Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09.23.2024 TC Agenda Packet
TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB MEETING AGENDA TOWN COUNCIL 1 Trophy Wood Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 September 23, 2024 6:00 PM Council Chambers CALL WORK SESSION TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM WORK SESSION ITEM 1. Presentation and discussion of survey results from the Bobcat Boulevard Traffic Survey as well as proposed traffic solutions. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) ADJOURN WORK SESSION CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER (immediately following Work Session or 7:00 p.m., whichever is later) INVOCATION led by Rev. Bill Eason, Fellowship United Methodist Church PLEDGES led by Council Member Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag Pledge of Allegiance to the Texas Flag PUBLIC COMMENT(S) This is an opportunity for citizens to address the Council on any matter pursuant to Texas Government Code 551.007. The Council is not permitted to discuss or take action on any presentations made concerning matters that are not listed on the agenda. Presentations are limited to matters over which the Council has authority. Speakers have up to three (3) minutes or the time limit determined by the Presiding Officer. Each speaker must have submitted their request to speak by completing the Speaker’s Form or may email mayorandcouncil@trophyclub.org COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT 2. Trophy Club Tritons Swim Team 3. Working for You... Trophy Club a) Update from Town Council Members Page 1 of 325 b) Update from Town Manager (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) c) Quick Civic Tip (Dean Roggia, Town Attorney) CONSENT AGENDA This part of the agenda consists of non-controversial, or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be removed from Consent by any council member by making such request prior to a motion and vote. 4. Consider approval of the August 26, 2024, Town Council work session and regular meeting minutes. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) 5. Consider approval of the September 9, 2024, Town Council regular meeting minutes. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) 6. Consider an ordinance accepting and approving an update of the Service and Assessment Plan and an updated Assessment Roll for the Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 ("PID) in compliance with Chapter 372 (Authorized Improvements Assessment). (April Duvall, Director of Finance) 7. Consider authorizing the Town Manager to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with Tyler Technologies for permitting software updates to Energov in the amount of $47,000. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) 8. Consider an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2024 Budget to allocate funding for a permitting software upgrade for the Community Development Department. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) 9. Consider approval of the 2025 Town Council Meeting Calendar. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance accepting and approving a service and assessment plan for authorized services (Emergency Services) and an assessment roll for the Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (The Highlands at Trophy Club); making a finding of special benefit of the property in the district; levying special assessments against property with the district; providing for payment of the assessments in accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) 11. Case SUP-24-003 (Pour Sports Alcohol Use) Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance granting a specific use permit for alcohol beverage sales on-premises consumption in conjunction with restaurant use at Pour Sports Restaurant located at 2230 SH 114 Suite 500, Trophy Club, Denton County, Texas. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) Page 2 of 325 INDIVIDUAL ITEMS 12. Case ME-24-002 (Pour Sports Sign Meritorious Exception) Consider a meritorious exception to install a non-conforming sign at Pour Sports Restaurant, generally located at the northeast corner of SH 114 and Trophy Club Drive addressed as 2230 SH 114 Suite 500, Trophy Club, Denton County, Texas. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) 13. Consider an ordinance of the Town Council amending Appendix A "Fee Schedule", Article A1.000, Section A1.014 "Water and Wastewater Fees for Public Improvement District No. 1" to establish fees and rates for water and sewer services to customers within the service area. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) 14. Consider a resolution appointing members to the Animal Shelter Advisory Board, Crime Control and Prevention District Board, Economic Development Corporation Board, Ethics Review Commission, Parks and Recreation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Zoning Board of Adjustment as recommended by the Town Council Appointments Committee. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to the following designated sections of the Texas Government Code, Annotated, Chapter 551 (Texas Open Meetings Act), the Town Council will recess into executive session to discuss the following: Section 551.074 Personnel Matters to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee: 1) Town Secretary RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION ADJOURN The Town Council may convene into executive session to discuss posted items as allowed by Texas Government Code Sections 551.071 through 551.076 and Section 551.087. CERTIFICATION: I do hereby certify that the Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the Town Hall for the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, in a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times on the following date and time: September 18, 2024, at 4:40 p.m., and said Notice of Meeting was also posted concurrently on the Town’s website in accordance with Texas Government Code Ch. 551 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled time of said meeting. /s/ Tammy Dixon Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please Page 3 of 325 contact the Town Secretary’s Office at 6822372900, 48 hours in advance, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. Page 4 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Brandon Wright, Town Manager AGENDA ITEM: Presentation and discussion of survey results from the Bobcat Boulevard Traffic Survey as well as proposed traffic solutions. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: In January 2024, the Town Council and Town Manager began reviewing alternative options for traffic improvements on Bobcat Boulevard between Trophy Club Drive and Marshall Creek Drive. The study area has a high volume of traffic during morning hours and late afternoon due to the presence of Byron Nelson High School, Medlin Middle School, and Beck Elementary. These three schools neighbor each other and cause higher traffic when dropping off and picking up students. The Town Manager proposed a comprehensive review of the concerns, objectives, and solutions related to the traffic in this area. The review aimed to gather information, including resident input, to facilitate an informed decision-making process. A six-phase approach was introduced with the expectation that the decision-making process would last approximately eight months, resulting in the Town Council review of the proposed solutions. The outlined phases included: 1. Traffic watch and review 2. Identify key objectives 3. Develop solutions 4. Town Council debrief 5. Community input and surveys 6. Final presentation to the Town Council Phase 1 and Phase 2 were completed by February 2024. During the Town Council Work Session on February 12, 2024, the Town Council and staff reviewed several objectives. These included enhancing traffic flow and pedestrian safety, improvements to left-hand movements at key intersections, minimizing pedestrian crossing delays, and improved compliance for vehicles yielding to pedestrian crosswalks. Staff collaborated with Lee Engineering to advance Phase 3 solution development, and presented those findings to the Town Council during a Phase 4 Town Council debrief on July 22, 2024. Phase 4 findings are presented below. Based on the Lee Engineering report, the intersections of Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard, Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard, Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive, and Page 5 of 325 High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard currently experience failing level of service scores during peak AM and PM hours for left-hand turn movements. Intersections are given a "level of service" score to indicate how efficiently traffic moves through turns at the crossroads. A score of "A" is the highest level of service and "F" is the lowest. Scores of "E" or "F" are both considered to be failing scores, while scores of "A" through "D" are considered passing scores. Below is a chart outlining the current level of service scores and the projected scores with new control mechanisms implemented such as traffic guards, traffic lights, and roundabouts. Intersection Traffic Control Officer Control Level of Service Score Traffic Light Control Level of Service Score Roundabout Control Level of Service Score Marshall Creek at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn) AM: C PM: C AM: D PM: D AM: C PM: A Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard (northbound left turn) AM: D PM: D AM: D PM: C AM: B PM: A High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (southbound) AM: F PM: C AM: C PM: B AM: B PM: A High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn) AM: F PM: C AM: D PM: B AM: B PM: B Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn) AM: D PM: D AM: D PM: D AM: B PM: B Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn) AM: E PM: D AM: B PM: A AM: B PM: B The Lee Engineering report indicates that all intersections along Bobcat Boulevard are projected to receive the passing level of service scores with the implementation of traffic guards, with the exceptions of the northbound left turn from Trophy Club Drive onto Bobcat Boulevard and the southbound and eastbound left turn at High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard. The Trophy Club Drive and Bobcat Boulevard intersection receives a passing level of service score with both a traffic light or a roundabout. The High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard intersection also receives a passing level of service with a traffic light or a roundabout. Page 6 of 325 Based on these results, Lee Engineering structured a series of recommended improvements that allow for the implementation of various solutions to arrive at a passing level of service scores throughout the study area. As represented in Table 8 of the Lee Engineering report, all intersections have a passing level of service score with the recommended solutions. Below is a summary of their recommended improvements: • Marshall Creek at Bobcat: Install a roundabout. A single-lane roundabout was predicted to accommodate the existing traffic volumes, but the design could be modified as desired. • Mid-Block between Marshall Creek and Parkview: Install a pedestrian hybrid beacon on Bobcat Boulevard midway between Marshall Creek and Parkview. Concurrent with this installation, pedestrians should be directed to utilize the mid-block crossing rather than crossing at the intersections. • Parkview at Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. • High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat: Station a crossing guard/traffic control officer at this location. Install a westbound right turn lane on Bobcat at the driveway. Reconfigure the crosswalk to be on the west side of the intersection rather than the east to better facilitate the westbound right turn and southbound left turn. Reconfigure the southbound approach to provide two southbound lanes (10' left turn and 10' right turn) with a 14' inbound lane. • Bobcat at Trophy Club: Install traffic signal control. Phase 5, Public input, was solicited beginning the week of July 29. Feedback was collected through in-person focus groups as well as online surveys. A memorandum was sent to Town Council August 22, 2024 with the findings below. Focus Groups Key concerns included potential traffic congestion and flow issues, particularly with one-lane roundabouts that might exacerbate existing traffic problems. A significant amount of debate focused on whether installing a traffic light at Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive would improve safety or contribute to further congestion. Pedestrian safety was another major concern, with roundabouts perceived as posing higher risks, especially for children. These discussions also highlighted the need for additional safety measures like pedestrian islands or HAWK signals. The cost of implementing roundabouts and their long-term maintenance was also a significant topic, alongside concerns about the financial impact, including potential effects on home values and light pollution from traffic lights. Speeding on Bobcat Boulevard and the anticipated impact of future developments, such as the stadium, were additional points of discussion. Overall, the feedback emphasized the need for a balanced approach that considers traffic flow, pedestrian safety, financial implications, and future changes. Community Survey Page 7 of 325 The Town opened an online community survey on July 29, which received a total of 735 responses before it closed on August 16. Of these, 423 respondents provided written responses to question 16, and 277 provided written responses to question 17. The main concerns highlighted in the survey included congestion during school drop-off times, cited by 81.01% of respondents; pedestrian and cyclist safety, noted by 64.46%; and intersection delays, mentioned by 58.61%. The survey evaluated different solutions for traffic management at several key intersections. For Trophy Club Drive and Bobcat Boulevard, installing a traffic signal had mixed reviews: 46.08% disapprove of the traffic light (31.36% strongly disapprove), while 53.21% believed it would improve pedestrian safety. At High School Drive #4 and Bobcat Boulevard, the idea of employing a traffic control guard received strong support, with 81.43% approving of this solution (48.83% strongly approving) and 84.86% believing it would improve pedestrian safety. The roundabout proposal for Marshall Creek and Bobcat Boulevard had 60.60% approving with the solution, but 43.99% felt it was unlikely to improve pedestrian safety compared to 35.11% responding that a roundabout at this location would improve pedestrian safety. When asked to rank order desired solutions (traffic guard, traffic signal, roundabout, no control) at the different intersections, the results for Trophy Club and Bobcat show that 38.32% of respondents prefer traffic guards followed by traffic signal at 30.21% and roundabout at 29.51%. At High School Drive #4 and Bobcat, respondents preferred traffic guards at 68.81% followed by traffic signal at 16.67% and roundabout at 10.23%. At Parkview and Bobcat, respondents prefer traffic guards at 56.39% followed by roundabout at 21.31% and traffic signal at 19.18%. At Marshall Creek, respondents prefer roundabout at 39.53% followed by traffic guards at 39.37% and traffic signal at 18.11%. The public feedback from question 16 (Q: If you indicated that you support some, but not all of the Lee Engineering Recommendation plan in Question 15, please provide comments below regarding what elements of the plan you do not support.) reveals a divided opinion on traffic solutions for Trophy Club, with many residents expressing strong preferences against either roundabouts or traffic signals at key intersections like Bobcat Blvd and Trophy Club Dr. While some support roundabouts for their ability to maintain traffic flow and reduce stops, a significant portion of respondents oppose them due to concerns about pedestrian safety and their effectiveness, especially for inexperienced drivers. Traffic signals also face considerable resistance, with many arguing they would disrupt the Town's charm, worsen traffic outside peak hours, and add unnecessary cost. Conversely, there is notable support for continuing or increasing the use of crossing guards during school hours as a cost-effective and flexible solution. Alternative suggestions include pedestrian bridges or beacons, reflecting a broader desire to avoid significant, permanent infrastructure changes. Overall, the survey highlights a preference for preserving the Town’s aesthetic while seeking solutions that address traffic issues during peak times without major disruptions or high costs. Page 8 of 325 The public input for question 17 (Q: Please provide any other feedback you have for traffic/pedestrian safety improvements on Bobcat Drive.) raises concerns for pedestrian safety and traffic congestion around school zones. Some residents expressed a desire for improvement with the current traffic management, particularly around Byron Nelson High School. Many respondents favored increasing the presence of crossing guards and implementing a pedestrian bridge to improve safety. There were strong objections to more intrusive measures such as traffic lights and roundabouts, which some felt would disrupt the Town’s aesthetic and exacerbate problems. Suggestions for less invasive solutions included changing the entrance and exit of High School Drive #4, adjusting school start times, and improving coordination among crossing guards. Overall, the feedback underscores a desire for effective, cost-efficient solutions that prioritize pedestrian safety without overwhelming the community with extensive, high-cost infrastructure changes. Conclusion The public survey and input sessions reveal a strong resistance to roundabouts and traffic signals at key intersections, such as Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. Many residents are concerned that roundabouts may increase safety risks for pedestrians and inexperienced drivers, while traffic signals could disrupt the Town’s charm and prove ineffective during non- peak hours. Instead, there is significant support for maintaining or expanding the use of crossing guards during school drop-off and pick-up times, which are seen as a practical and low-cost solution. It is worth noting that except for Marshall Creek and Bobcat, resident feedback indicates that traffic guards are the preferred solution at each location compared to more permanent improvements. At Marshall Creek and Bobcat, a roundabout and traffic guards essentially tied for first place. Additional suggestions include pedestrian bridges or beacons to improve safety. Overall, the feedback emphasizes a preference for addressing traffic issues with minimal infrastructure changes, aiming to preserve the town's aesthetic and avoid unnecessary disruptions. Staff collaborated with Lee Engineering to advance Phase 5 solution development from the feedback provided by residents. Based on the feedback, Lee Engineering structured a series of recommended improvements. Below is a summary of their recommended improvements: • Marshall Creek at Bobcat: Install a roundabout that discourages pedestrian crossings directly within the intersection. While a single-lane roundabout is currently anticipated to handle existing traffic volumes effectively, the design can be adjusted if needed. Additionally, incorporate a sidewalk along Bobcat Blvd up to High School Driveway #3 to enhance pedestrian access and safety. • Mid-Block between Marshall Creek and Parkview: No mid-block crossings. Maintain the Parkview Crossing Guard as the primary solution for managing pedestrian traffic at the main entrance to Byron Nelson High School (BNHS). • Parkview at Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. Page 9 of 325 • High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat: Add a right-turn lane out of High School Driveway #4, and a dedicated left-turn lane from Bobcat into the businesses. Install a traffic guard and remove one of the pedestrian crosswalks. • Bobcat at Trophy Club: No signal or roundabout. Maintain the current traffic guard solution. Consider adding a roundabout in the future if requested. Address the slip road issue. This approach aligns best with the community's aesthetic preferences. Based on these recommended solutions, below are the level of service scores for the previously failing intersections. Only Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive with the northbound left turn receives a failing level-of-service score of E. This turn is predicted to exceed the existing storage length of approximately 160 feet during the AM peak hour. The median width would allow for the northbound left turn lane on Trophy Club Drive to be lengthened. Intersection Level of Service Marshall Creek at Bobcat Boulevard with Roundabout (eastbound left turn) AM: C PM: A Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard with Traffic Guard (northbound left turn) AM: D PM: D High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard with Traffic Guard & Extra Turn Lane (southbound) AM: B PM: C High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn) AM: D PM: C Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn) AM: D PM: D Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn) AM: E PM: D The Town Council Workshop will focus on reviewing and discussing data from Phases 1 through 5. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A Page 10 of 325 FISCAL IMPACT: The following are preliminary cost estimates for certain elements associated with traffic improvements to the study area on Bobcat Boulevard. • Bobcat Left Hand-Turn Lane: $50,000 • HS 4/Right Hand-Turn Lane: $100,000 • HS 4/Bobcat Traffic Control Officer (Annual): $15,000 • One-lane roundabout at Marshall Creek and Bobcat Boulevard: $3.25 million to $3.5 million • HS 3/Crosswalk (flashers): $11,000 The preliminary cost estimate for the Lee Engineering recommended plan for Bobcat Boulevard is $3.7 million in one-time infrastructure costs with $15,000 in additional annual crossing guard personnel costs. A future project, based on resident support and desire may include the addition of a roundabout at the intersection of Trophy Club Drive and Bobcat. The amount of this roundabout is estimated at $4.25 million. Annual capital cost inflation figures are between 3% and 8%, with the amount potentially being as high as $300,000 per year before that project could be approved. In 2023, the Town Council issued a bond in the amount of $7 million to provide funding for traffic improvements on Bobcat Boulevard or other identified qualifying projects such as general road or park improvements. Denton County has previously agreed, subject to final approvals, to provide 50% funding up to $3.3 million for improvements to Bobcat Boulevard that address traffic concerns. Based on the recommended plan, the Town may expect Denton County to share in the cost of approximately $1.75 to $1.85 million. The Town's participation would be approximately $2 million. LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Lee Engineering Updated Report After Public Input Process ACTIONS/OPTIONS: This Work Shop agenda item is being presented for discussion and feedback purposes only. Staff is seeking direction from the Council regarding the next steps for Bobcat Boulevard. Page 11 of 325 Bobcat Traffic Improvements Town Council Workshop September 23, 2024 Page 12 of 325 Study Area Map Page 13 of 325 6-Phase Project 1. Traffic Watch & Review 2. Identify Key Objectives 3. Develop Solutions 4. Town Council Debrief 5. Community Input & Surveys 6. Final Presentation to Council 1. Page 14 of 325 Traffic Watch & Review Page 15 of 325 •Identify solutions for improved traffic flow and pedestrian safety at south BNHS exit onto Bobcat •Identify solutions for left-hand movements at Trophy Club Drive & Bobcat, Parkview & Bobcat, and Marshall Creek & Bobcat •Identify solutions to minimize pedestrian crossing delays •Identify solutions for improved compliance with vehicles stopping for pedestrian crosswalks •Identify other traffic control solutions to determine if any options provide substantial improvement over traffic-guard-controlled movements •Avoid diverting traffic onto neighborhood streets Key Objectives Page 16 of 325 •Marshall Creek & Bobcat: Install a roundabout. A single-lane roundabout was predicted to accommodate the existing traffic volumes, but the design could be modified as desired. •Mid-Block between Marshall Creek & Parkview: Install a pedestrian hybrid beacon on Bobcat Boulevard midway between Marshall Creek and Parkview. Concurrent with this installation, pedestrians should be directed to utilize the mid-block crossing rather than crossing at the intersections. •Parkview & Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. •High School Driveway #4 & Bobcat: Station a crossing guard/traffic control officer at this location. Install a westbound right turn lane on Bobcat at the driveway. Reconfigure the crosswalk to be on the west side of the intersection rather than the east to better facilitate the westbound right turn and southbound left turn. Reconfigure the southbound approach to provide two southbound lanes (10' left turn and 10' right turn) with a 14' inbound lane. •Bobcat & Trophy Club: Install traffic signal control. Lee Engineering Recommended Solutions Page 17 of 325 Town Council Debrief Workshop July 22, 2024 Town Council Debrief Page 18 of 325 Community Input & Surveys Total ResponsesTotal Filled Slots Input Sessions Survey 24 735 Page 19 of 325 Focus Group Sessions | Input Results General Feedback: •Concerns with traffic flow congestion with one-lane roundabout. •Concern that either traffic light or roundabout at TC Drive & Bobcat would increase congestion. •General concern with pedestrian safety at roundabouts. •Concern and questions about the cost options for roundabouts. •Concern of decreasing housing values with nearby traffic lights. •Anticipated impact of future developments on Bobcat. Page 20 of 325 Focus Group Sessions | Input Results Feedback: •A roundabout at Bobcat & Marshall Creek would need additional safety measures to ensure pedestrian safety, such as pedestrian islands and/or HAWK signal. •The area needs a balanced approach that considers traffic flow, pedestrian safety, financial impacts, and future changes. Page 21 of 325 Community Survey Results Q: What are your primary concerns about traffic flow and safety? •81.01% concerned about congestion during school drop- off and pick-up times. Page 22 of 325 Community Survey Results Q: Opinion of installing a traffic signal at TC Drive & Bobcat •46.08% disapprove of installing a traffic signal at TC Drive & Bobcat. Page 23 of 325 Community Survey Results Q: Opinion of installing a traffic control guard at High School Drive #4 & Bobcat •81.43% approve to adding a traffic control guard at High School Drive #4 & Bobcat. Page 24 of 325 Community Survey Results Q: Opinion of installing a roundabout at Marshall Creek & Bobcat •60.60% approve of installing a roundabout at the intersection of Marshall Creek & Bobcat. Page 25 of 325 Community Survey Results Improve Pedestrian Safety: •53.21% responded that a traffic signal at TC Drive & Bobcat would improve pedestrian safety. Page 26 of 325 Community Survey Results Improve Pedestrian Safety: •43.99% responded that a roundabout at Marshall Creek & Bobcat would not increase pedestrian safety. Page 27 of 325 Community Survey Results Improve Pedestrian Safety: •84.86% of responses indicate that a traffic control guard at HS Drive #4 & Bobcat would improve pedestrian safety. Page 28 of 325 Community Survey Results Lee Engineering Recommendation Survey Response Opinion of Recommendation Improve Pedestrian Safety Install a traffic signal at Trophy Club Drive & Bobcat. 39.20% Agree 14.72% Neither Agree nor Disagree 46.08% Disagree 53.21% Likely to improve safety 15.19% Neither Agree nor Disagree 31.60% Not likely to improve safety Install a roundabout at the intersection of Marshall Creek & Bobcat. 60.60% Agree 14.19% Neither Agree nor Disagree 25.21% Disagree 35.11% Likely to improve safety 20.90% Neither Agree nor Disagree 43.99% Not likely to improve safety Provide a traffic control guard at High School Drive #4 & Bobcat. 81.43% Agree 9.08% Neither Agree nor Disagree 9.49% Disagree 84.86% Likely to improve safety 7.91% Neither Agree nor Disagree 7.23% Not likely to improve safety Page 29 of 325 Community Survey Results Q. Prioritize proposed solution to improve traffic and pedestrian safety at the intersection of High School Drive #4 & Bobcat. Page 30 of 325 Community Survey Results Q. Prioritize proposed solution to improve traffic and pedestrian safety at the intersection of Parkview Drive & Bobcat. Page 31 of 325 Community Survey Results Q. Prioritize proposed solution to improve traffic and pedestrian safety at the intersection of Marshall Creek & Bobcat. Page 32 of 325 Community Survey Results •Concerns are raised that traffic signals could worsen congestion and disrupt traffic flow. •There is opposition to installing traffic signals anywhere in the town. •Many commenters prefer roundabouts over traffic signals. Roundabouts are seen as better for maintaining traffic flow during both peak and normal times. Q16. Provide comments regarding what elements of the plan you do or do not support. •Some support the use of traffic control guards, especially where roundabouts or traffic signals are not favored. •There is concern and questions about the financial implications of the proposed solutions, including the cost of roundabouts. •There is a strong focus on the safety concerns at High School Driveway #4. Page 33 of 325 Community Survey Results •Many respondents believe that adding crossing guards or police officers during peak times (morning and afternoon) is a cost-effective solution to manage traffic. •Many responses highlight the issue of cut- through traffic, particularly due to construction on Highway 114/377. •The impact of future developments, such as the new stadium, is a concern. Q17. Provide any other feedback you have for traffic/pedestrian safety improvements on Bobcat. •Lowering speed limits throughout the Town to enhance safety. •Roundabouts are generally preferred over traffic signals for improving traffic flow and safety. •Some desire for pedestrian overpasses or underpasses continues, especially in high- traffic areas like Bobcat Blvd. Page 34 of 325 Community Survey Results Survey and Input Session Feedback: •Residents expressed support for maintaining or expanding the use of crossing guards during school drop-off and pick-up times. •Residents indicate that traffic guards are the preferred solution at each location compared to more permanent improvements (except for Marshall Creek & Bobcat). •Residents prefer addressing traffic issues with minimal infrastructure changes, aiming to preserve the Town's aesthetic and avoid unnecessary disruptions. •Residents are resistant to roundabouts and traffic signals at key intersections, particularly at Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. •Many residents are concerned that roundabouts may increase safety risks for pedestrians and inexperienced drivers. •Residents are concerned that traffic signals will disrupt the Town’s charm and prove ineffective during non-peak hours. Page 35 of 325 Incorporating Feedback to Proposed Solutions •Lack of community support for infrastructure improvements at TC Drive & Bobcat. •If community support/desire grows in the future, the community feedback suggests a roundabout will be more desirable over traffic lights to maintain the Town’s charm and appeal. •Slip road modifications may be necessary to accommodate a proper roundabout. •Maintain the roundabout solution for Marshall Creek & Bobcat •BUT…. Develop a pedestrian safety plan that will include diverting pedestrians away from the roundabout for crossings at Parkview and at HS Entrance #3. •Develop the main high school stadium entrance at Parkview and Bobcat to avoid need for mid-block pedestrian crossing. Page 36 of 325 •Marshall Creek & Bobcat: Install a roundabout that discourages pedestrian crossings directly within the intersection. While a single-lane roundabout is currently anticipated to handle existing traffic volumes effectively, the design can be adjusted if needed. Additionally, incorporate a sidewalk along Bobcat Blvd up to High School Driveway #3 to enhance pedestrian access and safety. •Mid-Block between Marshall Creek & Parkview: No mid-block crossings. Maintain the Parkview Crossing Guard as the primary solution for managing pedestrian traffic at the main entrance to Byron Nelson High School (BNHS). •Parkview & Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. •High School Driveway #4 & Bobcat: Add a right-turn lane out of High School Driveway #4, and a dedicated left-turn lane from Bobcat into the businesses. Install a traffic guard and remove one of the pedestrian crosswalks. •Bobcat &Trophy Club: No signal or roundabout. Maintain the current traffic guard solution. Consider adding a roundabout in the future if requested. Address the slip road issue. This approach aligns best with the community's aesthetic preferences. Lee Engineering Final Recommended Solutions Page 37 of 325 Lee Engineering Final Recommended Solutions Intersection Level of Service Marshall Creek at Bobcat Boulevard with Roundabout (eastbound left turn) AM: C PM: A Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard with Traffic Guard (northbound left turn) AM: D PM: D High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard with Traffic Guard & Extra Turn Lane (southbound) AM: B PM: C High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn) AM: D PM: C Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn) AM: D PM: D Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn) AM: E PM: D Page 38 of 325 Lee Engineering Final Recommended Solutions Page 39 of 325 Solution Options Bobcat Left Hand-Turn Lane $50,000 HS 4/Right Hand-Turn Lane $100,000 HS 4/Bobcat Traffic Control $15,000 Officer (Annual) Marshall Creek/Bobcat $3.25 million to Roundabout $3.5 million Roundabout HS 3/Crosswalk $11,000 (Flashers) Amount Lee Engineering Recommendation Total Costs Construction: $3.7 million Annual Operations: $15,000 Tentative Denton County Participation: $1.75-1.85 million Town Participation: Approx. $2 million Page 40 of 325 Option Total Cost Bobcat & Trophy Club Roundabout* *If community support/desire increases, plan for the installation of a roundabout in the future to conform with the Town’s charm and appeal. May require modifications to the adjacent slip road to mitigate impacts to those neighbors. Future Project Construction: $4.25 million Construction’s annual inflation typically averages around 3-5%, but in recent years, inflationary pressures have pushed it to as high as 8%. (Annual increases as much as $300,000) Denton County participation may cover ½ of the cost. Page 41 of 325 Questions/Discussion Page 42 of 325 social media | email | website Page 43 of 325 ARIZONA NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA TEXAS 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1660, Dallas, TX 75234 (972) 248-3006 | www.leeengineering.com Page 1 of 18 September 17, 2024 Mr. Matt Cox Director of Community Development Town of Trophy Club 1 Trophy Wood Drive Trophy Club, TX 76262 Re: School Area Evaluation, Trophy Club, Texas – Preliminary Findings and Recommended Improvements Dear Mr. Cox: Lee Engineering has completed a preliminary review of the existing conditions near Byron Nelson High School, Medlin Middle School, and Samuel Beck Elementary School in the Town of Trophy Club, Texas. This study includes the following intersections: Bobcat Boulevard at Byron Nelson High School Driveways 1-4 Bobcat Boulevard at Marshall Creek Road Bobcat Boulevard at Parkview Drive Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive Bobcat Boulevard is a four-lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (mph). Between the High School Drive 4 and Trophy Club Drive, Bobcat Boulevard is undivided. Bobcat Boulevard does not continue east past Trophy Club Drive. Byron Nelson High School has four access driveways on Bobcat Boulevard. Marshall Creek Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Medlin Middle School has one access driveway on Marshall Creek Road. Parkview Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway with no posted speed limit. Medlin Middle School has three access driveways on Parkview Drive. Samuel Beck Elementary School has four access driveways on Parkview Drive and no access elsewhere. Trophy Club Drive is a four-lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. A vicinity map of the study area is shown in Figure 1 and the existing intersection lane configurations are shown in Figure 2. Note that all of the study intersections appear to operate with two-way stop control despite the presence of stop bars on all approaches at all intersections along the south side of the high school. Page 44 of 325 Page 2 of 18 Figure 1: Vicinity Map Byron Nelson High School Medlin Middle School Samuel Beck Elementary School Study Intersection Page 45 of 325 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 HS DRIVE 2 HS DRIVE 3 MARSHALL CREEK RD PARKVIEW DRHS DRIVE 4OFF-SITE DWYTROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DRBLVDBOBCAT BLVD BOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection One-Way STOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOP Figure 2Existing Intersection Lane Configurations Intersection Observed at Crossing Guard Intersection Observed at Crossing Guard Intersection Observed at Crossing Guard STOP Stop-Controlled Approach Lane Configuration Page 46 of 325 Page 4 of 18 Field Visit Observations Based on a field visit to the study intersection, the following observations are made: AM Peak Hour High school arrival time occurs before arrival time for the middle school, with minimal overlap between the two arrival periods. The crossing guards present at the intersections of Bobcat Boulevard with Parkview Drive and with Marshal Creek Road appear to be essential to getting pedestrians across the street and allowing traffic to clear the intersections. The crossing guard at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive is essential to keep traffic moving. High school students were observed crossing to the businesses on the south side of Bobcat Boulevard and then back to the high school. A number of heavy vehicles, specifically dirt and gravel haulers serving sites off of Trophy Park Drive, add to congestion within the study area. Long vehicle queues were observed on the eastbound approach of Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard in the morning school period. PM peak Hour The high school dismissal period occurs before dismissal for the middle school; however, there is some overlap between the two school dismissals. Exiting vehicles from the high school experience long delays from the easternmost driveway (identified as High School Driveway 4 in this study). There were also some pedestrians observed crossing at this drive, which the presence of a crossing guard would help. Note that eastbound vehicle queues from Trophy Club Drive extend to this driveway on Bobcat Boulevard. LEE observed high school students being picked up from vehicles parked on Roseville Drive east of the high school (approximately 300 feet east of High School Driveway 4). Some high school students were observed crossing to the commercial area south of Bobcat Boulevard for pickup. The pick-up for the middle school creates significant congestion in the area. Queues associated with the pick- up queue back up onto Bobcat Boulevard. Middle school students were observed to cross in large groups to Independence Park for pick-up. There is a marked school cross walk on Parkview Drive between the school exit driveway and Independence Park. Some middle school students also cross school driveways to be picked up from the curb on Parkview Drive south of the school rather than on campus. Overall, the existing crossing guards are essential for pedestrians and vehicles throughout the PM peak hour. Dismissal congestion was cleared by 4:35 PM. Existing and Projected Volumes Existing turning movement volumes were collected during the AM and School PM peak hours on Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at the above study intersections. The peak hour volumes and corresponding peak time periods at each intersection are shown in Figure 3. Pedestrian and bicycle movements are shown in Figure 4. Page 47 of 325 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 7:30 (3:45)272 (24)375 (203)6 (89) 48 (130)56 (13)284 (389)HS DRIVE 2 7:45 (3:45) HS DRIVE 3 7:30 (3:45)164 (34)376 (394)382 (284)153 (133) 115 (103)222 (300)2 (2)7 (88) 5 (24)350 (95)213 (279)MARSHALL CREEK RD 7:30 (4:00)307 (345)77 (103)321 (275) 219 (52)352 (362)158 (285)PARKVIEW DR7:45 (3:45)192 (153) 411 (471) 216 (114) 374 (462)164 (111)166 (128)HS DRIVE 47:30 (4:00)OFF-SITE DWY8 (1) 386 (557) 158 (44)77 (106)1 (0)139 (71)37 (45) 460 (523) 467 (61)64 (73)3 (0)6 (5)245 (234)304 (111)117 (209)535 (466)TROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DR7:30 (4:00)373 (495) 55 (69)BLVDBOBCAT BLVD BOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection AM Peak Hour (School PM Peak Hour) Tuesday, March 26, 2024. Turning movement volumes collected on Existing (2024) Peak Hour Vehicular Traffic Volumes Figure 3 Page 48 of 325 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 7:30 (3:45) HS DRIVE 2 7:45 (3:45) HS DRIVE 3 7:30 (3:45) MARSHALL CREEK RD 7:30 (4:00)PARKVIEW DR7:45 (3:45)HS DRIVE 47:30 (4:00)OFF-SITE DWYTROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DR7:30 (4:00)BLVDBOBCAT BLVD BOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection Existing (2024) Peak Hour Pedestrian Volumes0 (3)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (2) 0 (6) 1 (0) 0 (0) 13 (6) 3 (30) 1 (0) 3 (2)0 (3)2 (8)0 (0)1 (1)8 (6)7 (26)5 (2)4 (4)3 (10) 4 (3) 1 (1) 4 (2) 0 (29) 2 (6) 0 (5) 0 (4)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (1)1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (4) 5 (2) 0 (2) 0 (0) 2 (4) 1 (0) 0 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 14 (1) 0 (19) 0 (0) 0 (0)0 (2)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (5)0 (0)0 (0)0 (2)0 (4)0 (0)0 (0)3 (17)2 (33)0 (0)0 (3)0 (7) 11 (0) 1 (3) 2 (3) 1 (4) 4 (2) 0 (2) 2 (0)11 (1)3 (2)0 (1)0 (0)AM Peak Hour Peds (School PM Peak Hour Peds) Tuesday, March 26, 2024. Pedestrian volumes collected on AM Peak Hour Bikes (School PM Peak Hour Bikes) Figure 4 Page 49 of 325 Page 7 of 18 Intersection Capacity Analysis The Level of Service (LOS) of an intersection is a qualitative measure of capacity and operating conditions and is directly related to vehicle delay. The LOS criteria for unsignalized and signalized intersections are shown in Table 1. LOS is given a letter designation from A to F, with LOS A representing very short delays and LOS F representing very long delays or over-capacity conditions. LOS D is typically considered the minimum acceptable condition. