed based on wasteload allocations that are part of an approved or established TMDL that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or, if a TMDL has not been developed or approved, an equivalent analysis that determines sources and allocations for the pollutant(s) of concern; and (c) the TCEQ has determined that future discharges from the small MS4 do not have the potential to exceed Texas surface water quality standards, including impairment of designated uses, or other significant water quality impacts, including habitat and biological impacts. Part III. Storm Water Management Program (SWMP) To the extent allowable under state and local law, a SWMP must be developed and implemented according to the requirements of Part III of this general permit, for storm water discharges that reach waters of the United States, regardless of whether the discharge is conveyed through a separately operated storm sewer. The SWMP must be developed to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the MS4 to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), to protect water quality, and to satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act and the Texas Water Code. Existing programs or best management practices (BMPs) may be used to fulfill the requirements of this general permit. The MS4 operator must develop the SWMP to include the six minimum control measures described in Part III.A.1. through 6, and the operator may develop and include the optional seventh minimum control measure in Part III.A.7. Small MS4s have five years from the date of issuance of this general permit to fully implement their SWMP. A discharger=s compliance with its approved SWMP will be deemed compliance with Part III of this permit. Where the permittee lacks the authority to develop ordinances or to implement enforcement actions, the permittee shall exert enforcement authority as required by this general permit for its facilities, employees, and contractors. For discharges from third party actions, the permittee shall perform inspections and exert enforcement authority to the MEP. If the permittee does not have enforcement authority and is unable to meet the goals of this general permit through its own powers, then, unless otherwise stated in this general permit, the permittee shall perform the Town Council 83 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 22 following action in order to meet the goals of the permit: • Enter into interlocal agreements with municipalities where the small MS4 is located. These interlocal agreements must state the extent to which the municipality will be responsible for inspections and enforcement authority in order to meet the conditions of this general permit; or, • if the permittee is unable to enter into inter-local agreements, notify the TCEQ=s Field Operations Division as needed to report discharges or incidents that it can not itself enforce against. The controls and Best Management Practices (BMPs) included in the SWMP constitute effluent limitations for the purposes of compliance with the requirements of 30 TAC Chapter 319, Subchapter B, related to Hazardous Metals. A. Minimum Control Measures 1. Public Education and Outreach on Storm Water Impacts (a) A public education program must be developed and implemented to distribute educational materials to the community or conduct equivalent outreach activities that will be used to inform the public. The MS4 operator may determine the most appropriate sections of the population at which to direct the program. The MS4 operator must consider the following groups and the SWMP shall provide justification for any listed group that is not included in the program: (1) residents; (2) visitors; (3) public service employees; (4) businesses; (5) commercial and industrial facilities; and (6) construction site personnel. The outreach must inform the public about the impacts that storm water run-off can have on water quality, hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste, and steps that they can take to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff. (b) The MS4 operator must document activities conducted and materials used to fulfill this control measure. Documentation shall be detailed enough to demonstrate the amount of resources used to address each group. This documentation shall be retained in the annual reports required in Part IV.B.2. of this general permit. Town Council 84 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 23 2. Public Involvement/Participation The MS4 operator must, at a minimum, comply with any state and local public notice requirements when implementing a public involvement/participation program. It is recommended that the program include provisions to allow all members of the public within the small MS4 the opportunity to participate in SWMP development and implementation. Correctional facilities will not be required to implement this MCM. 3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (a) Illicit Discharges A section within the SWMP must be developed to establish a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges to the small MS4. The SWMP must include the manner and process to be used to effectively prohibit illicit discharges. To the extent allowable under state and local law, an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism must be utilized to prohibit and eliminate illicit discharges. Elements must include: (1) Detection The SWMP must list the techniques used for detecting illicit discharges; and (2) Elimination The SWMP must include appropriate actions and, to the extent allowable under state and local law, establish enforcement procedures for removing the source of an illicit discharge. (b) Allowable Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-storm water flows listed in Part II.B and Part VI.B. do not need to be considered by the MS4 operator as an illicit discharge requiring elimination unless the operator of the small MS4 or the executive director identifies the flow as a significant source of pollutants to the small MS4. In lieu of considering non-storm water sources on a case-by-case basis, the MS4 operator may develop a list of common and incidental non-storm water discharges that will not be addressed as illicit discharges requiring elimination. If developed, the listed sources must not be reasonably expected to be significant sources of pollutants either because of the nature of the discharge or the conditions that are established by the MS4 operator prior to accepting the discharge to the small MS4. If this list is developed, then all local controls and conditions established for these listed discharges must be described in the SWMP and any changes to the SWMP must be included in the annual report described in Part IV.B.2. of this general permit, and must meet the requirements of Part II.D.3. of the general permit. Town Council 85 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 24 (c) Storm Sewer Map (1) A map of the storm sewer system must be developed and must include the following: (i) the location of all outfalls; (ii) the names and locations of all waters of the U.S. that receive discharges from the outfalls; and (iii) any additional information needed by the permittee to implement its SWMP. (2) The SWMP must include the source of information used to develop the storm sewer map, including how the outfalls are verified and how the map will be regularly updated. 4. Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control The MS4 operator, to the extent allowable under State and local law, must develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any storm water runoff to the small MS4 from construction activities that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre or if that construction activity is part of a larger common plan of development or sale that would disturb one acre or more of land. The MS4 operator is not required to develop, implement, and/or enforce a program to reduce pollutant discharges from sites where the construction site operator has obtained a waiver from permit requirements under NPDES or TPDES construction permitting requirements based on a low potential for erosion. (a) The program must include the development and implementation of, at a minimum, an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to require erosion and sediment controls, as well as sanctions to ensure compliance, to the extent allowable under state and local law. (b) Requirements for construction site contractors to, at a minimum: (1) implement appropriate erosion and sediment control BMPs; and (2) control waste such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout water, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at the construction site that may cause adverse impacts to water quality. (c) The MS4 operator must develop procedures for: (1) site plan review which incorporate consideration of potential water quality impacts; Town Council 86 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 25 (2) receipt and consideration of information submitted by the public; and (3) site inspection and enforcement of control measures to the extent allowable under state and local law. 5. Post-Construction Storm Water Management in New Development and Redevelopment To the extent allowable under state and local law, the MS4 operator must develop, implement, and enforce a program to address storm water runoff from new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal to one acre of land, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will result in disturbance of one or more acres, that discharge into the small MS4. The program must ensure that controls are in place that would prevent or minimize water quality impacts. The permittee shall: (a) Develop and implement strategies which include a combination of structural and/or non-structural BMPs appropriate for the community; (b) Use an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to address post-construction runoff from new development and redevelopment projects to the extent allowable under state and local law; and (c) Ensure adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMPs. 6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations A section within the SWMP must be developed to establish an operation and maintenance program, including an employee training component, that has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. (a) Good Housekeeping and Best Management Practices (BMPs) Housekeeping measures and BMPs (which may include new or existing structural or non-structural controls) must be identified and either continued or implemented with the goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. Examples of municipal operations and municipally owned areas include, but are not limited to: (1) park and open space maintenance; (2) street, road, or highway maintenance; (3) fleet and building maintenance; (4) storm water system maintenance; (5) new construction and land disturbances; Town Council 87 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 26 (6) municipal parking lots; (7) vehicle and equipment maintenance and storage yards; (8) waste transfer stations; and (9) salt/sand storage locations. (b) Training A training program must be developed for all employees responsible for municipal operations subject to the pollution prevention/good housekeeping program. The training program must include training materials directed at preventing and reducing storm water pollution from municipal operations. Materials may be developed, or obtained from the EPA, states, or other organizations and sources. Examples or descriptions of training materials being used must be included in the SWMP. (c) Structural Control Maintenance If BMPs include structural controls, maintenance of the controls must be performed at a frequency determined by the MS4 operator and consistent with maintaining the effectiveness of the BMP. The SWMP must list all of the following: (1) maintenance activities; (2) maintenance schedules; and (3) long-term inspection procedures for controls used to reduce floatables and other pollutants. (d) Disposal of Waste Waste removed from the small MS4 and waste that is collected as a result of maintenance of storm water structural controls must be properly disposed. A section within the SWMP must be developed to include procedures for the proper disposal of waste, including: (1) dredge spoil; (2) accumulated sediments; and (3) floatables. (e) Municipal Operations and Industrial Activities The SWMP must include a list of all: Town Council 88 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 27 (1) municipal operations that are subject to the operation, maintenance, or training program developed under the conditions of this section; and (2) municipally owned or operated industrial activities that are subject to TPDES industrial storm water regulations. 7. Authorization for Municipal Construction Activities The development of a MCM for municipal construction activities is an optional measure and is an alternative to the MS4 operator seeking coverage under TPDES general permit TXR150000. Additionally, contractors working for the permittee are not required to obtain a separate authorization if they do not meet the definition of a Aconstruction site operator,@ as long as the permittee meets the status of construction site operator. Permittees that choose to develop this measure will be authorized to discharge storm water and certain non-storm water from construction activities where the permittee can meet the definition of Aconstruction site operator@ in Part I of this general permit. The authorization to discharge under this MCM is limited to the regulated area, such as the portion of the MS4 located within an urbanized area or the area designated by TCEQ as requiring coverage. However, an MS4 operator may also utilize this MCM over additional portions of their MS4 that are also in compliance with all of the MCMs listed in this general permit. This MCM must be developed as a part of the SWMP that is submitted with the NOI for permit coverage. If this MCM is developed after submitting the initial NOI, a NOC must be submitted notifying the executive director of this change, and identifying the geographical area or boundary where the activities will be conducted under the provisions of this general permit. Utilization of this MCM does not preclude a small MS4 from obtaining coverage under the TPDES Construction General Permit, TXR150000, or under an individual TPDES permit. (a) The MCM must include: (1) a description of how construction activities will generally be conducted by the permittee so as to take into consideration local conditions of weather, soils, and other site specific considerations; (2) a description of the area that this MCM will address and where the permittee=s construction activities are covered (e.g. within the boundary of the urbanized area, the corporate boundary, a special district boundary, an extra territorial jurisdiction, or other similar jurisdictional boundary); and (3) either a description of how the permittee will supervise or maintain oversight over contractor activities to ensure that the SWP3 requirements are properly implemented at the construction site; or how the permittee will make certain that contractors have a separate authorization for storm water discharges. (4) a general description of how a SWP3 shall be developed, according to Part VI.E. of this general permit, for each construction site. Town Council 89 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 28 B. General Requirements Permittees must provide documentation of the development, implementation, and evaluation of the SWMP. The documentation must be included in the SWMP and may be required to be submitted in the annual report required in Part IV.B.2. of this general permit. At a minimum, the documentation must include: 1. a list of any public or private entities assisting with the development or implementation of the SWMP; 2. a list of all BMPs and measurable goals for each of the MCMs; 3. a schedule for the implementation of all SWMP requirements; 4. a description of how each measurable goal will be evaluated; 5. a rationale statement that addresses the overall program, including how the BMPs and measurable goals were selected; and 6. if applicable, a list of all MS4 operators contributing to the development and implementation of the SWMP, including a clear description of the contribution. Part IV. Recordkeeping and Reporting A. Recordkeeping 1. The permittee must retain all records, a copy of this TPDES general permit, and records of all data used to complete the application (NOI) for this general permit and satisfy the public participation requirements, for a period of at least three years, or for the remainder of the term of this general permit, whichever is longer. This period may be extended by request of the executive director at any time. 2. The permittee must submit the records to the executive director only when specifically asked to do so. The SWMP required by this general permit (including a copy of the general permit) must be retained at a location accessible to the TCEQ. 3. The permittee must make the NOI and the SWMP available to the public if requested to do so in writing. Copies of the SWMP must be made available within 10 working days of receipt of a written request. Other records must be provided in accordance with the Texas Public Information Act. However, all requests for records from federal facilities must be made in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act. 4. The period during which records are required to be kept shall be automatically extended to the date of the final disposition of any administrative or judicial enforcement action that maybe instituted against the permittee. Town Council 90 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 29 B. Reporting 1. General Reporting Requirements (a) Noncompliance Notification According to 30 TAC ' 305.125(9), any noncompliance which may endanger human health or safety, or the environment, must be reported by the permittee to the TCEQ. Report of such information must be provided orally or by electronic facsimile transmission (FAX) to the TCEQ regional office within 24 hours of becoming aware of the noncompliance. A written report must be provided by the permittee to the TCEQ regional office and to the TCEQ Enforcement Division (MC- 224) within five working days of becoming aware of the noncompliance. The written report must contain: (1) a description of the noncompliance and its cause; (2) the potential danger to human health or safety, or the environment; (3) the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; (4) if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and (5) steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance, and to mitigate its adverse effects. (b) Other Information When the permittee becomes aware that it either submitted incorrect information or failed to submit complete and accurate information requested in an NOI, NOT, or NOC, or any other report, it must promptly submit the facts or information to the executive director. 2. Annual Report The MS4 operator must submit a concise annual report to the executive director within 90 days of the end of each permit year. The annual report must address the previous permit year. The first permit year for annual reporting purposes shall begin on the date of permit issuance, and shall last for one year. Subsequent calendar years will begin on the anniversary date of permit issuance and last for one year. The MS4 operator must also make a copy of the annual report readily available for review by TCEQ personnel upon request. The report must include: (a) The status of the compliance with permit conditions, an assessment of the appropriateness of the identified BMPs, progress towards achieving the statutory Town Council 91 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 30 goal of reducing the discharge of pollutants to the MEP, the measurable goals for each of the MCMs, and an evaluation of the success of the implementation of the measurable goals; (b) Status of any additional control measures implemented by the permittee (if applicable); (c) Any MCM activities initiated before permit issuance may be included, under the appropriate headings, as part of the first year=s annual report; (d) A summary of the results of information (including monitoring data) collected and analyzed, if any, during the reporting period used to assess the success of the program at reducing the discharge of pollutants to the MEP; (e) A summary of the storm water activities the MS4 operator plans to undertake during the next reporting cycle; (f) Proposed changes to the SWMP, including changes to any BMPs or any identified measurable goals that apply to the program elements; (g) The number of municipal construction activities authorized under this general permit and the total number of acres disturbed; (h) The number of non-municipal construction activities that occurred within the jurisdiction of the permittee (as noticed to the permittee by the construction operator); and (i) Notice that the MS4 operator is relying on another government entity to satisfy some of its permit obligations (if applicable). An annual report must be prepared whether or not the NOI and SWMP has been approved by the TCEQ. If the permittee has either not implemented the SWMP or not begun to implement the SWMP because it has not received approval of the NOI and SWMP, then the annual report may include that information. If permittees share a common SWMP, all permittees must contribute to a system-wide report (if applicable); Each permittee must sign and certify the annual report in accordance with 30 TAC ' 305.128 (relating to Signatories to Reports); and The annual report must be submitted to the following address: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Storm Water & Pretreatment Team; MC - 148 P.O. Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 Town Council 92 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 31 A copy of the annual report must also be submitted to the TCEQ Regional Office that serves the area of the regulated small MS4. If available, electronic submission of annual reports is encouraged. The Federal Waste Reduction Act and the Government Paperwork Elimination Act encourages governmental agencies to use electronic submission. See the TCEQ website at, www.tceq.state.tx.us for additional information and instructions. Part V. Standard Permit Conditions A. The permittee has a duty to comply with all permit conditions. Failure to comply with any permit condition is a violation of the general permit and statutes under which it was issued, and is grounds for enforcement action, for terminating coverage under this general permit, or for requiring a discharger to apply for and obtain an individual TPDES permit. B. Authorization under this general permit may be suspended or revoked for cause. Filing a notice of planned changes or anticipated non-compliance by the permittee does not stay any permit condition. The permittee must furnish to the executive director, upon request and within a reasonable timeframe, any information necessary for the executive director to determine whether cause exists for revoking, suspending, or terminating authorization under this general permit. Additionally, the permittee must provide to the executive director, upon request, copies of all records that the permittee is required to maintain as a condition of this general permit. C. It is not a defense for a discharger in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity to maintain compliance with the permit conditions. D. Inspection and entry shall be allowed under Texas Water Code Chapters 26-28, Health and Safety Code '' 361.032-361.033 and 361.037, and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) '122.41(i). The statement in Texas Water Code ' 26.014 that commission entry of a facility shall occur according to an establishment's rules and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection is not grounds for denial or restriction of entry to any part of the facility or site, but merely describes the commission's duty to observe appropriate rules and regulations during an inspection. E. The discharger is subject to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, as applicable, under Texas Water Code, Chapters 26, 27, and 28, and the Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361 for violations including but not limited to the following: a. negligently or knowingly violating CWA, '' 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405, or any condition or limitation implementing any sections in a permit issued under CWA, ' 402; and b. knowingly making any false statement, representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under a permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance. F. All reports and other information requested by the executive director must be signed by the person Town Council 93 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 32 and in the manner required by 30 TAC ' 305.128 (relating to Signatories to Reports). G. Authorization under this general permit does not convey property or water rights of any sort and does not grant any exclusive privilege. H. The permittee shall implement its SWMP on any new areas under its jurisdiction that are located in a UA or that are designated by the TCEQ. Implementation of the SWMP in these areas is required three (3) years from acquiring the new area, or five (5) years from the date of the original SWMP, whichever is later. Part VI. Authorization for Municipal Construction Activities The MS4 operator may obtain authorization under TPDES general permit TXR150000 to discharge storm water runoff from each construction activity performed by the MS4 operator that results in a land disturbance of one (1) or more acres of land. Alternatively, the MS4 operator may develop the SWMP to include this optional seventh (7th) storm water MCM if the eligibility requirements in Part VI.A. are met. If an MS4 operator decides to utilize this MCM, then the MS4 operator must include the MCM it in its SWMP submitted with the NOI or submit an NOC notifying the executive director of the addition of this MCM to its SWMP. The MS4 operator must identify the geographic area or boundary where the construction activities will be conducted under the provisions of this general permit. If the small MS4 meets the terms and requirements of this general permit, then discharges from these construction activities may be authorized under this general permit as long as they occur within the regulated geographic area of the small MS4. An MS4 operator may utilize this MCM over additional portions of their MS4 if those areas are also in compliance with all MCMs listed in this general permit. Even if an MS4 operator has developed this optional seventh storm water MCM, the MS4 operator may apply under TPDES general permit TXR150000 for authorization for particular municipal construction activities including those activities that occur during periods of low potential for erosion (for which no SWP3 must be developed). A. Eligible Construction Sites Discharges from construction activities within the regulated area where the MS4 operator meets the definition of construction site operator are eligible for authorization under this general permit. Discharges from construction activities outside of the regulated area, where the MS4 operator meets the definition of construction site operator, are only eligible for authorization under this general permit in those areas where the MS4 operator meets the requirements of Parts III.A.1. through III.A.6 of this general permit, related to MCMs. B. Discharges Eligible for Authorization 1. Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity Discharges of storm water runoff from small and large construction activities may be authorized under this general permit. Town Council 94 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 33 2. Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Support Activities Discharges of storm water runoff from construction support activities, including concrete batch plants, asphalt batch plants, equipment staging areas, material storage yards, material borrow areas, and excavated material disposal areas may be authorized under this general permit provided: (a) the activity is located within a 1-mile distance from the boundary of the permitted construction site and directly supports the construction activity; (b) a storm water pollution prevention plan is developed according to the provisions of this general permit and includes appropriate controls and measures to reduce erosion and discharge of pollutants in storm water runoff from the supporting industrial activity site; and (c) the construction support activity either does not operate beyond the completion date of the construction activity or obtains separate TPDES authorization for discharges as required. 