Loading...
07.22.2024 TC Agenda Packet TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB MEETING AGENDA TOWN COUNCIL 1 Trophy Wood Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 July 22, 2024 6:00 PM Council Chambers CALL WORK SESSION TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM WORK SESSION ITEM 1. Presentation and discussion on traffic improvements for Bobcat Boulevard. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) ADJOURN WORK SESSION CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER (immediately following Work Session or 7:00 p.m., whichever is later) INVOCATION led by Rev. Bill Eason, Fellowship United Methodist Church PLEDGES led by Council Member Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag Pledge of Allegiance to the Texas Flag PUBLIC COMMENT(S) This is an opportunity for citizens to address the Council on any matter pursuant to Texas Government Code 551.007. The Council is not permitted to discuss or take action on any presentations made concerning matters that are not listed on the agenda. Presentations are limited to matters over which the Council has authority. Speakers have up to three (3) minutes or the time limit determined by the Presiding Officer. Each speaker must have submitted their request to speak by completing the Speaker’s Form or may email mayorandcouncil@trophyclub.org COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT 2. Working for You... Trophy Club a) Update from Town Council Members b) Update from Town Manager (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) Page 1 of 186 c) Quick Civic Tip (Dean Roggia, Town Attorney) CONSENT AGENDA This part of the agenda consists of non-controversial, or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be removed from Consent by any council member by making such request prior to a motion and vote. 3. Consider approval of the June 24, 2024, Town Council work session and regular meeting minutes. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) 4. Consider a consolidated radio communications interlocal agreement between the Denton County Sheriff’s Office and the Town of Trophy Club for the use of a radio communication system for FY 2025. (Patrick Arata, Police Chief) 5. Consider an ordinance amending the FY 2024 Budget to increase construction inspection fee revenue and professional engineering services in the Community Development Department by $68,000 for additional construction inspection services related to Trophy Club residential developments. (Matt Cox, Community Development Director) INDIVIDUAL ITEMS 6. Presentation and discussion regarding an update from the arts commission ad hoc committee on the development of an arts commission in Trophy Club. (Tamara Smith, Assistant to the Town Manager) ADJOURN The Town Council may convene into executive session to discuss posted items as allowed by Texas Government Code Sections 551.071 through 551.076 and Section 551.087. CERTIFICATION I do hereby certify that the Notice of Meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the Town Hall for the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, in a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times on the following date and time: July 17, 2024, at 5:30 p.m., and said Notice of Meeting was also posted concurrently on the Town’s website in accordance with Texas Government Code Ch. 551 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled time of said meeting. /s/ Tammy Dixon Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please contact the Town Secretary’s Office at 6822372900, 48 hours in advance, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. Page 2 of 186 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: July 22, 2024 FROM: Brandon Wright, Town Manager AGENDA ITEM: Presentation and discussion on traffic improvements for Bobcat Boulevard. (Brandon Wright, Town Manager) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: In January 2024, the Town Council and Town Manager began reviewing alternative options for traffic improvements on Bobcat Boulevard between Trophy Club Drive and Marshall Creek Drive. The study area has a high volume of traffic during morning hours and late afternoon due to the presence of Byron Nelson High School, Medlin Middle School, and Beck Elementary. These three schools neighbor each other and cause higher traffic when dropping off and picking up students. The Town Manager proposed a comprehensive review of the concerns, objectives, and solutions related to the traffic in this area. The review aimed to gather information, including resident input, to facilitate an informed decision-making process. A six-phase approach was introduced with the expectation that the decision-making process would last approximately eight months, resulting in the Town Council review of the proposed solutions. The outlined phases included: 1. Traffic watch and review 2. Identify key objectives 3. Develop solutions 4. Town Council debrief 5. Community input and surveys 6. Final presentation to the Town Council Phase 1 and Phase 2 were completed by February 2024. During the Town Council Work Session on February 12, 2024, the Town Council and staff reviewed several objectives. These included enhancing traffic flow and pedestrian safety, improvements to left-hand movements at key intersections, minimizing pedestrian crossing delays, and improved compliance for vehicles yielding to pedestrian crosswalks. Staff has collaborated with Lee Engineering to advance Phase 3 solution development. Phase 4 will focus on the purpose of this Town Council Work Shop, where the Town Council will receive a briefing on the available solutions. Based on the Lee Engineering report, the intersections of Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard, Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard, Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive, and High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard currently experience failing level of service Page 3 of 186 scores during peak AM and PM hours for left-hand turn movements. Intersections are given a "level of service" score to indicate how efficiently traffic moves through turns at the crossroads. A score of "A" is the highest level of service and "F" is the lowest. Scores of "E" or "F" are both considered to be failing scores, while scores of "A" through "D" are considered passing scores. Below is a chart outlining the current level of service scores and the projected scores with new control mechanisms implemented such as traffic guards, traffic lights, and roundabouts. Intersection Traffic Control Officer Control Level of Service Score Traffic Light Control Level of Service Score Roundabout Control Level of Service Score Marshall Creek at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn) AM: C PM: C AM: D PM: D AM: C PM: A Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard (northbound left turn) AM: D PM: D AM: D PM: C AM: B PM: A High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (southbound) AM: F PM: C AM: C PM: B AM: B PM: A High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn) AM: F PM: C AM: D PM: B AM: B PM: B Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn) AM: D PM: D AM: D PM: D AM: B PM: B Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn) AM: E PM: D AM: B PM: A AM: B PM: B The Lee Engineering report indicates that all intersections along Bobcat Boulevard are projected to receive the passing level of service scores with the implementation of various control improvements, with the exceptions of the northbound left turn from Trophy Club Drive onto Bobcat Boulevard and the southbound and eastbound left turn at High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard. The Trophy Club Drive and Bobcat Boulevard intersection receives a passing level of service score with both a traffic light or a roundabout. The High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat Boulevard intersection also receives a passing level of service with a traffic light or a roundabout. Based on these results, Lee Engineering structured a series of recommended improvements that allow for the implementation of various solutions to arrive at a passing level of service scores throughout the study area. As represented in Table 8 of the Lee Engineering report, all intersections have a passing level of service score with the recommended solutions. Below is a Page 4 of 186 summary of their recommended improvements: • Marshall Creek at Bobcat: Install a roundabout. A single-lane roundabout was predicted to accommodate the existing traffic volumes, but the design could be modified as desired. • Mid-Block between Marshall Creek and Parkview: Install a pedestrian hybrid beacon on Bobcat Boulevard midway between Marshall Creek and Parkview. Concurrent with this installation, pedestrians should be directed to utilize the mid-block crossing rather than crossing at the intersections. • Parkview at Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. • High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat: Station a crossing guard/traffic control officer at this location. Install a westbound right turn lane on Bobcat at the driveway. Reconfigure the crosswalk to be on the west side of the intersection rather than the east to better facilitate the westbound right turn and southbound left turn. Reconfigure the southbound approach to provide two southbound lanes (10' left turn and 10' right turn) with a 14' inbound lane. • Bobcat at Trophy Club: Install traffic signal control. The Town Council's Work Shop aims to discuss and review these proposed options for traffic improvements on Bobcat Boulevard. A key focus will be gathering feedback from residents of Trophy Club to understand their preferences and concerns regarding the proposed solutions. To facilitate this, town staff is organizing resident input sessions and utilizing survey tools to collect feedback. Public input will be solicited beginning the week of July 29. Feedback will be collected through in-person focus groups as well as online surveys. Community input and final recommendations are anticipated to be presented to the Town Council at a Council Workshop on September 9, 2024. This process ensures that community perspectives are considered before any final decisions are made regarding the traffic improvements along Bobcat Boulevard. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: The following are preliminary cost estimates for certain elements associated with traffic improvements to the study area on Bobcat Boulevard. • Two-lane roundabout at Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. $4 to $4.25 million • Traffic light installation at Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. $500,000 • Traffic light installation at High School Entrance #4 at Bobcat Boulevard. $500,000 • Annual traffic/crossing guard at High School Entrance #4 at Bobcat Boulevard. $15,000 • Two-lane roundabout at Parkview Drive and Bobcat Boulevard. $3 to $3.5 million Page 5 of 186 • Traffic light installation at Parkview Drive and Bobcat Boulevard. $500,000 • One-lane roundabout at Marshall Creek and Bobcat Boulevard. $3.25 million to $3.5 million • Traffic light installation at Marshall Creek and Bobcat Boulevard. $500,000 • Mid-block pedestrian hybrid beacon. $350,000 The annual maintenance cost for traffic lights is estimated at $6,000 to $8,000 per intersection. The preliminary cost estimate for the Lee Engineering recommended plan for Bobcat Boulevard is $4.35 million in one-time infrastructure costs with $15,000 in additional annual crossing guard personnel costs and $8,000 in additional traffic light maintenance costs. In 2023, the Town Council issued a bond in the amount of $7 million to provide funding for traffic improvements on Bobcat Boulevard or other identified qualifying projects such as general road or park