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Level-of-Service (LOS) Average Delay (seconds/vehicle) Unsignalized Signalized A ≤ 10.0 ≤ 10.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 10.1 to 20.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 20.1 to 35.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 55.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 55.1 to 80.0 F > 50.0 or Volume exceeds Capacity > 80.0 or Volume exceeds Capacity SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2016 Capacity analyses were conducted for the study intersection for Existing peak hour traffic conditions. The following scenarios were analyzed: Table 2 - Existing traffic control Table 3 – Pretimed signalization with pedestrian phase assumed at the three intersections with traffic control officers to simulate this operation. Again, these intersections include: o Bobcat Boulevard at Marshall Creek Road o Bobcat Boulevard at Parkview Drive o Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive o For the purposes of this analysis, High School Driveway 4 was also analyzed with simulated officer control. Although there is no current crossing guard or police officer at this location, it was analyzed to determine potential improvements gained by officer control. Table 4 – Installation of traffic signal control at the above three intersections with coordination along Bobcat Boulevard. Operation at the adjacent school driveways is also shown, as installation of traffic signal control results in additional gaps in traffic along Bobcat Boulevard. Table 5 – Installation of traffic signal control with coordination at High School Driveway 4 along with the signalization in Table 4. Table 6 – Installation of single-lane roundabouts at the above four intersections. Note that a southbound right turn by-pass lane was assumed on Trophy Club Drive in order for the roundabout to operate acceptably. Similarly, a westbound right turn by-pass lane was assumed on Bobcat Boulevard at High School Driveway 4 in order for the roundabout to operate acceptably. The stop-control and signalized capacity analysis was performed using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition methodologies in the Synchro software package. The roundabout capacity was performed using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition methodologies in the SIDRA software package. Printouts of the traffic analysis results are provided as an attachment to this letter. Page 50 of 325 Page 8 of 18 Table 2: Capacity Analysis Results – Existing Traffic Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 1 High School Driveway 1 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 25.6 D 0.32 33 27.8 D 0.66 118 SB LT 11.5 B 0.43 55 9.8 A 0.04 3 2 High School Driveway 2 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB LT 22.9 C 0.53 78 18.5 C 0.40 48 WB RT 10.3 B 0.20 18 10.4 B 0.17 15 3 High School Driveway 3 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 27.3 D 0.09 8 20.9 C 0.39 45 SB LT 10.9 B 0.27 28 8.6 A 0.04 3 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) EB LT 296.3 F 1.49 423 88.5 F 0.60 70 EB RT 16.1 C 0.55 85 16.1 C 0.49 68 NB LT 9.2 A 0.18 18 10.3 B 0.32 35 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) WB LT 10.6 B 0.28 28 10.2 B 0.15 13 NB LT 439.0 F 1.74 368 164.7 F 1.07 193 NB RT 13.1 B 0.29 30 14.4 B 0.24 23 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT 15.1 C 0.36 43 9.5 A 0.06 5 WB LT 8.7 A 0.05 3 9.4 A 0.06 5 NB 43.2 E 0.51 63 15.0 B 0.19 18 SB 1487.7 F 4.03 743 202.0 F 1.23 275 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) EB LT 2300.7 F 4.91 238 289.7 F 1.20 155 EB RT 24.5 C 0.73 158 18.9 C 0.69 140 NB LT 19.9 C 0.75 178 10.5 B 0.44 58 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Table 3: Capacity Analysis Results – Simulated ‘Traffic Control Officer’ Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB LT 31.4 C 0.58 170 28.9 C 0.17 56 EB RT 6.4 A 0.57 43 8.8 A 0.58 66 NB LT 34.1 C 0.51 157 42.0 D 0.57 251 NB T 32.7 C 0.57 157 36.4 D 0.36 158 SB 32.3 C 0.66 138 39.3 D 0.79 185 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB 40.3 D 0.73 210 34.7 C 0.63 226 WB LT 43.2 D 0.61 150 44.1 D 0.33 86 WB T 38.8 D 0.53 128 48.2 D 0.66 173 NB LT 37.1 D 0.56 149 39.2 D 0.52 120 NB RT 8.0 A 0.42 50 10.3 B 0.38 44 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With ‘Crossing Guard’ EB LT 94.1 F 0.97 177 31.0 C 0.44 32 EB T 5.0 A 0.27 40 13.9 B 0.42 216 WB 29.3 C 0.97 130 15.1 B 0.68 78 NB 25 C 0.56 38 14.8 B 0.37 43 SB 100.5 F 1.07 201 28.6 C 0.60 124 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB LT 37.0 D 0.24 57 36.9 D 0.21 67 EB RT 18.7 B 0.73 119 20.9 C 0.72 209 NB LT 75.1 E 1.04 467 37.3 D 0.83 397 NB T 17.3 B 0.11 38 18.6 B 0.19 66 SB 34.6 C 0.90 132 47.6 D 0.86 154 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Page 51 of 325 Page 9 of 18 Table 4: Capacity Analysis Results – Installation of Traffic Signal Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 1 High School Driveway 1 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 19.6 C 0.25 25 16.1 C 0.48 65 SB LT 10.2 B 0.38 45 8.8 A 0.03 3 2 High School Driveway 2 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB LT 17.8 C 0.45 58 14.0 B 0.30 33 WB RT 9.3 A 0.17 15 9.3 A 0.14 13 3 High School Driveway 3 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 24.0 C 0.08 8 15.9 C 0.30 30 SB LT 10.4 B 0.26 25 8.1 A 0.04 3 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With Signal EB LT 48.4 D 0.73 201 49.3 D 0.38 73 EB RT 16.6 B 0.65 121 19.2 C 0.66 126 NB LT 6.6 A 0.30 81 2.3 A 0.40 24 NB T 5.0 A 0.17 80 0.7 A 0.13 14 SB 12.0 B 0.24 113 8.0 A 0.22 109 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With Signal EB 14.7 B 0.39 92 11.5 B 0.52 127 WB LT 7.6 A 0.48 48 5.6 A 0.27 27 WB T 4.4 A 0.18 37 4.9 A 0.22 52 NB LT 35.6 D 0.43 165 31.4 C 0.27 123 NB RT 3.8 A 0.27 37 4.5 A 0.20 33 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT 15.1 C 0.36 43 9.5 A 0.06 5 WB LT 8.1 A 0.04 3 8.2 A 0.04 3 NB 32.3 D 0.42 48 11.4 B 0.13 10 SB 1109.9 F 3.24 695 46.0 E 0.72 125 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) With Signal EB LT 48.1 D 0.43 62 45.7 D 0.45 66 EB RT 10.6 B 0.61 38 23.3 C 0.87 229 NB LT 17.2 B 0.79 235 5.6 A 0.56 121 NB T 2.1 A 0.05 13 2.2 A 0.08 23 SB 14.7 B 0.45 146 10.8 B 0.20 95 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Table 5: Capacity Analysis Results – Installation of Traffic Signal Control at High School Driveway 4 Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT 38.4 D 0.73 123 12.0 B 0.13 32 EB T 6.9 A 0.25 52 13.4 B 0.31 148 WB 25.3 C 0.90 240 20.2 C 0.47 218 NB 22.1 C 0.50 40 13.9 B 0.45 33 SB 32.8 C 0.62 174 17.9 B 0.36 117 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Page 52 of 325 Page 10 of 18 Table 6: Capacity Analysis Results – Installation of Roundabout Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) Single-Lane Roundabout EB 17.5 C 0.73 281 8.6 A 0.40 53 NB 12.2 B 0.62 171 9.4 A 0.57 120 SB 7.9 A 0.43 66 10.1 B 0.51 95 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) Single-Lane Roundabout EB 13.4 B 0.66 226 10.0 A 0.57 114 WB 11.3 B 0.61 122 9.3 A 0.53 99 NB 10.3 B 0.46 74 8.5 A 0.33 39 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB 11.2 B 0.62 129 10.5 B 0.58 112 WB 9.7 A 0.57 96 7.1 A 0.47 79 NB 8.2 A 0.16 16 7.8 A 0.14 14 SB 10.9 B 0.41 56 8.5 A 0.28 31 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) Single-Lane Roundabout with SB RT Bypass Lane EB 10.9 B 0.55 120 11.8 B 0.61 161 NB 11.5 B 0.66 165 10.2 B 0.60 134 SB T 10.4 B 0.42 56 7.6 A 0.30 33 SB RT 12.6 B 0.52 85 5.7 A 0.14 14 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) As shown, with only stop-control, the left turn movements on the approaches of Marshall Creek Road and Parkview Drive operate poorly during the AM and School PM peak hours. Similarly, the eastbound left turn of Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive operates with significant delay. In addition, southbound High School Driveway 4 operates well above capacity with significant queuing. With the simulated crossing guard/traffic control officer, those three intersections generally appear to operate at acceptable levels of service. The northbound left turn from Trophy Club Drive operates above capacity with significant queuing during the AM peak hour due to heavy traffic volumes for this movement. In addition, while a crossing guard/traffic control officer would improve operation for the southbound approach of High School Driveway 4, this would result in the eastbound left turn and the westbound approach to be approaching capacity during the AM peak hour. With installation of traffic signal control, the three public street intersections are predicted to operate at acceptable levels of service. The stop-controlled high school driveways also experience improvement with additional gaps in traffic due to upstream signals. However, the southbound High School Driveway 4 still operates with significant delay, particularly during the AM peak hour. Operation would be improved at High School Driveway 4 with traffic signal control, as shown in Table 5. Roundabout control generally results in better delay and level of service than traffic signal control at the above four intersections and could be considered as a viable option along Bobcat Boulevard. As noted previously, while single lane roundabouts could accommodate the existing traffic, right turn by-pass lanes would be needed at two locations: On southbound Trophy Club Drive at Bobcat Boulevard On westbound Bobcat Boulevard at High School Driveway 4 Page 53 of 325 Page 11 of 18 Preliminary Signal Warrant Analysis Preliminary signal warrant analysis was conducted for the three public street intersections and for High School Driveway 4. The traffic signal warrant analysis presented in this letter is based on the traffic signal warrants contained in Chapter 4C, “Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies,” of the 2011 Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Nine warrants are included in the manual for warranting a traffic signal installation. These warrants are: Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume; Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Vehicular Volume; Warrant 3 – Peak Hour; Warrant 4 – Pedestrian Volume; Warrant 5 – School Crossing; Warrant 6 – Coordinated Signal System; Warrant 7 – Crash Experience; Warrant 8 – Roadway Network; Warrant 9 – Intersection Near a Grade Crossing For the purposes of this study, Warrant 1, Warrant 2, Warrant 3, Warrant 5, and Warrant 7 were evaluated. Based on the predicted traffic volumes at these intersections, Bobcat Boulevard would be considered the Major Roadway and the other roadways would all be considered the Minor Roadway. However, at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive, Bobcat Boulevard would be considered the Minor Roadway. The Texas MUTCD recommends considering the effects of right turn volumes on the minor street approach if the movement enters the major street with minimal conflict, primarily with the presence of a right turn lane. However, for this preliminary analysis all right turn volumes were included and the minor street approaches were evaluated as two- lane approaches where applicable. High School Driveway 4 is a single-lane approach. Finally, this analysis was performed for four (4) hours of the day at each intersection based on the collected traffic data. In order to fully evaluate traffic volume warrants, additional data should be collected. The analysis volumes are included as an attachment to this letter along with the volume warrant results for each intersection. Additionally, a description of each of the above warrants is included as an attachment for reference. A summary of the warrant results is shown in Table 6. Highlighted cells indicate values which exceed the threshold value. Table 7: Preliminary Traffic Signal Warrant Results Intersection Vehicle Volume Warrants - Hours Met Warrant 5 Warrant 7 Warrant 1A Warrant 1B Warrant 1C Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Max Peds/Hr Required Gap (sec) Adequate Gaps/Hr Correctable Crashes/Yr Marshall Creek at Bobcat 3 1 3 3 2 52 17 - 0 Parkview at Bobcat 3 3 4 3 1 38 17 - 1 HS Drive 4 at Bobcat 3 4 3 3 1 57 19 - 1 Bobcat at Trophy Club 4 2 4 4 2 13 18 - 4 Minimum Required to Meet: 8 8 8 4 1 20 60 5 Based on the volume warrants, all intersections are anticipated to meet traffic thresholds for Warrant 3, the Peak Hour Warrant. However, this warrant is typically applicable for “unusual cases such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time”, per the Texas MUTCD. It is unclear whether a high school would qualify for this warrant. The intersection of Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive is predicted to meet Warrant 2, the Four-Hour Warrant. The other three intersections meet thresholds for Warrant 2 for three hours of the day, and it is possible that an additional hour may be met with additional traffic data collected. Similarly, it is possible that Warrant 1 could be met at one or more intersections with additional data collection. Page 54 of 325 Page 12 of 18 Warrant 5 was evaluated based on the collected pedestrian volumes. This warrant requires a minimum of 20 school pedestrians crossing the major road in an hour, which is met at Marshall Creek Road, Parkview Drive, and High School Driveway 4. This warrant also requires that the number of gaps in traffic on the major road exceeds the number of minutes in the evaluated time period. However, gap data was not collected as part of this study. Additionally, this warrant recommends consideration of alternative remedial measures such as a crossing guard before considering a traffic signal. Warrant 7 was evaluated based on available crash data from TxDOT’s online C.R.I.S. query tool for each intersection. Based on available data, none of the study intersections are anticipated to meet the crash warrant. Based on these results, installation of traffic signal control should be considered at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. It is recommended to collect 24-hour turning movement data and perform a full traffic signal warrant analysis. Similarly, consider conducting a full traffic signal warrant analysis at the other intersections. Preliminary Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Analysis A pedestrian hybrid beacon is used to warn and control vehicular traffic at an unsignalized location to assist pedestrians crossing the roadway at a marked crosswalk. A pedestrian hybrid beacon may be considered at marked crosswalk locations that do not meet traffic signal warrants or where a decision is made to not install a traffic signal. The need for a pedestrian hybrid beacon should be considered when the point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street, when plotted on Figure 4F-1 (or 4F-2 when applicable) of the Texas MUTCD, falls above the curve for the appropriate length of crosswalk. Based on the posted speed limit on Bobcat Boulevard (30 mph) the reduced warrant threshold was not used for this warrant. This warrant requires a minimum of 20 pedestrians per hour, so the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive would not meet this threshold based on the data in Table 6. Figure 5 shows the results of this analysis for the other three intersections in Table 6. Figure 5: Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guidelines (Figure 4F-1 from the Texas MUTCD) Crossing distance on Bobcat Boulevard at High School Driveway 4 is approximately 50 feet from center of curb ramp to center of curb ramp. At Parkview Drive and at Marshall Creek Road, the full crossing distance is approximately 75 feet, although it is possible that the median could act as a pedestrian refuge on the west side of each roadway. Based on these distances and the results in Figure 5, a pedestrian hybrid beacon could be considered at all three locations. Additionally, thresholds would also be met if pedestrians were relocated to a new mid-block crossing on Bobcat Boulevard, particularly if pedestrians from multiple intersections were relocated. Page 55 of 325 Page 13 of 18 Suggested Mitigation Based on the results of this analysis, the following mitigation measures are recommended: Marshall Creek at Bobcat: Install a roundabout. A single-lane roundabout was predicted to accommodate the existing traffic volumes, but the design could be modified as desired. Mid-Block between Marshall Creek and Parkview: Install a pedestrian hybrid beacon (HAWK signal) on Bobcat Boulevard midway between Marshall Creek and Parkview. Concurrent with this installation, pedestrians should be directed to utilize the mid-block crossing rather than crossing at the intersections. Parkview at Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat: Station a crossing guard/traffic control officer at this location. Install a westbound right turn lane on Bobcat at the driveway. Reconfigure the crosswalk to be on the west side of the intersection rather than the east to better facilitate the westbound right turn and southbound left turn. Reconfigure the southbound approach to provide two southbound lanes (10’ left turn and 10’ right turn) with a 14’ inbound lane. Bobcat at Trophy Club: Install traffic signal control. The resulting operation is shown in Table 8. Note that some results may differ from previous tables due to different arrival patterns in the model. Additionally, pedestrians crossing Bobcat Boulevard were relocated from Marshall Creek and Parkview to the proposed mid-block crossing. Table 8: Capacity Analysis Results – Recommended Mitigation Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With Roundabout (Single-Lane) EB 17.5 C 0.73 281 8.6 A 0.40 53 NB 12.2 B 0.62 171 9.4 A 0.57 120 SB 7.9 A 0.43 66 10.1 B 0.51 95 Mid-Block Pedestrian Signal EB 4.0 A 0.26 75 4.0 A 0.25 74 WB 12.1 B 0.22 157 17.1 B 0.24 185 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB 6.8 A 0.47 71 9.0 A 0.50 86 WB LT 13.3 B 0.53 66 7.3 A 0.25 23 WB T 9.8 A 0.46 45 9.3 A 0.50 45 NB LT 21.9 C 0.48 95 19.8 B 0.35 74 NB RT 6.0 A 0.38 38 6.4 A 0.29 31 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With ‘Crossing Guard’ EB LT 46.6 D 0.62 180 43.6 D 0.21 66 EB T 10.9 B 0.28 104 15.0 B 0.40 156 WB 20.3 C 0.73 194 31.3 C 0.72 213 NB 24.0 C 0.52 42 13.6 B 0.31 46 SB 21.3 C 0.46 92 28.1 C 0.37 119 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) With Traffic Signal EB LT 39.9 D 0.43 68 50.7 D 0.45 101 EB RT 4.8 A 0.54 45 43.2 D 0.86 221 NB LT 20.7 C 0.74 276 5.8 A 0.58 121 NB T 2.1 A 0.05 13 2.2 A 0.08 37 SB 16.3 B 0.52 132 9.3 A 0.19 88 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) For reference, the spacing between these intersections is shown in Table 9. Table 9: Spacing Between Intersections on Bobcat Boulevard Roadway Segment Approx. Distance High School Driveway 3 to Marshall Creek 820’ Marshall Creek to Mid-Block Crossing 210’ Mid-Block Crossing to Parkview 215’ Parkview to High School Driveway 4 530’ High School Driveway Dwy 4 to Trophy Club 600’ Page 56 of 325 Page 14 of 18 Based on the results above, predicted queues are not anticipated to extend to adjacent intersections. Additionally, most of the predicted 95th percentile left turn queues are predicted to be accommodated by existing left turn lane storage lengths, where applicable. However, the northbound left turn queue on Trophy Club Drive at Bobcat Boulevard is predicted to exceed the existing storage length of approximately 160 feet during the AM peak hour. As part of the improvements at this location, it is recommended to lengthen the northbound left turn lane on Trophy Club Drive. This should be possible with the existing median width. For reference, the delay values for the proposed mitigation are compared to the existing operation in Table 10. For ease of comparison, only the operation for the overall approach is shown. Existing conditions include a simulated crossing guard at the three locations where one is currently present. High School Driveway 4 existing condition is just two-way stop control. Table 10: Capacity Analysis Results – Comparison of Existing to Recommended Mitigation Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Existing Operation Mitigated Operation Existing Operation Mitigated Operation Delay (LOS)1 Delay (LOS) Delay (LOS) Delay (LOS) 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) EB 16.6 (B) 17.5 (C) 12.0 (B) 8.6 (A) NB 33.2 (C) 12.2 (B) 38.9 (D) 9.4 (A) SB 32.3 (C) 7.9 (A) 39.3 (D) 10.1 (B) 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB 40.3 (D) 6.8 (A) 34.7 (C) 9.0 (A) WB 40.4 (D) 11.1 (B) 47.3 (D) 8.9 (A) NB 22.6 (C) 14.0 (B) 25.8 (C) 13.8 (B) 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT / EB 15.1 (C) 21.1 (C) 9.5 (A) 17. 1 (B) WB LT / WB 8.1 (A) 20.3 (C) 8.7 (A) 31.3 (C) NB 32.5 (D) 24.0 (C) 11.4 (B) 13.6 (B) SB 1146.4 (F) 21.3 (C) 82.8 (F) 28.1 (C) 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) EB 21.0 (C) 8.7 (A) 22.9 (C) 44.1 (D) NB 64.7 (E) 17.4 (B) 31.5 (C) 4.7 (A) SB 34.6 (C) 16.3 (B) 47.6 (D) 9.3 (A) 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle (Level of Service) As shown, for most approaches the recommended mitigation is predicted to improve the average delay compared to existing conditions. Some approaches experience significant improvement, including the southbound High School Driveway 4 approach and both approaches of Trophy Club Drive at Bobcat Boulevard. The recommended lane configurations and traffic control are shown in Figure 6 for reference. Page 57 of 325 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 HS DRIVE 2 HS DRIVE 3 MARSHALL CREEK RD PARKVIEW DRHS DRIVE 4OFF-SITE DWYTROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DRBLVDBOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection One-Way Figure 6and Traffic Control Recommended Intersection Lane Configurations Lane Configuration Stop-Controlled Approach Recommended Change signal control. Install traffic turn lane. westbound right Install left turn lane. northbound existing Lengthen guard to remain. Existing crossing crossing. new mid-block pedestrians to Redirect hybrid beacon. pedestrian and install median refuge crossing with Install mid-block YIELDYIELD YIELDcrossing. new mid-block pedestrians to Redirect roundabout. single-lane Install Yield-Controlled Approach STOP YIELD Signalized Intersection Roundabout (northbound) lane). 14' inbound turn lane, and one lane, one 10' right one 10' left/through driveway to include Stripe southbound intersection. west side of east side to Bobcat from crosswalk on Relocate officer here. or traffic control crossing guard Locate a STOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOP Page 58 of 325 Page 16 of 18 Additional Analysis Based on Town Feedback An updated desired mitigation scenario was developed in response to feedback obtained at Town of Trophy Club public meetings over the summer. Based on this feedback, the following mitigation measures were analyzed: Marshall Creek at Bobcat: Install a roundabout. A single-lane roundabout was predicted to accommodate the existing traffic volumes, but the design could be modified as desired. Discourage pedestrian crossing at this location. Parkview at Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat: Station a crossing guard/traffic control officer at this location. Install a westbound right turn lane on Bobcat at the driveway and install a westbound left turn lane to service the commercial driveway. Reconfigure the southbound approach to provide two southbound lanes (10’ left turn and 10’ right turn) with a 14’ inbound lane. Remove the crosswalk on the east side of the intersection to better facilitate the westbound right turn and southbound left turn. Bobcat at Trophy Club: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. Consider installation of a roundabout in the future. High School Driveway 3 at Bobcat: Install sidewalk on the west side of Bobcat from Marshall Creek to Driveway 3 and install a crosswalk with flashers on Bobcat at Driveway 3. The resulting operation is shown in Table 11. Note that some results may differ from previous tables due to different arrival patterns in the model. Table 11: Capacity Analysis Results – Updated Mitigation Based on Meeting Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 3 High School Driveway 3 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With New Crosswalk and Relocated Peds WB 29.4 D 0.10 8 26.5 D 0.46 58 SB LT 11.2 B 0.28 30 8.8 A 0.05 3 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With Roundabout (Single-Lane) EB 17.5 C 0.73 281 8.6 A 0.40 53 NB 12.1 B 0.62 170 9.3 A 0.56 120 SB 7.9 A 0.43 66 10.1 B 0.51 94 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB 33.1 C 0.80 209 28.9 C 0.71 206 WB LT 52.1 D 0.55 202 49.0 D 0.28 120 WB T 48.6 D 0.48 164 52.6 D 0.56 193 NB LT 37.1 D 0.56 149 39.2 D 0.52 120 NB RT 8.0 A 0.42 50 10.3 B 0.38 44 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With ‘Crossing Guard’ EB LT 38.6 D 0.74 90 30.9 C 0.44 29 EB T 6.6 A 0.30 43 13.7 B 0.42 218 WB 16.1 B 0.72 102 12.7 B 0.49 67 NB 25.0 C 0.56 38 14.8 B 0.37 43 SB 17.1 B 0.43 75 25.1 C 0.40 101 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) With ‘Crossing Guard’ EB LT 45.8 D 0.24 66 37.4 D 0.21 83 EB RT 24.3 C 0.73 163 23.0 C 0.72 250 NB LT 75.1 E 1.04 467 37.3 D 0.83 397 NB T 17.3 B 0.11 38 18.6 B 0.19 66 SB 34.6 C 0.90 132 47.6 D 0.86 154 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) As shown, delay is for High School Driveway 3 is predicted to slightly increase with pedestrians relocated from Marshall Creek Road to this intersection; however, operation is still acceptable. The proposed roundabout at Marshall Creek Road experiences slight delay improvements with pedestrians removed. Operation at Parkview Drive and at Trophy club Drive remains similar to existing conditions with traffic control officers. Inclusion of a traffic control officer at High School Page 59 of 325 Page 17 of 18 Driveway 4 offers improvement over existing conditions. With additional capacity installed on westbound Bobcat Boulevard, High School Driveway 4 is predicted to operate at acceptable levels of service. Based on the results above, predicted queues are not anticipated to extend to adjacent intersections (see intersection spacing previously shown in Table 9). However, the northbound left turn queue on Trophy Club Drive at Bobcat Boulevard is predicted to exceed the existing storage length of approximately 160 feet during the AM peak hour. Again, lengthening of the northbound left turn lane on Trophy Club Drive should be possible with the existing median width. The updated lane configurations and traffic control recommended as a result of this meeting are shown in Figure 7 for reference. If you have any questions, please contact me or Joseph Short at (972) 248-3006. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services and are available to address any additional comments or concerns. Sincerely, Kristen Novak, P.E., PTOE Senior Project Engineer Lee Engineering TBPE Firm F-450 Attachments Synchro Output Sheets SIDRA Output Sheets Signal Warrant Data and Description Additional Analysis Resulting from Town Meetings Page 60 of 325 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 HS DRIVE 2 HS DRIVE 3 MARSHALL CREEK RD PARKVIEW DRHS DRIVE 4OFF-SITE DWYTROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DRBLVDBOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection One-Way Figure 7 Lane Configuration Stop-Controlled Approach Recommended Change guard to remain. Existing crossing YIELDYIELD YIELDroundabout. single-lane Install Yield-Controlled Approach STOP YIELD Signalized Intersection Roundabout intersection. west side of east side to Bobcat from crosswalk on Relocate officer here. or traffic control crossing guard Locate a STOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOP and Traffic Control Resulting from Town Meetings Recommended Intersection Lane Configurations guard to remain. Existing crossing STOPlanes. turn and left turn westbound right Install Drive 3. Parkview or HS pedestrians to Redirect Bobcat. with flashers on Install crosswalk to HS Drive 3. Marshall Creek Bobcat from on west side of Install sidewalk (northbound) lane). 14' inbound turn lane, and one lane, one 10' right one 10' left/through driveway to include Stripe southbound STOPPage 61 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Future Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 14 0 0 14 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65 Heavy Vehicles, % 17 25 2 2 8 2 Mvmt Flow 9 74 437 86 418 577 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1633 276 0 0 537 0 Stage 1 494 - - - - - Stage 2 1139 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 7.4 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.67 3.55 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 79 657 - - 987 - Stage 1 538 - - - - - Stage 2 238 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 44 648 - - 974 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 44 - - - - - Stage 1 531 - - - - - Stage 2 134 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 25.6 0 4.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 257 974 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.323 0.43 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 25.6 11.5 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.3 2.2 - Attachment 1 - Page 1 of 78 Page 62 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Future Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 225 169 3 326 0 0 562 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 613 163 562 0 - - - Stage 1 332 - - - - - - Stage 2 281 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 424 853 632 - 0 0 - Stage 1 699 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 741 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 421 853 632 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 421 - - - - - - Stage 1 695 - - - - - - Stage 2 741 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.5 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 421 853 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.534 0.198 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 22.9 10.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 3.1 0.7 - Attachment 1 - Page 2 of 78 Page 63 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Future Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 7 1 296 486 228 522 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1258 391 522 0 0 782 0 Stage 1 541 - - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 163 608 670 - - 832 - Stage 1 548 - - - - - - Stage 2 445 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 118 608 670 - - 832 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 118 - - - - - - Stage 1 546 - - - - - - Stage 2 323 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.3 0 3.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 178 832 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.094 0.274 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.3 10.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 1.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 3 of 78 Page 64 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 49.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 219 321 158 352 307 77 Future Vol, veh/h 219 321 158 352 307 77 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 16 16 0 0 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 175 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 267 391 193 429 374 94 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1041 266 484 0 - 0 Stage 1 437 - - - - - Stage 2 604 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 226 732 1075 - - - Stage 1 619 - - - - - Stage 2 508 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 179 710 1059 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 179 - - - - - Stage 1 499 - - - - - Stage 2 500 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 129.7 2.8 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1059 - 179 710 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.182 - 1.492 0.551 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 - 296.3 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 16.9 3.4 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 4 of 78 Page 65 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 50.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 411 192 216 374 166 164 Future Vol, veh/h 411 192 216 374 166 164 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 17 2 0 17 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 125 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 462 216 243 420 187 184 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 695 0 1300 358 Stage 1 - - - - 587 - Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 897 - ~ 153 638 Stage 1 - - - - 519 - Stage 2 - - - - 447 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 882 - ~ 107 626 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 107 - Stage 1 - - - - 511 - Stage 2 - - - - 318 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.9 227.3 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 107 626 - - 882 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.743 0.294 - - 0.275 - HCM Control Delay (s) $ 439 13.1 - - 10.6 - HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 14.7 1.2 - - 1.1 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 5 of 78 Page 66 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 182.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Future Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 16 0 10 19 0 25 10 0 19 25 0 16 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 203 495 10 47 590 599 8 4 82 99 1 178 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1214 0 0 524 0 0 1331 2233 297 1690 1939 636 Stage 1 - - - - - - 925 925 - 1009 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 406 1308 - 681 930 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 - - 1039 - - 113 42 699 ~ 61 65 421 Stage 1 - - - - - - 290 346 - 257 316 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 593 228 - 407 344 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 556 - - 1020 - - 38 21 670 ~ 28 33 405 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 38 21 - ~ 28 33 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 181 216 - 159 256 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 270 185 - 217 215 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.3 0.6 43.2 $ 1487.7 HCM LOS E F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 184 556 - - 1020 - - 69 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.509 0.364 - - 0.047 - - 4.032 HCM Control Delay (s) 43.2 15.1 - - 8.7 0.6 -$ 1487.7 HCM Lane LOS E C - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.5 1.7 - - 0.1 - - 29.7 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 6 of 78 Page 67 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 89.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 373 535 117 245 304 Future Vol, veh/h 55 373 535 117 245 304 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 4 4 0 0 6 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 69 466 669 146 306 380 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1919 353 692 0 - 0 Stage 1 502 - - - - - Stage 2 1417 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.88 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.88 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.88 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.54 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 58 643 899 - - - Stage 1 568 - - - - - Stage 2 186 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 14 637 894 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 14 - - - - - Stage 1 142 - - - - - Stage 2 185 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s $ 317 16.4 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 894 - 14 637 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.748 - 4.911 0.732 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 19.9 -$ 2300.7 24.5 - - HCM Lane LOS C - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.1 - 9.5 6.3 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 7 of 78 Page 68 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Future Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 3 0 22 1 3 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 12 2 23 2 33 2 Mvmt Flow 119 173 519 17 1 32 271 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 293 0 0 536 558 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - - - Stage 2 224 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 7.14 - - 6.44 4.76 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.94 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.94 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.57 3.42 - - 2.52 2.53 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 674 - - 657 822 - Stage 1 528 - - - - - - Stage 2 777 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 298 658 - - 788 788 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 298 - - - - - - Stage 1 517 - - - - - - Stage 2 729 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.8 0 1.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 441 788 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.662 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.8 9.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - D A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 4.7 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 8 of 78 Page 69 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Future Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Mvmt Flow 173 134 3 390 0 0 369 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 586 200 369 0 - - - Stage 1 396 - - - - - - Stage 2 190 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 441 808 838 - 0 0 - Stage 1 649 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 823 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 437 804 838 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 437 - - - - - - Stage 1 646 - - - - - - Stage 2 819 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 437 804 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.395 0.166 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 18.5 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.9 0.6 - Attachment 1 - Page 9 of 78 Page 70 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Future Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 30 353 120 1 43 499 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 763 249 0 0 473 479 0 Stage 1 419 - - - - - - Stage 2 344 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 6.44 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.52 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 341 751 - - 720 1080 - Stage 1 632 - - - - - - Stage 2 689 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 323 742 - - 1058 1058 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 323 - - - - - - Stage 1 628 - - - - - - Stage 2 657 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.9 0 0.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 367 1058 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.386 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.9 8.