3. Non-storm Water Discharges The following non-storm water discharges from construction sites authorized under this general permit are also eligible for authorization under this MCM: (a) discharges from fire fighting activities (fire fighting activities do not include washing of trucks, run-off water from training activities, test water from fire suppression systems, and similar activities); (b) fire hydrant flushings; (c) vehicle, external building, and pavement wash water where detergents and soaps are not used and where spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have not occurred (unless all spilled material is removed) (d) water used to control dust; (e) potable water sources including waterline flushings; (f) air conditioning condensate; and (g) uncontaminated ground water or spring water, including foundation or footing drains where flows are not contaminated with industrial materials such as solvents. Town Council 95 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 34 4. Other Permitted Discharges Any discharge authorized under a separate TPDES or TCEQ permit may be combined with discharges from construction sites operated by the small MS4. C. Limitations on Permit Coverage Discharges that occur after construction activities have been completed, and after the construction site and any supporting activity site have undergone final stabilization, are not eligible for coverage under Part VI of the general permit. D. Numeric Effluent Limitations All discharges of storm water runoff from concrete batch plants must be monitored at the following monitoring frequency and comply with the following numeric effluent limitations: Limitations Monitoring Parameter Daily Maximum Frequency Total Suspended Solids 65 mg/l 1/Year Oil and Grease 15 mg/l 1/Year pH between 6 and 9 standard units 1/Year E. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3) Operators of municipal construction activities that qualify for coverage under this general permit and that discharge storm water associated with construction activities that reach waters of the U.S. must: 1. develop a SWP3 according to the provisions of this general permit that covers the entire site and begin implementation of that plan prior to commencing construction activities; 2. post a signed copy of the notice contained in Attachment 1 of this general permit in a location at the construction site where it is readily available for viewing prior to commencing construction activities and maintain the notice in that location until completion of the construction activity and final stabilization of the site; 3. ensure the project specifications allow or provide that adequate BMPs may be developed and modified as necessary to meet the requirements of this general permit and the SWP3; 4. ensure all contractors are aware of the SWP3 requirements, are aware that municipal personnel are responsible for the day-to-day operations of the SWP3, and who to contact concerning SWP3 requirements; and 5. ensure that the SWP3 identifies the municipal personnel responsible for implementation of control measures described in the plan. Town Council 96 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 35 F. Effective Date of Coverage Operators of construction activities eligible for coverage under this general permit are authorized to discharge storm water associated with construction activity from a site 48 hours from the time that the signed notice is posted at the site. G. Deadlines for SWP3 Preparation and Compliance The SWP3 must: 1. be completed and initially implemented prior to commencing construction activities that result in soil disturbance; 2. be updated as necessary to reflect the changing conditions of new contractors, new areas of responsibility, and changes in best management practices; and 3. provide for compliance with the terms and conditions of this general permit. H. Plan Review and Making Plans Available The SWP3 must be retained on-site at the construction site or made readily available at the time of an on-site inspection to: the executive director; a federal, state, or local agency approving sediment and erosion plans, grading plans, or storm water management plans; local government officials; and the operator of a municipal separate storm sewer receiving discharges from the site. I. Keeping Plans Current The permittee must amend the SWP3 whenever: 1. there is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants and that has not been previously addressed in the SWP3; or 2. results of inspections or investigations by site operators, authorized TCEQ personnel, or a federal, state or local agency approving sediment and erosion plans indicate the SWP3 is proving ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in discharges authorized under this general permit. J. Contents of SWP3 The SWP3 must include, at a minimum, the information described in this section. 1. A site description, or project description, must be developed to include: (a) a description of the nature of the construction activity, potential pollutants and sources; Town Council 97 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 36 (b) a description of the intended schedule or sequence of major activities that will disturb soils for major portions of the site; (c) the number of acres of the entire construction site property and the total number of acres of the site where construction activities will occur, including off-site material storage areas, overburden and stockpiles of dirt, and borrow areas; (d) data describing the soil type or the quality of any discharge from the site; (e) a map showing the general location of the site (e.g. a portion of a city or county map); (f) a detailed site map indicating the following: (1) drainage patterns and approximate slopes anticipated after major grading activities; (2) areas where soil disturbance will occur; (3) areas which will not be disturbed; (4) locations of all major structural controls either planned or in place; (5) locations where stabilization practices are expected to be used; (6) locations of off-site material, waste, borrow or equipment storage areas; (7) surface waters (including wetlands) either adjacent or in close proximity; and (8) locations where storm water discharges from the site directly to a surface water body. (g) the location and description of asphalt plants and concrete plants (if any) providing support to the construction site and that are also authorized under this general permit; (h) the name of receiving waters at or near the site that will be disturbed or that will receive discharges from disturbed areas of the project; and (i) a copy of Part VI of this TPDES general permit. 2. The SWP3 must describe the structural and the non-structural controls (best management practices) that will be used to minimize pollution in runoff. The description must identify the general timing or sequence for implementation and the party responsible for implementation. At a minimum, the description must include the following components: Town Council 98 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 37 (a) Erosion and Sediment Controls (1) Erosion and sediment controls must be designed to retain sediment on-site to the maximum extent practicable with consideration for local topography and rainfall. (2) Control measures must be properly selected, installed, and maintained according to the manufacturer=s or designer=s specifications. If periodic inspections or other information indicates a control has been used incorrectly, or that the control is performing inadequately, the operator must replace or modify the control. (3) Sediment must be removed from sediment traps and sedimentation ponds no later than the time that design capacity has been reduced by 50%. (4) If sediment escapes the site, accumulations must be removed at a frequency to minimize further negative effects and, whenever feasible, prior to the next rain event. (5) Controls must be developed to limit offsite transport of litter, construction debris, and construction materials by storm water runoff. 3. Stabilization Practices The SWP3 must include a description of interim and permanent stabilization practices for the site, including a schedule of when the practices will be implemented. Site plans should ensure that existing vegetation is preserved where it is possible. (a) Stabilization practices may include but are not limited to: establishment of temporary vegetation, establishment of permanent vegetation, mulching, geotextiles, sod stabilization, vegetative buffer strips, protection of existing trees and vegetation and other similar measures. (b) The following records must be maintained and either attached to or referenced in the SWP3 and made readily available upon request to the parties in Part VI.H. of this general permit: (1) the dates when major grading activities occur; (2) the dates when construction activities temporarily or permanently cease on a portion of the site; and (3) the dates when stabilization measures are initiated. (c) Stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, and except as provided in (1) through (3) below, must be initiated no more than fourteen (14) days Town Council 99 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 38 after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. (1) Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity temporarily or permanently ceased is precluded by snow cover or frozen ground conditions, stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable. (2) Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity has temporarily or permanently ceased is precluded by seasonably arid conditions, stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable. These conditions exist in arid areas (areas with an average rainfall of 0 to 10 inches), semiarid areas (areas with an average annual rainfall of 10 to 20 inches), and other areas experiencing droughts. (3) Where construction activity on a portion of the site is temporarily ceased and earth disturbing activities will be resumed within twenty-one (21) days, temporary stabilization measures do not have to be initiated on that portion of site. 4. Structural Control Practices The SWP3 must include a description of any structural control practices used to divert flows away from exposed soils, to limit the contact of runoff with disturbed areas, or to lessen the off-site transport of eroded soils. (a) Sediment basins are required, where feasible, for common drainage locations that serve an area with ten (10) or more acres that remain disturbed at any one time. Sediment basins may be either temporary or permanent, but must be designed to store either the calculated volume of runoff from a 2 year, 24 hour storm from acreage drained, or designed to provide 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre drained. When calculating the volume of runoff from a 2-year, 24-hour storm event, it is not required to include the flows from offsite areas and flow from onsite areas that are either undisturbed or have already undergone final stabilization, if these flows are diverted around both the disturbed areas of the site and the sediment basin. In determining whether installing a sediment basin is feasible, the permittee may consider factors such as site soils, slope, available area on site, public safety, and other similar considerations. Where sediment basins are not feasible, equivalent control measures, which may include a series of smaller sediment basins, must be used. At a minimum, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or equivalent sediment controls are required for all down slope boundaries (and for those side slope boundaries deemed appropriate as dictated by individual site conditions) of the construction area. (b) Sediment traps and sediment basins may be used to control solids in storm water runoff for drainage locations serving less than ten (10) acres. At a minimum, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or equivalent sediment controls are required for all Town Council 100 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 39 down slope boundaries (and for those side slope boundaries deemed appropriate as dictated by individual site conditions) of the construction. Alternatively, a sediment basin providing storage for a calculated volume of runoff from these areas for a 2- year, 24- hour storm or 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre drained may be provided. 5. Permanent Storm Water Controls A description of any measures that will be installed during the construction process to control pollutants in storm water discharges that will occur after construction operations have been completed must be included in the SWP3. Permittees are only responsible for the installation and maintenance of storm water management measures prior to final stabilization of the site . 6. Other Controls (a) Off-site vehicle tracking of sediments and the generation of dust must be minimized. (b) The SWP3 must include a description of construction and waste materials expected to be stored on-site and a description of controls to reduce pollutants from these materials. (c) The SWP3 must include a description of pollutant sources from areas other than construction (including storm water discharges from dedicated asphalt plants and dedicated concrete plants), and a description of controls and measures that will be implemented at those sites to minimize pollutant discharges. 7. Approved State and Local Plans (a) Permittees must ensure the SWP3 is consistent with requirements specified in applicable sediment and erosion site plans or site permits, or storm water management site plans or site permits approved by federal, state, or local officials. (b) SWP3s must be updated as necessary to remain consistent with any changes applicable to protecting surface water resources in sediment erosion site plans or site permits, or storm water management site plans or site permits approved by state or local official for which the permittee receives written notice. 8. Maintenance All erosion and sediment control measures and other protective measures identified in the SWP3 must be maintained in effective operating condition. If through inspections the permittee determines that BMPs are not operating effectively, maintenance must be performed before the next anticipated storm event or as necessary to maintain the continued effectiveness of storm water controls. If maintenance prior to the next anticipated storm event is impracticable, maintenance must be scheduled and accomplished as soon as practicable. Town Council 101 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 40 9. Inspections of Controls (a) Personnel provided by the permittee and familiar with the SWP3 must inspect disturbed areas of the construction site that have not been finally stabilized, areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation, all structural control measures for effectiveness and necessary maintenance, and locations where vehicles enter or exit the site for evidence of off-site tracking. Inspections must occur at least once every fourteen (14) calendar days and within twenty four (24) hours of the end of a storm event of 0.5 inches or greater. As an alternative, the SWP3 may be developed to require that these inspections will occur at least once every seven (7) calendar days; in which case additional inspections are not required following each qualifying storm event. If this alternative schedule is developed, the inspection must occur on a specifically defined day, regardless of whether or not there has been a rainfall event since the previous inspection. Where sites have been finally or temporarily stabilized, where runoff is unlikely due to winter conditions (e.g. site is covered with snow, ice, or frozen ground exists), or during seasonal arid periods in arid areas (areas with an average annual rainfall of 0 to 10 inches) and semi-arid areas (areas with an average annual rainfall of 10 to 20 inches), inspections must be conducted at least once every month. (b) Personnel provided by the permittee and familiar with the SWP3 must inspect all accessible discharge locations to determine if erosion control measures are effective in preventing visually noticeable changes to receiving waters, including persistent cloudy appearance in water color and noticeable accumulation of sediments. Where discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations must be inspected to the extent that such inspections are practicable. The frequency for these inspections must be established by the permittee in the SWP3 with consideration for local rainfall and soil, but must occur at least once during the construction activity if a discharge occurs. (c) The SWP3 must be modified based on the results of inspections, as necessary, to better control pollutants in runoff. Revisions to the SWP3 must be completed within seven (7) calendar days following the inspection. If existing BMPs are modified or if additional BMPs are necessary, an implementation schedule must be described in the SWP3 and wherever possible those changes implemented before the next storm event. If implementation before the next anticipated storm event is impracticable, these changes must be implemented as soon as practicable. (d) A report summarizing the scope of the inspection, names and qualifications of personnel making the inspection, the dates of the inspection, and major observations relating to the implementation of the SWP3 must be made and retained as part of the SWP3. Major observations should include: the locations of discharges of sediment or other pollutants from the site; locations of BMPs that need to be maintained; locations of BMPs that failed to operate as designed or proved inadequate for a Town Council 102 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TPDES General Permit No. TXR040000 Page 41 particular location; and locations where additional BMPs are needed. (e) Actions taken as a result of inspections must be described within, and retained as a part of, the SWP3. Reports must identify any incidents of non-compliance. Where a report does not identify any incidents of non-compliance, the report must contain a certification that the facility or site is in compliance with the SWP3 and this permit. 10. The SWP3 must identify and ensure the implementation of appropriate pollution prevention measures for all eligible non-storm water components of the discharge. K. Additional Retention of Records The permittee must retain the following records for a minimum period of three (3) years from the date that final stabilization has been achieved on all portions of the site. Records include: 1. a copy of the SWP3; and 2. all reports and actions required by this general permit, including a copy of the site notice. Town Council 103 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Page 42 Attachment 1 CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTICE FOR THE Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Storm Water Program TPDES GENERAL PERMIT TXR040000 The following information is posted in compliance with Part VI of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s (TCEQ) TPDES General Permit Number TXR040000 for discharges of storm water runoff from construction sites that are operated by small municipal separate storm sewer system operators. Additional information regarding the TCEQ storm water permit program may be found on the internet at: www.tceq.state.tx.us Permit Number: TXR04 __________ Contact Name and Phone Number: Project Description: (Including estimated start date and either the projected end date, or date that disturbed soils will be finally stabilized) Location of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3): I, (Typed or Printed Name Person Completing This Certification) certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements for claiming an authorization under Part VI of TPDES General Permit TXR040000. A storm water pollution prevention plan has been developed and implemented according to permit requirements. I am aware there are significant penalties for providing false information or for conducting unauthorized discharges, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signature Date Town Council 104 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 At t a c h m e n t 2 CO N C R E T E B A T C H F A C I L I T I E S ST W / T X R 0 4 / CO PE R M I T T E E N A M E / A D D R E S S (I n c l u d e F a c i l i t y N a m e / L o c a t i o n i f D i f f e r e n t ) NA T I O N A L P O L L U T A N T D I S C H A R G E E L I M I N A T I O N S Y S T E M (N P D E S ) DI S C H A R G E M O N I T O R I N G R E P O R T ( D M R ) NA M E (2 - 1 6 ) (1 7 - 1 9 ) AD D R E S S PE R M I T N U M B E R D I S C H A R G E N U M B E R MO N I T O R I N G P E R I O D YE A R MO DA Y YE A R MO DA Y NO T E : En t e r y o u r p e r m i t n u m b e r i n t h e un d e r l i n e d s p a c e i n t h e u p p e r r i g h t h a n d c o r n e r o f th i s p a g e . Ex a m p l e : S T W / T X R 0 4 0 0 1 2 3 / CO M a i l t o : T C E Q ( M C 2 1 3 ) P . O . B o x 1 3 0 8 7 A u s t i n , T X 7 8 7 1 1 - 3 0 8 7 01 0 1 12 31 FA C I L I T Y LO C A T I O N (2 0 - 2 1 ) (2 2 - 2 3 ) (2 4 - 2 5 ) (2 6 - 2 7 ) (2 8 - 2 9 ) (3 0 - 3 1 ) (3 C a r d O n l y ) Q U A N T I T Y O R L O A D I N G ( 4 6 - 5 3 ) ( 5 4 - 6 1 ) (4 C a r d O n l y ) Q U A L IT Y O R C O N C E N T R A T I O N ( 3 8 - 4 5 ) ( 4 6 - 5 3 ) ( 5 4 - 6 1 ) PA R A M E T E R (3 2 - 3 7 ) AV E R A G E MA X I M U M UN I T S MI N I M U M AV E R A G E MA X I M U M UN I T S NO. EX (62-63) FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS (64-68) SAMPLE TYPE (69-70) SA M P L E ME A S U R E M E N T ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * T o t a l S u s p e n d e d So l i d s SA M P L E RE Q U I R E M E N T ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * 65 Da i l y M a x mg/l 1/Year Grab SA M P L E ME A S U R E M E N T ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * O i l & G r e a s e SA M P L E RE Q U I R E M E N T ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * 15 Da i l y M a x mg/l 1/Year Grab SA M P L E ME A S U R E M E N T ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * p H SA M P L E RE Q U I R E M E N T ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * 6. 0 - 9 . 0 Ra n g e S. U . 1/Year Grab SA M P L E ME A S U R E M E N T SA M P L E RE Q U I R E M E N T NA M E / T I T L E P R I N C I P A L E X E C U T I V E OF F I C E R TE L E P H O N E DATE TY P E D O R P R I N T E D I CE R T I F Y U N D E R P E N A L T Y O F L A W T H A T T H I S D O C U M E N T A N D A L L A T T A C H M E N T S W E R E PR E P A R E D U N D E R M Y D I R E C T I O N O R S U P E R V I S I O N I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H A S Y S T E M DE S I G N E D T O A S S U R E T H A T Q U A L I F I E D P E R S O N N E L P R O P E R L Y G A T H E R A N D E V A L U A T E TH E I N F O R M A T I O N S U B M I T T E D . B A S E D O N M Y I N Q U I R Y O F T H E P E R S O N O R P E R S O N S W H O MA N A G E T H E S Y S T E M , O R T H O S E P E R S O N S D I R E C T L Y R E S P O N S I B L E F O R G A T H E R I N G T H E IN F O R M A T I O N , T H E I N F O R M A T I O N S U B M I T T E D I S , T O T H E B E S T O F M Y K N O W L E D G E A N D BE L I E F , T R U E , A C C U R A T E , A N D C O M P L E T E . I A M A W A R E T H A T T H E R E A R E S I G N I F I C A N T PE N A L T I E S F O R S U B M I T T I N G F A L S E I N F O R M A T I O N , I N C L U D I N G T H E P O S S I B I L I T Y O F F I N E AN D I M P R I S O N M E N T F O R K N O W I N G V I O L A T I O N S . SI G N A T U R E O F P R I N C I P A L EX E C U T I V E OF F I C E R O R A U T H O R I Z E D A G E N T AR E A CO D E NU M B E R YEAR MO DAY CO M M E N T S A N D E X P L A N A T I O N O F AN Y V I O L A T I O N S ( R e f e r e n c e a l l a t t a c h m e n t s h e r e ) EP A F o r m 3 3 2 0 - 1 ( 3 - 9 9 ) (R E P L A C E S E P A F O R M T - 4 0 W H I C H M A Y N O T B E U S E D ) PAGE OF Fo r m A p p r o v e d O M B N o . 2 0 4 0 - 0 0 4 To w n Co u n c i l 10 5 of 20 6 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 MINUTES OF REGULAR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB LOCATION: 100 MUNICIPAL DRIVE, TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS Monday, March 17, 2008 7:00 P.M. STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § The Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, met in a Regular Session on Monday, March 17, 2008. The meeting was held within the boundaries of the Town and was open to the public. TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Nick Sanders Mayor Susan Edstrom Mayor Pro Tem Pam Cates Council Member Jim Moss Council Member Philip Sterling Council Member TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Kathleen Wilson Council Member D.4 Discuss and take appropriate action to amend Chapter 3, Article XV of the Code of Ordinances of the Town, entitled "Swimming Pools"; by amending Section 15.01 “Definitions”, Section 15.02 “Applicability and Prohibited Conduct”, and Section 15.04 (I) “Draining of Swimming Pools”, and providing an effective date. Town Manager Emmons referenced the Storm Water Management Plan adopted by Council in February and the discussions regarding pool discharge and backwash requirements mandated by TCEQ. Staff was previously advised by TCEQ that filtered backwash of pools is considered elicit and unauthorized. As of Friday, March 14, 2008, TCEQ informed Town Staff that elicit discharge would not be considered unauthorized. Town Manager Emmons asked the Council to determine if they are going to set policy for pool compliance now or wait until the State mandates. Emmons recommended Council not take action tonight and wait until staff receives the additional information they have requested from TCEQ. Council member Cates would like to wait until the State mandates and requested TCEQ submit their decision in writing to the Town. Mayor Pro Tem Edstrom is frustrated that Staff is receiving two different stories form TCEQ and requested a representative speak to the Council on record. Mayor Sanders acknowledged the Cities of Arlington, Grapevine, Farmers Branch and Southlake have adopted similar ordinances. Larry Hoover, 1118 Berkshire Court – Spoke against this Ordinance and is upset with the information previously provided by staff regarding this issue. Peggy Sweeney, 51 Meadowbrook – Thanked the Council and staff who worked on the revisions to the proposed Ordinance. J.D. Harvey, 5 Sunrise Court – Spoke against this Ordinance. Ryan Chitwood, 10 Overhill Drive – Expressed disappointment that Council would consider waiting for State mandates to approve. Council member Moss defended the Council advising they reviewed the information provided and proceeded according to legal requirements. Town Council 106 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Motion made by Edstrom, seconded by Moss to refer to a date uncertain. Motion passed unanimously without any further discussion. MINUTES OF A BUDGET WORKSHOP/REGULAR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB LOCATION: 100 MUNICIPAL DRIVE, TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS Monday, August 18, 2008 5:30 P.M. STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § The Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, met in a Regular Session on Monday, August 18, 2008. The meeting was held within the boundaries of the Town and was open to the public. TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Nick Sanders Mayor Philip Sterling Mayor Pro Tem Susan Edstrom Council Member Jim Moss Council Member Kathleen Wilson Council Member Glenn Strother Council Member D.3 Discuss and take appropriate action regarding an amendment to Chapter 3, Article XV of the Code of Ordinances of the Town, entitled "Swimming Pools"; by amending Section 15.01 "Definitions", Section 15.02 "Applicability and Prohibited Conduct", and Section 15.04 (I) "Draining of Swimming Pools", and providing an effective date. Town Manager Emmons gave a brief history of this Ordinance. Donna Curtis, 315 Inverness - Questioned the concept and specifics of the Ordinance. Ryan Chitwood,10 Overhill Drive - Spoke in favor of the Ordinance. Lois Bowman, 11 Overhill Drive – Spoke against the Ordinance. Frank Folger, 13 Overhill Drive – Spoke against the Ordinance. Ruth Ellen Campell, 11 Overhill Drive – Spoke against the Ordinance. Motion made by Edstrom; seconded by Strother to approve an amendment to Chapter 3, Article XV of the Code of Ordinances of the Town, entitled "Swimming Pools"; and add the date of June 15, 2010 to comply with subsection 1 above or to obtain a Compliance Permit in accordance with subsection 3 below. Council member Edstrom commented that this Ordinance first came before the Council in January, but TCEQ provided conflicting information. Council member Edstrom and Mayor Pro Tem Sterling both agreed that the residents have enough time to save money to implement the changes required by ordinance. Council member Wilson supports Mr. Chitwood’s endeavors concerning these amendments. Town Council 107 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Council member Moss said that given the TCEQ mandates this is the direction the Town has to go. Council member Strother said that he understands Mr. Chitwood’s concern, but would like the Ordinance to have more flexibility regarding the pool size and placement in the yard. Council member Edstrom asked that the Environmental Coordinator be made aware that this section needs amended with the annual TCEQ filings. Town Manager Emmons explained the non-compliance form and gave four retro-fitting options for compliance. Motion carried 4:1, with Strother opposing. Town Council 108 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2011-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS AMENDING CHAPTER 3 THE CODE OF ORDINANCES ENTITLED “BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION” OF ARTICLE XV, ENTITLED “SWIMMING POOLS” BY AMENDING SECTION 15.02 “APPLICABILITY AND PROHIBITED CONDUCT”, AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15.04 (I) “DRAINING OF SWIMMING POOLS” AND 15.04 (K) “CLARITY OF WATER”; PROVIDING FOR THE INCORPORATION OF PREMISES; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club (hereinafter referred to as “Town”) is a Home Rule municipality acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2007, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No.2007- 16, establishing “Swimming Pool Regulations” for the Town of Trophy Club, Texas; and WHEREAS, based upon information provided by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the Town has determined that regulations regarding discharge of backwash and wastewater from swimming pools may be addressed differently than the method provided in the current provisions regulating swimming pools; WHEREAS, the provisions contained herein are consistent with current law and standards regulating discharges from swimming pools and serve to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas recognizes the need to protect the environment; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined it appropriate to amend Sections 15.02 and 15.04 of Article XV of Chapter 3 as more fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Town Council hereby finds that the regulations established herein are in the best interest of the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the Town. Town Council 109 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS. SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF PREMISES All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT 2.01 Article XV, entitled “Swimming Pools” of Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended, so that subsections (A) and (E) of Section 15.02, entitled “Applicability and Prohibited Conduct” shall read in their entirety as follows and all other subsections of Section 15.02 shall remain the same: “Section 15.02 Applicability and Prohibited Conduct A. This Article shall be applicable to all new swimming pools and spas hereafter constructed, erected, or maintained, and shall also apply to all existing pools and spas which have a depth greater than twenty four inches (24”) of water at any point, unless otherwise expressly provided herein, including without limitation, the exclusion provided in Section 15.04 (I)(2) for pools built or permitted prior to July 1, 2005. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Article. E. It shall be unlawful for any Person owning, leasing, claiming, occupying or having supervision or control of any swimming pool that is subject to the provisions of this Article to permit the drainage of any swimming pool filter backwash and/or spent diatomaceous earth to the storm drainage system, to surface waters, or to adjacent public or private property.” 2.02 Article XV, entitled “Swimming Pools” of Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended, so that Section (I), entitled “Draining of Swimming Pools” of Section 15.04 entitled “Swimming “Pools” is hereby amended to be and read in its entirety as follows: “Section 15.04 Swimming Pools I. Draining of Swimming Pools 1. On any new swimming pool permitted on or after June 24, 2005, all backwash or drainage from a swimming pool shall discharge into the sanitary sewer system. An indirect connection shall be made by means of an air break discharging into a tail piece installed a minimum of 6” or 152 Town Council 110 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 mm above adjacent grade. The tailpiece shall be connected to a minimum 3” or 76 mm p-trap not less than 12” (304 mm) below grade which discharges into the yard cleanout riser. 2. Owners of existing pools (pools built or permitted prior to July 1, 2005) are not required by this Ordinance to retrofit the pool equipment and tie into the sanitary sewer. 3. Failure to comply with this Section shall be unlawful and shall constitute a violation of this Article.” 2.03 Article XV, entitled “Swimming Pools” of Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended, so that Subsection 5 of Section (K), entitled “Clarity of Water” of Section 15.04 entitled “Swimming “Pools” is hereby amended to be and read in its entirety as follows: “K. Clarity of Water 5. Wastewater from a swimming pool that is subject to the provisions of this Article shall be discharged into a sanitary sewer. There shall be no direct physical connection between the sewer system and any drain from the swimming pool or circulations system. 2.03 Article XV, entitled “Swimming Pools” of Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended, so that Subsection 6 of Section (K), entitled “Clarity of Water” of Section 15.04 entitled “Swimming “Pools” is hereby repealed in its entirety. “K. Clarity of Water ” SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE REPEALER This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other Ordinances affecting swimming pool regulations and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such Ordinances, whether codified or uncodified, except for those instances where there are direct conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance. Ordinances or parts thereof in force at the time this Ordinance shall take effect and that are inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with this Ordinance. Provided however, that any complaint, action, claim or lawsuit which has been initiated or has arisen under or pursuant to any such Ordinance on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall continue to be governed by the provisions of such Ordinance and for that purpose the Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Deleted: 6. Alternative equivalent methods of wastewater disposal may be approved by the Director of Community Development if the Director finds that the alternative method of disposal proposed would not create a public health hazard or public nuisance or violate any ordinance, state or federal law, rule or regulation. Wastewater disposal which creates a public health hazard or public nuisance is prohibited. Town Council 111 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 . SECTION 4. SAVINGS All rights and remedies of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any other Ordinance affecting swimming pool regulations which have secured at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such Ordinances same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. PENALTY It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Ordinance, and any person violating or failing to comply with any provision hereof shall be fined, upon conviction, in an amount not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), and a separate offense shall be deemed committed each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. SECTION 7. PUBLICATION The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to publish, the Caption, Penalty and Effective Date of this Ordinance as required by Section 52.011 of the Texas Local Government Code. SECTION 8. ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to engross and enroll this Ordinance in the ordinance records of the Town and as required by Charter. SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE Town Council 112 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its date of adoption and publication as provided by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town of Trophy Club, Texas this the 18th day of April, 2011. Connie White, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas [SEAL] ATTEST: Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas APPROVED TO AS FORM: Patricia A. Adams, Town Attorney Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 113 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2011-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS AMENDING CHAPTER 3 THE CODE OF ORDINANCES ENTITLED “BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION” OF ARTICLE XV, ENTITLED “SWIMMING POOLS” BY AMENDING SECTIONS 15.04 (I) “DRAINING OF SWIMMING POOLS” AND 15.04 (K) “CLARITY OF WATER”; PROVIDING FOR THE INCORPORATION OF PREMISES; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club (hereinafter referred to as “Town”) is a Home Rule municipality acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined it appropriate to amend Sections 15.02 and 15.04 of Article XV of Chapter 3 as more fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Town Council hereby finds that the regulations established herein are in the best interest of the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS. SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF PREMISES All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT 2.01 Article XV, entitled “Swimming Pools” of Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended, so that Section (I), entitled “Draining of Swimming Pools” of Section 15.04 entitled “Swimming “Pools” is hereby amended to be and read in its entirety as follows: Town Council 114 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 “Section 15.04 Swimming Pools I. Draining of Swimming Pools 1. With the exception of Section 15.02 I. 3, all backwash or drainage from a swimming pool shall discharge into the sanitary sewer system. An indirect connection shall be made by means of an air break discharging into a tail piece installed a minimum of 6” or 152 mm above adjacent grade. The tailpiece shall be connected to a minimum 3” or 76 mm p-trap not less than 12” (304 mm) below grade which discharges into the yard cleanout riser. 2. Owners of pools built or permitted prior to July 1, 2005 shall have until June 15, 2010 to comply with subsection 1 above or to obtain a Compliance Permit in accordance with subsection 3 below. 3. As an alternative to meeting the requirements of subsection 1 above, Owners of pools built or permitted prior to July 1, 2005, may obtain a Compliance Permit for an alternate disposal process for all swimming pool backwash. The Compliance Permit may be obtained from the Town’s Permitting Department. The Compliance Permit shall not allow for any backwash or drainage water to be pumped or drained directly or indirectly to adjacent public or private property, including without limitation, streets, storm sewers or surface waters. The Compliance Permit may allow for drainage if drainage remains on the Permittee’s property and Permittee properly disposes of all filter backwashes into the trash. Additionally, the Compliance Permit may allow for the drainage of de-chlorinated water to the curb and gutter. 4. Failure to comply with this Section shall be unlawful and shall constitute a violation of this Article. 2.02 Article XV, entitled “Swimming Pools” of Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended, so that Subsection 5 of Section (K), entitled “Clarity of Water” of Section 15.04 entitled “Swimming “Pools” is hereby repealed in its entirety: “K. Clarity of Water 2.03 Article XV, entitled “Swimming Pools” of Chapter 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended, so that Subsection 6 of Section (K), entitled “Clarity of Water” of Section 15.04 entitled “Swimming “Pools” is hereby repealed in its entirety. Deleted: A Deleted: approval Deleted: An Deleted: application for approval of an alternate disposal process Deleted: as required by the Compliance Permit Deleted: in accordance with the requirements of the Compliance Permit Deleted: 5. Wastewater from a swimming pool shall be discharged into a sanitary sewer. There shall be no direct physical connection between the sewer system and any drain from the swimming pool or circulations system.” ¶ Town Council 115 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 “K. Clarity of Water SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE REPEALER This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other Ordinances affecting swimming pool regulations and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such Ordinances, whether codified or uncodified, except for those instances where there are direct conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance. Ordinances or parts thereof in force at the time this Ordinance shall take effect and that are inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with this Ordinance. Provided however, that any complaint, action, claim or lawsuit which has been initiated or has arisen under or pursuant to any such Ordinance on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall continue to be governed by the provisions of such Ordinance and for that purpose the Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. SAVINGS All rights and remedies of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any other Ordinance affecting swimming pool regulations which have secured at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such Ordinances same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. PENALTY It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Ordinance, and any person violating or failing to comply with any provision hereof shall be fined, upon conviction, in an amount not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), and a separate offense shall be deemed committed each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Deleted: 6. Alternative equivalent methods of wastewater disposal may be approved by the Director of Community Development if the Director finds that the alternative method of disposal proposed would not create a public health hazard or public nuisance or violate any ordinance, state or federal law, rule or regulation. Wastewater disposal which creates a public health hazard or public nuisance is prohibited.” Town Council 116 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 SECTION 7. PUBLICATION The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to publish, the Caption, Penalty and Effective Date of this Ordinance as required by Section 52.011 of the Texas Local Government Code. SECTION 8. ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to engross and enroll this Ordinance in the ordinance records of the Town and as required by Charter. SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its date of adoption and publication as provided by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town of Trophy Club, Texas this the 18th day of April, 2011. Connie White, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas [SEAL] ATTEST: Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas APPROVED TO AS FORM: Patricia A. Adams , Town Attorney Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 117 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-210-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/13/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action: Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, amending Resolution No. 2010-22 appointing citizens to the Boards and Commissions; providing for the appointments of citizen volunteers to serve on the Citizens Financial Advisory Board and the Ethics Commission; designating terms of service; and providing an effective date. Attachments:CFAB Applicants.pdf Ethics Applications.pdf RES 2011-08 Amending 2010-22.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, amending Resolution No. 2010-22 appointing citizens to the Boards and Commissions; providing for the appointments of citizen volunteers to serve on the Citizens Financial Advisory Board and the Ethics Commission; designating terms of service; and providing an effective date. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal # 3: Strong Partnerships and Community Involvement Create a positive regional identity Foster a well informed community Enhance citizen volunteer opportunities Expand and promote recreational / active live style opportunities for all ages Forge collaborative relationships with other governmental and public entities Goal #4: Picturesque and Environmentally Sound Maintain neat and tidy appearance Improve property maintenance standards and code enforcement Develop / Enhance environmental and sustainability standards and programs Goal #5: Financial and Operational Stewardship Hire, develop, and retain quality staff Implement strong financial management standards Improve effectiveness and efficiency of operational processes Maintain / Improve infrastructure and assets Provide cost-effective services Deliver responsible customer service Town Council 118 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 119 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 120 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 121 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 122 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 123 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 124 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 125 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 126 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 127 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 128 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 129 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 130 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 131 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 132 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 133 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 134 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 135 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 136 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 137 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 138 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 139 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 140 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 141 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 142 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 143 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 144 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 145 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town Council 146 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2011-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2010-22 APPOINTING CITIZENS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENTS OF CITIZEN VOLUNTEERS TO SERVE ON THE CITIZENS FINANCIAL ADVISORY BOARD AND THE ETHICS COMMISSION; DESIGNATING TERMS OF SERVICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, benefits by having its citizens involved in local government through service on Boards and Commissions; and WHEREAS, the Trophy Club Town Council is charged with the responsibility of making appointments to Town Boards and Commissions, and pursuant to Town policies, appointments are typically made annually to fill expiring terms unless a resignation requires the filling of a vacancy mid-year; and WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club previously adopted Resolution No. 2010- 22 on September 27, 2010 appointing one (1) Town Council Liaison to serve on the Economic Development Corporation 4A, appointing one (1) Town Council Liaison to serve on the Economic Development Corporation 4B, and appointing one (1) Town Council Liaison to serve on the Parks and Recreation Board; and appointing citizens to serve on EDC 4A, EDC 4B, Parks and Recreation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, Tree Board and Zoning Board of Adjustment to fill terms expiring during the 2010-2011 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, since the passage of Resolution No. 2010-22, the Council has established additional Boards and Commissions for which it now seeks to appoint volunteers to serve and which therefore necessitate an amendment to Resolution No. 2010-22; and WHEREAS, by passage of this Resolution, the Town Council hereby amends Resolution No. 2010-22 making citizen volunteer appointments for the newly established Citizens Financial Advisory Board and Ethics Commission reaffirming current appointments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS: Section 1. That Resolution No. 2010-22, is amended as set forth below and that all other provisions of Resolution 2010-22 remain in effect as previously adopted by the Town Council. Town Council 147 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Section 2. That the Town Council hereby appoints the following individuals to serve on the Boards and Commissions specified herein with respective terms of service ending on September 30 of the year set forth below for each individual: Citizen Financial Advisory Board 1. Kathy Carlton (2012) 4.Jim Hase (2014) 2. Michael Buck (2013) 5.Bob Hill (2014) 3. Amanda McGough (2013) Ethics Commission 1. Ronald Eddins (2012) 4.Tom Setser (2014) Alternate 2. Jennifer Rauch (2013) 5.Ralph Scoggins (2014) Alternate 3. Bob Downey (2014) Section 3. That this Resolution shall become effective from and after its date of passage in accordance with the law. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, on this 2nd day of May 2011. ______________________________ Connie White, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas ATTEST: ____________________________________ Shannon DePrater, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas [Seal] APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________ Patricia A. Adams, Town Attorney Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 148 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-224-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution ratifying the Trophy Club Reserve Police Force Program and the appointment of the Reserve Force by the Chief of Police; and providing an effective date. Attachments:Reserve Ratification Memo.pdf RES 2011-11 Reserve Ratification.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Consider and take appropriate action regarding a Resolution ratifying the Trophy Club Reserve Police Force Program and the appointment of the Reserve Force by the Chief of Police; and providing an effective date. EXPLANATION: Recently it has come to our attention that there is an interpretation of a provision of the Local Government Code relative to Police Reserve programs that Council approval of Reserve Police Officers may be required. That is certainly one interpretation, and while staff does not necessarily agree with that interpretation, as a precautionary measure, staff is seeking the ratification of the appointment of Reserve Officers Mauthe, Ngyuen, Glover, Hankins, and Bury which were made by the Chief of Police pursuant to express provisions of the Local Government Code. TOWN COUNCIL GOAL(S): Goal #1: Safe and secure community. Maintain low crime rate Increase citizen awareness and involvement in crime prevention Provide superior Emergency Services Improve data security RECOMMENDATION AND JUSTIFICATION TO COUNCIL: Management recommends approval. Town Council 149 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town of Trophy Club 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 (682) 831-4600 Fax (817) 491-9312 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor, Council, and Town Manager Date: April 26, 2011 From: Chief Kniffen Re: Reserve Appointments Section 341.012 of the Local Government Code authorizes the governing body of a municipality to establish a reserve police force. This section appears to require that appointment to the reserve force be approved by the governing body before acting as a peace officer. It goes on to state that “approval of a person who is not a peace officer ... may carry a weapon only when authorized to do so by the chief of police and only when discharging official duties as a peace officer.” Chapter 10, Section 1.05 E of the Code of Ordinances states, “Members of the police reserve shall be appointed by the chief of police, to serve at his or her discretion, and any member may resign from the police reserve at any time, but it shall be his or her duty to notify the chief of police of his or her resignation.” Recently another department suspended their reserve operations after questions arose regarding the lack of approval by the Council. When this came to my attention, I asked the Town Attorney for an opinion on whether or not Council approval for our reserve officers was required. Part of the statute seems to indicate that approval by Council of a person “who is not a peace officer,” is required. This would authorize the appointment of a civilian as a reserve officer in an emergency situation or in a very small agency. The wording of the ordinance authorizing a police reserve could be interpreted to mean that the approval of reserve officers is delegated by the Council to the chief of police. All of our reserve officers are certified peace officers. All have been through the same hiring process as our full-time officers. However, out of an abundance of caution, the Town Attorney and I decided to present this resolution to the Council. I respectfully request and recommend ratification of the resolution approving the appointment of the reserve officers listed below. Officer Paul Bury Officer Todd Mauthe Officer Thinh Nguyen Officer Anthony Glover Officer Chris Hankins Town Council 150 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS RATIFYING THE TROPHY CLUB RESERVE POLICE FORCE PROGRAM AND THE APPOINTMENT OF THE RESERVE FORCE BY THE CHIEF OF POLICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 341.012 of the Texas Local Government Code (hereinafter “LGC 341.012”) authorizes the establishment of a Police Reserve Force; and WHEREAS, the Town has established a Reserve Police Force program with guidelines, qualifications and standards for training which are the same as those established for full time commissioned peace officers serving the Town; and WHEREAS, LGC 341.012 provides that the Chief of Police shall appoint the members of the Reserve Police Force who shall serve at the Chief’s discretion; and WHEREAS, the Chief of Police has made appointments of qualified commissioned peace officers to serve as members of the Police Reserve Force; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that the Trophy Club Police Reserve Force provides a valuable resource to the Town which is essential to the health, safety and welfare of the public and therefore, finds it appropriate to approve by ratification the existing Trophy Club Police Reserve Force program, including without limitation, the appointments to the Reserve Force made by the Chief of Police; and WHEREAS, the Town Council acknowledges that the members of the Reserve Police Force serve at the discretion of the Chief of Police and hereby authorizes the Chief of Police to appoint to the Reserve Force those commissioned peace officers that the Chief determines meet the qualifications and standards governing the Reserve Police Force program; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS: Section 1. The recitals contained in the preamble of this Resolution are determined to be true and correct and are hereby adopted as a part of this Resolution. Section 2. The Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas does hereby ratify the Trophy Club Reserve Police Force program, including without limitation the qualifications and training standards established for the members of the Reserve Force program and the appointment of commissioned peace officers by the Chief of Police. Town Council 151 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Section 3. The Trophy Club Reserve Police program and all appointments thereto by the Chief of Police are hereby ratified and approved. Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of passage accordance with law. y the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas on this 2nd day of May, 2011. Section 4. This in PASSED and APPROVED b Connie White, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas [SEAL] TTEST: retary A Shannon DePrater, Town Sec Town of Trophy Club, Texas PPROVED TO AS FORM: rney A Patricia A. Adams , Town Atto Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town Council 152 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-227-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Town Manager Slye's update regarding the following; discussion of the same. - Independence Park East Landscape Plan Update - Roundabout Funding Update - Finance Director Position Update - TML IEBP Conference, May 11 - 14, 2011 Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Town Manager Slye's update regarding the following; discussion of the same. - Independence Park East Landscape Plan Update - Roundabout Funding Update - Finance Director Position Update - TML IEBP Conference, May 11 - 14, 2011 Town Council 153 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-226-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Town Council Liaison Updates; discussion of same: - April 19, 2011 TCMUD No. 1 Meeting - Mayor Pro Tem Rose - April 25, 2011 EDC 4A Meeting - Council member Cantrell Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Town Council Liaison Updates; discussion of same: - April 19, 2011 TCMUD No. 1 Meeting - Mayor Pro Tem Rose - April 25, 2011 EDC 4A Meeting - Council member Cantrell Town Council 154 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-228-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action: Title:Mayor and Council Updates regarding training opportunities, educational sessions, and regional meetings; discussion of same. - Metroport Cities Partnership Meeting - April 21, 2011 - Bubbles of Love - April 25, 2011 - North Texas Commission - April 26, 2011 - Arbor Day Celebration - April 30, 2011 Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Mayor and Council Updates regarding training opportunities, educational sessions, and regional meetings; discussion of same. - Metroport Cities Partnership Meeting - April 21, 2011 - Bubbles of Love - April 25, 2011 - North Texas Commission - April 26, 2011 - Arbor Day Celebration - April 30, 2011 Town Council 155 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:12011-229-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:4/25/2011 Town Council On agenda:Final action:5/2/2011 Title:Items for Future Agendas. Attachments:Future Agenda Items List.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. TITLE Items for Future Agendas. Town Council 156 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Town of Trophy Club Town Council Future Agenda Items List 1. Consider and take appropriate action regarding procurement policies and their alignment with State statutes. (Rose, 2/1/10) 2. Consider and take appropriate action regarding placing policies and procedures on the Town web site. (Rose, 2/1/10) 3. Consider and take appropriate action regarding noise regulations for Oil and Gas Well Drilling and Production (Rose, 4/26/10) 4. Staff update regarding Marshall Branch Creek area located North of HWY114; discussion and action of the same. (Stotts, 6/21/10) 5. Staff proposal regarding the amenity lakes, including associated costs to accept the amenity lakes from the developer. (Stotts, 10/4/10) 6. Consider and take appropriate action regarding Planning & Zoning readiness if Local Option Election Petition is successful. (Cantrell, 1/3/11) 7. Explore the feasibility of combining the EDCs and improved ways of expending EDC funds. (Strother, 2/24/2011) 8. Consider and take appropriate action regarding the creation of a “Going Green” initiative throughout the Town. (White, 2/24/2011) 9. Consider and take appropriate action regarding Goals for the Town Manager. (Stotts, 4/18/2011) Town Council 157 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 Supplemental Information Town Council 158 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 1   April 15, 2011 Number 15 LEGISLATURE MAKING CITY TRAFFIC FINES UNAFFORDABLE AND UNCOLLECTABLE   The League issued the following press release on April 12: AUSTIN – The Texas Legislature is considering bills to raise the amount the state adds to every municipal traffic ticket by $25, to a total of $107. The State of Texas currently adds $82 to every traffic fine collected by cities, which amounted to $235 million in 2010. S.B. 726 by Sen. Jose Rodriguez (D-El Paso), scheduled for consideration in the Texas Senate today, would add $10 to municipal traffic fines. In the House, H.B. 258 by Rep. Naomi Gonzalez (D-El Paso), which would add another $15 to each ticket has been approved by the Ways and Means Committee. “This is a deceptive way for legislators to pay for expanding state government. Legislators are turning police officers into tax collectors because they are afraid to vote for a tax increase,” said Texas Municipal League Executive Director Bennett Sandlin. Since 2002, the state tax on every municipal traffic violation has more than doubled, rising from $40 to $82. Regardless DON’T MISS THE LEAGUE’S  2011 LEGISLATIVE  WORKSHOPS    The League is pleased to offer  live and online seminars  regarding the 2011 legislative  session:     Online on April 15.   Online on May 13.   Live in Austin on June  27.   Please go to www.tml.org and  click on “Training.”     Town Council 159 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 2   of the amount a city is able to collect on a traffic violation, the state gets $82 before the city gets any fine money. “In a state with about 15 million licensed drivers, there are more than six million traffic tickets issued each year. The state is making minor traffic infractions unaffordable for many drivers and uncollectable for cities,” Sandlin said. The Legislative Budget Board estimates that if S.B. 726 passes, only 65 percent of traffic fines will be paid. Some cities have seen collection rates drop below 50-percent as states fees have soared. “When someone gets a $250 ticket for not signaling a turn, it isn’t about crime and punishment; it’s about taxation without accountability. Legislators don’t want people to know they are raising taxes so they make cities collect it for them,” Sandlin said. “It’s time for legislators to draw the line on these out of control fees and oppose any further increases in this state money grab.” One of the legislators mentioned in the above release was highly displeased with it, and he issued a “counter” press release. The legislator claimed to respond to “the misleading statements” made by the Texas Municipal League: In a statement released by TML yesterday, the organization stated that if signed into law, S.B. 726 will add a $10 fee to every traffic fine collected by cities. In fact, the fee only applies to those convicted of a traffic violation, which are generally classified as Class C level misdemeanor offenses. Pedestrian and parking violations will be exempt. The revenue, which is expected to generate about $77.5 million for the 2012-2013 biennium, will be used for indigent defense, which is constitutionally mandated as a part of the Fair Defense Act passed in 2001, as well as for legal aid services. For TML to disregard the needs of veterans, victims of domestic abuse, and senior citizens is inexcusable…The Judicial Access and Improvement Account isn't paying for some new program or an expansion of government as they convey, it is providing much needed revenue for indigent defense, which is required by the constitution. Nothing in the League’s press release appeared misleading. In fact, League staff strives to ensure that anything we print is accurate. Much of the League’s effort is spent opposing legislation that would be detrimental to cities, and that makes some legislators unhappy. But the membership has, pursuant to a comprehensive legislative policy development process, directed League staff to do just that. The allegation that the League is disregarding the needs of veterans, victims of domestic abuse, and senior citizens, is disingenuous and patently false. As a matter of fact, we wholeheartedly believe that the Senator is doing a noble job of protecting those groups, and that there are many other worthy programs in need of funding. The issue is: how to pay for them? Town Council 160 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 3   Many city officials contend that state court costs adversely impact municipal courts in two ways. First, the state’s court costs are complicated to administer. While cities can keep a small percentage of the costs as an administrative fee, that amount is probably not sufficient to reimburse the cities for the bookkeeping and administrative problems connected with this function. More importantly, when setting an appropriate fine for an offense, a judge must consider the fact that the defendant will also be paying state court costs. As a result, municipal fine revenue is often much lower than it would otherwise be, because the judge has considered the state court costs when setting a defendant’s total fine. The bottom line is that cities can’t raise court fines fast enough to satisfy the state’s ever-growing appetite for revenue, while simultaneously maintaining the amount retained by cities. (Editor’s note: Just before this edition went to print, S.B. 726 made it to the Senate floor with the bare minimum of necessary votes. Word is getting out, and city officials who are opposed to new court fees should notify their representative.) PROPOSALS EMERGE FOR FUNDING STATE WATER PLAN Recently proposed amendments to H.J.R. 138 by Ritter seek to fund the state water plan in part through “tap fees” (sometimes referred to as a “state tax on water”) to be levied on “municipal” (generally city and special district) water customers. What makes the H.J.R. 138 proposals different from past tap fee proposals is that, because it is a constitutional amendment, it may be implemented only after a statewide election of the citizens. Thus, rather than a fee imposed by the state legislature, the fee would be imposed on the state’s water users only with their consent. The fact that the tap fees could be implemented only with the voters’ consent does not resolve several important city objections to the fees: (1) the use of local city staff and infrastructure to collect fees for the state; (2) the redistribution of revenue collected in densely-populated urban areas to projects built all over the state; and (3) the fact that the tap fees are not levied on industrial or agricultural users, just municipal users. At a hearing on the proposals before the House Natural Resources Committee, some legislators seemed to suggested that cities should acquiesce to the tap fee proposal. That would seem to indicate that cities don’t sufficiently contribute to water infrastructure in the state. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. As city officials already know, cities are a vital part of the state’s water infrastructure and planning process, both through participation in planning as well as construction and maintenance of the infrastructure that supplies water to millions of Texans daily, both inside and outside of city limits. Among other contributions, cities assist the state as a whole with participation in regional water planning by constructing and maintaining thousands of miles of water and wastewater mains and other water supply infrastructure, and through the payment of millions of dollars annually in fees to help fund the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Town Council 161 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 4   The League will continue to work with the author of H.J.R. 138 to ensure that municipal interests are protected. FIREFIGHTER CERTIFICATION FEES The Texas Commission on Fire Protection has issued proposed rules that would increase firefighter certification and other fees in order for the commission to become “self-funded.” The rules would raise initial certification fees, renewal fees, test application fees, and late renewal fees. Some fees will increase more than 200 percent. The commission held an emergency meeting on this issue in March. The League filed comments at that time. For more information on the rules, go to http://www.tcfp.state.tx.us/calendar/archive/2011/comm0311_notebook_Item_2.pdf. Comments on the proposed rules are being accepted through April 24, 2011, and can be sent to Gary L. Warren, Sr., Executive Director, Texas Commission on Fire Protection, P.O. Box 2286, Austin, Texas 78768-2286 or e-mailed to info@tcfp.state.tx.us.     TWO FEDERAL AGENCIES ISSUE NEW ADA RULES The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulates two main areas of city action: employment and construction of facilities. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is responsible for the ADA construction of facilities rules. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for regulations dealing with employment of individuals with disabilities. The DOJ issued revised regulations on accessibility in facility construction that went into effect on March 15. According to the DOJ press release, “the new rules adopt the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, which have been retooled to be more user-friendly for building code officials, builders, and architects, and have been harmonized with state and local accessibility codes.” The 2010 standards also include – for the first time – standards on making swimming pools, parks, golf courses, boating facilities, exercise clubs, and other recreation facilities accessible for individuals with disabilities. Cities covered by the ADA have until March 15, 2012, to comply with the 2010 Standards. In addition, the amended regulations contain many new or expanded provisions on general nondiscrimination policies. The compliance date for the all the new nondiscrimination provisions is March 15, 2011. For additional information, see http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/March/11-crt-324.html. To view the 2010 ADA Standards, go to: http://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards_index.htm. On March 24, the EEOC issued final revised regulations implementing the 2008 Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act (ADAAA). The ADAAA went into effect in January 2009, and the proposed EEOC implementing rules were reported in the September 30, 2009, edition of the Legislative Update (http://www.tml.org/leg_updates/legis_update093009l_ada.asp). The final Town Council 162 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 5   regulations reflect the comments received by the EEOC. The final regulations: (1) keep the ADA’s definition of the term “disability,” but outline a list of principles to guide the determination of whether a person has a disability; (2) clarify that the term “major life activities” includes “major bodily functions”; and (3) make it easier for individuals to establish coverage under the “regarded as” part of the definition of “disability.” As with the ADAAA itself, the main issue now is not whether an employee is disabled, but whether the employer and employee are successful in working with the disability and making reasonable accommodations, if possible. The EEOC has prepared two “question-and-answer” documents about the regulations to aid the public and employers on the new regulations, available on the EEOC Web site at http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/adaaa_info.cfm. To view the EEOC press release on the final regulations, go to http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/3-24-11.cfm. FCC TO REVIEW MUNICIPAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AUTHORITY The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) examining rights of way issues (http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0407/FCC-11-51A1.pdf) and how the agency “can work with its state, local, tribal, and federal partners to improve policies for access to rights of way and for wireless facility siting.” Specifically, the NOI seeks information and data regarding challenges, best practices, and educational efforts to help the FCC accurately determine the need for policy and rules surrounding broadband deployment. Similar NOIs in the past relating to cable franchising have resulted in curtailment of municipal authority. League staff – in cooperation with the National League of Cities, the Texas Coalition of Cities for Utility Issues, and others – will monitor and participate as necessary to protect municipal interests. SIGNIFICANT COMMITTEE ACTIONS H.B. 257 (Hilderbran), Relating to the periods for presumed abandonment of certain unclaimed personal property. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. As reported, the bill would modify the time in which a utility deposit becomes abandoned property. H.B. 342 (Fletcher), Relating to the reinstatement of a firefighter or police officer following a decision rendered by the Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’ Civil Service Commission or an independent third party hearing examiner. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. Town Council 163 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 6   H.B. 343 (Fletcher), Relating to the reporting and recording of a motor vehicle accident involving an official vehicle driven by a peace officer, firefighter, or an emergency medical services employee in the course of official duties. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. H.B. 348 (Walle), Relating to education and training for school district peace officers, school resource officers, and school security personnel employed by a school district. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. As reported, the bill would provide that a peace officer may not serve as a school district peace officer for more than a certain number of days unless the peace officer has completed additional education and training program approved by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. H.B. 360 (J. Jackson), Relating to ballot language for a proposition to approve the imposition or increase of a tax or the issuance of bonds. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. H.B. 469 (Callegari), Relating to the calculation of ad valorem taxes on the residence homestead of a 100 percent or totally disabled veteran for the tax year in which the veteran qualifies or ceases to qualify for an exemption from taxation of the homestead. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. (Companion bill is S.B. 201 by Uresti.) H.B. 470 (C. Anderson), Relating to the addition of Salvia divinorum and its derivatives and extracts to Penalty Group 3 of the Texas Controlled Substances Act. Reported from the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. H.B. 564 (Craddick), Relating to inspection of portable fire extinguishers in government-owned vehicles in certain local governmental jurisdictions. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. As reported, the bill would provide that a local government that adopts an ordinance, order, or policy requiring motor vehicles owned by the local government to be equipped with portable fire extinguishers shall require maintenance to be performed on the portable fire extinguishers annually in accordance with standards that are at least as stringent as the National Fire Protection Association Standard Number 10 - Portable Fire Extinguishers. H.B. 611 (Murphy), Relating to the provision of certain professional services by certain governmental entities. Reported from the House Committee on Government Efficiency and Reform. (Companion bill is S.B. 829 by D. Patrick.) H.B. 782 (Y. Davis), Relating to a requirement that certain bond issuers obtain an appraisal of property that is to be purchased with bond proceeds. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. H.B. 887 (Geren), Relating to registration of a motor vehicle alleged to have been involved in a violation detected by a photographic traffic signal enforcement system. Reported from the House Committee on Transportation. H.B. 896 (C. Howard), Relating to auxiliary members of an appraisal review board. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. Town Council 164 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 7   H.B. 956 (Marquez), Relating to the state fire marshal’s investigation of the death of a firefighter who dies in the line of duty or in connection with an on-duty incident. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 396 by Deuell.) H.B. 966 (Murphy), Relating to the consideration of pension and other postemployment benefits in establishing the rates of a gas utility. Reported from the House Committee on State Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 403 by Eltife.) H.B. 1083 (Elkins), Relating to the issuance of an identification card to certain honorably retired peace officers. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. H.B. 1089 (Martinez Fischer), Relating to the authority of a county or municipality to require the removal of graffiti by a property owner. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (This is a TML priority bill.)(Companion bill is H.B. 1425 by Garza.) H.B. 1137 (Darby), Relating to the transmission of records regarding over-the-counter sales of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and norpseudoephedrine and a person's civil liability for certain acts arising from the sale of those products. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. (Companion bill is S.B. 913 by Estes.) H.B. 1147 (W. Smith), Relating to notice by a governmental entity regarding certain geospatial data products. Reported from the House Committee on Technology. H.B. 1168 (D. Miller), Relating to smoke alarms and fire extinguishers in residential rental units. Reported from the House Committee on Business and Industry. As reported, the bill would make several changes to the law regarding smoke alarms and fire extinguishers in residential rental units, including that: (1) a local ordinance could not require that a smoke alarm powered by alternating current, rather than battery, be installed in a dwelling unit built before September 1, 1987, unless: (a) the interior of the unit is repaired, remodeled, or rebuilt at a projected cost of more than $5,000, the work requires a building permit, and the work results in the removal of interior walls or ceiling finishes exposing the structure or the interior of the unit provides access for wiring through an attic, crawl space, or basement; or (b) an addition occurs to the unit at a projected cost of more than $5,000; and (2) if a dwelling unit was occupied as a residence before September 1, 2011, or a certificate of occupancy was issued before that date, a smoke alarm may be powered by battery if installed in the appropriate manner. H.B. 1547, (Larson), would change the way desired future conditions for the groundwater resources in a groundwater management area are established, including changes to the way available groundwater in an aquifer is defined and calculated. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. H.B. 1559 (S. Davis), Relating to a prohibition on the destruction of certain court documents. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. H.B. 1595 (Isaac), Relating to regulation and enforcement of laws affecting sport shooting ranges. Reported from the House Committee on House Culture, Recreation. and Tourism. As reported, the bill would: (1) prohibit a governmental unit, including a city, from bringing suit Town Council 165 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 8   against a sport shooting range for the lawful discharge of firearms on the sport shooting range; (2) prohibit a city from regulating the discharge of a firearm at a sport shooting range; and (3) allow a city to enforce an ordinance or regulation through injunctive relief against a sport shooting range under certain circumstances. (Companion bill is S.B. 766 by Estes.) H.B. 1649 (Marquez), Relating to the enforcement of building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county. Reported from the House Committee on County Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 861 by Rodriguez.) H.B. 1711 (J. Davis), Relating to disaster remediation contracts. Reported from the House Committee on Economic and Small Business Development. H.B. 1933 (W. Smith), Relating to the regulation of metal recycling entities. Reported from the House Committee on House Environmental Regulation. H.B. 1979 (Laubenberg), Relating to strategic partnerships for the continuation of certain water districts annexed by a municipality. Reported from the House Committee on House Natural Resources. (Companion bill is S.B. 1082 by Hegar.) H.B. 2112 (Price), Relating to priority groundwater management areas. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. (Companion bill is S.B. 313 by Seliger.) H.B. 2468 (Phillips), Relating to providing a patron of a pay-to-park or valet parking service with certain information. Reported from the House Committee on Business and Industry. H.B. 2551 (Chisum), Relating to the land application of grit trap waste. Reported from the House Committee on Environmental Regulation. H.B. 2619 (Callegari), Relating to the submission of information about critical water and wastewater facilities. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. As reported, the bill would provide that: (1) each water and wastewater utility, including a municipally owned utility, shall annually submit certain infrastructure information to each retail electric provider that sells electric power to the utility, each electric utility that provides transmission and distribution service to the utility, the office of emergency management of each county in which the utility has water and wastewater facilities that qualify for critical load status under rules adopted by the Public Utility Commission (PUC), and to the PUC and the division of emergency management of the governor; and (2) if an electric utility determines that a water or wastewater utility’s facilities do not qualify for critical load status, the electric utility and the retail electric provider shall provide a detailed explanation of the electric utility’s determination to the affected utility and to the office of emergency management of the county in which the water and wastewater facilities are located. H.B. 2663 (Chisum), Relating to the effect of rules and standards adopted by the Railroad Commission of Texas relating to the liquefied petroleum gas industry on ordinances, orders, or rules adopted by political subdivisions relating to that industry. Reported from the House Committee on Energy Resources. Town Council 166 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 9   H.B. 2817 (L. Taylor), Relating to certain election practices and procedures. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. (Companion bill is S.B. 849 by Duncan) H.B. 2826 (Murphy), Relating to the issuance of a certificate for a municipal setting designation. Reported from the House Committee on Environmental Regulation. H.B. 2853 (J. Davis), Relating to tax increment financing. Reported from the House Committee on Economic and Small Business Development. H.B. 2973 (Hunter), Relating to encouraging public participation by citizens by protecting a person's right to petition, right of free speech, and right of association from meritless lawsuits arising from actions taken in furtherance of those rights. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. As reported, the bill would attempt to curtail Strategic lawsuits against public participation (sometimes referred to as SLAPP lawsuits). (Companion bill is S.B. 1565 by Ellis.) H.B. 2989 (Deshotel), Relating to establishing the Workplace Fraud Prevention Act. Reported from the House Committee on Business and Industry. H.B. 3487 (V. Taylor), Relating to regulations concerning certain service animals. Reported from the House Committee on Business and Industry. H.B. 3510 (Hamilton), Relating to the regulation of the towing, booting, and storage of vehicles. As reported, the bill would: (1) define an “incident management tow” to include the removal of a vehicle, cargo, and debris from an accident or incident scene; (2) define a “parking facility” to include certain lots or areas that charge a fee for parking; (3) allow the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation (Commission) to adopt different rules for two trucks, towing operators, towing companies, booting companies, and boot operators; (4) require the Commission to adopt requirements for a consent tow, private property tow, and incident management tow; (5) delete certain provisions related to alcohol testing of towing operators; (6) impose certain requirements regarding the renewal of a license under Occupations Code Chapter 2308 relating to towing and booting; (7) limit the fee charged for a private property tow and service related to a private property tow to that established under Chapter 2308 or authorized by a political subdivision; (8) provide that a homeowner or tenant under a written lease agreement who does not charge for parking may authorize the removal of an unauthorized vehicle that is blocking entry to or exit from a home or driveway; (9) provide that a boot operator may boot certain unauthorized vehicles in rural areas if the parking facility owner requests the boot or has a standing agreement with the boot operator; (10) require a vehicle storage facility accepting a vehicle that is towed (except for an incident management tow requested by a law enforcement agency) to report the tow and certain other information to the police or sheriff, as applicable, within two hours of receiving the vehicle; (11) require certain signage before the towing or booting of vehicles under certain circumstances; (12) provide, in regard to hearings under Chapter 2308 that: (a) court costs and attorneys fees may be recovered in some instances; (b) a justice court has jurisdiction over a hearing in the precinct in which the vehicle storage facility is located; and (c) the failure of a party to participate in a hearing constitutes waiver of the right to appeal; (13) provide that a failure to comply with certain permitting, licensing, and fee requirements is enforceable by law Town Council 167 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 10   enforcement; and (14) repeal certain provisions related to the fees for private property tows, the filing of reports/schedules, attorney’s fees. (Companion bill is S.B. 1371 by Carona.) H.B. 3823 (Thompson), Relating to the regulation of certain telecommunicators. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. H.J.R. 56 (Solomons), Relating to proposing a constitutional amendment to restrict the power of the legislature to mandate requirements upon certain local governments. Reported from the House Committee on State Affairs. As reported, the bill would provide that a local government is required to establish, expand, or modify a duty or activity that requires the expenditure of revenue by the local government is not effective unless the legislature appropriates or otherwise provides, from a source other than the revenue of the local government, for the payment or reimbursement of the costs incurred for the biennium by the local government in complying with the requirement. S.B. 100 (Van de Putte), Relating to the adoption of voting procedures necessary to implement the federal Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act. Reported from the Senate State Affairs Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 111 by V. Taylor.) S.B. 309 (Harris), Relating to the events eligible to receive funding through a major events trust fund. Reported from the House Committee on Economic and Small Business Development. (Companion bill is H.B. 735 by D. Patrick.) S.B. 313 (Seliger), Relating to priority groundwater management areas. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. S.B. 350 (Williams), Relating to the restructuring of fund obligations and accounts of the Texas Municipal Retirement System and related actuarial and accounting procedures. Reported from the House Committee on Pensions and Investments. (Companion bill is H.B. 997 by Truitt.) S.B. 370 (Seliger), Relating to the authority of the Texas Water Development Board to provide financial assistance for certain projects if the applicant has failed to complete a request for information relevant to the project. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. (Companion bill is H.B. 1734 by Ritter.) S.B. 375 (Wentworth), Relating to categories of information presumed to be public under the public information law. Reported from the Senate Select Committee on Open Government. As reported, the bill: (1) provides that certain types of information are expressly public unless they are made confidential under the Public Information Act or other law; and (2) clarifies that certain provisions of the Public Information Act provide for confidentiality of certain types of information. (Companion bill is H.B. 1044 by Solomons.) S.B. 602 (Rodriguez), Relating to allowing a governmental body to redact certain personal information under the public information law without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general and the calculation of certain deadlines. Reported from the Senate Select Committee on Open Government. As reported, the bill would: (1) authorize a governmental body to redact certain motor vehicle record information without the necessity of requesting a Town Council 168 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 11   decision from the attorney general; (2) authorize a governmental body to redact a credit card, debit card, charge card, or access device number without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general; (3) give a requestor the right to seek a decision from the attorney general if information is redacted as described in (1) or (2), above; (4) require a governmental body that redacts information as described in (1) or (2), above, to provide the requestor with a description of the redacted information, a citation to the statute that authorizes the governmental body to redact the information, and instructions regarding how the requestor may seek a decision from the attorney general regarding whether the redacted information is excepted from disclosure; (5) make a public information request that is modified in response to the requirement of a deposit or bond a separate request that is considered received on the date the governmental body receives the modified request; and (6) provide that if a governmental body receives a written request by mail and cannot establish the actual date of receipt, the written request is considered to be received on the third business day after the date of the postmark. (Companion bill is H.B. 1671 by Marquez.) S.B. 661 (Nichols), Relating to the continuation of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and the Public Utility Commission of Texas and to the transfer of functions from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Reported from the Senate Committee on Government Organization. S.B. 726 (Rodriguez), Relating to the establishment of the judicial access and improvement account to provide funding for basic civil legal services, indigent defense, and judicial technical support through certain county service fees and court costs. Reported from the Senate Finance Committee. (Please see article elsewhere in this edition.) S.B. 913 (Estes), Relating to the transmission of records regarding over-the-counter sales of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and norpseudoephedrine and a person's civil liability for certain acts arising from the sale of those products. Reported from the Senate Criminal Justice Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 1137 by Darby.) S.B. 924 (Carona), Relating to energy efficiency reports by municipally owned utilities and electric cooperatives. Reported from the Senate Business and Commerce Committee. S.B. 943 (Carona), Relating to the classification and use of energy storage equipment or facilities and the provision of studies and reports regarding energy storage equipment or those facilities. Reported from the Senate Business and Commerce Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 1421 by Anchia.) S.B. 1134 (Hegar), Relating to air permitting requirements for certain oil and gas facilities. Reported from the Senate Natural Resources Committee. As reported, the bill would: (1) require the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to perform certain environmental and air quality analyses before adopting a new permit or amending an existing permit relating to certain oil and gas facilities; (2) authorize the TCEQ to authorize planned maintenance, startup, or shutdown activities from certain oil and gas facilities; (3) allow the application of certain affirmative defenses under TCEQ rules to certain unauthorized emission or opacity events from a planned maintenance, start-up, or shutdown activity; and (4) authorize the TCEQ to amend a permit that has been adopted by the TCEQ before this bill takes effect to require that the permit Town Council 169 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 12   holder to provide certain information about the authorized facility to the TCEQ and require a facility handling sour gas to be a minimum distance from a recreational area or residence, in most cases. S.B. 1217 (Estes), Relating to an excavator's duty to notify a notification center before excavating. Reported from the Senate Business and Commerce Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 263 by Hilderbran.) S.B. 1258 (Duncan), Relating to the disposal of demolition waste from abandoned or nuisance buildings in certain areas. Reported from the Senate Natural Resources Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 2013 by Hardcastle.) S.B. 1269 (Wentworth), Relating to honorariums offered to and accepted by public servants. Reported from the Senate Select Committee on Open Government. As reported, the bill would: (1) remove an honorarium consisting of transportation, lodging, and meals from the definition of a “political contribution,” and (2) would create an exemption for honoraria consisting of transportation, lodging, and meals from the offenses relating to offering gifts to public servants and accepting gifts by public servants. (Companion bill is H.B. 2629 by Branch.) S.B. 1341 (Seliger), Relating to the participation by a taxing unit in a suit to compel an appraisal review board to order a change in an appraisal roll. Reported from the Senate Intergovernmental Relations Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 1435 by Elkins.) S.B. 1363 (Lucio), Relating to authorizing certain counties and municipalities to regulate land development. Reported from the Senate International Relations and Trade Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 3114 by V. Gonzales.) S.B. 1420 (Hinojosa), Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Department of Transportation. Reported from the Senate Government Organization Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 2675 by Harper-Brown.) S.B. 1442 (Shapiro), Relating to the application requirements for a local project permit. Reported from the Senate Select Committee on Open Government. As reported, the bill would provide that rights to which a permit applicant is entitled under Chapter 245 of the Local Government Code (the “permit vesting” statute) accrue on the filing of a required original application or plan for development or plat application that gives the regulatory agency fair notice that is sufficient to enable a reasonably prudent person to understand the project and the nature of the permit sought. (Companion bill is H.B. 2732 by Oliveira.) S.B. 1494 (Uresti), Relating to reporting to the Texas Judicial Council the election or appointment of certain municipal officers. Reported from the Senate Jurisprudence Committee. S.B. 1638 (W. Davis), Relating to the exception of certain personal information from required disclosure under the public information law. Reported from the Senate Select Committee on Open Government. Town Council 170 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 13   S.B. 1676 (Ellis), Relating to educational and training requirements for certain peace officers on ethical decision making. Reported from the Senate Criminal Justice Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 2823 by Coleman.) S.B. 1692 (Lucio), Relating to municipal and county budgets on the Internet. Reported from the Senate Select Committee on Open Government. S.B. 1741 (Fraser), Relating to tree mitigation fees imposed by municipalities. Reported from the Senate Natural Resources Committee. S.B. 1752 (Uresti), Relating to confidentiality of Class C misdemeanor records related to the conviction of a child. Reported from the Senate Jurisprudence Committee. S.J.R. 40 (Lucio), Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing a county to regulate land development if approved by a majority vote in a countywide election. Reported from the Senate International Relations and Trade Committee. (Companion bill is H.J.R. 134 by Oliveira.) SIGNIFICANT FLOOR ACTIONS H.B. 11 (Cook), Relating to reports filed with the comptroller regarding certain alcoholic beverage sales. Passed the House. H.B. 27 (Guillen), Relating to the payment of fines and costs by indigent defendants in misdemeanor cases. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would: (1) require that a municipal court judge who determines that the defendant cannot pay the imposed fine and costs allow the defendant to either pay the fine and costs in installments or perform community service to discharge all or part of the fine or costs; and (2) authorize a municipal court judge who makes a written determination at a hearing that an indigent defendant has failed to make a good faith effort to discharge the fines and costs either through installments or community service to order the defendant confined in jail until discharged by law. H.B. 125 (Legler), Relating to the inclusion of a draft impact analysis in the notice of rules proposed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Passed the House. (This is a TML priority bill.) H.B. 243 (Craddick), Relating to the creation of an offense for certain uses of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would: (1) prohibit the operator of a motor vehicle from using a wireless communication device to write or send a text-based communication while operating the vehicle unless the vehicle is stopped; and (2) define “text-based communication” to include a text message, instant message, and electronic mail, and would exclude a communication that is voice-activated and displayed in a manner that allows the driver to view the material on the dashboard or above the steering wheel. (Companion bill is S.B. 46 by Zaffirini.) Town Council 171 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 14   H.B. 289 (Jackson), Relating to activity that constitutes maintaining a common nuisance. Passed the House (Companion bill is S.B. 195 by Nelson.) H.B. 443 (Fletcher), Relating to the amount of the fee paid by a defendant for a peace officer’s services in executing or processing an arrest warrant, capias, or capias pro fine. Passed the House. H.B. 563 (Pickett), Relating to the purposes and designation of a transportation reinvestment zone. Passed the House. H.B. 571 (Huberty), Relating to the regulation of certain aggregate production operations by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Passed the House. H.B. 679 (Button), Relating to change order approval requirements for certain political subdivisions of the state. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1558 by Carona.) H.B. 690 (Martinez Fischer), Relating to the punishment for the offense of graffiti. Passed the House. H.B. 965 (Callegari), Relating to continuing education requirements for persons holding licenses issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Passed the House. H.B. 1376 (Bohac), Relating to the definition of a junked vehicle for purposes of abatement of a public nuisance. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would provide that “junked vehicle” means a vehicle that is self-propelled and displays an expired license plate or invalid motor vehicle inspection certificate or does not display a license plate or motor vehicle inspection certificate and meets certain other criteria in current law. H.B. 1573 (Gallego), Relating to certain pretrial and post-trial procedures in a criminal case. H.B. 1869 (Giddings), Relating to local governments that may consider a bidder's principal place of business when awarding a contract. Passed the House. H.B. 2690 (Deshotel), Relating to authorizing local governments to convey real property interests to other local governments for less than fair market value. S.B. 18 (Estes), Relating to the use of eminent domain authority. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would, among other things: 1. provide that a governmental or private entity may not take private property through the use of eminent domain if the taking is not for a “public use.” 2. provide that a city may exercise the right of eminent domain only for a public use to acquire public or private property, whether located inside or outside the municipality, for any of an enumerated list of uses in current law, including providing, enlarging, or improving of a only municipally owned city hall or other project. Town Council 172 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 15   3. require a record vote with specific procedures and wording to take each parcel of land through the use of eminent domain. 4. require a governmental entity to provide certain documents relating to the condemnation process in English, and if requested by the property owner, in a language used for providing voter materials for a county election in the county in which the property is located as required by the Voting Rights Act. 5. require that any entity authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain must submit to the state comptroller, by December 31, 2012, a letter stating that the entity is authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain and identifying the provision or provisions of law that grant the entity that authority, and would provide that the entity’s authority to use eminent domain will be suspended if the letter is not sent by the deadline and remain suspended until the entity submits the letter. 6. provide that a property owner may, within three days, rescind a voluntary purchase agreement with an entity that has eminent domain authority, unless the property owner is represented by an attorney. 7. provide that, before making a final offer, the condemning entity must obtain a written appraisal from an independent and certified appraiser not employed by the entity of the value of the property being acquired, and the damages, if any, to any of the property owner’s remaining property. 8. provide, among other things, that an entity with eminent domain authority that wants to acquire real property shall disclose to the property owner any and all appraisal reports produced or acquired by the entity relating specifically to the owner’s property and prepared in the ten years preceding the offer. 9. provide that: (1) an entity seeking to acquire property may not include a confidentiality provision in an offer or agreement to acquire the property; and (2) the entity shall inform the owner of the property that the owner has the right to: (a) discuss any offer or agreement regarding the entity’s acquisition of the property with others; or (b) keep the offer or agreement confidential (subject to the requirements of the Texas Public Information Act). 10. require an entity with eminent domain authority that wants to acquire real property for a public use to make a bona fide offer to acquire the property from the property owner voluntarily, and list specific criteria that must be met to meet the bona fide offer requirement. 11. provide that a court that determines that a condemnor did not make a bona fide offer to acquire the property from the property owner voluntarily must abate the suit, order the condemnor to make a bona fide offer, and order the condemnor to pay costs and attorneys’ and other professionals’ fees. 12. provide that a condemnation petition must state with specificity the public use for which the entity intends to acquire the property and that the city made a bona fide offer to acquire the property voluntarily. 13. provide, among other things, that each party has a reasonable period to strike one of the three special commissioners appointed by the judge in the case, with the judge appointing a replacement. 14. provide that the special commissioners shall consider an injury or benefit that is peculiar to the property owner and that relates to the property owner’s ownership, use, or enjoyment of the particular parcel of real property, including a material impairment of Town Council 173 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 16   direct access on or off the remaining property that affects the market value of the remaining property, but they may not consider an injury or benefit that the property owner experiences in common with the general community, including circuity of travel and diversion of traffic. 15. if the special commissioners or a court awards damages in a condemnation proceeding in an amount that is greater than 110 percent of the amount of damages the condemnor offered in a final written offer in conformance with the bill, the commissioners or the court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and other professional fees to the property owner in addition to costs. 16. require a city, as a cost of acquiring real property, to: (a) provide a relocation advisory service for an individual, a family, a business concern, a farming or ranching operation, or a nonprofit organization that is compatible with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act; and (b) pay moving expenses and rental supplements, make relocation payments, provide financial assistance to acquire replacement housing, and compensate for expenses incidental to the transfer of the property if an individual, a family, the personal property of a business, a farming or ranching operation, or a nonprofit organization is displaced in connection with the acquisition. 17. provide that an entity that is not subject to the Public Information Act, such a gas pipeline operator, must disclose certain information relating to its use of eminent domain upon request. 18. modify the current provisions that allow a property owner to repurchase the property if it isn’t used by the condemnor within ten years of the date of acquisition by providing that: A. an entity with eminent domain authority shall disclose in writing to the property owner, at the time of acquisition of the property through eminent domain, that: (a) the owner or the owner’s heirs, successors, or assigns may be entitled to: (i) repurchase the property; or (ii) request from the entity certain information relating to the use of the property and any actual progress made toward that use; and (b) the repurchase price is the price paid to the owner by the entity at the time the entity acquired the property through eminent domain or the fair market value of the property at the time the property owner becomes entitled to repurchase the property, whichever is less. B. a person from whom a real property interest is acquired by an entity through eminent domain for a public use, or that person's heirs, successors, or assigns, is entitled to repurchase the property as provided by this subchapter if: (a) the public use for which the property was acquired through eminent domain is canceled before the property is used for that public use; (b) no actual progress is made toward the public use for which the property was acquired between the date of acquisition and the 10th anniversary of that date; (c) the property becomes unnecessary for the public use for which the property was acquired, or a substantially similar public use, before the 10th anniversary of the date of acquisition; or (d) the initial use of the property is not the public use for which the property was acquired. C. not later than the 180th day after the date that the former property owner is entitled to repurchase the property, the entity shall send by certified mail, return Town Council 174 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 17   receipt requested, to the property owner or the owner's heirs, successors, or assigns a notice containing – among other things – an identification of the public use for which the property had been acquired, a statement that the person has a right to repurchase the property under the bill, and an explanation of the reason under the bill the person has acquired the right to repurchase the property. D. a property owner or the owner's heirs, successors, or assigns may request that the condemning entity make a determination – presumably at any time – and provide a statement and other relevant information regarding: (a) whether the public use for which the property was acquired was canceled before the property was used for the public use; (b) whether any actual progress was made toward the public use between the date of acquisition and the 10th anniversary of that date, including an itemized description of the progress made, if applicable; (c) whether the property became unnecessary for the public use, or a substantially similar public use, before the 10th anniversary of the date of acquisition; and (d) whether the initial use of the property was the public use for which the property was acquired. E. as soon as practicable after receipt of a notice of intent to repurchase, the entity shall offer to sell the property interest to the person for the price paid to the owner by the entity at the time the entity acquired the property through eminent domain or the fair market value of the property at the time the property owner becomes entitled to repurchase the property, whichever is less. 19. provide that a city council may adopt a development plan for a public use project at a public hearing to toll the 10-year right to repurchase if certain criteria are met. 20. modify the standard for determination of the fair value of the state’s interest in access rights to a highway right-of-way to be the same legal standard that is applied by the Texas Transportation Commission according to the Texas Transportation Code, which may include the impairment of highway access to or from real property where the real property adjoins the highway. 21. with regard to permissible roads built over an easement for an oil and gas pipeline, provide that the property owner and easement owner may agree to any terms related to the road that they wish. S.B. 160 (Williams), Relating to the regulation of certain aggregate production operations by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Passed the Senate. S.B. 201 (Uresti), Relating to the calculation of ad valorem taxes on the residence homestead of a 100 percent or totally disabled veteran for the tax year in which the veteran qualifies or ceases to qualify for an exemption from taxation. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 469 by Callegari.) S.B. 315 (Carona), Relating to the agencies and entities responsible for compiling and maintaining information pertaining to criminal combinations and criminal street gangs. Passed the Senate. Town Council 175 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 18   S.B. 326 (Duncan), Relating to the exemption from ad valorem taxation of certain tangible personal property stored temporarily at a location in this state. Passed the Senate. S.B. 403 (Eltife), Relating to the consideration of pension and other postemployment benefits in establishing the rates of a gas utility. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 966 by Murphy.) S.B. 432 (M. Jackson), Relating to the penalty for failure to make a timely installment payment of ad valorem taxes on property in a disaster area. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 803 by Bonnen.) S.B. 442 (Wentworth), Relating to notice by a governmental entity regarding certain geospatial data products. Passed the Senate. S.B. 449 (Watson), Relating to the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of open-space land devoted to water stewardship purposes on the basis of its productive capacity. Passed the Senate. S.B. 551 (Williams), Relating to liability for interest on ad valorem taxes on improvements that escaped taxation in a previous year. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 234 by Otto.) S.B. 694 (West), Relating to the regulation of metal recycling entities. Passed the Senate. S.B. 758 (Deuell), Relating to sales and use tax information provided to certain local governmental entities. Passed the Senate. S.B. 893 (Whitmire), Relating to motor fuel quality and testing. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2335 by Hardcastle.) S.B. 898 (Carona), Relating to energy efficiency programs in institutions of higher education and certain governmental entities. Passed the Senate. S.B. 904 (Patrick), Relating to the eligibility of certain overseas voters to receive a full ballot. Passed the Senate. (Companion bills are H.B. 1697 by P. King and H.B. 1773 by L. Taylor.) S.B. 937 (Lucio), Relating to priorities for restoration of electric service following an extended power outage. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 3126 by Naishtat.) S.B. 980 (Carona), Relating to communications services and markets. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2620 by Hancock.) S.B. 1097 (Eltife), Relating to single certification in incorporated or annexed areas served by water or sewer utilities. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2128 by Geren.) S.B. 1518 (Eltife), Relating to the powers and duties of the Texas Historical Commission. Passed the Senate. Town Council 176 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 19   S.B. 1612 (Ogden), Relating to the monitoring, oversight, and funding of certain public retirement systems. Passed the Senate. As passed, the bill would: (1) repeal the law that allows a city to issue obligations to fund its retirement benefits; and (2) allow the pension review board to require TMRS or other public retirement systems to complete an actuarial experience study every five years. Reported from Senate State Affairs and recommended for local/uncontested calendar. S.B. 1613 (Ogden), Relating to public meetings and information disclosure exemptions for public power utilities. Passed the Senate. As passed, the bill would: (1) repeal the current definition of “competitive matter” relating to public power utilities; (2) define a “competitive matter,” which can be deliberated by a public power utility in a closed meeting and is not generally subject to public disclosure, as a matter reasonably related to: (a) generation unit specific and portfolio fixed and variable costs, capital improvement plans for generation units, and generation unit operating characteristics and outage scheduling; (b) bidding and pricing information for purchased power, generation and fuel, and Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) bids, prices, offers, and related services and strategies; (c) effective fuel and purchased power agreements and fuel transportation arrangements and contracts; (d) risk management information, contracts, and strategies, including fuel hedging and storage; (e) plans, studies, proposals, and analyses for system improvements, additions, or sales, other than transmission and distribution system improvements inside the service area for which the public power utility is the sole certificated retail provider; and (f) customer billing, contract, and usage information, electric power pricing information, system load characteristics, and electric power marketing analyses and strategies; and (3) provide that a “competitive matter,” does not include, among other things: (a) any tariff of general applicability regarding rates and other matters; (b) salaries and total compensation of all employees of a public power utility; or (c) information publicly released by the ERCOT in accordance with a law, rule, or protocol generally applicable to similarly situated market participants. S.B. 1701 (Williams), Relating to procedures for and evidence that may be presented at a criminal asset forfeiture hearing and to the forfeiture of substitute assets under certain circumstances. Passed the Senate. As passed, the bill would: (1) authorize a court to order the forfeiture of substitute assets, that otherwise are not subject to forfeiture, if the court finds that property that was originally ordered forfeited: (a) cannot be located; (b) has been transferred, conveyed, sold to, or deposited with a third-party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or, (e) has been commingled with other property and cannot be separated without difficulty; and (2) provide that substitute assets described in (1), above, may not have a value greater than the value of the property originally ordered forfeited by the court. S.J.R. 16 (Estes), Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of open-space land devoted to water stewardship purposes on the basis of its productive capacity. Passed the Senate. Town Council 177 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 20   CITY OFFICIALS TESTIFY When the legislature is in session, nothing compares to the effectiveness of city officials testifying at the Capitol. City officials who take their time to travel to Austin to speak out on important city issues should be applauded by us all. Among the city officials who recently testified in front of legislative committees are the following:  Maher Maso, Mayor, Frisco  Steve Landin, Fire Chief, Laredo  Jessica Soloman, Police Department, Houston  Jonathan Newport, City Council, Houston  Jim Callaway, Sugarland  Rudy Garza, Corpus Christi  Dale Bernard, Police Department, Dallas  Paul LaSalle, Police Department, Houston  Jeff Nodal, Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Austin  Michael Embesi, Arborist, Austin  Patrick Welch, Police Department, Austin  Rusty Legg, Councilmember, Galveston  Keith Stretcher, City Attorney, Midland  T.C. Broadnax, Assistant City Manager, San Antonio  Clint Smith, South Padre Island  Sheryl Cole, Councilmember, Austin  Darrin Hall, Houston  Landon Stallings, Fire Chief, Fort Worth  Ronald Walker, Police Department, Houston  Patrick Welsh, Police Department, Dallas  Donald Baker, Police Department, Austin  Jennifer Richie, Irving  Jim Wilson, Councilmember, Benbrook While TML monitors most hearings, we won’t catch the testimony of every city official. If we missed your testimony or the testimony of another official in your city, please contact us at the following e-mail address, and we will include your name in the next edition of the TML Legislative Update: testify@tml.org. TML member cities may use the material herein for any purpose. No other person or entity may reproduce, duplicate, or distribute any part of this document without the written authorization of the Texas Municipal League. Town Council 178 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 1   April 22, 2011 Number 16 CITY/STATE CASH FLOW INDEX AS OF APRIL 2011: -$270,700,000 Beginning with this issue of the Legislative Update, League staff will calculate on a recurring basis the net yearly cash flow between Texas cities and the state. This cash flow index will be presented as a positive number if cities receive net income from the state. The index will be presented as a negative number if cities are net donors of money to the state. Currently, the cash flow index stands at a negative $270,700,000 or -$10.78 per capita. In other words, cities are net donors of funds to the state to the tune of over a quarter of a billion dollars per year. That is unusual: most states are net donors of money to their cities, not the other way around. Here’s a breakdown of the components of the index that are currently known to the League: Local parks grants: +$18,000,000 Mixed beverage tax: +$130,000,000 Library grants: +$15,000,000 Auto burglary grants: +$14,100,000 Homeless grants: +$10,000,000 Sales tax fee profit: -$51,800,000 TCEQ fees: -$41,000,000 State traffic ticket tax: -$235,000,000 TxDot Cash “Participation”: -$130,000,000 _____________ Total: -$270,700,000 DON’T MISS THE LEAGUE’S  2011 LEGISLATIVE  WORKSHOPS    The League is pleased to offer  live and online seminars  regarding the 2011 legislative  session:     Online on May 13.   Live in Austin on June  27.   Please go to www.tml.org and  click on “Training.”     Town Council 179 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 2   Why begin to calculate this figure now? There are at least two reasons. First, the proposed state budget, H.B. 1, would make sizeable cuts to what little funding Texas cities receive from the state, but would do nothing to decrease the flow of money from cities to the state. In fact, various court fee proposals would increase the flow of money from cities to the state. Combine this proposed increase with the proposed budget cuts, and the effect of the 2011 legislative session could be doubly bad for cities. Second, the League believes it will be useful to begin thinking of city/state relations in terms of one underlying dollar figure that captures the “big picture” of how we approach intergovernmental relations in Texas, and would make it easier to understand the effects of various legislation and proposals on that relationship. The bottom line is this: money to and from Texas cities is essentially fungible. If we “gain” $10 million in new homeless grants in a given session, but “lose” $50 million more in state traffic taxes during that same session, we were net losers overall. (Disclaimer: these figures are TML’s best estimate of cash flows that are readily measurable. The index will exclude cash flows that are impossible to accurately calculate. For example, cities donate an increasingly large amount of city-owned rights-of-way to TxDot as part of the cities’ “local participation.” Because a dollar figure cannot easily be put on those donations, the index will not include those amounts. The index will be adjusted as new cash flows are discovered.) FLOOR AMENDMENT TO S.B. 100 PRESERVES MAY UNIFORM ELECTION DATE IN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES   Last week, the Senate passed S.B. 100 by Senator Van de Putte. The bill would implement the federal Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act. The MOVE Act, which was passed by Congress in 2009, changes the way military and overseas voters register and vote in federal elections. The major change brought about by the MOVE Act is that federal ballots now must be transmitted to military and overseas voters at least 45 days before an election for federal office or any election held in conjunction with a federal election, including a primary and primary run-off election. Texas law currently does not allow for the transmission of ballots to military and overseas voters 45 days prior to the general primary election and primary runoff election in the spring of even-numbered years. The primary purpose of S.B. 100 is to adjust the dates of the general primary election and primary runoff election in order to bring Texas into compliance with the MOVE Act. S.B. 100, as passed, would retain the general primary date of the first Tuesday in March of an even-numbered year, while shifting the primary run-off to the fourth Tuesday in May of an even-numbered year in order to comply with the federal law. As highlighted in a recent Legislative Update article (http://www.tml.org/leg_updates/legis_update040811a_uniform_election_date.asp), the committee substitute that was voted out of the Senate Committee on State Affairs eliminated the May uniform election date in even-numbered years (the second Saturday in May). The reason provided for the elimination of the May election date in even-numbered years is that county elections officials would be unable to adequately prepare the electronic voting machines shared with or leased to cities, school Town Council 180 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 3   districts, and special districts on the May election date in even-numbered years because of the proximity to the new primary runoff election date. The practical effect of eliminating one May uniform date would be to move most city elections to the November uniform election date. An amendment was offered and accepted on the Senate floor which could preserve the May uniform date in even-numbered years for some cities. The amendment would expressly allow cities and other political subdivisions to continue to have the option of using the May uniform election date in even- numbered years. But the amendment also provides that a county elections administrator is not required to enter into a contract with a city to furnish election services on the May uniform election date in even-numbered years. What would the ultimate passage of S.B. 100 – in its current form – mean for Texas cities? If a city currently holds its elections in May, and contracts with the county to provide voting machines, the amendment still may not save the May uniform election date in even-numbered years. A county elections administrator who finds the task of reprogramming and calibrating electronic voting machines in the spring of even-numbered years too onerous may refuse to provide machines or otherwise assist with the city election on that date. Realistically, this means that many cities may still have to move their elections to the November date under the amended version of S.B. 100. There are a few different scenarios under which a city could still conduct an election in May of even- numbered years under the current version of the bill. If a city does not wish to contract with the county for election services, including electronic voting machines, the city could continue to use the May election date every year. Of course, this would mean that the city either must purchase electronic voting machines or enter into a contract with a voting system vendor to provide the machines. If a city wishes to continue to contract with the county for election services, the city election could be held in May of even-numbered years only if the county agrees to assist. Although the version of S.B. 100 that passed the Senate is by no means perfect, it at least gives some cities the ability to continue to hold their elections in May of even-numbered years. Cities that currently hold their elections in May and contract with the county for elections services should contact their county election officials to discuss the feasibility of continuing to use the May date in even-numbered years. The companion bill to S.B. 100, H.B. 111 by Van Taylor, has received a hearing in the House Committee on Defense and Veterans Affairs, but has not yet been voted out of committee. (In its current form, H.B. 111 would eliminate the May election date in even-numbered years.) We continue to urge city officials with concerns about S.B. 100 and H.B. 111 to contact their legislators as soon as possible. SIGNIFICANT COMMITTEE ACTIONS H.B. 241 (Parker), Relating to liability for interest if land appraised for ad valorem tax purposes as agricultural or open-space land is sold or diverted to a different use. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. Town Council 181 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 4   H.B. 257 (Hilderbran), Relating to the periods for presumed abandonment of certain unclaimed personal property. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. (Companion bill is H.B. 1764 by Harper-Brown.) H.B. 348 (Walle) Relating to education and training for certain school district peace officers and school resource officers employed by a school district. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. As reported would require: (1) a peace officer who serves as a school resource officer for more than 90 days to complete at least a 16-hour or longer education and training program; and (2) a peace officer who serves as a school district peace officer for more than 30 days to complete a 16- hour or longer education and training program. H.B. 528 (Solomons), Relating to the provision of pharmaceutical services through informal and voluntary networks in the workers' compensation system. Reported from the House Committee on State Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 318 by Van de Putte.) H.B. 777 (N. Gonzalez), Relating to court costs imposed on conviction and deposited to the courthouse security fund. Reported from the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. As reported, the bill would increase the amount a city may collect from a defendant under the municipal court building security fund from $3 to $8. H.B. 875 (C. Howard), Relating to the identification of certain defendants as foreign nationals who were not lawfully admitted to the United States or whose lawful status has expired and to their release on bail. Reported from the House Committee on State Affairs. H.B. 887 (Geren), Relating to registration of a motor vehicle alleged to have been involved in a violation detected by a photographic traffic signal enforcement system. Reported from the House Committee on Transportation. H.B. 956 (Marquez), Relating to the state fire marshal's investigation of the death of a firefighter who dies in the line of duty or in connection with an on-duty incident. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 396 by Deuell.) H.B. 1094 (Farias), Relating to the availability on the Internet of reports of political expenditures and contributions filed in connection with certain county and municipal offices. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. H.B. 1250 (Frullo), Relating to the use of facsimile signatures for certain documents involving certain municipalities. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 577 by Duncan.) H.B. 1283 (Craddick), Relating to consideration of a bidder’s principal place of business in awarding certain municipal contracts. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 640 by Seliger.) H.B. 1354 (S. Davis), Relating to liability of certain certified municipal inspectors for services rendered during an emergency or disaster. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. H.B. 1388 (Hopson), Relating to the prohibition of certain regulations by a municipality in its extraterritorial jurisdiction involving trees and vegetation. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 732 by Nichols.) Town Council 182 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 5   H.B. 1421 (Anchia), Relating to the classification and use of energy storage equipment or facilities and the provision of studies and reports regarding energy storage equipment or those facilities. Reported from the House Committee on State Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 943 by Carona.) H.B. 1545 (Lewis), Relating to the authority of certain political subdivisions to change the date of their general elections. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. (Companion bill is S.B. 1033 by Seliger.) H.B. 1643 (Zerwas), Relating to development agreements governing land in a municipality’s extraterritorial jurisdiction. Reported from the House Committee on Land and Resource Management. H.B. 1724 (Hamilton), Relating to economically driven mobility projects. Reported from the House Committee on Transportation. H.B. 1841 (Hartnett), Relating to the taxability of Internet hosting. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. H.B. 1971 (J. Jackson), Relating to the liability of a landowner for harm to a trespasser. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. (Companion bill is S.B. 1160 by Seliger.) H.B. 2013 (Hardcastle), Relating to the disposal of demolition waste from abandoned or nuisance buildings in certain areas. Reported from the House Committee on Environmental Regulation. As reported, the bill would provide that the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality may issue a permit by rule to authorize the governing body of a county or city with a population of 10,000 or less to dispose of demolition waste from an abandoned building or building found to be a nuisance if the disposal occurs on land that: (1) the county or city owns or controls; (2) would qualify for an arid exemption under commission rules; and (3) which the city acquired ownership or control of through bankruptcy, tax delinquency, or condemnation, with the previous owner of the building not being financially capable of paying the costs to transport and dispose of the demolition waste at a permitted solid waste facility. (Companion bill is S.B. 1258 by Duncan.) H.B. 2127 (Geren), Relating to the municipal regulation of the discharge of firearms and certain other weapons in certain counties. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. H.B. 2191 (Elkins), Relating to a ballot by mail single language requirement. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. (Companion bill is S.B. 1199 by D. Patrick.) H.B. 2226 (Truitt), Relating to authorized investments for governmental entities. Reported from the House Committee on Pensions, Investments, and Financial Services. As reported, the bill would: (1) require a city’s investment policy to include procedures to monitor rating changes in investments acquired with public funds and the liquidation of such investments; (2) require a city’s investment officer to attend a training session not less than once each state fiscal biennium; (3) provide that an obligation that is fully guaranteed or insured by the FDIC or by the explicit full faith and credit of the United States is an authorized investment; (4) provide that certain investment in certificates of deposit using a broker are authorized investments; (5) authorize an investment pool to invest its funds in money market mutual funds to the extent permitted by and consistent with state law and the investment policies and objectives adopted by the pool. Town Council 183 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 6   H.B. 2289 (Crownover), Relating to the authority of a gas corporation to use a public right-of-way along a railroad, a railroad right-of-way, an interurban railroad, or a street railroad. Reported from the House Committee on Energy Resources. H.B. 2313 (Coleman), Relating to the requirement to post notice of the subject of a meeting under the open meetings law as the requirement relates to reports about items of community interest at a meeting of a commissioners court. Reported from the House Committee on county Affairs. As reported, the bill would provide that a municipal governmental body that posts notice of each meeting on its official Internet Web site shall provide during regular office hours a computer terminal at certain municipal facilities convenient to the public that members of the public may use to view notices of meetings posted by the city. H.B. 2403 (Otto), Relating to a retailer engaged in business in this state. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. H.B. 2432 (J. Davis), Relating to the creation of public and private facilities and infrastructure. Reported from the House Committee on Economic and Small Business Development. (Companion bill is S.B. 1048 by M. Jackson.) H.B. 2476 (Harless), Relating to the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of certain dealer's heavy equipment inventory. Reported from the House Committee on Ways and Means. H.B. 2624 (Sheffield), Relating to procedures applicable in circumstances involving family violence or other criminal conduct and military personnel. Reported from the House Committee on Defense and Veteran’s Affairs. H.B. 2675 (Harper-Brown), Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Department of Transportation. Reported from the House Committee on Transportation. (Companion bill is S.B. 1420 by Hinojosa.) H.B. 2732 (Oliveira), Relating to the application requirements for a local project permit. Reported from the House Committee on Land and Resource Management. As reported, the bill would provide that rights to which a permit applicant is entitled under Chapter 245 of the Local Government Code (the “permit vesting” statute) accrue on the filing of a required original application or plan for development or plat application that gives the regulatory agency fair notice that is sufficient to enable a reasonably prudent person to understand the project and the nature of the permit sought. (Companion bill is S.B. 1442 by Shapiro.) H.B. 2973 (Hunter), Relating to encouraging public participation by citizens by protecting a person's right to petition, right of free speech, and right of association from meritless lawsuits arising from actions taken in furtherance of those rights. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. S.B. 181 (Shapiro), Relating to the reporting of water conservation measures by municipalities and water utilities. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. S.B. 462 (West), Relating to the right to an expunction of records and files relating to a person's arrest. Reported from the Senate Criminal Justice Committee. S.B. 573 (Nichols), Relating to certificates of public convenience and necessity for water or sewer services. Reported from the Senate Natural Resources Committee. Town Council 184 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 7   S.B. 641 (Seliger), Relating to the calculation of interest on certain ad valorem tax refunds. Reported from the Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations. As reported, the bill would change the amount of interest that a city making a refund of property taxes following a judicial proceeding must pay from eight percent to an annual rate that is equal to the sum of two percent and the most recent prime rate quoted, but not to exceed eight percent. (Companion bill is H.B. 1090 by Gonzalez.) S.B. 655 (Hegar), Relating to the abolition of the Railroad Commission of Texas, the creation of the Texas Oil and Gas Commission, and the transfer of the powers and duties of the railroad commission to the oil and gas commission. Reported from the House Committee on Energy Resources. S.B. 687 (Huffman), Relating to interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. Reported from the Senate Criminal Justice Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 1457 by Fletcher.) S.B. 732 (Nichols), Relating to the prohibition of certain regulations by a municipality in its extraterritorial jurisdiction involving trees and vegetation. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. S.B. 766 (Estes), Relating to regulation and enforcement of laws affecting sport shooting ranges. Reported from the House Committee on Culture, Recreation, and Tourism. (Companion bill is H.B. 1595 by Isaac.) S.B. 1489 (Whitmire), Relating to jurisdiction for the offenses of truancy and failure to attend school. Reported from the Senate Committee on Jurisprudence. S.B. 1693 (Carona), Relating to periodic rate adjustments by electric utilities. Reported from the Senate Committee on Business and Commerce. (Companion bill is H.B. 3610 by Thompson.) SIGNIFICANT FLOOR ACTIONS H.B. 268 (Hilderbran), Relating to the exemption from the sales and use tax for certain agricultural items. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1602 by Seliger.) H.B. 345 (Kleinschmidt), Relating to limitations on awards in an adjudication brought against a local governmental entity for breach of contract. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1382 by Wentworth.) H.B. 360 (J. Jackson), Relating to ballot language for a proposition to approve the imposition or increase of a tax or the issuance of bonds. Passed the House. H.B. 470 (C. Anderson), Relating to the addition of Salvia divinorum and its derivatives and extracts to Penalty Group 3 of the Texas Controlled Substances Act.. Passed the House. H.B. 478 (Orr), Relating to certain court costs associated with the offense of failing to secure a child passenger in a motor vehicle. H.B. 563 (Pickett), Relating to the purposes and designation of a transportation reinvestment zone. Passed the House. Town Council 185 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 8   H.B. 564 (Craddick), Relating to inspection of portable fire extinguishers in government-owned vehicles in certain local governmental jurisdictions. Passed the House. H.B. 725 (Callegari), Relating to the operation, powers, and duties of certain water districts. Passed the House. H.B. 930 (Darby), Relating to the requirements for an application for a tax warrant authorizing the seizure of personal property for the payment of ad valorem taxes. (Companion bill is S.B.1061 by Harris.) H.B. 984 (Truitt), Relating to agreements between contiguous municipalities regarding jurisdiction of cases in municipal courts. Passed the House. H.B. 1083 (Elkins), Relating to the issuance of an identification card to certain honorably retired peace officers. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would require a city police department to issue an identification card to an honorably retired police officer who holds a proficiency certificate. H.B. 1136 (Aycock), Relating to requiring an election authority to provide notice to certain county chairs regarding certain election activities. Passed the House. H.B. 1137 (Darby), Relating to the transmission of records regarding over-the-counter sales of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and norpseudoephedrine and a person's civil liability for certain acts arising from the sale of those products. Passed the House. H.B. 1147 (W. Smith), Relating to notice by a governmental entity regarding certain geospatial data products. Passed the House. H.B. 1814 (Lucio), Relating to the provision of water and certain equipment by water supply or sewer service corporations for use in fire suppression and the liability of those corporations. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1659 by Lucio.) H.B. 1964 (Villarreal), Relating to discharging fines and costs assessed against certain juvenile defendants through community service. Passed the House. H.B. 2257 (Phillips), Relating to communications during a disaster or an emergency by public service providers. Passed the House. H.B. 2605 (L. Taylor), Relating to the continuation and functions of the division of workers’ compensation of the Texas Department of Insurance. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 658 by Huffman.) H.B. 2619 (Callegari), Relating to the submission of information about critical water and wastewater facilities. Passed the House. H.B. 2694 (W. Smith), Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and abolishing the On-site Wastewater Treatment Research Council. Passed the House. This is the TCEQ sunset bill. As passed, the bill would, among other things: (1) require the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to develop and implement a policy to encourage the use of negotiated rulemaking and alternative dispute resolution procedures; (2) require the TCEQ to develop and implement a program to improve public access to information about the TCEQ and the Town Council 186 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 9   matters the agency regulates; (3) make changes to narrow the scope of the mission of the office of public interest council; (4) change how compliance history is used in certain enforcement situations, including limiting penalty enhancements or escalations attributed to compliance history, particularly with regard to air quality; (5) increase the penalties for statute and rule violations under the jurisdiction of the TCEQ; (6) require the TCEQ to create a general enforcement policy that takes into account the economic benefits of noncompliance; (7) authorize the TCEQ to approve a city’s supplemental environmental project in lieu of a fine that is necessary to bring the city into compliance with environmental laws or remediate environmental harm caused by the city’s alleged violation; (8) require the TCEQ to develop a policy to prevent a regulated entity from systematically avoiding compliance through the use of supplemental environmental projects; (9) make changes to the fees, penalties, and authorized TCEQ action for underground storage tanks; (10) require any water right holder who impounds, diverts, or otherwise uses state water to maintain water use information on a monthly basis to be made available to the TCEQ during an emergency water shortage or in response to a complaint, upon request; (11) authorize the TCEQ to order suspension and reallocation of water rights during a drought or other emergency water shortage and require recipients of a water transfer to comply with drought management measures; (12) extend the time period for a city-owned utility to notify ratepayers outside of city limits of a rate increase and allow the city to provide the notice electronically, when possible; (13) allow a non-city-owned utility to provide notice to a city of a rate increase via e-mail; (14) shift the burden of proof in a contested case hearing over a permit to the affected person rather than the applicant; (15) require an applicant for a permit for a new electric generating facility to submit an assessment comparing the best available technology for water cooling to the technology proposed for use by the facility; and (16) make several changes to dam inspection and regulation. (Companion is S.B. 657 by Huffman.) S.B. 44 (Zaffirini), Relating to the detention and transportation of a person with a mental illness. Passed the Senate. S.B. 100 (Van de Putte), Relating to the adoption of voting procedures necessary to implement the federal Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act. Passed the Senate. (Please see article elsewhere in this edition.)(Companion bill is H.B. 111 by V. Taylor.) S.B. 313 (Seliger), Relating to priority groundwater management areas. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would: (1) authorize the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to merge certain adjacent priority groundwater management areas and create procedures for a merger; and (2) allow the TCEQ to adopt rules regarding the inclusion of all or part of the land within an existing priority groundwater management area in a new or existing special district. S.B. 602 (Rodriguez), Relating to allowing a governmental body to redact certain personal information under the public information law without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general and the calculation of certain deadlines. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 1671 by Marquez.) S.B. 660 (Hinojosa), Relating to the review and functions of the Texas Water Development Board, including the functions of the board in connection with the process for establishing and appealing desired future conditions in a groundwater area. Passed the Senate. This is the Texas Water Development Board sunset bill. As passed, the bill would – in addition to previously summarized provisions – remove the current provisions requiring the attorney general to seek a writ of mandamus or other legal remedy in Travis County court to compel a political subdivision to pay that has defaulted on a payment agreement (usually loans or bond assistance) with the board. S.B. 661 (Nichols), Relating to the continuation of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and the Public Utility Commission of Texas and to the transfer of functions from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Passed the Senate. Town Council 187 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 10   S.B. 898 (Carona), Relating to energy efficiency programs in institutions of higher education and certain governmental entities. Passed the Senate. S.B. 924 (Carona), Relating to energy efficiency reports by municipally owned utilities and electric cooperatives. Passed the Senate. S.B. 1048 (Jackson, Mike), Relating to the creation of public and private facilities and infrastructure. Passed the Senate. As passed by the Senate, the bill would create a program with detailed criteria to encourage public and private facilities and infrastructure, and would provide that the bill is not exclusive of other authority and that a political subdivision must adopt a resolution to act pursuant to the bill’s authority. (Companion bill is H.B. 2432 by J. Davis.) S.B. 1082 (Hegar), Relating to strategic partnerships for the continuation of certain water districts annexed by a municipality. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 1979 by Laubenberg.) S.B. 1217 (Estes), Relating to an excavator’s duty to notify a notification center before excavating. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 263 by Hilderbran.) S.B. 1270 (Wentworth), Relating to the public information law. Passed the Senate. S.B. 1293 (Hegar), Relating to the amounts of administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for violations relating to certain pipelines. Passed the Senate. As passed, the bill would increase the penalty for violation of gas pipeline safety rules to $100,000 per day. S.B. 1420 (Hinojosa), Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Department of Transportation. Passed the Senate. This is the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) sunset bill. As passed, the bill, among many other things, would: 1. require TxDOT to develop a statewide transportation plan covering a period of 24 years and that is updated every four years that contains all modes of transportation; 2. provide that the plan must contain specific, long-term transportation goals for the state and measurable targets for each goal, identify priority corridors, projects, or areas of the state that are of particular concern in meeting the plan goals, and contain a participation plan specifying methods for obtaining formal input on the plan’s goals and priorities with input from, among others, political subdivisions; 3. provide that the Texas Transportation Commission by rule shall establish standards for processing an environmental review document for a highway project that must increase efficiency, minimize delays, and encourage collaboration and cooperation by the department with a local government sponsor, with a goal of prompt approval of legally sufficient documents; 4. a local government sponsor and TxDOT may enter into an agreement that defines the relative roles and responsibilities of the parties in the preparation and review of environmental review documents for a specific project; 5. require TxDOT to establish a project information reporting system that makes available in a central location on the Internet easily accessible and searchable information regarding all of TxDOT’s transportation plans; 6. require TxDOT to develop a process to identify and distinguish between the transportation projects that are required to maintain the state infrastructure and the transportation projects that would improve the state infrastructure in a manner consistent with the statewide transportation plan; Town Council 188 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 11   7. require TxDOT to develop a unified transportation program covering a period of 10 years and updated each year to guide the development of and authorize construction of transportation projects; 8. provide that any fines or fees received under the Texas highway Beautification Act go to the state highway fund, as opposed to the state highway beautification account; 9. create additional administrative procedures, fees, and civil penalties relating to outdoor advertising that is subject to state law; 10. provide that the combined license and permit fees may not exceed $10 for an off-premise sign erected and maintained by a nonprofit organization in a city or a city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction if the sign relates to or promotes only the city or a political subdivision whose jurisdiction is wholly or partly concurrent with the city; and 11. require TxDOT, in cooperation with local governments, to actively manage a system of changeable message signs located on highways under the jurisdiction of TxDOT to mitigate traffic congestion by providing current information to the traveling public, including information about traffic incidents, weather conditions, road construction, and alternative routes when applicable.   (Companion bill is H.B. 2675 by Harper-Brown.) S.B. 1521 (Uresti), Relating to the distribution of money appropriated from a municipal court building security fund. Passed the Senate. S.B. 1612 (Ogden), Relating to the monitoring, oversight, and funding of certain public retirement systems. Passed the Senate. S.B. 1638 (W. Davis), Relating to the exception of certain personal information from required disclosure under the public information law. Passed the Senate. S.B. 1692 (Lucio), Relating to municipal and county budgets on the Internet. Passed the Senate. S.J.R. 37 (Van de Putte), Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the provision that requires the automatic resignation of certain county, municipal, or district officeholders if they become candidates for another office. Passed the Senate. As passed, the bill would amend the resign to run provision of the Texas Constitution, Section 65, Article XVI, to provide that certain elected district, county, and precinct officers who announce their candidacy for another office more than one year and thirty days before the expiration of their current term of office automatically resign from office. CITY-RELATED BILLS FILED S.B. 2 (Jackson) – Economic Development: would allow the Texas Economic Development and Tourism Office to establish the Public-Private Competitiveness Initiative for Industry Clusters, under which cities may apply to receive matching grants to stimulate local economic growth. S.B. 1906 (Wentworth) – Open Meetings Act: would provide that a municipal governmental body that posts notice of each meeting on its official Internet Web site shall provide during regular office hours a computer terminal at certain municipal facilities convenient to the public that members of the public may use to view notices of meetings posted by the city. Town Council 189 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 12   S.B. 1908 (Lucio) – Annexation: would provide that a type A general law city that meets certain criteria in current law may unilaterally annex an area if the area receives water and sewer service from a municipal utility district that provides water and sewer service to all or part of the city. CITY OFFICIALS TESTIFY When the legislature is in session, nothing compares to the effectiveness of city officials testifying at the Capitol. City officials who take their time to travel to Austin to speak out on important city issues should be applauded by us all. Among the city officials who recently testified in front of legislative committees are the following:  Tommy Gonzales, City Manager, Irving  Robert Lowry, Arlington  Ray Lopez, Councilmember, San Antonio  Michael Talbot, City Manager, Bastrop  Todd Renshaw, Police Department, Frisco  Robert Finn, Department of Public Safety, Southlake  Gilbert Palacios, Fire Department, Houston  Michael Dirden, Police Department Arson Unit Chief, Houston  Jay Cairns, Councilmember, Uvalde  Steve Griffith, Assistant City Manager, Sugarland  Sylvia Firth, Director of Government Affairs, El Paso  Jesus Garza, City Administrator, Von Ormy  Landon Stalling, Fire Marshal, Fort Worth  Darrin Hall, Intergovernmental Relations, Houston  John Cabrales, Intergovernmental Relations, Denton  A.C. Gonzalez, Assistant City Manager, Dallas,  Miguel Ozuna, Human Resources Director, Cedar Park  Michael Wolfe, Mayor, Hempstead  John Cueller, Councilmember, Weslaco  Bruce Pearson, Cibolo  Charles Zech, Cibolo  John Bierschwale, Assistant City Manager, Schertz  Randy Burkett, Traffic Engineer, Fort Worth  Gary Schatz, Traffic Engineer, Austin  Brian Gruetzner, Police Department, Austin  Floyd Akers, City Attorney, Pflugerville While TML monitors most hearings, we won’t catch the testimony of every city official. If we missed your testimony or the testimony of another official in your city, please contact us at the following e-mail address, and we will include your name in the next edition of the TML Legislative Update: testify@tml.org. TML member cities may use the material herein for any purpose. No other person or entity may reproduce, duplicate, or distribute any part of this document without the written authorization of the Texas Municipal League. Town Council 190 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 1   April 29, 2011 Number 17 SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE WRAPS UP WORK ON THE STATE BUDGET The Senate Finance Committee wrapped up its work on the state budget last week. The full Senate is expected to consider the budget soon. Overall, the Senate Committee Substitute to House Bill 1 (C.S.H.B. 1) appropriates approximately $12 billion more than the House version, but is still $11 billion shy of what was appropriated for the 2010-2011 biennium. The Senate Finance Committee proposal makes approximately $154 million in cuts over the biennium in appropriations that previously flowed to cities, including cuts to the mixed beverage tax, library aid, local parks grants, and solid waste grants. If there is a silver lining, it is that the House and the Senate are currently only $28.7 million apart on the funding items that affect cities. That makes it less likely – though not certain – that cities would face further cuts later in the process. Once the budget is approved by the full Senate, C.S.H.B. 1 will be considered by a conference committee made up of members from the House and the Senate. The conference committee is charged with working out the differences between what was voted from the two chambers. DON’T MISS THE LEAGUE’S  2011 LEGISLATIVE  WORKSHOPS    The League is pleased to offer  live and online seminars  regarding the 2011 legislative  session:     Online on May 13.   Live in Austin on June  27.   Please go to www.tml.org and  click on “Training.”     Town Council 191 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 2   WHAT FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE DOING ABOUT K2 K2 is a mixture of herbs and spices sprayed with a synthetic compound that is chemically similar to TCH, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. It is oftentimes packaged and sold as incense, and is abused because it mimics the high of marijuana. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) reports that, since January 2010, approximately 600 calls were made to the Texas Poison Center Network related to K2 exposure. Reported adverse effects associated with use of these marijuana-like substances include chest pain, heart palpitations, agitation, drowsiness, hallucinations, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and confusion. Action has been taken at every level of government in response to this public health and safety hazard. Cities were some of the first governmental actors in Texas to work to address the K2 problem. In Texas, cities including Allen, Bryan, Cedar Park, College Station, Dallas, Jasper, Plano, Sulphur Springs, Tyler, and others have adopted regulations regarding the sale and possession of K2. On March 1, 2011, the federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) used its emergency scheduling authority and issued a final order to control five synthetic cannabinoid chemicals in so-called “fake pot” products such as K2. The order temporarily places these chemicals in Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act, which makes it illegal to manufacture, sell, or possess these products for at least one year. The DSHS is generally required by state law to place substances on the federal Controlled Substances list into the Texas Schedules of Controlled Substances. Thus, in response to DEA’s action, DSHS added the same five chemicals to Schedule 1 of the Texas Schedules of Controlled Substances. The Texas ban became effective April 22, 2011. Penalties for the manufacture, sale, or possession of K2 are set out in Chapter 481 of the Health and Safety Code (the “Texas Controlled Substances Act”). To the extent a local ordinance works to regulate the same chemicals, it is now likely preempted by this statewide action. In addition, several bills have been filed this legislative session calling for the prohibition of K2. For instance, Senate Bill 331 (Shapiro) and House Bill 597 (Madden) would add certain synthetic cannabinoids to Penalty Group 2 of the Texas Controlled Substances Act. S.B. 331 has passed the Senate and has been referred to the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. TRANSPARENCY IN THE TEXAS SENATE? NOT SO MUCH On April 7, the author of a Senate bill that would allow concealed handgun license holders to carry their guns on college campuses brought the bill to the Senate floor. According to the Texas Observer, on that date, “we saw some unscripted debate and a rare public tiff between two senators.” Town Council 192 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 3   During the debate, one Senator publicly changed his mind about the bill on the Senate floor, which left it without the votes necessary to move forward. “The Texas Senate usually conducts business behind closed doors. What happens on the Senate floor typically has been figured out beforehand,” reported the Observer. The bill was pulled down and most presumed it was dead for the session. But, on April 27, the author attempted to add it as an amendment to an unrelated higher education reform bill. The bill’s author, a Democrat, was visibly concerned at the proffered amendment. After some parliamentary procedure questions were raised by Senators, an interesting – but not unusual – thing happened. The dean of the Senate rose and moved that the Senate recess into a “caucus of the whole Senate” to discuss “some procedural issues.” What does that mean in plain English? It means that the Senate went behind closed doors, presumably to figure out what to do next. (After three hours of closed door discussions, the president of the Senate came to the dais and adjourned the Senate until the following day with no further explanation.) Wouldn’t it be interesting if a mayor tried to take his or her entire city council behind closed doors to discuss “some procedural issues”? That won’t ever happen, of course, because if it did, that mayor and every member of the city council would be subject to criminal penalties, including jail time. It sure would have been interesting to be a fly on the wall during that “caucus of the whole,” wouldn’t it? CONGRESS PASSES SPENDING BILL After weeks of partisan bickering and a near government shutdown, the United States House and Senate passed a fiscal year 2011 spending bill with the largest cuts in domestic discretionary spending in history. The compromise bill, H.R. 1473, which House and Senate leadership and the White House agreed to shortly before the deadline, slashed nearly $40 billion from federal programs, including the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Throughout the negotiation process, cities and towns fought hard to preserve funding for the CDBG program, one of the most effective federal programs that serves as a catalyst for economic recovery and job creation in communities of all sizes. Under the agreement, CDBG would be funded at $3.3 billion – or $600 million less – than in fiscal year 2010, but $1.8 billion more than the program would have received in an earlier House-passed measure, H.R. 1. In response to the vote, NLC Executive Director Donald J. Borut, said, “While we are grateful that the House and Senate agreed to fund CDBG and other programs important to cities and towns at higher levels than in H.R. 1, cuts to these programs of any amount will mean that cities will be forced to cut programs and services at the local level, which will very likely lead to layoffs and a drag on economic recovery in our communities.” Town Council 193 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 4   In addition to cuts to CDBG, the HOME program loses nearly $200 million in funding, but the Choice Neighborhoods and Sustainable Communities programs, both of which would have been eliminated under H.R. 1, would each be funded at $100 million for fiscal year 2011. Under the measure, the federal highway program is cut by nearly $900 million and funding for high speed rail, a priority for President Obama, would be eliminated. However, the measure does include $528 million for the National Infrastructure Investment Grants program, which would be modeled after the popular TIGER program; under H.R. 1, this program would have been eliminated. After completing their work on the fiscal year 2011 spending, members of Congress headed home for a two-week recess. When they return in May, they will face potentially even more contentious debates involving fiscal year 2012 spending, the country’s debt ceiling and disagreements on how to reduce the country’s $14 trillion deficit. “Clearly, there will continue to be pressure on Congress and the Administration to reduce federal spending,” Borut said. “That’s why city officials must continue to impress upon federal policymakers the essential nature of these programs have in our communities and for our families. Now is not the time to be silent hoping they already know this to be the case.” The article above was reprinted with permission from the National League of Cities. TCEQ SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROPOSED LEAD TRANSPORT CHANGES TO STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is considering a revision to the state implementation plan (SIP), which governs air quality regulation in the state. The proposed revision would incorporate a plan to address lead transport for the 2008 lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). These revisions reference existing control strategies to reduce the concentration of lead, dispersion modeling of major lead sources in Texas, and issues that may specifically affect cities in Collin County. Additionally, the revision verifies that the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review permitting programs are being implemented in Texas and that lead is not considered a visibility-impairing pollutant. A public hearing on this proposal will be held at the TCEQ headquarters in Austin on May 17, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., and will be structured for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Written comments on the proposed revision may also be mailed, faxed, or Town Council 194 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 5   submitted to the agency electronically. The public comment period opened on April 22 and will close on May 23. For more information, please visit the TCEQ's “SIP Hot Topics” Web page at http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/sip/Hottop.html. SIGNIFICANT COMMITTEE ACTIONS H.B. 138 (Callegari), Relating to the acquisition of and compensation for real property, including blighted property, for public purposes through condemnation or certain other means. Reported from the House Committee on Land and Resource Management. As reported, the bill would provide – among other things – that: 1. the term "blighted area" means an tract of real property that presents four or more of the following conditions for one year after a property owner receives notice of the condition: (a) the property contains uninhabitable, unsafe, or abandoned structures; (b) the property has inadequate provisions for sanitation; (c) there exists on the property an imminent harm to life or other property caused by fire, flood, hurricane, tornado, earthquake, storm, or other natural catastrophe declared to be a disaster; (d) the property has been identified by the federal Environmental Protection Agency as a Superfund site or as environmentally contaminated to an extent that the property requires remedial investigation or a feasibility study; (e) the property has been the location of substantiated and repeated illegal activity of which the property owner knew or should have known; (f) the maintenance of the property is below county or municipal standards; (g) the property is abandoned and contains a structure that is not fit for its intended use because the utilities, sewerage, plumbing, heating, or a similar service or facility of the structure has been disconnected, destroyed, removed, or rendered ineffective; or (h) the property presents an economic liability to the immediate area because of deteriorating structures or hazardous conditions; 2. the current statutory provisions relating to urban renewal eminent domain apply only to a tract of blighted property (as opposed to "slum" areas); 3. a municipal governing body must determine that each unit of property (as opposed to an “area,” as is current law) be designated as blighted, and make corresponding procedural changes to urban renewal laws; 4. notwithstanding any other law, an area may not be considered a blighted area on the basis of a condition described in number (1) above unless the city has given notice in writing to the property owner regarding the imminent harm to life or other property caused by the condition of the property, and the property owner fails to take reasonable measures to remedy the harm caused by the property; and 5. an area may not be considered blighted solely for aesthetic reasons. H.B. 256 (Hilderbran), Relating to state-issued certificates of franchise authority to provide cable service and video service. Reported from the House Committee on State Affairs. H.B. 274 (Creighton), Relating to attorney’s fees, early dismissal, expedited trials, and the reform of certain remedies and procedures in civil actions. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. Town Council 195 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 6   H.B. 305 (Harless), Relating to the punishment prescribed for burglary of a vehicle. Reported from the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. H.B. 351 (Veasey), Relating to the expunction of records and files relating to a person's arrest. Reported from the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. H.B. 507 (Button), Relating to notice for certain transactions involving local government entities. Reported from the House Committee on Technology. H.B. 628 (Callegari), Relating to contracts by governmental entities and related professional services and to public works performance and payment bonds. Reported from the House Committee on Government Efficiency and Reform. As reported, the bill would generally consolidate the provisions of current law relating to alternative delivery systems for construction projects into one chapter in the Government Code. The bill would also, among many other things: (1) prohibit a reverse auction procedure for a public works contract for which a performance or payment bond is required; (2) provide that the board of trustees of a school district may enter into an agreement for the design, construction, or renovation of improvements to real property not owned or leased by the district if the improvements benefit real property owned or leased by the district, such as the design, construction, or renovation of highways, roads, streets, sidewalks, crosswalks, utilities, and drainage improvements; and (3) prohibit the use of an interlocal contract to purchase construction services unless the services are in connection with the construction of a specific facility to be jointly owned, used, or financed by the parties to the contract or: (a) the services are in connection with a job order contract; (b) the governing body of the governmental entity for whom the work will ultimately be performed approves the purchase in open session; (c) public notice is provided in a manner consistent with a direct contract for job order contracting services; and (d) work orders under the contract comply with state law. H.B. 800 (C. Anderson), Relating to an interlocal contract between a governmental entity and a purchasing cooperative to purchase roofing materials or services. Reported from House Committee on Government Efficiency and Reform. As reported, this bill would provide that an interlocal contract between a governmental entity and a purchasing cooperative may not be used to purchase roofing materials or services, including materials or services for construction, repair, or replacement of a roof unless the contract is a renewal of a contract based on a request for proposal submitted before September 1, 2011. H.B. 956 (Marquez), Relating to the state fire marshal's investigation of the death of a firefighter who dies in the line of duty or in connection with an on-duty incident. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (Companion bill is S.B. 396 by Deuell.) H.B. 984 (Truitt), Relating to agreements between contiguous municipalities regarding jurisdiction of cases in municipal courts. Reported from the Senate Jurisprudence Committee. H.B. 1047 (Schwertner), Relating to the impoundment of a motor vehicle if operated without financial responsibility and a driver's license. Reported from the House Committee on Town Council 196 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 7   Transportation. As reported, the bill would authorize a peace officer to impound the vehicle of a person only if detailed procedures are followed and the person: (1) is involved in a motor vehicle accident or is stopped for an alleged violation of a local traffic ordinance, a state traffic law, or any other law that applies to the operation of a vehicle on a roadway; and (2) operates a motor vehicle without insurance. H.B. 1092 (Christian), Relating to the exemption from certain construction requirements for volunteer fire departments in certain counties. Reported from the House Committee on Licensing and Administrative Procedures. (Companion bill is H.B. 1231 by Hopson.) H.B. 1164 (Keffer), Relating to enforcement actions by the Texas Board of Professional Engineers against political subdivisions and certain public officials. Reported from the House Committee on Licensing and Administrative Procedures H.B. 1178 (Flynn), Relating to employment protection for members of the state military forces. Reported from the House Committee on Defense and Veterans’ Affairs. H.B. 1406 (Riddle), Relating to the persons authorized to take a blood specimen from a vehicle operator to test for alcohol concentration or other intoxicating substances. Reported from the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. H.B. 1457 (Fletcher), Relating to interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety (Companion bill is S.B. 687 by Huffman.) H.B. 1626 (Flynn), Relating to the use of alternate electronic reporting databases for over-the- counter sales of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and norpseudoephedrine. Reported from the House Committee on House Homeland Security and Public Safety H.B. 1959 (Thompson), Relating to appeal of the refusal of an alcoholic beverage license or permit based on a certification of an area’s wet or dry status. Reported from the House Committee on Licensing and Administrative Procedures. As reported, the bill would provide that if a county clerk, city secretary, or city clerk certifies that the location or address given in an application to the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission is not in a wet area or otherwise refuses to issue the certification, the applicant is entitled to a hearing before the county judge to contest the certification or refusal to certify. H.B. 2048 (Lyne), Relating to the collection and enforcement of state and local hotel occupancy taxes. Reported from House Committee on House Ways and Means. H.B. 2174 (Hartnett), Relating to the establishment of the judicial access and improvement account to provide funding for basic civil legal services, indigent defense, and judicial technical support through certain county service fees. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. Town Council 197 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 8   H.B. 2443 (Price), Relating to persons remaining on and parking vehicles on state highway right-of-way. Reported from the House Committee on Transportation. H.B. 2477 (Harless), Relating to the provision of bilingual election materials. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. (Companion bill is S.B. 1039 by Ellis.) H.B. 2490 (Solomons), Relating to the regulation of certain metal dealers. Reported from the House Committee on Environmental Regulation. H.B. 2686 (Lucio), Relating to the impoundment of a motor vehicle involved in an accident if operated without financial responsibility. Reported from the House Committee on Transportation. H.B. 2889 (Madden), Relating to the expunction of records and files relating to a person’s arrest. Reported from the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. (Companion bill is S.B. 1473 by Hinojosa.) H.B. 2902 (Zerwas), Relating to the release of extraterritorial jurisdiction by certain general-law municipalities. Reported from the House Committee on Land and Resource Management. H.B. 2944 (Coleman), Relating to Internet availability of bonds and other debt obligations issued by local governments. Reported from the House Committee on County Affairs. As reported, the bill would: (1) require the Bond Review Board to develop and maintain a searchable computerized database of outstanding bonds and other debt obligations issued by each local government; and (2) require local governmental entities to provide information to the Bond Review Board that is determined to be necessary for the database. H.B. 3001 (Thompson), Relating to the electronic monitoring of certain high-risk sex offenders. Reported from the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. H.B. 3037 (Chisum), Relating to contested case hearings for environmental permits. Reported from the House Committee on Environmental Regulation. H.B. 3082 (Isaac), Relating to the location of certain mobile voting stations. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. H.B. 3391 (D. Miller), Relating to rainwater harvesting and other water conservation initiatives. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. H.B. 3393 (Hughes), Relating to the filing by a court reporter of an official transcript of a court proceeding. Reported from the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence. H.B. 3486 (V. Taylor), Relating to municipal regulation of dogs used for search and rescue or law enforcement purposes. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. Town Council 198 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 9   H.B. 3530 (Ritter), Relating to the functions of the Texas Water Development Board, including the functions of the board and related entities in connection with the process for establishing desired future conditions in a groundwater management area. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. This bill is the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) sunset bill. The bill would, among other provisions: (1) require the TWDB to develop and implement a policy to encourage the use of negotiated rulemaking and alternative dispute resolution procedures; (2) make changes to the manner in which defaults on TWDB financial assistance is handled by the board; (3) require the TWDB to create a uniform water use calculation system for municipal water use and require that the system be used in water conservation plans and certain other reports required by statute; (4) require the executive administrator of the TWDB to designate the director of the Texas Natural Resources Information System to serve as the state geographic information officer and, among other duties, support the geographic data needs of emergency management responders during emergencies; (5) require the TWDB to establish advisory committees, including local governmental representative members, to assist the board with state geographic data issues; (6) require regional water plans to be consistent with the desired future conditions adopted for the relevant aquifers located in the regional water planning area. (Companion bill is S.B. 660 by Hinojosa.) H.B. 3547 (Alvarado), Relating to enforcement by a local government of fire safety standards at certain child-care facilities. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. H.B. 3610 (Thompson), Relating to periodic rate adjustments by electric utilities. Reported from the House Committee on State Affairs. (Please see S.B. 1693 by Carona in Recent Floor Actions in this edition.) H.B. 3692 (Gallego), Relating to peace officer interaction with persons with mental illness and to a person's incompetency to stand trial. Reported from House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. As reported, the bill would: (1) require a peace officer answering an emergency call to attempt to determine whether any person involved is a person with mental illness and, if so, and if no offense has been committed: (a) require the officer to notify local mental health authorities; (b) allow an officer to provide assistance to the mentally ill person; (c) authorize the officer take the person into custody; (2) require a peace officer answering an emergency call to attempt to determine whether any person involved is a person with mental illness and, if so, and if an offense has been committed, authorize the officer to issue a citation in lieu of arrest or take the person into custody; (3) provide, in regard to an incompetency trial, that a suggestion of incompetency is the threshold requirement for an informal inquiry which may be satisfied solely by a representation from any source; and (4) require the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education to establish minimum curriculum requirements for preparatory and advanced programs that include training in mental illness. H.J.R. 137 (Ritter), Proposing constitutional amendments relating to the funding of certain water projects. Reported from the House Committee on Natural Resources. As reported, the resolution would amend the Texas Constitution to provide that the Texas Water Development Board may issue general obligation bonds, at its determination and on a continuing basis, for one or more accounts of the Texas Water Development Fund in amounts such that the aggregate Town Council 199 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 10   principal amount of the bonds issued by the board that are outstanding at any time does not exceed $6 billion. S.B. 9 (Williams), Relating to homeland security. Reported from Senate Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security. As reported, the bill would require a law enforcement agency to: (1) verify the immigration status of a person held in custody; or (2) notify the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement if the agency is unable to verify the person’s immigration status. S.B. 365 (Ogden), Relating to distributed generation of electric power. Reported from the Senate Business and Commerce Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 225 by Strama.) S.B. 396 (Deuell), Relating to the state fire marshal’s investigation of the death of a firefighter who dies in the line of duty or in connection with an on-duty incident. Reported from the House Committee on Urban Affairs. (Companion bill is H.B. 956 by Marquez.) S.B. 545 (Seliger), Relating to employment records for law enforcement officers, including procedures to correct employment termination reports. Reported from the House Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety. S.B. 812 (Zaffirini) Relating to the service requirement benefits of certain retirees who resume employment within the Texas Municipal Retirement System. Reported from the Senate State Affairs Committee. As reported, this bill would modify the reemployment provisions related to retirement under the Texas Municipal Retirement System so that a person who resumes employment with the same employing city after at least 12 months separated from the city is entitled to a lump sum payment of his suspended annuity payments. S.B. 904 (D. Patrick), Relating to the eligibility of certain overseas voters to receive a full ballot. Reported from the House Committee on Elections. (Companion bills are H.B. 1697 by P. King and H.B. 1773 by L. Taylor.) S.B. 1164 (Wentworth), Relating to optional annuity increases and annual supplemental payments for certain retirees and beneficiaries of the Texas Municipal Retirement System. Reported from the Senate State Affairs Committee. As reported, this bill would give the members of the Texas Municipal Retirement System another option when calculating possible increases in annuities or supplemental benefits given to retirees and beneficiaries of deceased retirees. (Companion bill is H.B. 2934 by Castro.) S.B. 1420 (Hinojosa), Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Department of Transportation. Reported from the House Committee on Transportation. (Companion bill is H.B. 2675 by Harper-Brown.) S.B. 1505 (Uresti), Relating to the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of a real property interest in oil or gas in place. Reported from the Senate Finance Committee. As reported, the bill would change the method by which a real property interest in oil and gas in place is appraised by: (1) using the average price of the oil or gas interest for the preceding calendar year; and (2) Town Council 200 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 11   eliminating the comptroller-computed market condition factor multiplier and instead using a price adjustment factor. (Companion bill is H.B. 889 by Lewis.) S.B. 1529 (Hinojosa), Relating to the date by which law enforcement agencies must report arrests to the Department of Public Safety. Reported from the Senate Criminal Justice Committee. S.B. 1565 (Ellis), Relating to encouraging public participation by citizens by protecting a person's right to petition, right of free speech, and right of association from meritless lawsuits arising from actions taken in furtherance of those rights. Reported from the Senate State Affairs Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 2973 by Hunter.) S.B. 1579 (Ogden), Relating to state fiscal matters related to general government. Reported from the Senate State Affairs Committee. As reported, the bill would – among many other things – provide that: (1) a state agency that receives an appropriation from the state may, notwithstanding any other law, adopt fees or charges of any amount to cover any costs the agency incurs in performing its lawful functions; and (2) the Texas Enterprise Fund may be used for the Texas homeless housing and services program administered by the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs. (Companion bill is H.B. 3665 by Otto.) S.B. 1583 (Ogden), Relating to state fiscal matters related to law enforcment and criminal justice. Reported from the Senate Finance Committee. As reported, the bill would: (1) require an auto insurer to pay to the automobile burglary and theft prevention authority a fee of $2 per motor vehicle year of insurance for insurance policies delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed by the insurer; and (2) require that 50 percent of each fee collected be appropriated only to the authority. (Companion bill is H.B. 3649 by Otto.) S.B. 1584 (Ogden), Relating to state fiscal matters related to natural resources and the environment. Reported from the Senate Finance Committee. As reported, the bill would: (1) require the Texas Railroad Commission (TRC) to provide for the imposition of reasonable surcharges as necessary on fees imposed by the TRC that are required to be deposited to the credit of an oil and gas regulation and cleanup fund in amounts sufficient to enable the TRC to recover the costs of performing certain functions related to oil and gas regulation and cleanup; (2) authorize the money in the oil and gas regulation and cleanup fund to be used for any purpose related to the regulation of oil and gas development, including oil and gas monitoring and inspections, oil and gas remediation, oil and gas well plugging, public information and services related to those activities, and administrative costs and state benefits for personnel involved in those activities; and (3) abolish the current oil-field cleanup fund. (Companion bill is H.B. 3418 by Darby.) S.B. 1798 (West), Relating to a presumption that certain retailers are engaged in business in this state for the purpose of the use tax. Reported from the Senate Finance Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 1317 by Naishtat.) Town Council 201 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 12   S.B. 1816 (Zaffirini), Relating to county and municipal land development regulation. Reported from the Senate International Relations and Trade Committee. (Companion bill is H.B. 2803 by Raymond.) S.J.R. 4 (Hinojosa), Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board. Reported from the Senate Finance Committee. SIGNIFICANT FLOOR ACTIONS H.B. 38 (Menendez), Relating to the punishment for the offense of graffiti. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would, among other provisions: (1) increase the penalty for graffiti on a government building to a state jail felony, with an enhancement to the next higher category of offense if the person has been previously convicted for graffiti; and (2) require a juvenile court that finds that a child who has previously been adjudicated for a graffiti offense for placing markings on certain structures to order the child and the parent or guardian of the child to make restitution by personally restoring the property, with the owner’s consent. H.B. 343 (Fletcher), Relating to the reporting and recording of a motor vehicle accident involving an official vehicle driven by a peace officer, firefighter, or an emergency medical services employee in the course of official duties. Passed the House. H.B. 782 (Y. Davis), Relating to a requirement that certain bond issuers obtain an appraisal of property that is to be purchased with bond proceeds. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would provide that neither a city nor a type B economic development corporation may purchase property wholly or partly with bond proceeds until the entity obtains an independent appraisal of the property’s market value. H.B. 812 (P. King), Relating to the definition of peace officer for purposes of intercepting or collecting information in relation to certain communications in an investigation of criminal conduct. Passed the House. H.B. 887 (Geren), Relating to registration of a motor vehicle alleged to have been involved in a violation detected by a photographic traffic signal enforcement system. Passed the House. H.B. 896 (C. Howard), Relating to auxiliary members of an appraisal review board. Passed the House. H.B. 1094 (Farias), Relating to the availability on the Internet of reports of political expenditures and contributions filed in connection with certain county and municipal offices. Passed the House. H.B. 1168 (D. Miller), Relating to smoke alarms and fire extinguishers in residential rental units. Passed the House. Town Council 202 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 13   H.B. 1261 (Thompson), Relating to court costs imposed on conviction and deposited to the municipal court technology fund. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1678 by Ellis.) H.B. 1283 (Craddick), Relating to consideration of a bidder's principal place of business in awarding certain municipal contracts. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 640 by Seliger.) H.B. 1545 (Lewis), Relating to the authority of certain political subdivisions to change the date of their general elections. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1033 by Seliger.) H.B. 1559 (S. Davis), Relating to a prohibition on the destruction of certain court documents. Passed the House. H.B. 1711 (J. Davis), Relating to disaster remediation contracts. Passed the House. H.B. 1841 (Hartnett), Relating to the taxability of Internet hosting. Passed the House. H.B. 1859 (Hochberg), Relating to the applicability of architectural barrier standards. Passed the House. As passed, this bill would provide that architectural barriers do not apply to a building or facility owned, operated, or controlled by a religious organization, including a place of worship, if the religious organization applies to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation for the exemption. H.B. 1899 (Pickett), Relating to the posting of signs in school crossing zones regarding the prohibited use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle. Passed the House. H.B. 1933 (W. Smith), Relating to the regulation of metal recycling entities. Passed the House. H.B. 2040 (Hamilton), Relating to critical incident stress management and crisis response services. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1065 by Williams.) H.B. 2139 (Guillen), Relating to the establishment of an “Adopt a Library” program. Passed the House. H.B. 2226 (Truitt), Relating to authorized investments for governmental entities. Passed the House. H.B. 2289 (Crownover), Relating to the authority of a gas corporation to use a public right-of- way along a railroad, a railroad right-of-way, an interurban railroad, or a street railroad. Passed the House. H.B. 2403 (Otto), Relating to a retailer engaged in business in this state. Passed the House. H.B. 2466 (Phillips), Relating to the licensing and operation of motor vehicles by minors. Passed the House. Town Council 203 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 14   H.B. 2476 (Harless), Relating to the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of certain dealer's heavy equipment inventory. Passed the House. H.B. 2605 (L. Taylor), Relating to the continuation and functions of the division of workers’ compensation of the Texas Department of Insurance. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would: (1) provide for a contested case hearing if a party has a medical dispute regarding workers compensation that is not resolved by an independent review; (2) allow judicial review of the case after the contested case hearing if there is still a dispute; (3) change the way administrative violations by workers’ compensation insurance carriers are treated; (4) require that a city ensure that a police officer or firefighter who is seriously injured in the line of duty be provided with necessary medical care, compensation to pay for health care services to cure or relieve the injury and any effects naturally resulting from the injury, and any necessary artificial body part within ten days of receiving notice of a compensable injury; and (5) provide that the loser pays in medical fee disputes. (Companion bill is S.B. 658 by Huffman.) H.B. 2624 (Sheffield), Relating to procedures applicable in circumstances involving family violence or other criminal conduct and military personnel. Passed the House. As passed, the bill would require a police department who investigates or responds to a possible family violence incident to note whether the suspect is a member of the armed forces, and if so, provide written notice of the incident to the staff judge advocate or provost marshal of the suspect’s assigned military installation. H.B. 2694 (W. Smith), Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and abolishing the On-site Wastewater Treatment Research Council. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 657 by Huffman.) H.B. 3302 (Reynolds), Relating to the authority of certain Type A economic development corporations to undertake certain categories of projects. Passed the House. H.B. 3465 (Sheffield), Relating to the ability of certain municipalities enhancing participation in economic development programs, including small business development. Passed the House. H.B. 3487 (V. Taylor), Relating to regulations concerning certain service animals. Passed the House. H.B. 3510 (Hamilton), Relating to the regulation of the towing, booting, and storage of vehicles. Passed the House. (Companion bill is S.B. 1371 by Carona.) H.B. 3823 (Thompson), Relating to the regulation of certain telecommunicators. Passed the House. S.B. 375 (Wentworth), Relating to categories of information presumed to be public under the public information law. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 1044 by Solomons.) S.B. 573 (Nichols), Relating to certificates of public convenience and necessity for water or sewer services. Passed the Senate. Town Council 204 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 15   S.B. 602 (Rodriguez), Relating to allowing a governmental body to redact certain personal information under the public information law without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general and the calculation of certain deadlines. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 1671 by Marquez.) S.B. 913 (Estes), Relating to the transmission of records regarding over-the-counter sales of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and norpseudoephedrine and a person's civil liability for certain acts arising from the sale of those products. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 1137 by Darby.) S.B. 985 (Carona), Relating to the regulation of Voice over Internet Protocol service. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2874 by Geren.) S.B. 1024 (Rodriguez), Relating to the prosecution of the offense of theft of service. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2196 by Rodriguez.) S.B. 1178 (Nelson), Relating to the regulation of certain shelter day-care facilities, child-care facilities, and individuals providing child-care services. S.B. 1269 (Wentworth), Relating to honorariums offered to and accepted by public servants. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2629 by Branch.) S.B. 1271 (Duncan), Relating to alternative dispute resolution systems established by counties. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2479 by Perry.) S.B. 1442 (Shapiro), Relating to the application requirements for a local project permit. Passed the Senate. (Companion bill is H.B. 2732 by Oliveira.) S.B. 1489 (Whitmire), Relating to jurisdiction for the offenses of truancy and failure to attend school. Passed the Senate. S.B. 1692 (Lucio), Relating to municipal and county budgets on the Internet. Passed the Senate. S.B. 1693 (Carona), Relating to periodic rate adjustments by electric utilities. Passed the Senate. As passed, the bill would provide: (1) that the Public Utility Commission or a regulatory authority (e.g., a city), on the petition of an electric utility, may approve a tariff or rate schedule in which a nonfuel rate may be periodically adjusted upward or downward, based on changes in the parts of the utility's invested capital; and (2) for procedures to implement the so-called “periodic rate review mechanism” provided for in (1). (Companion bill is H.B. 3610 by Thompson.) S.B. 1752 (Uresti), Relating to confidentiality of Class C misdemeanor records related to the conviction of a child. Passed the Senate. Town Council 205 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011 16   CITY-RELATED BILLS FILED S.B. 1917 (Zaffirini) – Hotel Occupancy Tax: would repeal the local hotel occupancy tax exemption for permanent hotel residents in cities with a population of less than 50,000. S.J.R. 53 (Ellis) – Taxes: would amend the Texas Constitution to: (1) require the legislature to periodically review state and local tax preferences, as that term is defined by the legislature; (2) provide that any tax preference that takes effect on or after September 1, 2012, expires six years after the date the preference takes effect, unless otherwise provided by the legislature. CITY OFFICIALS TESTIFY When the legislature is in session, nothing compares to the effectiveness of city officials testifying at the Capitol. City officials who take their time to travel to Austin to speak out on important city issues should be applauded by us all. Among the city officials who recently testified in front of legislative committees are the following:  Shanae Jennings, City Secretary, Irving  Carl E. Gierisch, Mayor, Roanoke  Holly Gray-McPherson, Mayor Pro-Tem, Roanoke  Jim Jones, Police Department, San Antonio  Tom Schoolcraft, Mayor, Helotes  Tina Paez, Deputy Director of Regulatory Affairs, Houston  Mark Israelson, Assistant City Manager, Plano  Jay Dogey, City of Attorney, Arlington  Nick Fehrenbach, Manager of Regulatory Affairs, Dallas  Philip Boyd, Special Projects Coordinator, Lewisville  Robert Wood, City Manager, Westlake Hills While TML monitors most hearings, we won’t catch the testimony of every city official. If we missed your testimony or the testimony of another official in your city, please contact us at the following e-mail address, and we will include your name in the next edition of the TML Legislative Update: testify@tml.org. TML member cities may use the material herein for any purpose. No other person or entity may reproduce, duplicate, or distribute any part of this document without the written authorization of the Texas Municipal League. Town Council 206 of 206 Meeting Date: May 2, 2011