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.8 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 10 of 78 Page 71 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 275 285 362 345 103 Future Vol, veh/h 52 275 285 362 345 103 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 11 39 39 0 0 11 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 175 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 57 302 313 398 379 113 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1311 324 531 0 - 0 Stage 1 475 - - - - - Stage 2 836 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 150 672 1033 - - - Stage 1 592 - - - - - Stage 2 386 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 95 623 995 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 95 - - - - - Stage 1 391 - - - - - Stage 2 372 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.6 4.5 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 995 - 95 623 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.315 - 0.602 0.485 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - 88.5 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS B - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - 2.8 2.7 - - Attachment 1 - Page 11 of 78 Page 72 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 16.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 471 153 114 462 128 111 Future Vol, veh/h 471 153 114 462 128 111 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 67 44 0 67 44 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 125 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 506 165 123 497 138 119 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 738 0 1218 447 Stage 1 - - - - 656 - Stage 2 - - - - 562 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 864 - 173 559 Stage 1 - - - - 478 - Stage 2 - - - - 534 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 809 - ~ 129 501 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 129 - Stage 1 - - - - 447 - Stage 2 - - - - 424 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 94.9 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 129 501 - - 809 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.067 0.238 - - 0.152 - HCM Control Delay (s) 164.7 14.4 - - 10.2 - HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.7 0.9 - - 0.5 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 12 of 78 Page 73 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 25.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Future Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 56 9 0 10 56 0 9 10 0 57 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 605 1 49 568 66 5 0 79 115 0 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 691 0 0 662 0 0 1197 1547 369 1165 1514 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 758 758 - 756 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 789 - 409 758 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.56 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.53 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 900 - - 922 - - 141 113 628 148 119 573 Stage 1 - - - - - - 365 413 - 364 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 400 - 588 413 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 - - 873 - - 96 87 589 ~ 107 92 512 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 96 87 - ~ 107 92 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 326 369 - 325 357 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 415 345 - 476 369 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 1 15 202 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 443 851 - - 873 - - 157 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.191 0.056 - - 0.056 - - 1.225 HCM Control Delay (s) 15 9.5 - - 9.4 0.4 - 202 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.2 - - 0.2 - - 11 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 13 of 78 Page 74 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 21.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 495 466 209 234 111 Future Vol, veh/h 69 495 466 209 234 111 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 6 6 0 0 8 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 2 2 2 3 2 Mvmt Flow 76 544 512 230 257 122 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1473 204 387 0 - 0 Stage 1 326 - - - - - Stage 2 1147 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.88 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.88 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.88 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.54 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 115 803 1168 - - - Stage 1 698 - - - - - Stage 2 261 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 63 792 1159 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 63 - - - - - Stage 1 387 - - - - - Stage 2 259 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 52 7.3 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1159 - 63 792 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.442 - 1.204 0.687 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - 289.7 18.9 - - HCM Lane LOS B - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.3 - 6.2 5.6 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 14 of 78 Page 75 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Future Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 14 0 0 14 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65 Heavy Vehicles, % 17 25 2 2 8 2 Mvmt Flow 9 74 437 86 418 577 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1633 276 0 0 537 0 Stage 1 494 - - - - - Stage 2 1139 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 7.4 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.67 3.55 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 79 657 - - 987 - Stage 1 538 - - - - - Stage 2 238 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 44 648 - - 974 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 44 - - - - - Stage 1 531 - - - - - Stage 2 134 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 25.6 0 4.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 257 974 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.323 0.43 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 25.6 11.5 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.3 2.2 - Attachment 1 - Page 15 of 78 Page 76 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Future Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 225 169 3 326 0 0 562 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 613 163 562 0 - - - Stage 1 332 - - - - - - Stage 2 281 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 424 853 632 - 0 0 - Stage 1 699 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 741 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 421 853 632 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 421 - - - - - - Stage 1 695 - - - - - - Stage 2 741 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.5 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 421 853 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.534 0.198 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 22.9 10.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 3.1 0.7 - Attachment 1 - Page 16 of 78 Page 77 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Future Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 7 1 296 486 228 522 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1258 391 522 0 0 782 0 Stage 1 541 - - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 163 608 670 - - 832 - Stage 1 548 - - - - - - Stage 2 445 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 118 608 670 - - 832 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 118 - - - - - - Stage 1 546 - - - - - - Stage 2 323 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.3 0 3.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 178 832 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.094 0.274 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.3 10.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 1.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 17 of 78 Page 78 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Future Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 19.0 19.0 18.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 28.8% 28.8% 23.8% 23.8% 22.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 21.0 21.0 17.0 17.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.57 0.51 0.57 0.66 Control Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 LOS C A C C C Approach Delay 16.6 33.2 32.3 Approach LOS B C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 18 of 78 Page 79 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 391 193 429 468 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.57 0.51 0.57 0.66 Control Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 116 0 107 124 105 Queue Length 95th (ft) 170 43 157 157 138 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 464 690 376 752 710 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.57 0.51 0.57 0.66 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 19 of 78 Page 80 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Future Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 20.0 20.0 17.0 17.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 28.8% 25.0% 25.0% 21.3% 21.3% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 21.0 18.0 18.0 15.0 15.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.22 0.22 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.56 0.42 Control Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 LOS D D D D A Approach Delay 40.3 40.4 22.6 Approach LOS D D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 10 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 36.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 20 of 78 Page 81 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 678 243 420 187 184 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.56 0.42 Control Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 124 111 86 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 210 m150 m128 149 50 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 935 398 796 331 441 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.56 0.42 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 21 of 78 Page 82 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 140.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Future Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 16 0 10 19 0 25 10 0 19 25 0 16 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 203 495 10 47 590 599 8 4 82 99 1 178 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1214 0 0 524 0 0 1331 2233 297 1690 1939 636 Stage 1 - - - - - - 925 925 - 1009 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 406 1308 - 681 930 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 - - 1216 - - 145 43 *954 ~ 72 70 421 Stage 1 - - - - - - 376 410 - 257 316 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 593 228 - 549 408 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 556 - - 1194 - - 49 22 *915 ~ 35 36 405 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 49 22 - ~ 35 36 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 234 256 - 159 264 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 279 190 - 305 255 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.3 0.6 32.5 $ 1146.4 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 222 556 - - 1194 - - 84 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.422 0.364 - - 0.04 - - 3.312 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.5 15.1 - - 8.1 0.5 -$ 1146.4 HCM Lane LOS D C - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 1.7 - - 0.1 - - 28 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 22 of 78 Page 83 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 9 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Future Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 2 4 4 8 12 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 2 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 31.0 31.0 14.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 18.8% 18.8% 38.8% 38.8% 17.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 13.0 13.0 29.0 29.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Control Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 LOS D B E B C Approach Delay 21.0 64.7 34.6 Approach LOS C E C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 10 (13%), Referenced to phase 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.04 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 23 of 78 Page 84 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 10 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 466 669 146 686 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Control Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 82 ~368 25 93 Queue Length 95th (ft) m57 119 #467 38 #132 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 282 642 641 1270 760 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 24 of 78 Page 85 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Future Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 3 0 22 1 3 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 12 2 23 2 33 2 Mvmt Flow 119 173 519 17 1 32 271 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 293 0 0 536 558 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - - - Stage 2 224 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 7.14 - - 6.44 4.76 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.94 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.94 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.57 3.42 - - 2.52 2.53 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 674 - - 657 822 - Stage 1 528 - - - - - - Stage 2 777 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 298 658 - - 788 788 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 298 - - - - - - Stage 1 517 - - - - - - Stage 2 729 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.8 0 1.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 441 788 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.662 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.8 9.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - D A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 4.7 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 25 of 78 Page 86 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Future Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Mvmt Flow 173 134 3 390 0 0 369 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 586 200 369 0 - - - Stage 1 396 - - - - - - Stage 2 190 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 441 808 838 - 0 0 - Stage 1 649 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 823 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 437 804 838 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 437 - - - - - - Stage 1 646 - - - - - - Stage 2 819 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 437 804 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.395 0.166 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 18.5 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.9 0.6 - Attachment 1 - Page 26 of 78 Page 87 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Future Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 30 353 120 1 43 499 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 763 249 0 0 473 479 0 Stage 1 419 - - - - - - Stage 2 344 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 6.44 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.52 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 341 751 - - 720 1080 - Stage 1 632 - - - - - - Stage 2 689 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 323 742 - - 1058 1058 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 323 - - - - - - Stage 1 628 - - - - - - Stage 2 657 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.9 0 0.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 367 1058 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.386 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.9 8.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.8 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 27 of 78 Page 88 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Future Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 27.0 27.0 16.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 21.3% 21.3% 33.8% 33.8% 20.0% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 15.0 15.0 25.0 25.0 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.31 0.31 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.58 0.57 0.36 0.79 Control Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 LOS C A D D D Approach Delay 12.0 38.9 39.3 Approach LOS B D D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 28 of 78 Page 89 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 302 313 398 492 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.58 0.57 0.36 0.79 Control Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 0 170 113 114 Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 66 251 158 #185 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 331 519 553 1105 625 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.58 0.57 0.36 0.79 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Attachment 1 - Page 29 of 78 Page 90 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Future Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 19.0 19.0 14.0 14.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 33.8% 23.8% 23.8% 17.5% 17.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 25.0 17.0 17.0 12.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.52 0.38 Control Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 LOS C D D D B Approach Delay 34.7 47.3 25.8 Approach LOS C D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 30 of 78 Page 91 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 671 123 497 138 119 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.52 0.38 Control Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 164 65 140 64 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m226 m86 m173 120 44 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1067 376 752 265 312 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.52 0.38 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 31 of 78 Page 92 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Future Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 56 9 0 10 56 0 9 10 0 57 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 605 1 49 568 66 5 0 79 115 0 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 691 0 0 662 0 0 1197 1547 369 1165 1514 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 758 758 - 756 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 789 - 409 758 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.56 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.53 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 900 - - 1195 - - 234 148 *876 *248 156 573 Stage 1 - - - - - - 609 577 - *364 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 400 - *824 577 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 - - 1131 - - 161 117 *822 *191 123 512 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 161 117 - *191 123 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 544 516 - *325 365 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 424 353 - *696 516 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0.8 11.4 52.4 HCM LOS B F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 651 851 - - 1131 - - 255 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.13 0.056 - - 0.043 - - 0.754 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 9.5 - - 8.3 0.2 - 52.4 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - - 5.4 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 32 of 78 Page 93 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 9 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Future Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 2 4 4 8 12 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 2 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 19.0 30.0 30.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 23.8% 23.8% 37.5% 37.5% 13.8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 17.0 17.0 28.0 28.0 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.35 0.35 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Control Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 LOS D C D B D Approach Delay 22.9 31.5 47.6 Approach LOS C C D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 33 of 78 Page 94 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 10 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 544 512 230 379 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Control Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 143 230 41 78 Queue Length 95th (ft) m67 209 #397 66 #154 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 368 757 619 1238 443 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 34 of 78 Page 95 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Future Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 45.0 31.0 31.0 7.0 11.0 17.0 Total Split (%) 17.5% 56.3% 38.8% 38.8% 8.8% 13.8% 21% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.5 43.0 29.0 5.0 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.54 0.36 0.06 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.27 0.97 0.56 1.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 LOS F A C C F Approach Delay (s/veh) 30.6 29.3 25.0 100.5 Approach LOS C C C F Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 38.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 35 of 78 Page 96 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 505 1236 94 278 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.27 0.97 0.56 1.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 92 26 130 6 ~112 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#177 40 m130 38 #201 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 210 1897 1274 169 261 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 0.27 0.97 0.56 1.07 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 36 of 78 Page 97 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 7.0 35.0 28.0 28.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 8.8% 43.8% 35.0% 35.0% 12.5% 18.8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.0 33.0 26.0 8.0 13.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.41 0.33 0.10 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.68 0.37 0.60 Control Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 LOS C B B B C Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.1 15.1 14.8 28.6 Approach LOS B B B C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 37 of 78 Page 98 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 606 683 84 192 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.68 0.37 0.60 Control Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 154 47 2 57 Queue Length 95th (ft) m32 216 m78 43 124 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 110 1459 1004 226 319 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.68 0.37 0.60 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 38 of 78 Page 99 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Future Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 14 0 0 14 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65 Heavy Vehicles, % 17 25 2 2 8 2 Mvmt Flow 9 74 437 86 418 577 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1633 276 0 0 537 0 Stage 1 494 - - - - - Stage 2 1139 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 7.4 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.67 3.55 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 90 *917 - - 1121 - Stage 1 672 - - - - - Stage 2 238 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 54 *905 - - 1106 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 54 - - - - - Stage 1 663 - - - - - Stage 2 146 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 19.6 0 4.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 329 1106 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.253 0.378 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 19.6 10.2 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 1.8 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 39 of 78 Page 100 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Future Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 225 169 3 326 0 0 562 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 613 163 562 0 - - - Stage 1 332 - - - - - - Stage 2 281 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 506 *1011 632 - 0 0 - Stage 1 812 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 741 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 503 *1011 632 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 503 - - - - - - Stage 1 807 - - - - - - Stage 2 741 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.2 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 503 1011 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.447 0.167 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 17.8 9.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 2.3 0.6 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 40 of 78 Page 101 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Future Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 7 1 296 486 228 522 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1258 391 522 0 0 782 0 Stage 1 541 - - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 183 747 670 - - 889 - Stage 1 627 - - - - - - Stage 2 445 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 136 747 670 - - 889 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 136 - - - - - - Stage 1 625 - - - - - - Stage 2 331 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 24 0 3.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 206 889 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.081 0.256 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 24 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 1 - Attachment 1 - Page 41 of 78 Page 102 of 325 Timings 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Future Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Detector Phase 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 43.0 23.0 23.0 57.0 34.0 Total Split (%) 43.0% 23.0% 23.0% 57.0% 34.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 20.7 30.3 65.8 70.3 56.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.30 0.66 0.70 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.65 0.30 0.17 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 LOS D B A A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 29.5 5.5 12.0 Approach LOS C A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 86 (86%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:NBSB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 42 of 78 Page 103 of 325 Queues 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 391 193 429 468 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.65 0.30 0.17 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 160 94 19 22 68 Queue Length 95th (ft) 201 121 81 80 113 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 681 728 764 2489 1931 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.54 0.25 0.17 0.24 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 43 of 78 Page 104 of 325 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Future Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Turn Type NA D.P+P NA Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 5 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 5 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 43.0 28.0 71.0 29.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 43.0% 28.0% 71.0% 29.0% 28.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max Max None Act Effct Green (s) 51.1 62.0 66.5 24.5 35.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.62 0.67 0.25 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.48 0.18 0.43 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 LOS B A A D A Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.7 5.6 19.8 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 87 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 44 of 78 Page 105 of 325 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 678 243 420 187 184 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.48 0.18 0.43 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 148 42 37 101 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 118 m48 37 165 37 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1724 683 2353 433 849 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.36 0.18 0.43 0.22 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 45 of 78 Page 106 of 325 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 136.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Future Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 16 0 10 19 0 25 10 0 19 25 0 16 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 203 495 10 47 590 599 8 4 82 99 1 178 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1214 0 0 524 0 0 1331 2233 297 1690 1939 636 Stage 1 - - - - - - 925 925 - 1009 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 406 1308 - 681 930 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 - - 1227 - - 147 43 *949 ~ 74 70 421 Stage 1 - - - - - - 381 414 - 257 316 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 593 228 - 558 411 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 556 - - 1204 - - 50 22 *910 ~ 36 37 405 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 50 22 - ~ 36 37 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 237 258 - 159 264 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 279 191 - 310 256 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.3 0.5 32.3 $ 1109.9 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 223 556 - - 1204 - - 86 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.42 0.364 - - 0.039 - - 3.235 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.3 15.1 - - 8.1 0.5 -$ 1109.9 HCM Lane LOS D C - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 1.7 - - 0.1 - - 27.8 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 46 of 78 Page 107 of 325 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Future Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 29.0 46.0 46.0 71.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 29.0% 46.0% 46.0% 71.0% 25.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.3 43.7 77.2 81.7 42.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.44 0.77 0.82 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.61 0.79 0.05 0.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 LOS D B B A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.5 14.5 14.7 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 5 (5%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 14.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 47 of 78 Page 108 of 325 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 466 669 146 686 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.61 0.79 0.05 0.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 47 177 6 88 Queue Length 95th (ft) 62 38 235 13 146 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 425 889 966 2862 1533 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.52 0.69 0.05 0.45 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 48 of 78 Page 109 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Future Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 3 0 22 1 3 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 12 2 23 2 33 2 Mvmt Flow 119 173 519 17 1 32 271 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 293 0 0 536 558 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - - - Stage 2 224 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 7.14 - - 6.44 4.76 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.94 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.94 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.57 3.42 - - 2.52 2.53 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 454 *921 - - 954 1013 - Stage 1 697 - - - - - - Stage 2 777 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 420 *899 - - 984 984 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 420 - - - - - - Stage 1 683 - - - - - - Stage 2 735 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 0 1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 614 984 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.476 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.1 8.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 2.6 0.1 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 49 of 78 Page 110 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Future Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Mvmt Flow 173 134 3 390 0 0 369 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 586 200 369 0 - - - Stage 1 396 - - - - - - Stage 2 190 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 577 *980 838 - 0 0 - Stage 1 805 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 823 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 571 *976 838 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 571 - - - - - - Stage 1 801 - - - - - - Stage 2 819 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.9 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 571 976 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.302 0.137 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 14 9.3 - HCM Lane LOS - B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.3 0.5 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 50 of 78 Page 111 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Future Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 30 353 120 1 43 499 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 763 249 0 0 473 479 0 Stage 1 419 - - - - - - Stage 2 344 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 6.44 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.52 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 434 *980 - - 958 1225 - Stage 1 782 - - - - - - Stage 2 689 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 414 *969 - - 1208 1208 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 414 - - - - - - Stage 1 777 - - - - - - Stage 2 660 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.9 0 0.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 472 1208 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.3 0.037 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.9 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.2 0.1 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 51 of 78 Page 112 of 325 Timings 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Future Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Detector Phase 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 35.0 32.0 32.0 65.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 35.0% 32.0% 32.0% 65.0% 33.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.6 21.1 79.9 85.3 66.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.21 0.80 0.85 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.66 0.40 0.13 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 LOS D B A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.0 1.4 8.0 Approach LOS C A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 24 (24%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:NBSB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 8.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 52 of 78 Page 113 of 325 Queues 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 302 313 398 492 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.66 0.40 0.13 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 67 8 5 56 Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 126 24 14 109 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 539 657 955 3018 2254 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.46 0.33 0.13 0.22 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 53 of 78 Page 114 of 325 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Future Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Turn Type NA D.P+P NA Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 5 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 5 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 50.0 19.0 69.0 31.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 19.0% 69.0% 31.0% 19.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max Max None Act Effct Green (s) 51.9 60.0 64.5 26.5 34.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.60 0.65 0.27 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.27 0.22 0.29 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 LOS B A A C A Approach Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.0 18.9 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 83 (83%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 10.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 54 of 78 Page 115 of 325 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 671 123 497 138 119 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.27 0.22 0.29 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 110 24 54 70 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 27 52 123 33 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1702 562 2282 469 682 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.17 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 55 of 78 Page 116 of 325 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Future Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 56 9 0 10 56 0 9 10 0 57 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 605 1 49 568 66 5 0 79 115 0 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 691 0 0 662 0 0 1197 1547 369 1165 1514 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 758 758 - 756 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 789 - 409 758 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.56 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.53 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 900 - - 1239 - - 250 153 *855 *266 163 573 Stage 1 - - - - - - 651 603 - *364 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 400 - *804 603 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 - - 1173 - - 173 121 *802 *204 129 512 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 173 121 - *204 129 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 582 539 - *325 366 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 426 354 - *677 539 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0.8 11.4 46 HCM LOS B E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 650 851 - - 1173 - - 269 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.13 0.056 - - 0.042 - - 0.715 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 9.5 - - 8.2 0.2 - 46 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - - 5 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 56 of 78 Page 117 of 325 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Future Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 47.0 47.0 73.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 27.0% 47.0% 47.0% 73.0% 26.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 30.9 76.8 81.3 55.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.31 0.77 0.81 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.56 0.08 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 LOS D C A A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 26.0 4.5 10.8 Approach LOS C A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 8 (8%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 13.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 57 of 78 Page 118 of 325 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 544 512 230 379 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.56 0.08 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 165 64 11 47 Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 229 121 23 95 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 390 922 1123 2875 1876 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.59 0.46 0.08 0.20 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 58 of 78 Page 119 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Future Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 2 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 16.0 62.0 46.0 46.0 15.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 16.0% 62.0% 46.0% 46.0% 15.0% 23.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 53.0 57.5 41.5 7.2 23.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.58 0.42 0.07 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.50 0.62 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 LOS D A C C C Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 68 (68%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 23.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 59 of 78 Page 120 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 505 1236 94 278 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.50 0.62 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 41 316 7 115 Queue Length 95th (ft) 123 52 240 40 174 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 279 2028 1377 238 448 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.39 0.62 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 60 of 78 Page 121 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 2 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 10.0 66.0 56.0 56.0 18.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 9.1% 60.0% 50.9% 50.9% 16.4% 23.6% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 57.9 61.5 53.5 6.3 30.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.56 0.49 0.06 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.47 0.45 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 LOS B B C B B Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.3 20.2 13.9 17.9 Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 61 of 78 Page 122 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 606 683 84 192 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.47 0.45 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 113 165 0 48 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 148 218 33 117 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 363 1978 1463 283 529 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.47 0.30 0.36 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 62 of 78 Page 123 of 325 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Future Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 22.0 15.0 15.0 13.0 13.0 Total Split (%) 44.0% 30.0% 30.0% 26.0% 26.0% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 13.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.26 0.26 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.53 0.46 0.48 0.38 Control Delay (s/veh) 6.7 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 6.8 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 LOS A B A C A Approach Delay (s/veh) 6.8 9.6 14.0 Approach LOS A A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 9.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 63 of 78 Page 124 of 325 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 678 243 420 187 184 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.53 0.46 0.48 0.38 Control Delay (s/veh) 6.7 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 6.8 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 51 41 33 48 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 m66 m48 95 38 Internal Link Dist (ft) 180 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1448 460 920 389 486 Starvation Cap Reductn 186 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.53 0.46 0.48 0.38 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 64 of 78 Page 125 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 467 3 1 Future Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 467 3 1 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 22.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 9.0 19.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 22.0% 52.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 9.0% 19.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 17.5 50.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.50 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 0.73 0.71 0.52 0.82 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 LOS D B C A C D Approach Delay (s/veh) 22.3 20.3 24.0 49.1 Approach LOS C C C D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 24.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 65 of 78 Page 126 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 505 637 599 94 278 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 0.73 0.71 0.52 0.82 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 131 93 181 30 7 126 Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 107 194 49 42 #184 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 150 Base Capacity (vph) 309 1764 875 844 181 340 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 0.73 0.71 0.52 0.82 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Attachment 1 - Page 66 of 78 Page 127 of 325 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Future Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 29.0 46.0 46.0 71.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 29.0% 46.0% 46.0% 71.0% 25.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.3 50.8 77.2 81.7 35.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.51 0.77 0.82 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.54 0.74 0.05 0.52 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 LOS D A C A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 8.7 17.4 16.3 Approach LOS A B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 79 (79%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 14.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 67 of 78 Page 128 of 325 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 466 669 146 686 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.54 0.74 0.05 0.52 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 29 197 6 102 Queue Length 95th (ft) m63 28 276 13 132 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 425 871 908 2862 1324 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.54 0.74 0.05 0.52 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 68 of 78 Page 129 of 325 Timings 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 628 540 Future Volume (vph) 628 540 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 4 8 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 80.0 80.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 80.0% 80.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 75.5 75.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 13.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.5 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 14.2 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 4.0 14.2 Approach LOS A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.26 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 8.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 69 of 78 Page 130 of 325 Queues 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 683 587 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 13.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.5 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 14.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 146 Queue Length 95th (ft) 75 171 Internal Link Dist (ft) 143 180 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 2671 2671 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1597 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.55 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 70 of 78 Page 131 of 325 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Future Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 21.0 16.0 16.0 13.0 13.0 Total Split (%) 42.0% 32.0% 32.0% 26.0% 26.0% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 19.0 14.0 14.0 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.28 0.28 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.35 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 7.6 9.8 19.6 6.4 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 9.0 7.6 9.8 19.8 6.4 LOS A A A B A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.0 9.3 13.6 Approach LOS A A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 9.9 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 71 of 78 Page 132 of 325 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 671 123 497 138 119 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.35 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 7.6 9.8 19.6 6.4 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 9.0 7.6 9.8 19.8 6.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 63 12 45 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 86 m22 67 74 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 176 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1333 495 990 389 416 Starvation Cap Reductn 142 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 32 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.25 0.50 0.39 0.29 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 72 of 78 Page 133 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 61 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 61 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 44.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 21.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 14.0% 44.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 15.0% 21.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 42.0 28.0 28.0 13.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.41 0.72 0.14 0.31 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 LOS D B C A B C Approach Delay (s/veh) 17.8 31.3 13.6 32.3 Approach LOS B C B C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 25.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 73 of 78 Page 134 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 606 617 66 84 192 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.41 0.72 0.14 0.31 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 126 186 1 3 78 Queue Length 95th (ft) m66 157 213 23 46 151 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 150 Base Capacity (vph) 212 1486 857 470 272 353 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.23 0.41 0.72 0.14 0.31 0.54 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 74 of 78 Page 135 of 325 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Future Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 43.0 43.0 73.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 27.0% 43.0% 43.0% 73.0% 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 27.4 76.8 81.3 59.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.27 0.77 0.81 0.59 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.58 0.08 0.19 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 LOS D D A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 43.9 4.7 9.2 Approach LOS D A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 19.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 75 of 78 Page 136 of 325 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 544 512 230 379 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.58 0.08 0.19 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 243 64 11 42 Queue Length 95th (ft) m100 311 121 23 88 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 390 900 1094 2875 1992 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.60 0.47 0.08 0.19 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 76 of 78 Page 137 of 325 Timings 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 620 590 Future Volume (vph) 620 590 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 4 8 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 80.0 80.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 80.0% 80.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 75.5 75.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 16.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.6 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 17.1 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 4.0 17.1 Approach LOS A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.25 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 10.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 77 of 78 Page 138 of 325 Queues 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 674 641 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 16.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.6 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 17.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 182 Queue Length 95th (ft) 74 185 Internal Link Dist (ft) 144 176 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 2671 2671 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1547 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.57 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 78 of 78 Page 139 of 325 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [4. 2024 AM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Attachment 2 - Page 1 of 12 Page 140 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [4. 2024 AM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Bobcat Approach 3 L2 158 3.0 193 3.0 0.616 12.2 LOS B 6.7 171.3 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 8 T1 352 3.0 429 3.0 0.616 12.2 LOS B 6.7 171.3 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 Approach 510 3.0 622 3.0 0.616 12.2 LOS B 6.7 171.3 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 North: SB Bobcat Approach 4 T1 307 3.0 374 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 33.7 14 R2 77 3.0 94 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 32.8 Approach 384 3.0 468 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 33.5 West: EB Marshall Creek Approach 5 L2 219 3.0 267 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 28.6 12 R2 321 3.0 391 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 27.9 Approach 540 3.0 659 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 28.2 All Vehicles 1434 3.0 1749 3.0 0.728 13.0 LOS B 11.0 281.0 0.69 0.76 1.07 30.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:08:44 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 2 of 12 Page 141 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [4. 2024 PM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Bobcat Approach 3 L2 285 3.0 313 3.0 0.567 9.4 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 8 T1 362 3.0 398 3.0 0.567 9.4 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 Approach 647 3.0 711 3.0 0.567 9.4 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 North: SB Bobcat Approach 4 T1 345 3.0 379 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.5 0.64 0.59 0.74 32.6 14 R2 103 3.0 113 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.5 0.64 0.59 0.74 31.7 Approach 448 3.0 492 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.5 0.64 0.59 0.74 32.4 West: EB Marshall Creek Approach 5 L2 52 3.0 57 3.0 0.400 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 32.9 12 R2 275 3.0 302 3.0 0.400 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 31.9 Approach 327 3.0 359 3.0 0.400 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 32.0 All Vehicles 1422 3.0 1563 3.0 0.567 9.5 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.49 0.38 0.52 32.1 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:10:36 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 3 of 12 Page 142 of 325 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [5. 2024 AM - Parkview at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Parkview Dr at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:15:15 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 4 of 12 Page 143 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [5. 2024 AM - Parkview at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Parkview Dr at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Parkview Approach 3 L2 166 3.0 189 3.0 0.457 10.3 LOS B 2.9 73.6 0.68 0.72 0.84 31.3 18 R2 164 3.0 186 3.0 0.457 10.3 LOS B 2.9 73.6 0.68 0.72 0.84 30.4 Approach 330 3.0 375 3.0 0.457 10.3 LOS B 2.9 73.6 0.68 0.72 0.84 30.9 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 216 3.0 245 3.0 0.610 11.3 LOS B 4.8 122.0 0.61 0.45 0.62 31.3 6 T1 374 3.0 425 3.0 0.610 11.3 LOS B 4.8 122.0 0.61 0.45 0.62 31.2 Approach 590 3.0 670 3.0 0.610 11.3 LOS B 4.8 122.0 0.61 0.45 0.62 31.2 West: EB Bobcat Approach 2 T1 411 3.0 467 3.0 0.664 13.4 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.72 0.74 1.05 31.1 12 R2 192 3.0 218 3.0 0.664 13.4 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.72 0.74 1.05 30.3 Approach 603 3.0 685 3.0 0.664 13.4 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.72 0.74 1.05 30.9 All Vehicles 1523 3.0 1731 3.0 0.664 11.9 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.67 0.62 0.84 31.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:19:27 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 5 of 12 Page 144 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [5. 2024 PM - Parkview at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Parkview Dr at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Parkview Approach 3 L2 128 3.0 138 3.0 0.329 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.6 0.63 0.61 0.63 32.0 18 R2 111 3.0 119 3.0 0.329 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.6 0.63 0.61 0.63 31.1 Approach 239 3.0 257 3.0 0.329 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.6 0.63 0.61 0.63 31.6 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 114 3.0 123 3.0 0.534 9.3 LOS A 3.9 99.0 0.48 0.31 0.48 32.6 6 T1 462 3.0 497 3.0 0.534 9.3 LOS A 3.9 99.0 0.48 0.31 0.48 32.5 Approach 576 3.0 619 3.0 0.534 9.3 LOS A 3.9 99.0 0.48 0.31 0.48 32.6 West: EB Bobcat Approach 2 T1 471 3.0 506 3.0 0.573 10.0 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.49 0.30 0.49 32.7 12 R2 153 3.0 165 3.0 0.573 10.0 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.49 0.30 0.49 31.8 Approach 624 3.0 671 3.0 0.573 10.0 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.49 0.30 0.49 32.5 All Vehicles 1439 3.0 1547 3.0 0.573 9.4 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.51 0.35 0.51 32.4 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:18:35 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 6 of 12 Page 145 of 325 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [6. 2024 AM - HS Dwy 4 at Bobcat w RT Lane (Site Folder: General)] High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout with WB Right Turn Lane Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Monday, July 15, 2024 3:28:14 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 7 of 12 Page 146 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [6. 2024 AM - HS Dwy 4 at Bobcat w RT Lane (Site Folder: General)] High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout with WB Right Turn Lane Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Driveway Approach 3 L2 6 3.0 8 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 33.3 8 T1 3 3.0 4 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 33.2 18 R2 64 3.0 82 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 32.3 Approach 73 3.0 94 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 32.4 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 37 3.0 47 3.0 0.565 10.1 LOS B 3.7 95.8 0.56 0.42 0.56 32.5 6 T1 460 3.0 590 3.0 0.565 10.1 LOS B 3.7 95.8 0.56 0.42 0.56 32.5 16 R2 467 3.0 599 3.0 0.527 9.3 LOS A 3.3 85.3 0.52 0.38 0.52 32.0 Approach 964 3.0 1236 3.0 0.565 9.7 LOS A 3.7 95.8 0.54 0.40 0.54 32.3 North: SB HS Driveway 4 Approach 7 L2 77 3.0 99 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 31.3 4 T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 31.3 14 R2 139 3.0 178 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 30.5 Approach 217 3.0 278 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 30.8 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 158 3.0 203 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 31.5 2 T1 386 3.0 495 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 31.5 12 R2 8 3.0 10 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 30.6 Approach 552 3.0 708 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 31.5 All Vehicles 1806 3.0 2315 3.0 0.619 10.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.45 0.59 31.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, July 15, 2024 3:28:16 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 8 of 12 Page 147 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [6. 2024 PM - HS Dwy 4 at Bobcat w RT Lane (Site Folder: General)] High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout with WB Right Turn Lane Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Driveway Approach 3 L2 5 3.0 5 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 33.6 8 T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 33.5 18 R2 73 3.0 79 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 32.5 Approach 79 3.0 86 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 32.6 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 45 3.0 49 3.0 0.471 7.5 LOS A 3.1 79.4 0.25 0.11 0.25 33.8 6 T1 523 3.0 568 3.0 0.471 7.5 LOS A 3.1 79.4 0.25 0.11 0.25 33.7 16 R2 61 3.0 66 3.0 0.050 3.1 LOS A 0.2 5.0 0.14 0.05 0.14 35.1 Approach 629 3.0 684 3.0 0.471 7.1 LOS A 3.1 79.4 0.24 0.10 0.24 33.8 North: SB HS Driveway 4 Approach 7 L2 106 3.0 115 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.9 4 T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.8 14 R2 71 3.0 77 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.0 Approach 178 3.0 193 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.5 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 44 3.0 48 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 32.3 2 T1 557 3.0 605 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 32.3 12 R2 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 31.4 Approach 602 3.0 654 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 32.3 All Vehicles 1488 3.0 1617 3.0 0.583 8.7 LOS A 4.4 112.4 0.44 0.31 0.44 32.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, July 15, 2024 3:34:54 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 9 of 12 Page 148 of 325 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [7. 2024 AM - Trophy Club at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Attachment 2 - Page 10 of 12 Page 149 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7. 2024 AM - Trophy Club at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Trophy Club Approach 3 L2 535 3.0 669 3.0 0.655 11.5 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.44 0.22 0.44 30.2 8 T1 117 3.0 146 3.0 0.655 11.5 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.44 0.22 0.44 30.2 Approach 652 3.0 815 3.0 0.655 11.5 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.44 0.22 0.44 30.2 North: SB Trophy Club Approach 4 T1 245 3.0 306 3.0 0.417 10.4 LOS B 2.2 55.7 0.67 0.74 0.87 32.5 14 R2 304 3.0 380 3.0 0.517 12.6 LOS B 3.3 85.4 0.72 0.85 1.10 30.5 Approach 549 3.0 686 3.0 0.517 11.6 LOS B 3.3 85.4 0.70 0.80 1.00 31.4 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 55 4.0 69 4.0 0.552 11.0 LOS B 4.7 120.0 0.66 0.65 0.84 31.8 12 R2 373 3.0 466 3.0 0.552 10.9 LOS B 4.7 120.0 0.66 0.65 0.84 30.9 Approach 428 3.1 535 3.1 0.552 10.9 LOS B 4.7 120.0 0.66 0.65 0.84 31.1 All Vehicles 1629 3.0 2036 3.0 0.655 11.4 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.59 0.53 0.73 30.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:27:14 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 11 of 12 Page 150 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7. 2024 PM - Trophy Club at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Trophy Club Approach 3 L2 466 3.0 512 3.0 0.600 10.2 LOS B 5.2 133.8 0.41 0.21 0.41 31.0 8 T1 209 3.0 230 3.0 0.600 10.2 LOS B 5.2 133.8 0.41 0.21 0.41 30.9 Approach 675 3.0 742 3.0 0.600 10.2 LOS B 5.2 133.8 0.41 0.21 0.41 31.0 North: SB Trophy Club Approach 4 T1 234 3.0 257 3.0 0.303 7.6 LOS A 1.3 33.2 0.58 0.55 0.58 33.9 14 R2 111 3.0 122 3.0 0.144 5.7 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.52 0.46 0.52 33.8 Approach 345 3.0 379 3.0 0.303 7.0 LOS A 1.3 33.2 0.56 0.52 0.56 33.9 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 69 4.0 76 4.0 0.607 11.9 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.67 0.65 0.88 31.4 12 R2 495 3.0 544 3.0 0.607 11.8 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.67 0.65 0.88 30.6 Approach 564 3.1 620 3.1 0.607 11.8 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.67 0.65 0.88 30.7 All Vehicles 1584 3.0 1741 3.0 0.607 10.1 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.54 0.44 0.61 31.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:29:46 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 12 of 12 Page 151 of 325 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT – PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS A descripƟon of the evaluated warrants is provided below. Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 1 is based on the volumes from both approaches on the major street and the higher approach volume on the minor street. It also uses the number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach. Either Condition A or Condition B of this warrant must be met for Warrant 1 to be satisfied. The Texas MUTCD allows for the use of a reduced warranting threshold (70%) for intersections where the posted or 85th-percentile speed exceeds 40 mph or if the intersection is located in a community with a population under 10,000. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis. Condition A of Warrant 1 is met when, for each of any eight (8) hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to the intersection during the same eight hours. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 600 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 200 vph (higher volume approach) Condition B of Warrant 1 applies to operating conditions where the major street traffic is so heavy that it creates excessive delay or hazardous conditions for minor street traffic when entering or crossing the major street. The warrant condition is met when, for each of any eight hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to an intersection. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 900 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 100 vph (higher volume approach) A combination of Conditions A and B may be applied at locations where Conditions A and B are not satisfied. The same eight hours of the day are not required to be used for meeting both conditions. Under the combination warrant, the warranting thresholds are: Major Street: 480 vph and 720 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (total for both directions) Minor Street: 160 vph and 80 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (higher volume approach) Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Volumes Warrant 2 is satisfied when the volumes for any four (4) hours of an average day, when plotted on Figure 4C-1 (or 4C-2 when applicable) of the Texas MUTCD, fall above the curve for the appropriate number of lanes. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis and Figure 4C-1 was utilized for all four intersections. Warrant 3 – Peak Hour Volume Warrant 3 is intended for application when traffic conditions are such that for at least one (1) hour of the day, the minor street traffic experiences undue delays entering or crossing the major street. Warrant 3 is satisfied when either of the following conditions is met: 1. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day: a. The delay experienced by the traffic on the minor-street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds 4 vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach, and b. The volume on the same minor-street approach equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes, and c. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. Attachment 3 - Page 1 of 13 Page 152 of 325 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT – PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS A descripƟon of the evaluated warrants is provided below. Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 1 is based on the volumes from both approaches on the major street and the higher approach volume on the minor street. It also uses the number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach. Either Condition A or Condition B of this warrant must be met for Warrant 1 to be satisfied. The Texas MUTCD allows for the use of a reduced warranting threshold (70%) for intersections where the posted or 85th-percentile speed exceeds 40 mph or if the intersection is located in a community with a population under 10,000. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis. Condition A of Warrant 1 is met when, for each of any eight (8) hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to the intersection during the same eight hours. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 600 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 200 vph (higher volume approach) Condition B of Warrant 1 applies to operating conditions where the major street traffic is so heavy that it creates excessive delay or hazardous conditions for minor street traffic when entering or crossing the major street. The warrant condition is met when, for each of any eight hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to an intersection. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 900 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 100 vph (higher volume approach) A combination of Conditions A and B may be applied at locations where Conditions A and B are not satisfied. The same eight hours of the day are not required to be used for meeting both conditions. Under the combination warrant, the warranting thresholds are: Major Street: 480 vph and 720 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (total for both directions) Minor Street: 160 vph and 80 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (higher volume approach) Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Volumes Warrant 2 is satisfied when the volumes for any four (4) hours of an average day, when plotted on Figure 4C-1 (or 4C-2 when applicable) of the Texas MUTCD, fall above the curve for the appropriate number of lanes. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis and Figure 4C-1 was utilized for all four intersections. Warrant 3 – Peak Hour Volume Warrant 3 is intended for application when traffic conditions are such that for at least one (1) hour of the day, the minor street traffic experiences undue delays entering or crossing the major street. Warrant 3 is satisfied when either of the following conditions is met: 1. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day: a. The delay experienced by the traffic on the minor-street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds 4 vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach, and b. The volume on the same minor-street approach equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes, and c. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. Attachment 3 - Page 2 of 13 Page 153 of 325 2. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15- minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (or Figure 4C-4) for the existing combination of approach lanes. As further specified in the Texas MUTCD: “This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.” It is unclear if traffic characteristics at these intersections fall under the unusual cases identified above. A school does tend to attract or discharge a large number of vehicles over a short time. However, schools are not specifically mentioned in the Texas MUTCD. However, Warrant 3 graphs were evaluated for reference. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis and Figure 4C-3 was utilized for all four intersections. For the delay portion of Warrant 3, delay was estimated using Synchro traffic analysis software, as presented in the letter. Based on this analysis, all four intersections are anticipated to meet the delay portion of Warrant 3 during the AM peak hour. Additionally, all intersections except at Marshall Creek Road are anticipated to meet delay thresholds during the School PM peak hour. See the estimated delay values for each intersection below for reference. Intersection Delay in Vehicle-Hours for Minor Street Approach AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Hour Marshall Creek at Bobcat 19.5 2.5 Parkview at Bobcat 20.8 6.3 High School Dwy 4 at Bobcat 89.7 9.9 Bobcat at Trophy Club 37.7 8.1 Warrant 5 – School Crossing This warrant applies at an established school crossing where a traffic engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of school children at the school crossing shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic during the period when the children are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period and there are a minimum of 20 school children during the highest crossing hour. This warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 300 feet, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict progression. It is recommended to consider implementing other remedial measures prior to signal installation, such as warning signs/flashers, school speed zones, crossing guards, and grade-separated crossings. Each of the four intersections has at least one marked crosswalk on the major roadway. As identified in Table 6 of the letter, there are enough pedestrians crossing to satisfy this warrant at all intersections except the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. As previously noted, gap studies were not performed as part of this work effort. For reference, the length of gap required is based on average walking speed (assumed 3.5 ft/sec), pedestrian start-up and clearance time (assumed 5 seconds) and crossing distance. The crossing distance is impacted by whether a median exists such that a pedestrian can stop in the median to wait for additional gaps in traffic and thus make a two-stage crossing. At the intersections at Marshall Creek Road and at Parkview Drive, there is a median present and the crossing may be completed in two stages. When treated as a two-stage crossing, the crossing distance across Bobcat Boulevard at the crosswalk is approximately 42 feet from the center of curb ramp to center of the median. In this case, pedestrians would require a 17-second gap in vehicular traffic to cross each leg of Bobcat Boulevard. At the High School Driveway 4 intersection, there is no median and the crossing distance across Bobcat Boulevard at the crosswalk is approximately 50 feet from the center of curb ramp to center of curb ramp. In this case, pedestrians would require a 19-second gap in vehicular traffic to cross the entirety of Bobcat Boulevard. In order to evaluate whether an adequate number of gaps exists, a gap study would be required on Bobcat Boulevard. However, as noted above, this warrant recommends other measures before traffic signal installation. These locations are already within a 20-mph reduced speed school zone and there are crossing guards present during school peak hours. Attachment 3 - Page 3 of 13 Page 154 of 325 Warrant 7 – Crash Experience The warrant is satisfied when: 1. Adequate trial of less restrictive remedies with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and 2. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by traffic signal control, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and 3. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1, or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 80 percent columns. Lee Engineering obtained all available crash reports that have occurred at these intersections between 2014 and present from TxDOT’s online C.R.I.S. Query tool. As noted in Table 6 of this letter, none of the intersections had five or more crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period. The highest number of crashes occurred at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive, where four (4) crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control occurred within a 12-month period. A summary of all available crash data is shown below for reference. The highest number of crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period are highlighted for each intersection. Crash ID Crash Type Potentially Correctible by Signal? Crash Date Crash Severity Light Condition Pavement Surface Condition Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard 13703655 Right Turn No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard 14352739 Right Angle YES 2/27/2015 Not Injured Daylight Slush 16538943 Fixed Object No 7/15/2018 Fatal Injury Daylight Dry 17355925 Fixed Object No 10/21/2019 Not Injured Daylight Dry 17969728 Right Angle YES 11/13/2020 Not Injured Daylight Dry High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard 15331510 Pedestrian YES 9/15/2016 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 16418931 Rear End No 5/16/2018 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19152169 Fixed Object No 10/5/2022 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 19507546 Fixed Object No 4/23/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19892782 Right Angle YES 11/6/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive 13698685 Sideswipe No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow 13757587 Fixed Object No 2/8/2014 Not Injured Daylight Dry 13836908 Left Turn YES 5/10/2014 Possible Injury Daylight Dry 15543732 Rear End No 1/15/2017 Not Injured Daylight Wet 16849370 Right Angle YES 1/10/2019 Suspected Minor Injury Dark, Lighted Dry 18785601 Rear End No 2/28/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19165980 Left Turn YES 10/8/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19458297 Right Angle YES 3/26/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19600321 Right Angle YES 6/14/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19705873 Right Angle YES 8/16/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19855903 Left Turn YES 11/4/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 20159027 Left Turn YES 4/23/2024 Not Injured Daylight Dry Warrant Volume Data The following four pages include traffic volume data and applicable graphs for Warrants 2 and 3 for each intersection. Attachment 3 - Page 4 of 13 Page 155 of 325 Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Marshall Creek Road and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Marshall Creek Rd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 306 260 566 357 0 357 11 - - Y - - - 8:00 513 376 889 428 0 428 20 Y - Y Y Y Y 15:00 449 334 783 317 0 317 16 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 647 448 1,095 327 0 327 46 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 1,915 1,418 3,333 1,429 0 1,429 93 3 1 4 3 3 2 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 5 of 13 Page 156 of 325 Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Parkview Drive and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Parkview Drive Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 514 425 939 238 238 12 Y Y Y Y Y - 8:00 546 550 1,096 342 342 14 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 415 457 872 170 170 7 - - Y Y - - 16:00 624 576 1,200 239 239 38 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,099 2,008 4,107 989 0 989 71 3 3 4 4 3 1 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 6 of 13 Page 157 of 325 High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of High School Driveway 4 and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd High School Driveway 4 Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 485 535 1,020 30 91 91 1 - Y - Y - - 8:00 484 814 1,298 84 207 207 22 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 468 439 907 48 219 219 13 Y Y Y Y Y - 16:00 602 629 1,231 78 177 177 53 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,039 2,417 4,456 240 694 694 89 3 4 3 4 3 1 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 7 of 13 Page 158 of 325 Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive are shown below. Hour Begin Trophy Club Drive Bobcat Blvd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 345 504 849 318 318 0 Y - Y Y Y - 8:00 554 467 1,021 448 448 9 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 540 268 808 414 414 0 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 675 345 1,020 564 564 13 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 2,114 1,584 3,698 1,744 0 1,744 22 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 8 of 13 Page 159 of 325 Warrant 7 – Crash Experience The warrant is satisfied when: 1. Adequate trial of less restrictive remedies with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and 2. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by traffic signal control, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and 3. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1, or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 80 percent columns. Lee Engineering obtained all available crash reports that have occurred at these intersections between 2014 and present from TxDOT’s online C.R.I.S. Query tool. As noted in Table 6 of this letter, none of the intersections had five or more crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period. The highest number of crashes occurred at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive, where four (4) crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control occurred within a 12-month period. A summary of all available crash data is shown below for reference. The highest number of crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period are highlighted for each intersection. Crash ID Crash Type Potentially Correctible by Signal? Crash Date Crash Severity Light Condition Pavement Surface Condition Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard 13703655 Right Turn No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard 14352739 Right Angle YES 2/27/2015 Not Injured Daylight Slush 16538943 Fixed Object No 7/15/2018 Fatal Injury Daylight Dry 17355925 Fixed Object No 10/21/2019 Not Injured Daylight Dry 17969728 Right Angle YES 11/13/2020 Not Injured Daylight Dry High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard 15331510 Pedestrian YES 9/15/2016 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 16418931 Rear End No 5/16/2018 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19152169 Fixed Object No 10/5/2022 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 19507546 Fixed Object No 4/23/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19892782 Right Angle YES 11/6/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive 13698685 Sideswipe No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow 13757587 Fixed Object No 2/8/2014 Not Injured Daylight Dry 13836908 Left Turn YES 5/10/2014 Possible Injury Daylight Dry 15543732 Rear End No 1/15/2017 Not Injured Daylight Wet 16849370 Right Angle YES 1/10/2019 Suspected Minor Injury Dark, Lighted Dry 18785601 Rear End No 2/28/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19165980 Left Turn YES 10/8/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19458297 Right Angle YES 3/26/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19600321 Right Angle YES 6/14/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19705873 Right Angle YES 8/16/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19855903 Left Turn YES 11/4/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 20159027 Left Turn YES 4/23/2024 Not Injured Daylight Dry Warrant Volume Data The following four pages include traffic volume data and applicable graphs for Warrants 2 and 3 for each intersection. Attachment 3 - Page 9 of 13 Page 160 of 325 Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Marshall Creek Road and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Marshall Creek Rd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 306 260 566 357 0 357 11 - - Y - - - 8:00 513 376 889 428 0 428 20 Y - Y Y Y Y 15:00 449 334 783 317 0 317 16 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 647 448 1,095 327 0 327 46 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 1,915 1,418 3,333 1,429 0 1,429 93 3 1 4 3 3 2 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 10 of 13 Page 161 of 325 Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Parkview Drive and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Parkview Drive Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 514 425 939 238 238 12 Y Y Y Y Y - 8:00 546 550 1,096 342 342 14 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 415 457 872 170 170 7 - - Y Y - - 16:00 624 576 1,200 239 239 38 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,099 2,008 4,107 989 0 989 71 3 3 4 4 3 1 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 11 of 13 Page 162 of 325 High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of High School Driveway 4 and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd High School Driveway 4 Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 485 535 1,020 30 91 91 1 - Y - Y - - 8:00 484 814 1,298 84 207 207 22 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 468 439 907 48 219 219 13 Y Y Y Y Y - 16:00 602 629 1,231 78 177 177 53 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,039 2,417 4,456 240 694 694 89 3 4 3 4 3 1 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 12 of 13 Page 163 of 325 Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive are shown below. Hour Begin Trophy Club Drive Bobcat Blvd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 345 504 849 318 318 0 Y - Y Y Y - 8:00 554 467 1,021 448 448 9 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 540 268 808 414 414 0 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 675 345 1,020 564 564 13 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 2,114 1,584 3,698 1,744 0 1,744 22 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 13 of 13 Page 164 of 325 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Future Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 7 1 296 486 228 522 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1290 407 522 0 0 798 0 Stage 1 557 - - - - - - Stage 2 733 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 155 593 670 - - 820 - Stage 1 537 - - - - - - Stage 2 436 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 108 584 670 - - 808 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 108 - - - - - - Stage 1 527 - - - - - - Stage 2 308 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 29.4 0 3.4 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 164 808 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.102 0.282 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 29.4 11.2 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.3 1.2 - Attachment 4 - Page 1 of 16 Page 165 of 325 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Future Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 21.0 22.0 22.0 17.0 17.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 26.3% 27.5% 27.5% 21.3% 21.3% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 19.0 20.0 20.0 15.0 15.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.55 0.48 0.56 0.42 Control Delay (s/veh) 33.1 52.1 48.6 37.1 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 33.1 52.1 48.6 37.1 8.0 LOS C D D D A Approach Delay (s/veh) 33.1 49.9 22.6 Approach LOS C D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 10 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 37.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 4 - Page 2 of 16 Page 166 of 325 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 678 243 420 187 184 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.55 0.48 0.56 0.42 Control Delay (s/veh) 33.1 52.1 48.6 37.1 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 33.1 52.1 48.6 37.1 8.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 146 129 116 86 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #209 202 164 149 50 Internal Link Dist (ft) 194 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 851 442 884 331 441 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.55 0.48 0.56 0.42 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Attachment 4 - Page 3 of 16 Page 167 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT SBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 467 3 1 139 Future Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 467 3 1 139 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 40.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 7.0 16.0 16.0 17.0 Total Split (%) 21.3% 50.0% 28.8% 28.8% 28.8% 8.8% 20.0% 20.0% 21% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.5 38.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.48 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.06 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.30 0.21 0.64 0.72 0.56 0.32 0.43 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.6 6.6 24.6 25.5 6.1 25.0 32.2 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.6 6.6 24.6 25.5 6.1 25.0 32.2 8.6 LOS D A C C A C C A Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.8 16.1 25.0 17.1 Approach LOS B B C B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 4 - Page 4 of 16 Page 168 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 505 47 590 599 94 100 178 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.30 0.21 0.64 0.72 0.56 0.32 0.43 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.6 6.6 24.6 25.5 6.1 25.0 32.2 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.6 6.6 24.6 25.5 6.1 25.0 32.2 8.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 53 30 14 97 32 6 44 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m90 43 m16 m102 m40 38 75 33 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 200 200 Base Capacity (vph) 276 1676 223 928 827 169 310 412 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.30 0.21 0.64 0.72 0.56 0.32 0.43 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 4 - Page 5 of 16 Page 169 of 325 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Future Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 2 4 4 8 12 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 2 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 31.0 31.0 14.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 18.8% 18.8% 38.8% 38.8% 17.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 13.0 13.0 29.0 29.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.8 24.3 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.8 24.3 75.1 17.3 34.6 LOS D C E B C Approach Delay (s/veh) 27.1 64.7 34.6 Approach LOS C E C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 10 (13%), Referenced to phase 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.04 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 44.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 4 - Page 6 of 16 Page 170 of 325 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 466 669 146 686 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.8 24.3 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.8 24.3 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 132 ~368 25 93 Queue Length 95th (ft) m66 163 #467 38 #132 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 282 642 641 1270 760 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 4 - Page 7 of 16 Page 171 of 325 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Future Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 45 6 0 45 0 6 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 30 353 120 1 43 499 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 841 288 0 0 473 518 0 Stage 1 458 - - - - - - Stage 2 383 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 6.44 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.52 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 304 709 - - 720 1044 - Stage 1 604 - - - - - - Stage 2 659 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 266 675 - - 987 987 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 266 - - - - - - Stage 1 578 - - - - - - Stage 2 602 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 26.5 0 0.7 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 306 987 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.463 0.045 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 26.5 8.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - D A - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 2.3 0.1 - Attachment 4 - Page 8 of 16 Page 172 of 325 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Future Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 24.0 22.0 22.0 14.0 14.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 27.5% 27.5% 17.5% 17.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 22.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.28 0.56 0.52 0.38 Control Delay (s/veh) 28.9 49.0 52.6 39.2 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 28.9 49.0 52.6 39.2 10.3 LOS C D D D B Approach Delay (s/veh) 28.9 51.9 25.8 Approach LOS C D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 37.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 4 - Page 9 of 16 Page 173 of 325 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 671 123 497 138 119 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.28 0.56 0.52 0.38 Control Delay (s/veh) 28.9 49.0 52.6 39.2 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 28.9 49.0 52.6 39.2 10.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 146 66 142 64 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 206 120 193 120 44 Internal Link Dist (ft) 239 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 940 442 884 265 312 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.28 0.56 0.52 0.38 Intersection Summary Attachment 4 - Page 10 of 16 Page 174 of 325 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT SBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 61 0 0 71 Future Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 61 0 0 71 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 7.0 35.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 10.0 15.0 15.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 8.8% 43.8% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 12.5% 18.8% 18.8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.0 33.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 8.0 13.0 13.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.16 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.20 0.49 0.12 0.37 0.40 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 30.9 13.7 14.6 13.6 3.1 14.8 34.9 10.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 30.9 13.7 14.6 13.6 3.1 14.8 34.9 10.4 LOS C B B B A B C B Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.0 12.7 14.8 25.1 Approach LOS B B B C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.49 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 15.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 4 - Page 11 of 16 Page 175 of 325 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 606 49 568 66 84 115 77 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.20 0.49 0.12 0.37 0.40 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 30.9 13.7 14.6 13.6 3.1 14.8 34.9 10.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 30.9 13.7 14.6 13.6 3.1 14.8 34.9 10.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 152 7 42 0 2 52 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m29 218 m11 m67 m2 43 101 36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 200 200 Base Capacity (vph) 110 1459 243 1150 538 226 284 289 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.20 0.49 0.12 0.37 0.40 0.27 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 4 - Page 12 of 16 Page 176 of 325 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Future Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 2 4 4 8 12 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 2 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 19.0 30.0 30.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 23.8% 23.8% 37.5% 37.5% 13.8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 17.0 17.0 28.0 28.0 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.35 0.35 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Control Delay (s/veh) 37.4 23.0 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 37.4 23.0 37.3 18.6 47.6 LOS D C D B D Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.7 31.5 47.6 Approach LOS C C D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 32.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 4 - Page 13 of 16 Page 177 of 325 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour based on Meeting H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\New Scenario 9-13.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 544 512 230 379 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Control Delay (s/veh) 37.4 23.0 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 37.4 23.0 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 41 182 230 41 78 Queue Length 95th (ft) 83 250 #397 66 #154 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 368 757 619 1238 443 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Attachment 4 - Page 14 of 16 Page 178 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [4. 2024 AM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat - No Peds (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Bobcat Approach 3 L2 158 3.0 193 3.0 0.615 12.1 LOS B 6.6 170.1 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.1 8 T1 352 3.0 429 3.0 0.615 12.1 LOS B 6.6 170.1 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 Approach 510 3.0 622 3.0 0.615 12.1 LOS B 6.6 170.1 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 North: SB Bobcat Approach 4 T1 307 3.0 374 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 33.7 14 R2 77 3.0 94 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 32.8 Approach 384 3.0 468 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 33.5 West: EB Marshall Creek Approach 5 L2 219 3.0 267 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 28.6 12 R2 321 3.0 391 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 27.9 Approach 540 3.0 659 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 28.2 All Vehicles 1434 3.0 1749 3.0 0.728 13.0 LOS B 11.0 281.0 0.69 0.76 1.06 30.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, September 16, 2024 10:18:20 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 4 - Page 15 of 16 Page 179 of 325 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [4. 2024 PM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat - No Peds (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Bobcat Approach 3 L2 285 3.0 313 3.0 0.563 9.3 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 32.0 8 T1 362 3.0 398 3.0 0.563 9.3 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 Approach 647 3.0 711 3.0 0.563 9.3 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 North: SB Bobcat Approach 4 T1 345 3.0 379 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.3 0.64 0.59 0.74 32.6 14 R2 103 3.0 113 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.3 0.64 0.59 0.74 31.7 Approach 448 3.0 492 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.3 0.64 0.59 0.74 32.4 West: EB Marshall Creek Approach 5 L2 52 3.0 57 3.0 0.399 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 32.9 12 R2 275 3.0 302 3.0 0.399 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 31.9 Approach 327 3.0 359 3.0 0.399 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 32.0 All Vehicles 1422 3.0 1563 3.0 0.563 9.4 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.49 0.38 0.52 32.1 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, September 16, 2024 10:19:20 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 4 - Page 16 of 16 Page 180 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary AGENDA ITEM: Consider approval of the August 26, 2024, Town Council work session and regular meeting minutes. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Town Council held a work session and regular meeting on August 26, 2024. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. 08.26.2024 draft minutes ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the August 26, 2024, Town Council work session and regular meeting minutes. Page 181 of 325 Town of Trophy Club Town Council Meeting Minutes August 26, 2024, 6:00 p.m., Work Session and Regular Meeting 1 Trophy Wood Drive, Trophy Club, Texas 76262 CALL WORK SESSION TO ORDER Mayor Tiffany called the work session to order at 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Steve Flynn, Mayor Pro Tem Stacey Bauer, Council Member Place 1 Jeff Beach, Council Member Place 2 Rhylan Rowe, Council Member Place 4 (arrived at 6:30 p.m.) LuAnne Oldham, Council Member Place 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT Dennis Sheridan, Council Member Place 3 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Brandon Wright, Town Manager Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Jason Wise, Fire Chief April Duvall, Director of Finance Matt Cox, Director of Community Development Denise Deprato, Director of Human Resources Chase Ellis, Director of Parks and Recreation Jill Lind, Director of Communications and Marketing Tamara Smith, Assistant to the Town Manager WORK SESSION ITEM 1. Presentation and discussion on the Town's solid waste contract that expires in May 2025 and service options to consider for inclusion in future contracts. (Tamara Smith, Assistant to the Town Manager) Tamara Smith, Assistant to the Town Manager, gave a presentation on the solid waste contract highlighting and noting the following, and also answered questions from the Town Council: • Purpose and Objectives • Contract Overview • Current Service Report • Opportunities • Proposal Structure Page 182 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 2 • Feedback • Proposed Timeline Following the presentation, the Town Council engaged in a discussion regarding the solid waste contract request for proposals. Key points raised included the amount of revenue generated from the 12% franchise fee and clarification of those utilizing the HHW Landfill Drop Off services. The Council provided the following feedback for consideration in the proposal: • Some council members expressed a desire to maintain current service levels. • There was a request to provide as many options to homeowners as possible, including pricing for HHW at the door. • The Council suggested exploring an option for recycling bins with attached lids. • The idea of a dedicated webpage on the provider’s website was proposed. • A larger recycling bin option was also discussed. • Contributions from the contractor for events like the 4th of July were encouraged. • The Council expressed a preference against forming a subcommittee in the RFP review process. • The session concluded with these considerations to be integrated into the forthcoming request for proposal (RFP). ADJOURN Mayor Tiffany adjourned the work session at 6:54 p.m. CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Tiffany called the regular meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. INVOCATION Chaplain David Impwi led the invocation. PLEDGES Mayor Tiffany led the Pledge of Allegiance to the American and Texas Flags. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT 2. Northwest ISD - Destination Imagination Global Finals. Page 183 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 3 Mayor Tiffany introduced Team Bacon on Deck. Team Managers Kimberly Fine and Bambi Trotter introduced the team members: Victoria Duet, Carter Ceman, Crosby Fine, Liam Hicks, and Camden Trotter. They gave a presentation on their Destination Imagination project, which involved planting trees in the Rainforest and successfully raising over $500, exceeding their initial goal of $250. The team competed locally, at Regionals, and at the state level, ultimately winning 3rd place at the Global competition in Kansas City, MO, for their impactful community project. 3. Working for You . . . Trophy Club a) Update from Town Council Members Mayor Tiffany acknowledged and praised the Parks & Recreation team featured in the latest Trophy Club Neighbors magazine, highlighting the department's dedication to providing exceptional experiences for the community's children throughout the year and recognized the magazine as an important source of information for Trophy Club residents. Council Member Bauer provided a reminder that the National Day of Service event would be held on September 14, 2024. b) Update from Town Manager Town Manager Wright provided the following updates: • Patriot Day Ceremony –September 11th at the fire station, starting at 8:45 AM. The event will honor those lost in the 2001 attacks with remarks from local leaders, a moment of silence at 8:59 AM, and an opportunity to thank first responders. • National Day of Service – September 14th, there will be three volunteer shifts (8:00–10:00 AM, 10:00 AM–12:00 PM, and 12:00–2:00 PM) for participants to help clean Trophy Club Park. The Town will provide litter grabbers and trash bags, but participants should bring their own gloves, bug spray, and sunscreen. Registration is available at perfectlove.org. • Dive-In Movie – August 30th, at the pool. Gates open at 7:30 PM, and the movie, Disney Pixar's Elemental, will start at 8:15 PM. • Taste of Trophy Club – A food festival will be held on September 7th, from 6:00–9:00 PM at Independence Park East, featuring diverse food options, live music, and family-friendly activities. • Upcoming Boards and Commissions Meetings o The Arts and Culture Ad Hoc Committee, September 5th at 6:00 PM at Town Hall. Page 184 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 4 c) Quick Civic Tip Town Attorney Roggia spoke in reference to Franchise Agreements. He explained that the Town, as a home rule municipality, controls its roads and regulates utilities through franchise agreements. These agreements, governed by the Town Charter, allow the Town Council to grant, renew, and amend franchises via ordinance after a public hearing, ensuring they are reviewed periodically rather than indefinitely. CONSENT AGENDA 4. Consider approval of the August 12, 2024, Town Council Work Session and Regular Meeting Minutes. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) 5. TUP-24-001 PD-30 Retail Construction Trailer Consider a resolution approving a temporary use permit to allow a construction trailer on PD-30 Lot 1, Block A property, generally located approximately 260 feet east of Trophy Club Drive and approximately 253 feet north of SH 114, currently zoned Planned Development District 30, Trophy Club Town Center, Trophy Club, Denton County, Texas. (Matt Cox, Community Development Director). The caption of the resolution reads as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB APPROVING A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR MIDTOWN DEVELOPMENT INC., TO PLACE A CONSTRUCTION TRAILER ON THE PD-30 LOT 1, BLOCK A PROPERTY, GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 260 FEET EAST OF TROPHY CLUB DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 253 FEET NORTH OR SH 114, AND PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 6. Consider an ordinance of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas amending Section 1.08.032 “Board Established, Membership; Meetings” of Chapter 1 “General Provisions”; Article 1.08 “Parks and Recreation”; and Division 2 “Parks and Recreation Board” of the Town’s Code of Ordinances, by decreasing the number of board members from nine (9) to seven (7) and dissolving regular board member places eight (8) and nine (9). (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary). The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2024-15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS; AMENDING SECTION 1.08.032 “BOARD ESTABLISHED, MEMBERSHIP; MEETINGS” OF CHAPTER 1 “GENERAL PROVISIONS”; ARTICLE 1.08 “PARKS AND RECREATION”; AND DIVISION 2 “PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD” OF THE TOWN’S CODE OF ORDINANCES, BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF BOARD MEMBERS FROM NINE (9) TO SEVEN (7), AND DISSOLVING REGULAR BOARD MEMBER PLACES EIGHT (8) AND NINE (9); PROVIDING THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Page 185 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 5 7. Consider an ordinance of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, amending Section 3.15.002 “Members” of Article 3.15 entitled “Building Standards Commission” of Chapter 3 “Building Regulations” of the Code of Ordinances, regarding the composition of the Building Standards Commission. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2024-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS; AMENDING CHAPTER 3 “BUILDING REGULATIONS”; ARTICLE 3.15 “BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION”; SECTION 63.15.002 “MEMBERS” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, TO MODIFY THE COMPOSITION OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION; PROVIDING THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 8. Consider an ordinance approving a negotiated settlement between the Atmos Cities Steering Committee and Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division regarding the company’s 2024 Rate Review Mechanism filing. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager). The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2024-17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, APPROVING A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (“ACSC”) AND ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION REGARDING THE COMPANY’S 2024 RATE REVIEW MECHANISM FILING; DECLARING EXISTING RATES TO BE UNREASONABLE; ADOPTING TARIFFS THAT REFLECT RATE ADJUSTMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT; FINDING THE RATES TO BE SET BY THE ATTACHED SETTLEMENT TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE AND IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST; APPROVING AN ATTACHMENT ESTABLISHING A BENCHMARK FOR PENSIONS AND RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS; REQUIRING THE COMPANY TO REIMBURSE ACSC’S REASONABLE RATEMAKING EXPENSES; DETERMINING THAT THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE COMPANY AND THE ACSC’S LEGAL COUNSEL. 9. Consider approval of the FY 2025 Compensation Pay Plan, effective October 6, 2024. (Denise Deprato, Director of Human Resources) 10. Consider authorizing the Town Manager to execute an audit services engagement letter and agreement amendment with Forvis Mazars, LLP for the FY2024 annual audit. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) Page 186 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 6 11. Consider approval of the annual rate increase for solid waste services from Allied Waste, dba Republic Services effective September 1, 2024. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) 12. Consider authorizing the Town Manager to negotiate and execute an interlocal agreement with the City of Watauga, Texas for vehicle maintenance services in an annual amount not to exceed $40,000. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) 13. Consider a first amendment to the interlocal cooperation agreement for administration of fire protection services with the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1 ("District") Section C. Payment to change the timing of District payments to the Town of Trophy Club from monthly to bi-annually; and authorize the Town Manager to execute same on behalf of the Town. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) 14. Consider rescheduling the November 11, 2024 Town Council Meeting to Tuesday, November 12, 2024 to avoid a conflict with Veterans Day, which is a Town - recognized holiday. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) Council Member Beach requested the removal of item 13 from the Consent Agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn moved to approve Consent Items 4-12, and 14. Council Member Rowe seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 13. Consider a first amendment to the interlocal cooperation agreement for administration of fire protection services with the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1 ("District") Section C. Payment to change the timing of District payments to the Town of Trophy Club from monthly to bi-annually; and authorize the Town Manager to execute same on behalf of the Town. Council Member Beach asked Town Manager Wright to provide a summary of the agenda item. Town Manager Wright explained during the FY 2025 Budget process, discussions with the District resulted in a need for the District's operating reserves for fire services to be drawn below the 25% target established in the interlocal agreement. Due to limited cash on hand, Town and District staff recommend that the timing of payments be changed to line up with the bi-annual receipt of property tax disbursements from Denton and Tarrant Counties. If approved, the amendment would change the timing of bi -annual payments to be made in February and September. Page 187 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 7 Council Member Beach moved to approve a first amendment to the interlocal cooperation agreement for administration of fire protection services with the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1 ("District") Section C. Payment to change the timing of District payments to the Town of Trophy Club from monthly to bi-annually; and authorize the Town Manager to execute same on behalf of the Town. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 PUBLIC HEARINGS 15. Case PD-AMD-24-003 PD-30 Amendment Multi-tenant Monument Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending Planned Development District 30 (PD-30) to allow a multi-tenant monument sign with a changeable electronic variable message sign (CEVMS) display located at 2200 - 2300 SH 114 on Lot 2, Block A, of the Trophy Club Town Center Addition, of the C. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 823, Trophy Club, Denton County, Tex as. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) Mayor Tiffiany opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Cox provided an overview of the proposal, previously reviewed in June. Concerns were raised about the sign's height, the placement of the Town Center logo, and the use of an LED sign. In response, the sign’s height was reduced from 35 to 32 feet, the LED display was lowered, and the Town Center logo was moved to the top. These changes were presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) on August 1st. Public notices were sent out, and no responses or opposition had been received as of that morning. Mike Biggs, P&Z Chairman, stated that P&Z revisited the proposal, focusing on concerns about height and LED effectiveness. After discussions, the Commission emphasized the sign's purpose in supporting local businesses and boosting the Town's tax base by attracting attention. Despite debates on visibility and readability, P&Z supported maintaining the sign’s height at 32 feet for optimal advertising effectiveness with a vote of 5 to 1. Those who spoke in favor: Ben Lee, Owner Social Oak Wine & Whiskey Lounge, 2230 SH 114, Ste 550 Yochoua Arrouas, Director of Development for Beck Ventures, reiterated that the sign was primarily designed for tenants and business attraction. He emphasized that the $200,000 investment required the sign to be large and bright to effectively reach driver s Page 188 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 8 on Highway 114. Reducing the screen size would diminish its effectiveness, and a smaller sign would not justify the investment. No one spoke in opposition. Mayor Tiffany closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. A discussion followed with Council members expressing concerns about the height and size of the sign, particularly the LED portion. Several members questioned whether reducing the size would impact visibility for drivers on the highway and affect the ability to effectively advertise for the businesses in the center. Bill Swift, Legacy Signs, explained that shrinking the sign would reduce the number of visible lines and potentially impact its effectiveness. Council members continued to discuss the aesthetic impact and visibility concerns, with some suggesting minor design changes, such as incorporating the Town’s clock tower as a landmark. There was general support for the sign due to its potential to increase sales tax revenue, promote local businesses, and improve the visibility of the Town Center. Council Member Rowe moved to approve Ordinance No. 2024-18 amending PD- 30 to allow the multi-tenant monument sign with a CEVMS display as presented, with an amendment that the sign be no less than 32 feet and no more than 35 feet in height. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn moved to amend the motion , setting the sign height to a maximum of 32 feet. Council Member Beach seconded the motion. VOTE ON AMENDMENT TO MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2024-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2024-05 P&Z, WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE NOS. 2016-11 P&Z, 2014-06 P&Z, AND 2012-04 P&Z, KNOWN AS PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 30 Page 189 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 9 (“PD-30”), AND ALSO KNOWN AS TROPHY CLUB TOWN CENTER, WHICH IS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT “A” HERETO, BY PROVIDING AN AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT “B” OF ORDINANCE NO. 2024-05 ENTITLED “PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS” BY AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION II “DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS”, SUBSECTION H “SIGNAGE, CLOCK TOWER AND MISCELLANEOUS”, AND SUBPARAGRAPH 1.c. “FREESTANDING DEVELOPMENT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS”, TO ALLOW A MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT SIGN WITH CEVMS DISPLAY, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN EXHIBITS “B” AND “B- 1”, ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2000-06 THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 16. Conduct a public hearing for the FY 2025 Proposed Budget and FY 2025 -2030 Capital Improvement Plan and schedule adoption of the FY 2025 Budget and FY 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan for the September 9, 2024, Town Council Meeting. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) Mayor Tiffiany opened the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. Ms. Duvall, presented the FY 2025 Proposed Budget, explaining that it is based on a tax rate of $0.415469, with an M&O rate of $0.316042 for daily operations and an I&S rate of $0.099427 for debt repayment. Total revenues are projected at $28,514,279, with $16,316,611 allocated to the general fund for operations, and total expenditures amounting to $38,000,500 with $16,395,500 of this related to General Fund expenditures. The M&O rate is capped at a 3.5% annual increase, by law. Ms. Duvall noted the following budget inclusions: • 3% cost of living adjustment (COLA) for all staff • Up to 2% merit increase based on performance • New positions: o Additional crossing guard for the high school o Part-time staff member for the Parks Department • Community pool separated into its own department Page 190 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 10 • Events like Taste of Trophy Club and Christmas in the Park moved to the hotel occupancy fund • Funding for: o Parks Master Plan o Replacement vehicles for Police, Fire, EMS, and Community Development Departments o Shared costs for a SWAT vehicle o Economic Development Corporation's Thrive Grant Program • Budget savings: o $56,000 reduction in Town Manager’s contingency fund o $12,000 saved by eliminating offsite storage o $200,000 in IT savings from software consolidation o $50,000 saved in electricity costs across departments No one spoke in favor or opposition. Mayor Tiffany closed the public hearing at 8:14 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn expressed his appreciation for the smooth and well- organized budget subcommittee process led by Town Manager Wright and Ms. Duvall, thanking them and their staff for their assistance and support throughout the process . Council Member Rowe moved to schedule adoption of the FY 2025 Budget and FY 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan for the September 9, 2024, Town Council meeting. Council Member Council Member Beach seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 INDIVIDUAL ITEMS 17. Consider an ordinance of the Town of Trophy Club amending Chapter 2 “Animal Control,” Article 2.02 “Impoundment,” Section 2.02.001 “Generally,” Subsection (c) “Disposition of Unclaimed Animals” to provide for forfeiture; and amending Appendix A “Fee Schedule,” Article A1.000 “General Provisions,” Section A1.006 “Animal Control,” Subsection (a) “Impound Fee,” of the Code of Ordinances. (Patrick Arata, Chief of Police) Town Manager Wright provided an overview of proposed ordinance, including revisions to the fee schedule for animal impoundment, the introduction of a tiered structure, and additional boarding and rabies vaccination fees. Changes to the disposition of unclaimed animals were also proposed, offering multiple options, including adoption, transfer to a rescue organization, and euthanasia in specific cases. Page 191 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 11 Animal Shelter Advisory Board Chair, Susan Edstrom, expressed concerns about the decision-making process for euthanizing animals, advocating for more oversight and the development of clear procedures. Pam Swan, 2809 Sherwood, spoke on this issue. After a lengthy discussion, the Town Council reached a consensus to defer a decision on the proposed ordinance until after policies are finalized and reviewed by the Animal Shelter Advisory Board. Council Member Beach moved to defer this item until staff has developed a policy, to be reviewed by the Animal Shelter Advisory Board. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 18. Consider a resolution authorizing the defeasance of a portion of the Town's 2014 Certificates of Obligation for an additional amount not to exceed $125,000 to enable the Town to lower future interest expenses and reduce its overall debt burden. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) Ms. Duvall presented and reviewed the proposed resolution. Council Member Rowe moved to approve Resolution No. 2024-14 authorizing the defeasance of a portion of the Town's 2014 Certificates of Obligation for an additional amount not to exceed $125,000 to enable the Town to lower future interest expenses and reduce its overall debt burden. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. The caption of the resolution reads as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE REDEMPTION AND DEFEASANCE OF CERTAIN OUTSTANDING BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE DEPOSIT OF FUNDS WITH THE PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR; AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None ABSENT: Sheridan VOTE: 6-0-1 Page 192 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – August 26, 2024 Page 12 EXECUTIVE SESSION/OPEN SESSION Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, the Town Council convened into a Closed Executive Session at 8:54 p.m. and reconvened into Regular Session at 9:44 p.m. in accordance with the Texas Government Code regarding: Section 551.071 Consultation with Town Attorney to seek legal advice regarding the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District Boundaries. No Action Taken. Section 551.074 Personnel Matters to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee, to wit: 1) Town Manager. No Action Taken. ADJOUNMENT Mayor Tiffany adjourned the Town Council meeting at 9:44 p.m. ____________________________ Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Page 193 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary AGENDA ITEM: Consider approval of the September 9, 2024, Town Council regular meeting minutes. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Town Council held a regular meeting on September 9, 2024. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. 09.09.2024 draft minutes ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Move to approve the September 9, 2024, Town Council regular meeting minutes. Page 194 of 325 Town of Trophy Club Town Council Meeting Minutes September 09, 2024, 7:00 p.m., Regular Meeting 1 Trophy Wood Drive, Trophy Club, Texas 76262 CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Tiffany called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Steve Flynn, Mayor Pro Tem Stacey Bauer, Council Member Place 1 Jeff Beach, Council Member Place 2 Dennis Sheridan, Council Member Place 3 Rhylan Rowe, Council Member Place 4 LuAnne Oldham, Council Member Place 5 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Brandon Wright, Town Manager Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Jason Wise, Fire Chief Patrick Arata, Chief of Police April Duvall, Director of Finance Matt Cox, Director of Community Development Denise Deprato, Director of Human Resources Chase Ellis, Director of Parks and Recreation Jill Lind, Director of Communications and Marketing Tamara Smith, Assistant to the Town Manager INVOCATION Due to the absence of the scheduled pastor, the invocation was not delivered . PLEDGES Council Member Oldham led the Pledge of Allegiance to the American and Texas Flags. PUBLIC COMMENTS Written public comment was submitted by Pat Keefer, 216 Fresh Meadow, regarding ways to avoid industrializing Trophy Cub. COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT 2. Metroport Meals on Wheels Page 195 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 2 Mayor Tiffany introduced Mary King, Executive Director and John Thane, President, of Metroport Meals on Wheels. Ms. King gave a presentation on the Metroport Meals on Wheels program and its positive impact on the community. 3. Working for You . . . Trophy Club a) Update from Town Council Members Council Member Bauer and Mayor Pro Tem Flynn expressed their appreciation to the Parks and Recreation Department for organizing the Taste of Trophy Club event on September 7th. They praised the event for its great turnout, delicious food, entertaining music, and fantastic weather. Mayor Tiffany and Council Member Oldham spoke on the Northwest ISD Annual Communities Luncheon held on September 6th, noting that it was insightful. A key takeaway from the event was that construction on the BNHS Stadium is projected to begin in August 2026. b) Update from Town Manager Jill Lind, Director of Communications and Marketing announced the launch of Ask Indy, the Town's new AI-powered customer service platform. She demonstrated how the tool works, showing how users can ask questions through the Town website or by texting, and how the platform helps provide answers or routes issues to the appropriate department. Chase Ellis, Director of Parks and Recreation, provided an update on the Parks Master Plan process, noting that the RFQ closed on August 30th, with eight firms submitting proposals. The evaluation process is underway, and scores are expected later this week. The top three to four firms will be interviewed on September 19th, with the goal of presenting a consultant recommendation to the Council at the first meeting in October . Town Manager Wright provided the upcoming events and meetings: • The Patriot Day Ceremony will be held at Fire Station 1 on September 11th at 8:45 AM to honor those who lost their lives in the 2001 attacks. The event will include remarks from community leaders, a moment of silence at 8:59 AM, and an opportunity to thank first responders. • A community cleanup day is scheduled for Saturday, September 14th at Trophy Club Park, with three volunteer shifts from 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM. Volunteers are encouraged to register online. • National Night Out will take place on October 1st, where neighborhoods are encouraged to participate in the annual event against crime by organizing block parties and notifying the Trophy Club Police Department. Page 196 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 3 • Upcoming Boards and Commissions Meetings and Events o September 16, Parks and Recreation Board, 6:00 p.m. o September 19, Economic Development Corporation Board,6:00 p.m. c) Quick Civic Tip Town Attorney Roggia provided an overview of the budget process, explaining that it is governed by the Town Charter and various sections of the Texas Government Code and Tax Code. CONSENT AGENDA 3. Consider an ordinance of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas amending Chapter 1 "General Provisions", Article 1.02 "Administration and Finance", Section 1.02.002 "Signature Authority of Mayor and Town Manager" of the Code of Ordinances to authorize the Town Manager to execute interlocal cooperation agreements equal to or less than $25,000. (Dean Roggia, Town Attorney). Removed from Consent. 4. Consider an ordinance amending the FY 2024 Budget to appropriate funding for claims related to vehicle hail damage and for repairs to the Fire Department's ladder truck. (April Duvall, Director of Finance). The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2024-20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AMENDING THE TOWN’S ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OCTOBER 1, 2023, AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2024, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2023-15, AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2024-11 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2024-13, BY PROVIDING FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GENERAL FUND; PROVIDING THAT EXPENDITURES FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANNUAL BUDGET, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 5. Consider authorizing the Town Manager to negotiate and execute a vehicle repair contract with Siddons-Martin (Emergency Group, LLC) in an amount not to exceed $32,447.23 for fire apparatus repairs and testing. (Jason Wise, Fire Chief) Council Member Sheridan requested item 3 be removed from Consent. Council Member Beach moved to approve Consent Items 4-5. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. Page 197 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 4 VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 3. Consider an ordinance of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas amending Chapter 1 "General Provisions", Article 1.02 "Administration and Finance", Section 1.02.00 1 "Signature Authority of Mayor and Town Manager" of the Code of Ordinances to authorize the Town Manager to execute interlocal cooperation agreements equal to or less than $25,000. (Dean Roggia, Town Attorney). Councilmember Sheridan raised questions regarding the approval process for Interlocal Agreements (ILAs), particularly whether they need to be tied to budgeted funds and whether the Town Manager can approve ILAs without council approval if there are no associated costs. The Town Attorney clarified that under the Interlocal Cooperation Act, governing bodies must approve all ILAs, but by ordinance, the Town Council can grant certain approval authority to the Town Manager. Council Member Rowe moved to approve Ordinance No. 2024-19 of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas amending Chapter 1 "General Provisions", Article 1.02 "Administration and Finance", Section 1.02.00 1 "Signature Authority of Mayor and Town Manager" of the Code of Ordinances to authorize the Town Manager to execute interlocal cooperation agreements equal to or less than $25,000. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2024-19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS; AMENDING CHAPTER 1 “GENERAL PROVISIONS”; ARTICLE 1.02 “ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE”; SECTION 1.02.001 “SIGNATURE AUTHORITY OF MAYOR AND TOWN MANAGER” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, TO AUTHORIZE THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN $25,000.00; PROVIDING THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Flynn, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: Beach, Sheridan VOTE: 5-2 INDIVIDUAL ITEMS 6. Consider an ordinance accepting an Annual Service and Assessment Plan update for authorized services (emergency services) for Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (The Highlands at Trophy Club), and the proposed assessment roll; setting a date for public hearing on September 23, 2024; authorizing the Page 198 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 5 publication of notice and directing the mailing of notices as required by law; enacting other provisions relating thereto; and providing an effective date. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) Town Manager Wright recommended an adjustment to this item to focus solely on setting the public hearing date and time, explaining that the ordinance would be considered during the public hearing on September 23, 2024. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn moved set to a date for public hearing on September 23, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. and authorize the publication of notice and directing the mailing of notices as required by law. Council Member Sheridan seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 7. Consider a resolution establishing the debt financing plan and tax rate goal for the FY 2025 Budget and the FY 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) Town Manager Wright provided an overview of the debt financing plan, which outlines the process for issuing debt over the next several years to fund capital improvements, primarily for street and sidewalk repairs. The plan anticipates issuing approximately $7 million every 2-3 years to support $16 million in infrastructure projects over the next six years. The next debt issuance is planned for 2025. He explained that the strategy is designed to minimize costs and maintain financial flexibility. The plan will be reviewed and updated annually as part of the budget process to account for changes in the bond market and town needs. Council Member Beach moved to approve Resolution 2024-15 establishing the debt financing plan and tax rate goal for the FY 2025 Budget and the FY 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn seconded the motion. The caption of the resolution reads as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB ESTABLISHING THE DEBT FINANCING PLAN AND TAX RATE GOAL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 BUDGET AND THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 Page 199 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 6 8. Consider a resolution adopting the Town of Trophy Club FY 2025 Business Plan. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) Town Manager Wright provided an update on the strategic plan and the business plan for fiscal year 2025. He explained the business plan focuses on the top six goals prioritized by the Town Council for the next one to two years, including emergency management, public safety, park planning, asset maintenance, senior housing regulations, and redevelopment strategies. These goals are incorporated into the annual budget, with progress to be tracked and reported quarterly. Council Member Oldham moved to approve Resolution 2024-16 adopting the Town of Trophy Club FY 2025 Business Plan . Council Member Beach seconded the motion. The caption of the resolution reads as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 BUSINESS PLAN FOR THE STRATEGIC PLAN. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 9. Consider a resolution adopting the FY 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) Ms. Duvall presented the updated six-year Capital Improvement Plan which allocates over $16 million towards infrastructure replacement and maintenance. The plan addresses critical needs, ensuring Trophy Club remains well-maintained and prepared for future growth. Key projects include street improvements, sidewalk enhancements, storm drainage upgrades, and new pickleball courts. She stated the full plan was available on the town's website and in the council agenda packet . Council Member Oldham moved to approve Resolution 2024-17 adopting the FY 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. Council Member Beach seconded the motion. The caption of the resolution reads as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 Page 200 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 7 10. Consider an ordinance adopting the FY 2025 Annual Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025 making appropriations for each fund and department and ratify the property tax increase reflected in the FY 2025 Budget. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) Ms. Duvall presented the FY 2025 Proposed Budget, based on a tax rate of $0.415469, with projected revenues of $28,514,279 and expenditures totaling $38,000,500. Key budget highlights include a 3% cost of living adjustment for staff, up to 2% merit increases, new positions (a crossing guard and part-time Parks staff), and funding for various projects such as the Parks Master Plan and replacement vehicles. Savings were achieved through reductions in the Town Manager’s contingency fund, IT consolidation, and electricity costs. Additionally, community events were moved to the hotel occupancy fund. Ms. Duvall extended a special thanks to the Finance Subcommittee members, Mayor Pro Tem Flynn, Council Member Sheridan, and Council Member Ro we, for their dedication and time in contributing to the budget process. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn moved to approve Ordinance 2024-21 adopting the FY 2025 Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025, making appropriations for each fund and department. Council Member Sheridan seconded the motion. The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2024-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, ADOPTING AND APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2024 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2025, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT, PROJECT, OPERATION, ACTIVITY, PURCHASE, ACCOUNT, AND OTHER EXPENDITURES; PROVIDING FOR EMERGENCY EXPENDITURES AND EXPENDITURES AS ALLOWED BY APPLICABLE LAW; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF DOCUMENTS; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 Town Manager Wright stated the ratification of the property tax increase would be considered following the consideration of tax rate levy item. 11. Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance levying municipal ad valorem taxes for FY 2025 from October 1, 2024, to September 30, 2025, at the rate of $0.415469 per $100 assessed valuation on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the Town of Trophy Club. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) Page 201 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 8 Mayor Tiffany opened the public hearing at 8:13 p.m. Ms. Duvall presented the proposed tax rate for fiscal year 2025 explaining the proposed rate of $0.415469 remains unchanged from the previous year, with a maintenance and operations component of $0.316042 and an interest and sinking component of $0.099427. While the overall rate remains the same, it will generate more revenue for maintenance and operations, effectively resulting in a 5.16% increase. For a home valued at $100,000, this would result in an increase of approximately $0.37 in maintenance and operations taxes. She stated no public comments were received on this item. No one spoke in favor or opposition. Mayor Tiffany closed the public hearing at 8:14 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn moved that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of $0.415469, which is effectively a 4.99 percent increase in the tax rate; and moved to approve Ordinance 2024-22 adopting the 2024 tax rolls and fixing and levying municipal ad valorem taxes for the fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2024, and ending on September 30, 2025, and for each fiscal year thereafter until otherwise provided, at the rate of $0.415469 per $100 assessed valuation on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the Town of Trophy Club as of January 1, 2024. Council Member Beach seconded the motion. The caption of the ordinance reads as follows: ORDINANCE 2024-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, FIXING AND LEVYING MUNICIPAL AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2024 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2025, AND FOR EACH FISCAL YEAR THEREAFTER UNTIL OTHERWISE PROVIDED, AT A RATE OF $0.415469 PER ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) ASSESSED VALUATION ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE TOWN; DIRECTING THE ASSESSMENT THEREOF TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF CURRENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES AND INDEBTEDNESS OF THE TOWN; APPROVING THE TAX RATE AND LEVY AND NOTIFYING THE PUBLIC THAT THIS TAX RATE WILL RAISE MORE TAXES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS THAN LAST YEAR’S TAX RATE; PROVIDING FOR DUE AND DELINQUENT DATES TOGETHER WITH PENALTIES AND INTEREST; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT TO THE TOWN ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR; PROVIDING FOR PENALTY AND INTEREST; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 Page 202 of 325 Town Council Meeting Minutes – September 9, 2024 Page 9 Second part of Item 10. Ratification of the property tax increase reflected in the FY 2025 Budget. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn moved to ratify the property tax revenue increase reflected in the FY 2025 Budget. "This budget will raise more total property taxes than last year's budget by $628,512 or 6.14%, and of that amount, $134,787 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 12. Consider casting a vote for the official ballot of the Texas Municipal League Regional 8 Director Election. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) Town Manager Wright explained that the Town of Trophy Club participates in the election of the director for Region 8 of the Texas Municipal League (TML) Board of Directors and a brief biography of each of the four candidates was provided in the agenda packet. Mayor Tiffany moved to cast the Town’s vote for Kim Greaves, Mayor of Westlake for the Texas Municipal League Region 8 Director election. Council Member Beach seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Flynn, Sheridan, Tiffany, Rowe, Oldham NAYES: None VOTE: 7-0 EXECUTIVE SESSION/OPEN SESSION Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, the Town Council convened into a Closed Executive Session at 8:18 p.m. and reconvened into Regular Session at 9:27 p.m. in accordance with the Texas Government Code regarding: Section 551.074 Personnel Matters to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee, to wit: 1) Town Secretary. No Action Taken. ADJOUNMENT Mayor Tiffany adjourned the Town Council meeting at 9:27 p.m. ____________________________ Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Page 203 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: April Duvall, Director of Finance AGENDA ITEM: Consider an ordinance accepting and approving an update of the Service and Assessment Plan and an updated Assessment Roll for the Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 ("PID) in compliance with Chapter 372 (Authorized Improvements Assessment). (April Duvall, Director of Finance) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: Each year, the Town Council reviews and approves the updated Service and Assessment Plan (SAP) and Assessment Roll for Public Improvement District No. 1 (PID) in Trophy Club. Revenue bonds were originally issued in 2007 to finance the acquisition, construction, and maintenance of properties within The Highlands of Trophy Club. In 2015, the bonds were refinanced, reducing the interest rate with a savings passed on to homeowners. With completion of the public improvements in infrastructure necessary for the properties within The Highlands of Trophy Club, all funds were fully expended on the agreed-upon authorized improvements. This ordinance includes making and adopting necessary findings, formally accepting the annual Service Plan Update and Assessment Roll, and establishing an effective date. This action is a requirement of the PID Infrastructure Plan, which contains no significant changes from the plan approved in the previous year. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: The Service and Assessment Plan (SAP) outlines the authorized improvements to be provided by the PID, detailing the associated costs, indebtedness, and the method for assessing properties within the PID. The 2024 update includes an assessment roll that identifies each parcel based on the assessment method outlined in the amended SAP. Notably, there have been no parcel subdivisions added since the last update in 2023. The original PID indebtedness from the 2015 Bonds, which are to repaid from assessments, is $26,154,979. Assessments on any property may be paid in full at any time. If not paid in full, the assessments are payable in annual installments of principal and interest, the last of which is scheduled for the 2032 tax year. The 2024 annual installments will be billed by the Town in 2024 and will be delinquent on February 1, 2025. Below is a chart with the annual installment amount per lot type for the current year. LOT TYPE ANNUAL INSTALLMENT Type 1 $2,420.91 Type 2 $1,839.89 Type 3 $1,500.97 Page 204 of 325 Type 4 $1,283.08 Type 5 $1,065.20 LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the ordinance as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit A: 2024 Annual Service Plan Update ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the ordinance accepting and approving an update of the Service and Assessment Plan and an updated Assessment Roll for the Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 ("PID) in compliance with Chapter 372 (Authorized Improvements Assessment). Page 205 of 325 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, ACCEPTING AND APPROVING AN UPDATE OF THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AND AN UPDATED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 (“PID”) IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 372 (AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT); MAKING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR THE INCORPORATION OF FINDINGS; ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE ANNUAL SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN UPDATE AND UPDATED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE PID ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT “A” HERETO; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club (the “Town”) is a home rule municipality acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 2007, after due notice, the Town Council held a public hearing in the manner required by law on the advisability of the public improvements and services described in the petition as required by Sec. 372.009 of the Public Improvement District Assessment Act, Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the “PID Act”) and made the findings required by Sec. 372.009(b) of the PID Act and, by Resolution No. 2007-08 adopted by a majority of the members of the Town Council, authorized the PID in accordance with its finding as to the advisability of the public improvements and services; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2007, after notice and a public hearing conducted in the manner required by law, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 2007 -29, which was supplemented by Ordinance No. 2009-24 adopted by the Town Council on September 28, 2009 (as supplemented, the “Assessment Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2007, the Town Council issued special assessment revenue bonds secured by the assessments levied pursuant to the Assessment Ordinance (the “2007 Bonds”); and WHEREAS, on December 22, 2015, the Town Council issued special assessment revenue refunding bonds (the “2015 Bonds”), to refund in full the 2007 Bonds, such 2015 Bonds being secured by the assessments levied pursuant to the Assessment Ordinance; and WHEREAS, Section 372.013 of the PID Act and the Service and Assessment Plan require that the Service and Assessment Plan and Assessment Roll be annually reviewed and updated; and Page 206 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to the issuance of the 2015 Bonds, the Service and Assessment Plan should be updated to reflect the issuance of the 2015 Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Annual Service and Assessment Plan Update and updated Assessment Roll attached as Exhibit “A” hereto conform the original Assessment Roll to the principal and interest payment schedule required for the 2015 Bonds, thereby reducing the amounts listed on the original Assessment Roll, and update the Assessment Roll to reflect prepayments, property divisions and changes to the budget allocation for District public improvements that occur during the year, if any; and WHEREAS, the Town Council now desires to proceed with the adoption of this Ordinance which supplements the Assessment Ordinance and approves and adopts the Annual Service and Assessment Plan Update and the Updated Assessment Roll attached thereto, in conformity with the requirements of the PID Act, for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2024, and ending September 30, 2025. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS: SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF FINDINGS The findings and determinations set forth in the preambles above are incorporated herein for all purposes and are hereby adopted. SECTION 2. ANNUAL SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN UPDATE AND UPDATED ASSESSMENT ROLL The Annual Service and Assessment Plan Update and Updated Assessment Roll attached hereto as Exhibit “A” are hereby accepted and approved in compliance with the PID Act in all matters as required by law. SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE REPEALER That this Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other Ordinances and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such Ordinances except for those instances where there are direct conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance. Ordinances or parts thereof in force at the time this Ordinance shall take effect and that are inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with this Ordinance. Provided however, that any complaint, action, claim, or lawsuit which has bee n initiated or has arisen under or pursuant to such Ordinance on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall continue to be governed by the provisions of that Ordinance and for that purpose the Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Page 207 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 3 of 4 SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, void, or invalid, the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or the application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby, it being the intent of the Town Council that no portion hereof, or provision or regulation contained herein shall become inoperative or fail by rea son of any unconstitutionality, voidness, or invalidity of any other portion hereof, and all provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable for that purpose. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect, and the levy of the Assessments, and the provisions and terms of the Service and Assessment Plan and Assessment Role shall be and become effective upon passage and execution hereof in accordance with the law. ADOPTED, PASSED, and APPROVED by the Town Council, by a vote of _______ members voting “for”, _______ members voting “against”, and with _______ absentees on this 23rd day of September 2024. Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas [SEAL] ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Town of Trophy Club, Texas Town of Trophy Club, Texas Page 208 of 325 Exhibit “A” Annual Service and Assessment Plan Update and Updated Assessment Roll Page 209 of 325 Page 210 of 325 Page 211 of 325 Page 212 of 325 Page 213 of 325 Page 214 of 325 Page 215 of 325 Page 216 of 325 Page 217 of 325 Page 218 of 325 Page 219 of 325 Page 220 of 325 Page 221 of 325 Page 222 of 325 Page 223 of 325 Page 224 of 325 2024 Principal Interest Net Debt Service 2024 $1,726.50 $734.15 $2,460.65 $53.03 ($92.76)$2,420.91 $19,341.66 2025 $1,833.67 $672.12 $2,505.79 $53.82 ($92.76)$2,466.85 $17,615.16 2026 $1,923.87 $615.75 $2,539.63 $54.63 ($92.76)$2,501.49 $15,781.49 2027 $2,018.32 $554.10 $2,572.41 $55.45 ($92.76)$2,535.10 $13,857.61 2028 $2,119.13 $485.54 $2,604.66 $56.28 ($92.76)$2,568.18 $11,839.30 2029 $2,229.49 $412.16 $2,641.64 $57.12 ($92.76)$2,606.00 $9,720.17 2030 $2,339.85 $316.04 $2,655.88 $57.98 ($92.76)$2,621.10 $7,490.69 2031 $2,493.71 $195.20 $2,688.91 $58.85 ($92.76)$2,655.00 $5,150.84 2032 $2,657.13 $66.43 $2,723.56 $59.73 ($92.76)$2,690.53 $2,657.13 Total $20,985.39 $4,844.82 $25,830.21 $559.14 ($927.64)$25,461.71 (a) Tax Year 2024 corresponds to Bond Year 2025. Tax Year 2024 Annual Installments will become due by January 31, 2025. (b) Subject to change. Tax Year: Exhibit A Annual Installments By Lot Type Lot Type: 1 Assessment Balance Tax Year (a) PID Bonds Collections Costs Refunding Credit Annual Installment (b) Page 225 of 325 Page 226 of 325 2024 Principal Interest Net Debt Service 2024 $1,312.14 $557.96 $1,870.09 $40.30 ($70.50)$1,839.89 $14,699.66 2025 $1,393.59 $510.81 $1,904.40 $40.90 ($70.50)$1,874.81 $13,387.52 2026 $1,462.14 $467.97 $1,930.12 $41.52 ($70.50)$1,901.13 $11,993.93 2027 $1,533.92 $421.11 $1,955.03 $42.14 ($70.50)$1,926.67 $10,531.79 2028 $1,610.54 $369.01 $1,979.55 $42.77 ($70.50)$1,951.82 $8,997.87 2029 $1,694.41 $313.24 $2,007.65 $43.41 ($70.50)$1,980.56 $7,387.33 2030 $1,778.28 $240.19 $2,018.47 $44.07 ($70.50)$1,992.04 $5,692.92 2031 $1,895.22 $148.35 $2,043.57 $44.73 ($70.50)$2,017.80 $3,914.64 2032 $2,019.42 $50.49 $2,069.90 $45.40 ($70.50)$2,044.80 $2,019.42 Total $15,948.89 $3,682.06 $19,630.96 $424.94 ($705.00)$19,350.90 (a) Tax Year 2024 corresponds to Bond Year 2025. Tax Year 2024 Annual Installments will become due by January 31, 2025. (b) Subject to change. Tax Year: Exhibit A Annual Installments By Lot Type Lot Type: 2 Assessment Balance Tax Year (a) PID Bonds Collections Costs Refunding Credit Annual Installment (b) Page 227 of 325 Page 228 of 325 2024 Principal Interest Net Debt Service 2024 $1,070.43 $455.17 $1,525.60 $32.88 ($57.51)$1,500.97 $11,991.83 2025 $1,136.88 $416.71 $1,553.59 $33.37 ($57.51)$1,529.45 $10,921.40 2026 $1,192.80 $381.77 $1,574.57 $33.87 ($57.51)$1,550.92 $9,784.52 2027 $1,251.36 $343.54 $1,594.90 $34.38 ($57.51)$1,571.76 $8,591.72 2028 $1,313.86 $301.03 $1,614.89 $34.89 ($57.51)$1,592.27 $7,340.37 2029 $1,382.28 $255.54 $1,637.82 $35.42 ($57.51)$1,615.72 $6,026.51 2030 $1,450.70 $195.94 $1,646.65 $35.95 ($57.51)$1,625.08 $4,644.23 2031 $1,546.10 $121.02 $1,667.13 $36.49 ($57.51)$1,646.10 $3,193.52 2032 $1,647.42 $41.19 $1,688.61 $37.03 ($57.51)$1,668.13 $1,647.42 Total $13,010.94 $3,003.79 $16,014.73 $346.66 ($575.13)$15,786.26 (a) Tax Year 2024 corresponds to Bond Year 2025. Tax Year 2024 Annual Installments will become due by January 31, 2025. (b) Subject to change. Tax Year: Exhibit A Annual Installments By Lot Type Lot Type: 3 Assessment Balance Tax Year (a) PID Bonds Collections Costs Refunding Credit Annual Installment (b) Page 229 of 325 Page 230 of 325 2024 Principal Interest Net Debt Service 2024 $915.04 $389.10 $1,304.14 $28.10 ($49.16)$1,283.08 $10,251.08 2025 $971.85 $356.22 $1,328.07 $28.53 ($49.16)$1,307.43 $9,336.04 2026 $1,019.65 $326.35 $1,346.00 $28.95 ($49.16)$1,325.79 $8,364.19 2027 $1,069.71 $293.67 $1,363.38 $29.39 ($49.16)$1,343.60 $7,344.54 2028 $1,123.14 $257.34 $1,380.47 $29.83 ($49.16)$1,361.14 $6,274.83 2029 $1,181.63 $218.44 $1,400.07 $30.28 ($49.16)$1,381.18 $5,151.69 2030 $1,240.12 $167.50 $1,407.62 $30.73 ($49.16)$1,389.18 $3,970.06 2031 $1,321.67 $103.46 $1,425.12 $31.19 ($49.16)$1,407.15 $2,729.95 2032 $1,408.28 $35.21 $1,443.49 $31.66 ($49.16)$1,425.98 $1,408.28 Total $11,122.26 $2,567.75 $13,690.01 $296.34 ($491.65)$13,494.70 (a) Tax Year 2024 corresponds to Bond Year 2025. Tax Year 2024 Annual Installments will become due by January 31, 2025. (b) Subject to change. Tax Year: Exhibit A Annual Installments By Lot Type Lot Type: 4 Assessment Balance Tax Year (a) PID Bonds Collections Costs Refunding Credit Annual Installment (b) Page 231 of 325 Page 232 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.014(A) Notice (Required Before Contract Execution) NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This Notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) Under a court order or foreclosure; 2) By a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) To a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) By a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) By a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent’s estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) From one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) To or from a government entity; or, 8) Of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest. The following notice shall be given to the prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchases, subject to certain exception, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchase and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. Page 233 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.014(A) Notice (Required Before Contract Execution) NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS TROPHY CLUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to Trophy Club, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from Trophy Club. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by Trophy Club Town Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from Trophy Club. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. Page 234 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.014(A) Notice (Required Before Contract Execution) The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. Buyer (Print Name) Signature Date Buyer (Print Name) Signature The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. Seller (Print Name) Signature Date Seller (Print Name) Signature Date Page 235 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.0143 Notice (Required At Closing And Must Be Recorded In Denton County Deed Of Records) AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS TROPHY CLUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to Trophy Club, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from Trophy Club. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by Trophy Club Town Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from Trophy Club. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. Page 236 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.0143 Notice (Required At Closing And Must Be Recorded In Denton County Deed Of Records) The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. Buyer (Print Name) Signature Date Buyer (Print Name) Signature STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF ______________ § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by ___________________ and __________________, known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this ______________, 20___ Notary Public, State of Texas Page 237 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.0143 Notice (Required At Closing And Must Be Recorded In Denton County Deed Of Records) The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. Seller (Print Name) Signature Date Seller (Print Name) Signature STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF ______________ § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by ___________________ and __________________, known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this ______________, 20___ Notary Public, State of Texas Page 238 of 325 Page 239 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Matt Cox, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM: Consider authorizing the Town Manager to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with Tyler Technologies for permitting software updates to Energov in the amount of $47,000. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Town of Trophy Club utilizes Tyler Technologies' Energov software to facilitate processes for permitting, building, health and fire inspections, code compliance, and planning & zoning. The software was first adopted in 2015, and an upgrade was implemented in 2019 to improve its functionality. However, since July 2023, a more advanced upgrade has been available, addressing several critical areas that the current system struggles to meet effectively. An upgrade to the citizen access portal is now essential to enhance the user experience for residents and contractors when applying for permits, scheduling inspections, lodging code complaints, and making online payments. The outdated portal has presented inefficiencies, underscoring the urgency of this enhancement to provide a smoother, more responsive customer service for users. Staff has preemptively discussed with the Town IT Department and Energov to ensure a smooth transition and avoid service disruptions. Energov is a cloud-based enterprise permitting and licensing software platform that is used to coordinate, manage, and track the day-to-day planning, permitting, inspections, code enforcement, and compliance functions. The system upgrade will also streamline operations by automatically processing online payments to the Town’s Finance Department through our existing provider, Tyler Technologies. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: The Energov upgrade cost is $47,000. This amount is not currently budgeted for in the FY 2024 Budget and will require a budget amendment. The budget amendment is included for Town Council consideration on this agenda. LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the contract as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Implementation Quote Page 240 of 325 ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to authorize the Town Manager to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with Tyler Technologies for permitting software updates to Energov in the amount of $47,000. Page 241 of 325 2024-451425-J3D6Y1 CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 Quoted By:Ally Maddox Quote Expiration:7/29/24 Quote Name: Sales Quotation For: Town of Trophy Club 100 Municipal Dr Trophy Club TX 76262 Professional Services Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price Maintenance Professional Services End User Training - Onsite 40 $ 225 $ 9,000 $ 0 Professional Implementation Services - Remote 150 $ 200 $ 30,000 $ 0 Project Management Services - Remote 40 $ 200 $ 8,000 $ 0 TOTAL:$ 47,000 $ 0 Page 242 of 325 2024-451425-J3D6Y1 CONFIDENTIAL Page 2 Summary One Time Fees Recurring Fees Total Services $ 47,000 $ 0 Total Third-Party Hardware, Software, Services $ 0 $ 0 Summary Total $ 47,000 $ 0 Contract Total $ 47,000 Estimated Travel Expenses $ 4,000 Customer Approval:Date: Print Name:P.O.#: Client agrees that items in this sales quotation are, upon Client's signature or approval of same, hereby added to the existing agreement ("Agreement") between the parties and subject to its terms. Additionally, payment for said items, as applicable but subject to any listed assumptions herein, shall conform to the following terms: •License fees for Tyler and third party software are invoiced upon the earlier of (i) delivery of the license key or (ii) when Tyler makes such software available for download by the Client; •Fees for hardware are invoiced upon delivery; •Fees for year one of hardware maintenance are invoiced upon delivery of the hardware; •Annual Maintenance and Support fees, SaaS fees, Hosting fees, and Subscription fees are first payable when Tyler makes the software available for download by the Client (for Maintenance) or on the first day of the month following the date this quotation was signed (for SaaS, Hosting, and Subscription), and any such fees are prorated to align with the applicable term under the Agreement, with renewals invoiced annually thereafter in accord with the Agreement. •Fees for services included in this sales quotation shall be invoiced as indicated below. o Implementation and other professional services fees shall be invoiced as delivered. Page 243 of 325 2024-451425-J3D6Y1 CONFIDENTIAL Page 3 •Expenses associated with onsite services are invoiced as incurred. Comments Implementation service hours are scheduled and delivered in four (4) or eight (8) hour increments. Implementation: Tyler leads the configuration of Citizen Access for 54 case types. These case types already exist in Enterprise Permitting and Licensing and the only changes to back office configuration will be those strictly necessary to update the case types for Citizen Access. Case types included in the scope of this implementation: •Residential Permit types: 19 •Commercial Permit types: 16 •Other Permit types: 11 •Plan types: 5 •Business license types: 3 Tyler's implementation team is responsible for the following tasks: •Tyler will ensure that the online portal is operating and connected to the Client's GIS. The Client is responsible for maintaining their GIS in accordance with Tyler's GIS deployment guidelines. •Tyler will not create any custom automations or Geo Rules for Citizen Access. •Tyler will provide documentation and up to 40 hours of training on Citizen Access Administration pages. •Tyler will provide basic setup and testing of Tyler Payments connection to Citizen Access. Integrations: The only integrations included in this quote are: •Enterprise Permitting and Licensing to Citizen Access •Citizen Access to Tyler Payments There are no custom documents or reports included in the scope of this implementation. There are no conversion services included in the scope of this implementation. Training: Training Engagements – For each 40-hour training engagement, the client receives and is billed four (4) 8-hour days of direct instruction and up to 8 hours of preparatory and administrative time to allow trainers to familiarize themselves with client needs, develop schedules, prepare software Page 244 of 325 2024-451425-J3D6Y1 CONFIDENTIAL Page 4 environments, and complete documentation. The following training engagement is included in the scope of this implementation: End User Training: software functionality training for all end users in all purchased modules with client SMEs present to address business process questions. Designed to prepare all users for transitioning production processing to EPL. Following production cutover, it is recommended that client SMEs offer business process training for staff/others on an ongoing basis. Page 245 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: April Duvall, Director of Finance AGENDA ITEM: Consider an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2024 Budget to allocate funding for a permitting software upgrade for the Community Development Department. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The attached budget amendment is the fourth proposed adjustment for the FY 2024 Budget. In accordance with Section 9.06 of the Town Charter, which states, “If during or before the fiscal year the Town Manager certifies that there are available for appropriation, revenues in excess of those estimated in the budget, the Council by ordinance may make supplemental appropriations for the year up to the amount of such excess.” This amendment addresses budget variances and reallocates resources for unanticipated expenditures. Amendment Changes Include: • General Fund Expenditures: An increase of $47,000, raising total expenditures from $14,650,487 to $14,697,487. Specific Adjustments: • EnerGov Software update (Permitting Department): Tyler Technologies requires a software upgrade to integrate credit card processing with their EnerGov platform, which is used by the Community Development Department for permit processing. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: This budget amendment will result in an increase in General Fund expenditures from $14,650,487 to $14,697,487. LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the ordinance as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance Page 246 of 325 ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the ordinance amending the FY 2024 Budget to appropriate funding for an essential upgrade to the Permitting Department's EnerGov software. Page 247 of 325 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AMENDING THE TOWN’S ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OCTOBER 1, 2023, AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2024, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2023-15, AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2024-11, ORDINANCE NO. 2024-13 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2024-20, BY PROVIDING FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GENERAL FUND; PROVIDING THAT EXPENDITURES FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANNUAL BUDGET, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club, Texas (the “Town”), is a home rule municipality acting under its Town Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Town Council previously adopted its budget for the fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2023, and ending on September 30, 2024 (the “Annual Budget”); and WHEREAS, the Annual Budget was adopted by Ordinance No. 2023-15 on September 11, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Annual Budget was amended by Ordinance No. 2024-11 on May 28, 2024, Ordinance No. 2024-13 on July 22, 2024 and Ordinance No. 2024-20 on September 9, 2024; and WHEREAS, after the Town Council’s approval of the Annual Budget, unexpected needs have arisen which require amendment of the Annual Budget; and WHEREAS, Town Charter Sec. 9.13 and Section 102.010 of the Texas Local Government Code allow the Town to amend its Annual Budget as deemed necessary for any municipal purpose; and WHEREAS, the Town is also allowed to amend its Annual Budget for emergency appropriations to meet a pressing need for public expenditure to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as a result of unusual and unforeseen conditions; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that an amendment to the Annual Budget pursuant to this Ordinance is a public necessity and in the best interest of the public health and general welfare of the Town and its citizens. Page 248 of 325 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. All of the above premises are hereby found to be true and correct factual and legislative determinations of the Town and are hereby approved and incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2. The Annual Budget of the Town for the fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2023, and ending on September 30, 2024, as adopted by Ordinance No. 2023-15, and as amended by Ordinance No. 2024-11, 2024-13 and 2024-20, is hereby amended to provide for adjustments to the General Fund, as shown in Exhibit “A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, and expenditures for said fiscal year shall be made in accordance with the Annual Budget, as amended. SECTION 3. The expenditures and amendments authorized by this Ordinance are necessary to meet unusual and/or unforeseen conditions or circumstances that could not have been included in the original budget through the use of reasonably diligent thought and attention. SECTION 4. A true and correct copy of this Ordinance showing the approved budget amendments shall be filed with the Town Secretary and in the office of the County Clerk as required by Section 102.009 of the Local Government Code. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other provisions of ordinances of the Town, except where the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Town Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance should be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, or sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the Town Council without incorporation in this Ordinance of such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. Page 249 of 325 SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, this 23rd day of September, 2024. APPROVED: Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor ATTEST: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Page 250 of 325 Exhibit “A” Town of Trophy Club Budget Amendment No. 4 Page 251 of 325 Department Line Item Line Item Description Budget Total Recommended Change Amended Budget Section 1 Community Development 01-522-60800 Software & Support -$ 47,000$ 47,000$ Total Community Development:-$ 47,000$ 47,000$ Total Expenditure Increase 47,000$ FY24 BUDGET AMENDMENT #4: Page 252 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary AGENDA ITEM: Consider approval of the 2025 Town Council Meeting Calendar. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: Per the Town Charter, the Town Council shall hold at least two (2) regular meetings a month for at least seven (7) months and a minimum of one meeting during each of the other five (5) months, for a minimum of nineteen (19) regular meetings per year. The Town Council may hold as many other meetings as may be necessary for the transaction of the business of the Town. All regular meetings shall be held at the Municipal Building or at such other places within Town limits as will permit the attendance of the general public. The proposed schedule includes two (2) regular meetings in February, April, May, July, August, September, and October, and (1) regular meeting in January, March, June, November, and December. The Town Council Retreats are scheduled for January 23rd/24th and July 17th/18th. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with this agenda item. LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025 Town Council Meeting Calendar ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the 2025 Town Council Meeting Calendar. Page 253 of 325 Date Meeting Type HARD deadline by 12 pm Posting Date 1/13 Regular - 7 pm 1/3 1/8 Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1/23 Council RETREAT 1 2 3 4 1 1 1/24 Council RETREAT 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2/10 Regular - 7 pm 1/31 2/5 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 2/24 Regular - 7 pm 2/14 2/19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 3/10 Regular - 7 pm 2/28 3/5 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 4/14 Regular - 7 pm 4/4 4/9 30 31 4/28 Regular - 7 pm 4/18 4/23 5/12 Regular - 7 pm 5/2 5/7 5/14 *Possible Special Mtg to Canvass Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 5/27 Regular - 7 pm 5/16 5/21 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6/23 Regular - 7 pm 6/13 6/18 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 7/14 Regular - 7 pm 7/3 7/9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 7/17 Council RETREAT 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7/18 Council RETREAT 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 7/28 Regular - 7 pm 7/18 7/23 8/11 Regular - 7 pm 8/1 8/6 8/25 Regular - 7 pm 8/15 8/20 9/8 Regular - 7 pm 8/29 9/3 Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 9/22 Regular - 7 pm 9/12 9/17 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 10/13 Regular - 7 pm 10/3 10/8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10/16 Director's Retreat 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 10/17 Director's Retreat 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 10/27 Regular - 7 pm 10/17 10/22 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 11/10 Regular - 7 pm 10/31 11/5 31 12/8 Regular - 7 pm 11/21 12/3 Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 MAY MEETINGS 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 *If an election is held, last day to canvass is 5/14. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 A special meeting may have to be held 5/14 to canvass. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 4th Monday holdiay. Meeting set for 4th Tuesday 30 Regular Meetings Council Retreat Town Offices Close 1/2 Day Agenda Item/Backup Deadline NISD Spring Break Town Offices Closed-Holidays Agenda Posting Date DRAFT December 2025 Town of Trophy Club August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 January 2025 rev 09.13.2024 February 2025 March 2025 Proposed 2025 Town Council Meeting Schedule Page 254 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: April Duvall, Director of Finance AGENDA ITEM: Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance accepting and approving a service and assessment plan for authorized services (Emergency Services) and an assessment roll for the Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (The Highlands at Trophy Club); making a finding of special benefit of the property in the district; levying special assessments against property with the district; providing for payment of the assessments in accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: Each year, the Town Council approves the updated Service and Assessment Plan for authorized services (emergency services) within the Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (The Highlands at Trophy Club). Prior to adopting the budget, the Town Council conducts a public hearing regarding the provision of emergency services requiring the assessment placed on properties within The Highlands at Trophy Club. Notice of the assessment and public hearing were mailed to property owners within the designated area. The authorized services provided under the Public Improvement District (PID) are fire suppression and control, inspection services, arson investigation, hazardous material response, search and rescue, emergency recovery and extraction, and pre-hospital medical stabilization or transportation of persons who are sick, injured, wounded, or otherwise incapacitated or helpless. Pre-hospital medical stabilization and transportation services include basic life support ambulance services, advanced life support ambulance service, air ambulance services, and quick-response unit services provided by the Town. The Town and Trophy Club Municipal Utility District (TCMUD) No. 1 cooperatively work together in providing these services and collecting the funding necessary to sustain these services. The assessment rate is determined as the same rate charged to TCMUD customers who receive the same charge on their property tax bills from TCMUD. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: The Emergency Services District (ESD) in the PID covers $572,690 of fire- related expenses at a rate of $0.05136, which is slightly lower than last year's rate of $0.05186. This amount represents the PID’s share of fire services, with the remainder funded through the MUD. Without the ESD assessment, these expenditures would fall to the Town to cover. Page 255 of 325 LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the ordinance as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit A: 2024 Annual Service Plan Update 3. PID Assessment Description Notice 4. Notice of Public Hearing ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council conduct the public hearing and move to approve the ordinance accepting and approving a service and assessment plan for authorized services (Emergency Services) and an assessment roll for the Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (The Highlands at Trophy Club); making a finding of special benefit of the property in the district; levying special assessments against property with the district; providing for payment of the assessments in accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code. Page 256 of 325 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2024-xx AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, ACCEPTING AND APPROVING A SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR AUTHORIZED SERVICES (EMERGENCY SERVICES) AND AN ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 (THE HIGHLANDS AT TROPHY CLUB); MAKING A FINDING OF SPECIAL BENEFIT TO THE PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT; LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT OF THE ASSESSMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 372, TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR THE METHOD OF ASSESSMENT AND THE PAYMENT OF THE ASSESSMENT; PROVIDING PENALTIES AND INTEREST ON DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING A CUMULATIVE REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club (the “Town”) is a home rule municipality acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2007, a petition was submitted and filed with the Town Secretary of the Town (the “Town Secretary”) pursuant to the Public Improvement District Assessment Act, Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code (the “PID Act”), requesting the creation of a public improvement district over a portion of the area of the Town to be known as The Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the petition contained the signatures of the owners of taxable property representing more than fifty percent of the appraised value of taxable real property liable for assessment within the District, as determined by the then current ad valorem tax rolls of the Denton Central Appraisal District and the signatures of property owners who own taxable real property that constitutes more than fifty percent of the area of all taxable property that is liable for assessment by the District; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 2007, after due notice, the Town Council of the Town (the “Town Council”) held the public hearing in the manner required by law on the advisability of the public improvements and services described in the petition as required by Sec. 372.009 of the PID Act and made the findings required by Sec. 372.009(b) of the PID Act and, by Resolution No. 2007-08 adopted by a majority of the members of the Town Council, authorized the District in accordance with its finding as to the advisability of the public improvements and services; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2007, the Town published notice of its authorization of the District in the Trophy Club Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town; and Page 257 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 2 of 8 WHEREAS, no written protests of the District from any owners of record of property within the District were filed with the Town Secretary within 20 days after May 18, 2007; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2007, the Council adopted a resolution directing the filing of a proposed assessment roll, and directing related action; and WHEREAS, the Town has conducted annual reviews from 2008 through 2023 as provided in the PID Act and has annually adopted ordinances approving a Service and Assessment Plan for Authorized Services and an Assessment Roll for The Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2024, through the adoption of Ordinance No. 2024- XX and as part of its 2023-2024 annual review of the special assessments for emergency services, the Town Council, pursuant to Section 372.016(b) of the PID Act, caused the publication on September 11, 2024 of notice of a public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town to consider the proposed “Assessment Roll” and the “Service and Assessment Plan for Authorized Services” (the “Plan”) and the levy of the “Assessments” on property in the District; and WHEREAS, the Town Council, pursuant to Section 372.016(c) of the PID Act, directed the mailing of notice of the public hearing to consider the proposed Assessment Roll and the Plan and the levy of Assessments on property in the District to the last known address of the owners of the property liable for the Assessments; and WHEREAS, the Town Council convened the hearing at 7:00 p.m. on the 23rd day of September, 2024, at which all persons who appeared, or requested to appear, in person or by their attorney, were given the opportunity to contend for or contest the Plan, the Assessment Roll, and each proposed assessment, and to offer testimony pertinent to any issue presented on the amount of the assessment, the allocation of costs of the Authorized Services, the purposes of the assessment, the special benefits of the assessment, and the penalties and interest on delinquent Assessments; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 372.013 and 372.014 of the PID Act, the Town Council has directed the preparation of a Service and Assessment Plan for Authorized Services for the District (the “Plan”), such Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” covers a period of at least five (5) years, and defines the annual indebtedness and the projected costs of the Authorized Services, as identified and defined in the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Plan includes an assessment plan that apportions the cost of the Authorized Services to be assessed against property in the District and such apportionment is made on the basis of special benefits accruing to the property because of the Authorized Services; and Page 258 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 3 of 8 WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that the Assessment Roll and the Plan should be approved and that the assessments should be levied as provided in the Plan and Assessment Roll; and WHEREAS, the Town Council further finds that there were no written objections or evidence submitted to the Town Secretary in opposition to the Plan, the allocation of costs, the Assessment Roll, and the levy of assessments; and WHEREAS, the Town Council closed the hearing, and, after considering all written and documentary evidence presented at the hearing, including all written comments and statements filed with the Town, determined to proceed with the adoption of this Ordinance in conformity with the requirements of the PID Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. TERMS Terms not otherwise defined herein are defined in the Service and Assessment Plan for Authorized Services (the “Plan”) attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A.” SECTION 2. FINDINGS The findings and determinations set forth in the preambles are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and ordains, as follows: (a) The apportionment of the costs of the Authorized Services pursuant to the Plan is fair and reasonable, reflects an accurate presentation of the special benefit each property will receive from the public improvements identified in the Plan, and is hereby approved; (b) The Plan covers a period of at least five years and defines projected costs for the Authorized Services; (c) The Plan apportions the cost of the Authorized Services to be assessed against property in the District and such apportionment is made on the basis of special benefits accruing to the property because of the Authorized Services; (d) All of the real property in the District which is being assessed in the amounts shown in the Assessment Roll will be benefited by the Authorized Services proposed to be provided through the District in the Plan, and each parcel of real property will receive special benefits in each year equal to or greater than each annual Assessment and Page 259 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 4 of 8 will receive special benefits during the term of the Assessments equal to or greater than the total amount assessed; (e) The method of apportionment of the costs of the Authorized Services set forth in the Plan results in imposing equal shares of the costs on property similarly benefited, and results in a reasonable classification and formula for the apportionment of the costs of the Authorized Services; (f) The Plan should be approved as the service plan and assessment plan for the District as described in Sections 372.013 and 372.014 of the PID Act; (g) The 2023 Assessment Roll in the form attached as Appendix “A” to the Plan (the “Assessment Roll”) should be approved as the 2024 Assessment Roll for the District; (h) The provisions of the Plan relating to due and delinquency dates for the Assessments, interest and penalties on delinquent Assessments and procedures in connection with the imposition and collection of Assessments should be approved and will expedite collection of the Assessments in a timely manner in order to provide the services needed and required for the area within the District; and (i) A written notice of the date, hour, place and subject to this meeting of the Town Council was posted at a place convenient to the public for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended, and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this Ordinance and the subject matter hereof has been discussed, considered, and formally acted upon. SECTION 3. ASSESSMENT PLAN The Plan is hereby accepted and approved pursuant to the PID Act Sections 372.013 and 372.014 as the Service and Assessment Plan for the District. SECTION 4. ASSESSMENT ROLL The Assessment Roll is hereby accepted and approved pursuant to the PID Act Section 372.016 Assessment Roll of the District. SECTION 5. LEVY AND PAYMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR COSTS OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (a) The Town Council hereby levies an assessment on each tract of property located within the District, as shown and described in the Plan and the Assessment Roll, in Page 260 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 5 of 8 the respective amounts shown on the Assessment Roll as a special assessment on the properties set forth in the Assessment Roll. (b) The levy of the Assessments shall be effective on the date of execution of this Ordinance levying assessments and strictly in accordance with the terms of the Plan. (c) Each Assessment shall be paid annually pursuant to the terms of the Plan. (d) Each Assessment shall be collected each year in the manner set forth in the Plan by the Denton County Tax Assessor Collector or other qualified collection agent, duly authorized by the Town Council. SECTION 6. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The method of apportioning the costs of the Authorized Services is as set forth in the Plan. SECTION 7. APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATOR DTA (www.FinanceDTA.com) is hereby appointed and designated as the Administrator of the Service and Assessment Plan for Authorized Services and of the Assessments levied by this Ordinance. The Administrator shall perform the duties of the Administrator described in the Plan and in this Ordinance. In addition to other applicable costs of collection, whether legally authorized by contract or other District document, the Administrator’s fees, charges, and expenses for providing such service shall constitute Collection Costs. SECTION 8. PENALTIES AND INTEREST ON DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS Delinquent assessments shall be subject to the penalties, interest, procedures, and foreclosure sales set forth in the Plan. The Assessments shall have lien priority as specified in the PID Act and the Plan. SECTION 9. APPLICABILITY OF TAX CODE To the extent not inconsistent with this Ordinance, and not inconsistent with the PID Act or the other laws governing public improvement districts, the provisions of the Texas Tax Code shall be applicable to the imposition and collection of Assessments by the Town. Page 261 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 6 of 8 SECTION 10. CUMULATIVE REPEALER This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other Ordinances and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such Ordinances except for those instances where there are direct conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance. Ordinances or parts thereof in force at the time this Ordinance shall take effect and that are inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with this Ordinance. Provided however, that any complaint, action, claim, or lawsuit which has been initiated or has arisen under or pursuant to such Ordinance on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall continue to be governed by the provisions of that Ordinance and for that purpose the Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, void, or invalid, the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or the application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby, it being the intent of the Town Council that no portion hereof, or provision or regulation contained herein shall become inoperative or fail by reason of any unconstitutionality, voidness, or invalidity of any other portion hereof, and all provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable for that purpose. SECTION 12. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect, and the levy of the Assessments, and the provisions and terms of the Plan shall be and become effective on upon passage and execution hereof. ADOPTED, PASSED, and APPROVED by the Town Council, by a vote of _____ members voting “for” and members voting “against” and with absentee, on this 23rd day of September 2024. Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Town of Trophy Club, Texas ATTEST: [SEAL] Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Town of Trophy Club, Texas Page 262 of 325 ORD 2024-xx Page 7 of 8 APPROVED TO AS FORM: Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Town of Trophy Club, Texas Page 263 of 325 EXHIBIT A SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR AUTHORIZED SERVICES FOR THE DISTRICT (THE “PLAN”) Page 264 of 325 Page 265 of 325 Page 266 of 325 Page 267 of 325 Page 268 of 325 Page 269 of 325 Page 270 of 325 Page 271 of 325 Page 272 of 325 Page 273 of 325 Page 274 of 325 Page 275 of 325 Page 276 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 67687 470277 537349 580362 583540 73937 470278 557641 580363 583541 82144 470279 557642 580364 583542 83515 470280 557643 580365 583543 84263 470281 557644 580366 583544 98639 470282 557645 580367 583545 98641 470283 557646 580368 583546 171483 470284 557647 580369 583547 305643 470285 557648 580370 583548 315393 470286 557649 580371 583549 329833 470287 557650 580372 583550 338637 470288 557651 580373 583551 465509 470289 557652 580374 583552 465510 470290 557653 580375 583553 465511 470291 557654 580376 583554 465512 470292 557655 580377 583555 465513 470293 557656 580378 583556 465514 470294 557657 580379 583557 465515 470295 557658 580380 583558 465516 470296 557659 580381 583559 465517 470297 557660 580382 583560 465518 470298 557661 580383 583561 465519 470299 557662 580384 583562 465520 470300 557663 580385 583563 465521 498867 557665 580386 583564 465522 498868 557666 580387 583565 465523 498869 557667 580388 583566 465524 498870 557668 580389 583567 465525 498871 557669 580390 583568 465526 498873 557670 580392 583569 465527 498874 557671 580393 583570 465528 498875 557672 580394 583571 465529 498876 557673 580395 583573 465530 498877 557674 580396 583574 465531 498878 557675 580397 583575 465532 498879 557676 580398 583576 465533 498880 557677 580399 583577 465534 498911 557678 580400 583578 465535 498912 557679 580401 583579 465536 498913 557680 580402 583580 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll Page 277 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll 465537 498914 557681 580403 583581 465538 498915 557682 580404 583582 465539 498916 557683 580405 583583 465540 498917 557684 580406 583584 465541 498918 557685 580407 583585 465542 498919 557686 580408 583586 465543 498920 557687 580409 583587 465544 498922 558332 580410 583588 465545 498923 558333 580411 583589 465546 498924 558334 580412 583590 465547 498925 558335 580413 583591 465548 498926 558336 580414 583592 465549 498927 558337 581612 583593 465550 498928 558338 583215 583594 465551 498929 558339 583216 583595 465552 498930 558340 583217 583596 465553 498931 558341 583218 583597 465554 498932 558342 583219 583598 465555 498933 558343 583220 583599 465556 498934 558344 583221 583600 465557 498935 558345 583222 583601 465558 498936 558346 583223 583602 465559 498937 558347 583224 583603 465560 498938 558348 583225 583604 465561 498939 558349 583226 583605 465562 498940 558350 583227 583606 465563 498945 558351 583228 583607 465564 498946 558352 583229 583608 465565 498947 558353 583230 583609 465566 498948 558354 583231 583612 465567 498949 558355 583232 583613 465568 498950 558356 583233 583614 465569 498951 558357 583234 583615 465570 498952 558358 583235 583616 465571 498953 558359 583236 583617 465572 498954 558360 583237 583618 465573 498955 558361 583238 583619 465574 498956 558362 583239 583620 465575 523472 558363 583240 583621 465576 525439 558364 583241 583622 Page 278 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll 465577 533255 558365 583242 583623 465578 533256 558366 583243 583624 465579 533257 558367 583244 583625 465580 533258 558368 583245 583626 465581 533259 558369 583246 583627 465582 533262 558370 583247 583628 465583 533264 558371 583248 583629 466259 533287 558372 583249 583630 466260 533289 558373 583250 583631 466261 533290 558374 583251 583632 469275 533291 558375 583252 583633 469276 533292 558376 583253 583634 469277 533293 558377 583254 583643 469278 533294 558378 583255 583644 469279 533295 558379 583256 583645 469280 533296 558380 583257 583646 469281 533297 558381 583258 583647 469282 533298 558382 583259 583648 469283 533307 558383 583260 583649 469284 533309 558384 583261 583650 469286 533310 558385 583262 583651 469287 533311 558386 583263 583652 469288 533312 558387 583264 583653 469289 533313 558388 583265 583654 469290 533314 558389 583266 583655 469291 533315 558390 583267 583656 469292 533316 558391 583268 583657 469293 533317 558392 583269 583658 469294 533318 558393 583270 583659 469295 533319 558394 583271 583660 469296 533320 558395 583272 583661 469297 533321 558396 583273 583662 469298 533322 558397 583274 583663 469299 533323 558398 583275 583664 469300 533324 558399 583276 583665 469301 533325 558400 583277 583666 469302 533326 558401 583278 583667 469303 533327 558402 583279 583668 469304 533328 558403 583280 583669 469305 533329 558404 583281 583670 Page 279 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll 469306 533330 558405 583282 583671 469307 533331 558406 583283 583672 469308 533332 558407 583284 583673 469309 533333 558408 583285 583674 469310 533334 558409 583286 583675 469311 533335 558410 583287 583676 469312 533336 558411 583288 583677 469313 533337 558412 583289 583678 469314 533338 558413 583290 583679 469315 533339 558414 583291 583680 469316 533340 558415 583292 583681 469317 533341 558416 583293 583682 469318 533342 558417 583294 583683 469319 533343 558418 583295 583684 469320 533344 558419 583296 583685 469321 533345 558420 583297 583686 469322 533346 558421 583298 583687 469323 533347 558422 583299 583688 469324 533348 558423 583300 583689 469325 533349 558424 583301 583690 469326 533350 558425 583302 583691 469327 533351 558426 583303 583692 469328 533352 558427 583304 583693 469329 533353 558428 583305 620681 469330 533354 558429 583306 621956 469331 533355 558430 583307 622299 469332 533356 558431 583308 622300 469333 533357 558432 583309 622301 469334 533358 558433 583310 622302 469335 533359 558434 583311 622303 469336 533360 558435 583312 622304 469337 533361 558436 583313 622305 469338 533362 558437 583314 622306 469343 533363 558438 583315 622307 469372 533364 558439 583316 622308 470048 533365 558440 583317 622309 470049 533366 558441 583318 622310 470050 533367 558442 583319 622311 470051 533368 558443 583320 622312 470052 533369 558444 583321 622313 Page 280 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll 470053 533370 558445 583322 622314 470054 533371 558446 583323 622315 470055 533372 558447 583324 622316 470056 533373 558448 583325 622317 470057 533374 558449 583326 622318 470058 533375 558450 583327 622319 470059 533376 558451 583328 622320 470060 533377 558452 583329 622321 470061 533378 558453 583330 622322 470062 533379 558454 583331 622323 470063 533380 558455 583332 622324 470064 533381 558456 583333 622325 470065 533382 558457 583334 622326 470066 533383 558458 583335 622327 470067 533384 558459 583336 622328 470068 533385 558460 583337 622329 470069 533386 558461 583338 622330 470070 533387 558462 583339 631471 470071 533388 558463 583356 635052 470072 533389 558464 583375 635053 470073 533390 558465 583376 635054 470074 533391 558466 583377 635055 470075 533392 558467 583378 635056 470076 533393 558468 583379 635057 470077 533394 558469 583380 635058 470078 533395 558470 583381 635059 470079 533396 558471 583382 635060 470080 533397 558472 583383 635061 470081 533398 558473 583384 635062 470082 533399 558474 583385 635063 470083 533400 558475 583386 635064 470084 533401 558476 583387 635065 470085 533402 558477 583388 635066 470086 533403 558478 583389 635067 470087 533404 558479 583390 635068 470088 533405 558480 583391 635069 470089 533406 558481 583392 635070 470090 533407 558482 583393 635071 470091 533408 558483 583394 635072 470092 533409 558484 583395 635073 Page 281 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll 470093 533410 558485 583396 635074 470094 533411 558486 583397 635075 470095 533412 558487 583398 635076 470096 533413 558488 583399 635077 470097 533414 558489 583400 635078 470098 533415 558490 583401 635079 470099 533416 558491 583402 635080 470100 533417 558492 583403 635081 470101 533418 558493 583404 635082 470102 533419 558494 583405 635083 470103 533420 558495 583406 635084 470104 533421 558496 583407 635085 470105 533422 558497 583408 635086 470106 533425 558498 583409 635087 470107 533428 558499 583410 635088 470108 533429 558500 583411 635089 470109 533430 558501 583412 635090 470110 533431 558502 583413 635091 470111 533432 558503 583414 635092 470153 533433 558504 583415 635093 470154 533434 558505 583416 635094 470155 533464 558506 583417 635095 470156 533480 558507 583418 635096 470157 533490 558508 583419 635097 470158 533498 558509 583420 635098 470159 533500 558510 583421 635099 470160 533501 558511 583422 635100 470161 534852 558512 583423 635101 470162 534853 558513 583424 635102 470163 534854 558514 583425 635103 470164 534855 558515 583426 635104 470165 534856 558516 583427 635105 470166 534857 558517 583428 635106 470167 534858 558518 583429 635107 470168 534859 558519 583470 635108 470169 534860 558520 583471 635109 470170 534861 558521 583472 635110 470171 534862 558522 583473 635111 470172 534863 558523 583474 635112 470173 534864 558524 583475 635113 Page 282 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll 470174 534865 558525 583476 635114 470175 534866 558526 583477 635115 470176 534867 558527 583478 635116 470177 534868 558528 583479 635117 470178 534869 558529 583480 635118 470179 534870 558530 583481 635119 470180 534871 558531 583482 635120 470181 534872 558532 583483 635121 470182 534873 558533 583484 635122 470183 534874 558534 583485 635123 470184 534875 558535 583486 635124 470185 534876 558536 583487 635125 470186 534877 558537 583488 635126 470187 534878 558538 583489 635127 470188 534879 558539 583490 635128 470189 534880 558540 583491 635129 470190 534881 558541 583492 635130 470191 534882 558542 583493 635131 470192 534883 558543 583494 635132 470193 534884 558544 583495 635133 470194 534885 558545 583496 635134 470195 534886 567352 583497 635135 470196 534887 567353 583498 635136 470197 534888 567354 583499 635137 470198 534889 567355 583500 635138 470199 534890 567356 583501 635139 470200 534891 567357 583502 635140 470201 534892 567358 583503 635141 470202 534893 567359 583504 635142 470203 534894 567360 583505 635143 470204 534895 567361 583506 635144 470205 534896 567362 583507 635145 470249 534897 567363 583508 635146 470250 534898 567364 583509 635147 470251 536563 567365 583510 635148 470252 536564 567366 583511 635149 470253 536565 567367 583512 635150 470254 536566 567368 583513 635151 470255 536567 567369 583514 635152 470256 536568 567370 583519 635153 Page 283 of 325 PID Assessment Rate 0.05136 Town of Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District 2024 Assessment Roll 470257 536569 567371 583520 635154 470258 536570 567372 583521 635155 470259 536571 567373 583522 635156 470260 536572 580345 583523 635157 470261 536573 580346 583524 635158 470262 536574 580347 583525 635159 470263 536575 580348 583526 635160 470264 536576 580349 583527 635161 470265 536577 580350 583528 635162 470266 536578 580351 583529 650739 470267 536579 580352 583530 657776 470268 536580 580353 583531 667200 470269 536581 580354 583532 681973 470270 536582 580355 583533 730909 470271 536583 580356 583534 730930 470272 536584 580357 583535 733756 470273 536585 580358 583536 744759 470274 536586 580359 583537 942882 470275 536587 580360 583538 470276 536588 580361 583539 Page 284 of 325 Page 285 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.014(A) Notice (Required Before Contract Execution) NOTICE OF OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A person who proposes to sell or otherwise convey real property that is located in a public improvement district established under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code (except for public improvement districts described under Section 372.005), or Chapter 382, Local Government Code, shall first give to the purchaser of the property this written notice, signed by the seller. For the purposes of this notice, a contract for the purchase and sale of real property having a performance period of less than six months is considered a sale requiring the notice set forth below. This Notice requirement does not apply to a transfer: 1) Under a court order or foreclosure; 2) By a trustee in bankruptcy; 3) To a mortgagee by a mortgagor or successor in interest or to a beneficiary of a deed of trust by a trustor or successor in interest; 4) By a mortgagee or a beneficiary under a deed of trust who has acquired the land at a sale conducted under a power of sale under a deed of trust or a sale under a court-ordered foreclosure or has acquired the land by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; 5) By a fiduciary in the course of the administration of a decedent’s estate, guardianship, conservatorship, or trust; 6) From one co-owner to another co-owner of an undivided interest in the real property; 7) To or from a government entity; or, 8) Of only a mineral interest, leasehold interest, or security interest. The following notice shall be given to the prospective purchaser before the execution of a binding contract of purchase and sale, either separately or as an addendum or paragraph of a purchase contract. In the event a contract of purchase and sale is entered into without the seller having provided the required notice, the purchases, subject to certain exception, is entitled to terminate the contract. A separate copy of this notice shall be executed by the seller and the purchase and must be filed in the real property records of the county in which the property is located at the closing of the purchase and sale of the property. Page 286 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.014(A) Notice (Required Before Contract Execution) NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS TROPHY CLUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to Trophy Club, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from Trophy Club. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by Trophy Club Town Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from Trophy Club. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. Page 287 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.014(A) Notice (Required Before Contract Execution) The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. Buyer (Print Name) Signature Date Buyer (Print Name) Signature The undersigned seller acknowledges providing this notice to the potential purchaser before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. Seller (Print Name) Signature Date Seller (Print Name) Signature Date Page 288 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.0143 Notice (Required At Closing And Must Be Recorded In Denton County Deed Of Records) AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ NOTICE OF OBLIGATION TO PAY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT TO TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS TROPHY CLUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ As the purchaser of the real property described above, you are obligated to pay assessments to Trophy Club, Texas, for the costs of a portion of a public improvement or services project (the "Authorized Improvements") undertaken for the benefit of the property within Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 Emergency Services District (the "District") created under Subchapter A, Chapter 372, Local Government Code. AN ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LEVIED AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL AT ANY TIME. IF THE ASSESSMENT IS NOT PAID IN FULL, IT WILL BE DUE AND PAYABLE IN ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS THAT WILL VARY FROM YEAR TO YEAR DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID, COLLECTION COSTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND DELINQUENCY COSTS. The exact amount of the assessment may be obtained from Trophy Club. The exact amount of each annual installment will be approved each year by Trophy Club Town Council in the annual service plan update for the district. More information about the assessments, including the amounts and due dates, may be obtained from Trophy Club. Your failure to pay any assessment or any annual installment may result in penalties and interest being added to what you owe or in a lien on and the foreclosure of your property. Page 289 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.0143 Notice (Required At Closing And Must Be Recorded In Denton County Deed Of Records) The undersigned purchaser acknowledges receipt of this notice before the effective date of a binding contract for the purchase of the real property at the address described above. The undersigned purchaser acknowledged the receipt of this notice including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended. Buyer (Print Name) Signature Date Buyer (Print Name) Signature STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF ______________ § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by ___________________ and __________________, known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this ______________, 20___ Notary Public, State of Texas Page 290 of 325 Texas Property Code Section 5.0143 Notice (Required At Closing And Must Be Recorded In Denton County Deed Of Records) The undersigned seller acknowledges providing a separate copy of the notice required by Section 5.014 of the Texas Property Code including the current information required by Section 5.0143, Texas Property Code, as amended, at the closing of the purchase of the real property at the address above. Seller (Print Name) Signature Date Seller (Print Name) Signature STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF ______________ § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by ___________________ and __________________, known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he or she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this ______________, 20___ Notary Public, State of Texas Page 291 of 325 Page 292 of 325 Page 293 of 325 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a public hearing will be conducted by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club , Texas on the 23 rd day of September , 2024 at 6 :00 p.m. at the Municipal Building at 1 Trophy Wood Drive , Trophy Club , Texas 76262 . The public hearing will be held to consider proposed assessments to be levied against the assessable property within THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO . 1 (the "District ") pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended . The general nature of the improvements are emergency serv ices (the "Authorized Services "), including , without limitation , fire suppression and control, inspection services , arson investigations , hazardous material response , search and rescue , emergency recovery and extraction , pre-hospital medical stabilization or transportation of persons who are sick , injured , wounded , or otherwise incapacitated or helpless including basic life support ambulance services , advanced life support ambulance services , air ambulance services , and quick-response unit services provided by the Town. The Town has prov ided such services pursuant to an annual assessment within the District since 2007. The total annual cost of the Authorized Services for the Town 's Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025 is approximately $572 ,690 . The boundaries of the District are described as follows : The District includes approximately 609 .683 acres located with in the corporate limits of the Town of Trophy Club , Denton County , Texas. The District is generally located to the north of Oakmont Drive , Oak Hill Drive and the Quorum Condominiums , east of the Lakes Subdivision and Parkview Drive , south of the Corp of Engineers Property and west of the Town 's eastern town limits . The District is more particularly described by metes and bounds and such description is available for inspect ion at Town Hall , 1 Trophy Wood Drive , Trophy Club , Texas 76262 . All written or oral objections will be considered at the public hearing . A copy of the Service and Assessment Plan for Authorized Services and proposed Assessment Roll , which includes the assessments to be levied against each parcel in the District , is available for public inspection at the office of the Town Secretary , Town of Trophy Club , at 1 Trophy Wood Drive , Trophy Club , Texas 76262 . September , 2024. Tammy Dixon , T n Secretary Town of Trophy Club , Texas Page 294 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Matt Cox, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM: Case SUP-24-003 (Pour Sports Alcohol Use) Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance granting a specific use permit for alcohol beverage sales on-premises consumption in conjunction with restaurant use at Pour Sports Restaurant located at 2230 SH 114 Suite 500, Trophy Club, Denton County, Texas. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: Pour Sports Restaurant is requesting approval of a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for alcoholic beverage sales for on-premises consumption in conjunction with restaurant use according to Section 14.02.252 of the Town's Code of Ordinances. The property's zoning of Planned Development District 30 (PD-30) does not restrict the sales of alcoholic beverages beyond the regulations of the Town Code and State Law. Pour Sports is applying for a SUP to obtain a mixed beverage restaurant permit (MB/FB) and a mixed beverage late hours permit (LH) that will allow for the sale and consumption of wine, beer, and liquor on the premises and during late hours (12:00 pm midnight - 2:00 am). The Town Code does not restrict hours of operation beyond TABC's regulations. Section 14.02.252(b) of the Code of Ordinances states that no alcoholic beverages may be sold within 300 feet of a church, public school or private school, or public hospital. Subsection (g) describes the methods of measurement as front door to front door and along the street from property line when measuring for churches and public hospitals, and in a direct line from the nearest property line to property line when measuring to public schools and private schools. Pour Sports complies with Town and State requirements, as the closest church (Fellowship United Methodist Church) is approximately 1,205 feet away, the closest public school (Lakeview Elementary School) is approximately 6,600 feet away, and the closest private school (Primrose School of Westlake at Entrada) is approximately 3,400 feet away. The nearby Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Trophy Club is a private hospital, so there are no separation requirements. The Chief of Police has reviewed this application, as required by Code, and has no objections. A notice of a public hearing was distributed as required by State law. To date, staff has not received any inquiries. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the SUP application at their September 5, 2024 meeting and unanimously recommended the item for approval (4-0). Page 295 of 325 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with this agenda item. LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the ordinance as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Pour Sports Location Map 3. Special Use Permit Application ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council conduct the public hearing and move to approve the ordinance granting a specific use permit for alcohol beverage sales on-premises consumption in conjunction with restaurant use at Pour Sports Restaurant located at 2230 SH 114 Suite 500, Trophy Club, Denton County, Texas. Page 296 of 325 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS APPROVING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES FOR ON-PREMISES CONSUMPTION IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE OPERATED BY POUR SPORTS RESTAURANT, 2230 E SH 114 #500 OF TC TOWN CENTER, WITHIN PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 30; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF PREMISES; PROVIDING APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, DISCONTINUATION, & REVOCATION; PROVIDING A SAVINGS AND REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to sell alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine, for on-premises consumption in conjunction with a restaurant use operated by Pour Sports Restaurant, located at 2230 E SH 114 #500 of TC Town Center; and WHEREAS, all legal requirements and conditions were complied with, and after public notices were given in compliance with State law and public hearings were conducted, and after considering the information submitted at those public hearings and all other relevant information and materials, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town has recommended to the Town Council the adoption of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, after due deliberations and consideration of the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and the information and other materials received at the public hearing, the Town Council has concluded that the adoption of this Ordinance is in the best interests of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas and of the public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS: SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF PREMISES The above and foregoing premises are true and correct and are incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. Page 297 of 325 ORDINANCE NO.2024-XX PAGE 2 SECTION 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, DISCONTINUATION, & REVOCATION In all respects the Land shall be subject to the applicable regulations contained in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances and regulations of the Town, including without limitation regulations governing PD Planned Development No. 30 and all amendments thereto. The Specific Use Permit granted by this Ordinance shall control in cases of conflict between th is Ordinance and/or PD Planned Development No. 30 and/or the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The Specific Use Permit granted hereby shall discontinue if the use for which this Specific Use Permit is granted ceases to be operated at the permitted location for a minimum period of six (6) continuous months. Further, this Specific Use Permit shall be subject to revocation in accordance with the Town of Trophy Club Code of Ordinances. SECTION 3. SAVINGS AND REPEALER This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the Town affecting the regulation of land and zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of those ordinances except in those instances where the provisions of those Ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance whether such Ordinances are codified or uncodified, and all other provisions of the Ordinances of the Town of Trophy Club, codified or uncodified, not in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any complaint, action, cause of action or claim which prior to the effective date of this Ordinance has been initiated or has a risen under or pursuant to such repealed Ordinance(s) shall continue to be governed by the provisions of that Ordinance and for that purpose the Ordinance shall be deemed to remain and continue in full force and effect. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY The sections, paragraphs, sentences, phrases, clauses and words of this Ordinance are severable, and if any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, clause or word in this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, and the Town Council hereby declares that it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. PENALTY It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Ordinance, and any person violating or failing to comply with any provision hereof shall be fined, upon conviction, in an amount not less than One Dollar ($1.00) nor more than Two Thousan d Page 298 of 325 ORDINANCE NO.2024-XX PAGE 3 Dollars ($2,000.00), and a separate offense shall be deemed committed each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. The penalty provided by this section shall be cumulative of all other penalties allowed by law, including without limitation, civil remedies available for enforcement of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. PUBLICATION The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Clu b is hereby directed to publish the Caption, Penalty and Effective Date of this Ordinance as required by Section 3.16 of the Town’s Charter. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its date of adoption and publication as provided by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, this 23rd day of September 2024. Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor ATTEST: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Page 299 of 325 Page 300 of 325 Page 301 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Matt Cox, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM: Case ME-24-002 (Pour Sports Sign Meritorious Exception) Consider a meritorious exception to install a non-conforming sign at Pour Sports Restaurant, generally located at the northeast corner of SH 114 and Trophy Club Drive addressed as 2230 SH 114 Suite 500, Trophy Club, Denton County, Texas. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: Section 3.09.010 of the Town's Code of Ordinances allows an interested party to make a request for a meritorious exception to the Planning & Zoning Commission and Town Council to consider a proposal that does not conform to the sign regulations but may have merit and make a positive contribution to the visual environment. A request for a meritorious exception is necessary for the proposed sign at Pour Sports because it exceeds the sign height prescribed in Planned Development District 30 (PD-30). PD-30 states that a sign shall fit within: HEIGHT 2 feet, 6 inches (30 inches) WIDTH 40 feet As shown on Exhibit A, Pour Sports signs dimensions for Front elevation (Southwest) are: Top sign- Front HEIGHT 5 feet WIDTH 9 feet OVERALL SF 45 sq ft Page 302 of 325 Bottom sign- Front HEIGHT 3.5 feet WIDTH 3.5 feet OVERALL SF 12.25 sq ft Exhibit A Page 303 of 325 As shown on Exhibit B, Pour Sports sign dimension for Rear elevation (Northeast) is: Rear Logo Sign- Heigth 4.5 Width 4.5 Overall SF 20.25 Exhibit B BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this item at their September 5, 2024 meeting and unanimously recommended the item for approval (4-0). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with this agenda item. Page 304 of 325 LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Pour Sports Location Map 2. Pour Sports Sign Elevation Front 3. Pour Sports Sig Elevation Rear 4. Pour Sport Meritorious Exception Application ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the meritorious exception to install a non-conforming sign at Pour Sports Restaurant, generally located at the northeast corner of SH 114 and Trophy Club Drive addressed as 2230 SH 114 Suite 500, Trophy Club, Denton County, Texas. Page 305 of 325 Page 306 of 325 Page 307 of 325 Page 308 of 325 Page 309 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: April Duvall, Director of Finance AGENDA ITEM: Consider an ordinance of the Town Council amending Appendix A "Fee Schedule", Article A1.000, Section A1.014 "Water and Wastewater Fees for Public Improvement District No. 1" to establish fees and rates for water and sewer services to customers within the service area. (April Duvall, Director of Finance) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: On September 18, 2024, the TCMUD No. 1 Board of Directors convened to review and approve adjustments to its water and sewer rates. Per the Amended and Restated Contract for Wholesale Water Supply, Wastewater Treatment Services, and Water/Wastewater Operational Services, the Town is required to adopt a Town Rate Order mirroring any changes made by the MUD Board. The attached documents outline these modifications, which include a 2% increase in water service volumetric rates to reflect the pass thru increase from the City of Fort Worth. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: The TCMUD No. 1 Board approved Rate Order No. 2024- 0918A, implementing amendments to water meter fees. FISCAL IMPACT: Water Service Volumetric Rate Increase Gallons Used Rate per 1,000 gallons Change effective October 1, 2024 0 to 6,000 $ 4.6 0 $ 4 .69 6,001 to 17,000 $ 5.3 5 $ 5 .46 17,001 to 25,000 $ 6.1 9 $ 6 .32 25,001 to 50,000 $ 7.1 9 $ 7 .34 Page 310 of 325 50,001+ $ 8.3 6 $ 8 .53 LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the ordinance as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Current Water and Wastewater Fees for Public Improvement District No. 1 Article A1.014 ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the ordinance of the Town Council amending Appendix A "Fee Schedule", Article A1.000, Section A1.014 "Water and Wastewater Fees for Public Improvement District No. 1" to establish fees and rates for water and sewer services to customers within the service area. Page 311 of 325 Page 1 of 4ORD 2024-XX TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AMENDING SUBSECTION (D)(2) “VOLUMETRIC RATES”, OF SECTION A1.014 “WATER AND WASTEWATER FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1”, OF ARTICLE A1.000 “GENERAL PROVISIONS”, OF APPENDIX A “FEE SCHEDULE”, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF PREMISES; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT; PROVIDING THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club, Texas (the “Town”) is a home rule municipality acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, fees imposed by the Town are adopted by Ordinance and are codified in Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the Town; and WHEREAS, Appendix A, Article A1.000, Section A1.014 of the Code of Ordinances, Town of Trophy Club, Texas, contains water and wastewater fees for the Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 (hereinafter “PID”), including monthly residential (single-family) and commercial water fees; and WHEREAS, the Town is the owner and operator of a water and sewer system designed to serve present and future inhabitants of the PID (the “Town System”); and WHEREAS, under the Amended and Restated Contract for Wholesale Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Services and Water and Wastewater Operational Services between the Town and Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1 (the “MUD”) dated July 25, 2017, as amended by that “First Amendment” dated March 22, 2023 (collectively the “Contract”), the MUD has agreed to provide the Town with wholesale water and wastewater services and with operations services related to the Town System within the boundaries of the PID Property, as that term is defined in the Contract; and WHEREAS, the Contract requires that the MUD shall provide to Town any amended or revised MUD Rate Order adopted by the MUD and the Town shall adopt a Town Rate Order identical to the amended or revised MUD Rate Order; and Page 312 of 325 Page 2 of 4ORD 2024-XX WHEREAS, the Town received MUD Rate Order No. 2024-0918A, which was approved by the MUD on September 18, 2024, with an effective date of October 1, 2024; and WHEREAS, Town Council finds and determines that this Ordinance meets its contractual obligations pursuant to the Contract and is adopted in the exercise of the Town’s governmental functions and legislative power and is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and the citizens of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF PREMISES The above and foregoing premises are true and correct and are incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2. AMENDMENTS Only Subsection (d)(2) “Volumetric rates” of Section A1.014 “Water and wastewater fees for Public Improvement District No. 1”, of Article A1.000 “General Provisions”, of Appendix A “Fee Schedule”, of the Code of Ordinances, Town of Trophy Club, Texas, is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety as follows, and all other subsections not expressly mentioned hereafter shall remain the same: “(2)Volumetric rates: Gallons Used Rate per 1,000 gallons 0 to 6,000 $4.69 6,001 to 17,000 $5.46 17,001 to 25,000 $6.32 25,001 to 50,000 $7.34 50,001+ $8.53 ” SECTION 3. CUMULATIVE This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other provisions of ordinances of the Town, except where the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Page 313 of 325 Page 3 of 4ORD 2024-XX SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Town Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance are severable, and if any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by a valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases of this Ordinance; since the same would have been enacted by the Town Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase. SECTION 5. SAVINGS All rights and remedies of the Town are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the ordinances of the Town that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this Ordinance, but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 6. PENALTY It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Ordinance, and any person violating or failing to comply with any provision of this Ordinance shall be fined, upon conviction, not less than One Dollar ($1.00) nor more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. SECTION 7. PUBLICATION The Town Secretary of the Town is hereby directed to publish the caption and penalty of this Ordinance as required by Section 3.16 of the Town’s Charter. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect on October 1st, 2024, in accordance with law, and it is so ordained. Page 314 of 325 Page 4 of 4ORD 2024-XX PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, this 23rd day of September 2024. Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor ATTEST: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Page 315 of 325 § A1.014. Water and wastewater fees for Public Improvement District No. 1. (a) Connection fee - 1": $2,300.00. (b) Impact fee: Each customer requesting an initial connection shall also pay to the district the applicable City of Fort Worth Impact Fee. (c) Meter fee: Meter fees for meter sizes less than or greater than 1" shall be based upon the fee charged by the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1 ("MUD1") in accordance with its duly adopted rate order. (1) 5/8" meter: $358.00. (2) 1" meter: $428.00. (3) 1-1/2" meter: $905.00. (4) 2"–10": Quoted at time of purchase. (d) Monthly residential (single-family homes) and commercial water fees: (1) Base rates: Meter Size Monthly Base Rate 5/8" & 3/4" $20.26 1" $38.08 1.5" $67.54 2" $108.06 3" $204.80 4" $337.68 6" $675.38 (2) Volumetric rates: Gallons Used Rate per 1,000 gallons 0 to 6,000 $4.60 6,001 to 17,000 $5.35 17,001 to 25,000 $6.19 25,001 to 50,000 $7.19 50,001 + $8.36 (e) Multi-unit buildings: Each multi-unit building (apartments, townhomes, business complex, etc.) served by a single 5/8" meter or 1" meter shall be billed the base rate for the meter size servicing the building multiplied by the number of units in the building or complex. Town of Trophy Club, TX Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/TR3145 on 2024-09-10 Page 316 of 325 (f) Monthly residential (single-family homes) wastewater fees - effective April 1, 2022: (1) The district uses winter averaging for the purpose of calculating sewer charges on utility bills. The sewer charges are based on average water consumption for three months (December, January and February billing). The average consumption will be analyzed annually and take affect the first of April each year. (2) New customers will be assigned a default value user charge that is equal to the average winter water use for all residential customers. The winter average used for new residential customer is 7,000 gallons. (3) A customer with a water leak during the averaging months may request a reduction in the sewer usage calculation. Any customer filling a pool after resurfacing, construction or major repairs during the averaging months may request that their winter average calculation be adjusted. Requests for a reduction in sewer usage calculations must be submitted in writing to the general manager and have documentation showing the construction or repairs as applicable to the issue. The general manager or a duly authorized representative may adjust the metered water usage in determining the winter average. To assist in establishing winter averaging sewer rates, customers are encouraged to submit requests for sewer average reductions no later than March 15th. (A) Base rate: $22.15. (B) 0–4,000 gallons: $3.57/1,000 gallons (C) 4,001–8,000 gallons: $5.09/1,000 gallons. (D) 8,001–12,000 gallons: $7.18/1,000 gallons. (E) >12,001 gallons: $10.22/1,000 gallons. (g) Monthly commercial wastewater fees - effective April 1, 2023: (1) Base rate: $22.15. (2) Volumetric rate: $8.57/1,000 gallons. Commercial sewer usage is billed based on actual water usage per month. (h) Multi-unit buildings: Each multi-unit building (apartments, townhomes, business complex, etc.) shall be billed the base rate for each meter servicing the building and sewer usage will be billed based on actual water usage per month. (i) Annual capital improvement and maintenance charge: $8.27 (monthly fee per connection). (j) Returned checks: $25.00. (k) Security deposits: (1) Builders: $100.00. (2) Residential and lessees: $100.00. Town of Trophy Club, TX § A1.014 § A1.014 Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/TR3145 on 2024-09-10 Page 317 of 325 (3) Commercial: Meter Size Water Sewer 3/4" $75 $60 1" $100 $100 1.5" $250 $200 2" $500 $320 3" $1,000 $700 4" $1,800 $1,200 6" $3,750 $2,500 8" $5,400 $3,600 (l) Residential fire lines, connections, and fees: (1) Residences between 6,000–8,000 square feet shall have installed on its one-inch water service line, for fire protection, a one-inch U-branch, with a separate meter and meter- box. Cost will be quoted at the time of request and payable at time of permitting. (2) Residences over 8,000 square feet, in addition to its regular one-inch water service line, shall have installed a separate one- and one-half inch water service line for fire protection with its own meter and meter-box. Cost will be quoted at the time of request and payable at time of permitting. (m) Water and sewer service taps: Actual cost plus 10%. An estimate will be provided prior to work being performed. When water taps have been made by someone other than the district personnel, there is an installation/inspection fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) plus the cost of the appropriate meter. (n) Temporary water service - construction meters - security deposit: $1,500.00. (o) Billing procedures and charges: (1) Disconnection fees for nonpayment for residential homeowners and lessees: (A) Additional security deposit of $100.00. (B) Service fee: $50.00. (C) After hours reconnection fees, if applicable. (D) All outstanding balances must be paid. (2) Same-day service: $25.00 (for the start or termination of water and sewer service, or to perform re-reads the same day as requested). (3) Accuracy reading fee: Town of Trophy Club, TX § A1.014 § A1.014 Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/TR3145 on 2024-09-10 Page 318 of 325 (2006 Code, ch. 1, sec. 8.16; Ordinance 2008-10, sec. II, adopted 3/3/08; Ordinance 2008-17 adopted 7/7/08; Ordinance 2008-37 adopted 11/17/08; Ordinance 2008-42 adopted 12/15/08; Ordinance 2014-16 adopted 6/16/14; Ordinance 2014-32 adopted 9/23/14; Ordinance 2015-24 adopted 8/25/15; Ordinance 2016-01 adopted 1/12/16; Ordinance 2016-44 adopted 9/27/16; Ordinance 2017-06 adopted 2/20/17; Ordinance 2017-07 adopted 3/28/17; Ordinance 2017-27 adopted 9/26/17; Ordinance 2018-04 adopted 2/13/18; Ordinance 2018-07 adopted 3/27/18; Ordinance 2018-20 adopted 9/25/18; Ordinance 2018-28 adopted 11/13/18; Ordinance 2019-09 adopted 3/26/19; Ordinance 2019-20 adopted 9/24/19; Ordinance 2019-27 adopted 11/12/19; Ordinance 2020-05 adopted 4/14/20; Ordinance 2020-18 adopted 10/13/20; Ordinance 2021-22 adopted 9/27/21; Ordinance 2021-24 adopted 10/25/21; Ordinance 2022-09 adopted 4/14/22; Ordinance 2022-30 adopted 9/27/2022; Ordinance 2022-32 adopted 10/25/2022; Ordinance 2023-05 adopted 3/28/2023; Ordinance 2023-20 adopted 11/13/2023) (A) $25.00 if the original reading appears to be accurate. If the original meter reading appears to be in error, no fee will be charged. (B) $125.00 to remove meter and bench test. (4) Meter data logging fee: One data log per year allowed at no charge. Each subsequent data logging service is $25.00. (p) Service line inspection and lead test: $150.00. (q) Water and wastewater rates and fees are the same for all properties within the corporate boundaries of the town whether service is received directly from MUD1 or service is received from town as a wholesale customer of MUD1. (r) Town fees as set forth above are applicable to the boundaries of the Trophy Club Public Improvement District No. 1 and are based upon a rate order adopted by Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No 1 (“MUD1”). Customers of the town receiving service to property located within the boundaries of the PID shall be subject to the duly adopted MUD1 Service Rules and Policies, including all fees imposed thereby, as amended from time to time. (s) Rates and fees for water and wastewater service applicable to the boundaries of MUD1 are imposed pursuant to a rate order duly adopted by MUD1. Town of Trophy Club, TX § A1.014 § A1.014 Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/TR3145 on 2024-09-10 Page 319 of 325 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: September 23, 2024 FROM: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary AGENDA ITEM: Consider a resolution appointing members to the Animal Shelter Advisory Board, Crime Control and Prevention District Board, Economic Development Corporation Board, Ethics Review Commission, Parks and Recreation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Zoning Board of Adjustment as recommended by the Town Council Appointments Committee. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Town Council appointed Mayor Tiffany and Council Members Oldham and Beach to the Town Council Appointments Committee (Committee), tasking them with making recommendations to the full Council regarding appointments to all Boards, Commissions, and Corporations (Boards). On August 26, 2024, the Town Council approved an ordinance reducing the number of Parks and Recreation Board members from nine (9) to seven (7), and an ordinance aligning the composition of the Building Standards Commission with the Zoning Board of Adjustment, making their members the same. Following these changes, there are now twenty-four (24) positions to fill, including four (4) positions with unexpired terms ending in 2025. A total of thirty-three (33) applications were received, including fifteen (15) from current members and eighteen (18) from new applicants. The Committee conducted thirty (30) interviews between July 10, 2024, and August 23, 2024. Two applicants did not respond to interview invitations. Susan Edstrom was not interviewed, as she was the only qualified applicant for the Animal Welfare representative position. In some instances, the number of applicants greatly exceeded the available positions, while for other boards, there were fewer applicants than vacancies. After discussions with several applicants, many expressed a willingness to serve on other boards where there was a need. This flexibility was factored into the Committee's balanced recommendations across all Boards. Following the interviews, the Committee compiled recommendations that achieve a thoughtful mix of experienced and new members. Where appropriate, individuals were also recommended for Chair and Vice Chair positions. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: After reviewing applications and conducting interviews, the Appointment Committee recommends the slate of individuals presented in the resolution for appointment to Trophy Club's Boards and Commissions. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with this agenda item. Page 320 of 325 LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the resolution as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Applicants ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the resolution appointing members to the Animal Shelter Advisory Board, Crime Control and Prevention District Board, Economic Development Corporation Board, Ethics Review Commission, Parks and Recreation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Zoning Board of Adjustment as recommended by the Town Council Appointments Committee. Page 321 of 325 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY BOARD; CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT BOARD; ECONCOMIC DEVELOMENT CORPORATION BOARD; ETHICS REVIEW COMMISSION; PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD; PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; AND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; DESIGNATING TERMS OF SERVICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, benefits by having its citizens involved in local government through service on Boards, Commissions, and Corporations; and WHEREAS, the Trophy Club Town Council is responsible for making appointments to the Boards, Commissions, and Corporations serving the Town whose terms are expiring; and WHEREAS, the Town Council is responsible for appointing a Chairperson to the Animal Advisory Board, Parks and Recreation Board, Zoning Board of Adjustment; and responsible for appointing a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson to the Planning and Zoning Commission. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitals set forth in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found to be true and correct. SECTION 2. The Town Council of Trophy Club, Texas, hereby appoints the following individuals to serve on the Animal Services Board with the respective chairperson as specified below: Name Place Term Ending Date Brian Hall Animal Control Officer 09/30/2026 Susan Edstrom Animal Welfare Representative 09/30/2026 Deanna Polner Member 09/30/2026 Chair: Susan Edstrom SECTION 3. The Town Council of Trophy Club, Texas, hereby appoints the following individuals to serve on the Crime Control and Prevention District Board as specified below: Name Place Term Ending Date Marc Bartels Place 1 09/30/2026 Marion Hawker Place 5 09/30/2026 Garry Ash Place 7 09/30/2026 SECTION 4. That the Town Council of Trophy Club, Texas, hereby appoints the Page 322 of 325 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX PAGE 2 following individuals to serve on the Economic Development Corporation Board as specified below: Name Place Term Ending Date Terry Addington Place 1 09/30/2026 Garrett Wallace Place 3 09/30/2026 Allan Pedersen Place 4 09/30/2026 SECTION 5. The Town Council of Trophy Club, Texas, hereby appoints the following individuals to serve on the Ethics Commission as specified below: Name Place Term Ending Date Jennifer Olson Place 1 09/30/2026 Amy Mancuso Place 2 09/30/2026 Julie Edwards Place 3 09/30/2025 (unexpired term) Jacqueline Ross Place 4 09/30/2025 Lisa DeLong Alternate 09/30/2025 Victoria Heguy Alternate 09/30/2025 SECTION 6. The Town Council of Trophy Club, Texas, hereby appoints the following individuals to serve on the Parks and Recreation Board with the respective chairperson as specified below: Name Place Term Ending Date Robert Ferguson Place 2 09/30/2026 Gary Packan Place 4 09/30/2026 Jeffrey Eason Place 5 09/30/2025 Steven Ford Place 6 09/30/2026 Dana Kizer Place 7 09/30/2025 Chair: Jennifer Kashner SECTION 7. The Town Council of Trophy Club, Texas, hereby appoints the following individuals to serve on the Planning and Zoning Commission with the respective chairperson and vice-chairperson as specified below: Name Place Term Ending Date Srinath Sadam Place 1 09/30/2025 (unexpired term) Terry Kesterson Place 5 09/30/2026 Sean Holmes Place 6 09/30/2026 Michael Biggs Place 7 09/30/2026 Chair: Michael Biggs Vice Chair: Mike Branum Page 323 of 325 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX PAGE 3 SECTION 8. The Town Council of Trophy Club, Texas, hereby appoints the following individuals to serve on the Zoning Board of Adjustment with the respective chairperson as specified below: Name Place Term Ending Date Steve Boedeker Place 2 09/30/2026 Stephen Bowman Place 3 09/30/2026 Aaron Ross Place 5 09/30/2025 (unexpired) Robert Stevens Alternate 3 09/30/2026 Daniel Parham Alternate 4 09/30/2026 Chair: Stephen Bowman SECTION 9. This resolution shall become effective October 1, 2024. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024. Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor ATTEST: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary APPROVED TO AS FORM: Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Page 324 of 325 2 positions (Animal Welfare Rep & Regular Member)3 open positons/1 vacancy Susan Edstrom Josh Appling Deanna Polner Michael Biggs Jacqueline Ross Victoria Heguy Sean Holmes Terry Kesterson 3 open positions Jonathan Poole Aaron Ross Marc Bartels Srinath Sadam Gene Popik Robert Stevens 3 open positions 4 open positons/1 vacancy Teri Addington Steven Boedeker Steven Boedeker Steve Bowman Stephen Boulware Garrett Wallace Greg Fox Allan Pedersen Garrett Wallace 2 open positons/2 vacancies Amy Mancuso Jennifer Olson 3 open positions Garry Ash Wendie Bailey Lisa DeLong Robert Ferguson Steven Ford Marion Hawker Dean Murray Gary Packan Daniel Parham Stephanie Presley List of Boards and Commissions Applicants Zoning Board of Adjustment Animal Shelter Advisory Board Crime Control & Prevention District Economic Development Corporation Ethics Review Commission Parks & Recreation Board Planning & Zoning Commission Page 325 of 325