improvements. Denton County has previously agreed, subject to final approvals, to provide 50% funding up to $3.3 million for improvements to Bobcat Boulevard that address traffic concerns. LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Lee Engineering Report ACTIONS/OPTIONS: This Work Shop agenda item is being presented for discussion and feedback purposes only. Staff is seeking Council consensus on desired options to present to residents with the goal of collecting feedback before the Town Council takes action to determine future actions. Page 6 of 186 Bobcat Traffic Improvements Town Council Workshop July 22, 2024 Page 7 of 186 6-Phase Project 1. Traffic Watch & Review 2. Identify Key Objectives 3. Develop Solutions 4. Town Council Debrief 5. Community Input & Surveys 6. Final Presentation to Council 1. Page 8 of 186 Study Area Map Page 9 of 186 January Observations Page 10 of 186 •Identify solutions for improved traffic flow and pedestrian safety at south BNHS exit onto Bobcat •Identify solutions for left-hand movements at Trophy Club Drive & Bobcat, Parkview & Bobcat, and Marshall Creek & Bobcat •Identify solutions to minimize pedestrian crossing delays •Identify solutions for improved compliance with vehicles stopping for pedestrian crosswalks •Identify other traffic control solutions to determine if any options provide substantial improvement over traffic-guard-controlled movements •Avoid diverting traffic onto neighborhood streets Key Objectives Page 11 of 186 Current Conditions INTERSECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)F F Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard (northbound left turn)F F High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (southbound)F F High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)C A Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn)F F Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn)C B A through D = Passing Scores E & F = Failing ScoresPage 12 of 186 Simulated Traffic Control Officer Control INTERSECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)C C Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard (northbound left turn)D D High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (southbound)F C High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)F C Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn)D D Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn)E D A through D = Passing Scores E & F = Failing ScoresPage 13 of 186 Simulated Traffic Light Control INTERSECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)D D Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard (northbound left turn)D C High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (southbound)C B High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)D B Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn)D D Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn)B A A through D = Passing Scores E & F = Failing ScoresPage 14 of 186 Simulated Roundabout Control INTERSECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)C A Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard (northbound left turn)B A High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (southbound)B A High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)B B Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn)B B Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn)B B A through D = Passing Scores E & F = Failing ScoresPage 15 of 186 •Marshall Creek at Bobcat: Install a roundabout. A single-lane roundabout was predicted to accommodate the existing traffic volumes, but the design could be modified as desired. •Mid-Block between Marshall Creek and Parkview: Install a pedestrian hybrid beacon on Bobcat Boulevard midway between Marshall Creek and Parkview. Concurrent with this installation, pedestrians should be directed to utilize the mid-block crossing rather than crossing at the intersections. •Parkview at Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers. •High School Driveway #4 at Bobcat: Station a crossing guard/traffic control officer at this location. Install a westbound right turn lane on Bobcat at the driveway. Reconfigure the crosswalk to be on the west side of the intersection rather than the east to better facilitate the westbound right turn and southbound left turn. Reconfigure the southbound approach to provide two southbound lanes (10' left turn and 10' right turn) with a 14' inbound lane. •Bobcat at Trophy Club: Install traffic signal control. Lee Engineering Recommendation Page 16 of 186 Lee Engineering Recommendation Page 17 of 186 Lee Engineering Recommendation INTERSECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)C A Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard (northbound left turn)C B High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (southbound)C C High School Drive #4 at Bobcat Boulevard (eastbound left turn)D D Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (eastbound left turn)D D Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive (northbound left turn)C A A through D = Passing Scores E & F = Failing ScoresPage 18 of 186 Solution Options Bobcat/Trophy Club Roundabout Bobcat/Trophy Club Traffic Light HS 4/Bobcat Traffic Light HS 4/Bobcat Traffic Control Officer (Annual) Parkview/Bobcat Roundabout Parkview/Bobcat Traffic Light Marshall Creek/Bobcat Roundabout Marshall Creek/Bobcat Traffic Light Mid-Block Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Traffic Light Maintenance (Annual) Amount $4 million to $4.25 million $500,000 $500,000 $15,000 $3 million to $3.5 million $500,000 $3.25 million to $3.5 million $500,000 $350,000 $6,000 to $8,000 Cost Estimates Page 19 of 186 Solution Options Bobcat/Trophy Club Roundabout Bobcat/Trophy Club Traffic Light HS 4/Bobcat Traffic Light HS 4/Bobcat Traffic Control Officer (Annual) Parkview/Bobcat Roundabout Parkview/Bobcat Traffic Light Marshall Creek/Bobcat Roundabout Marshall Creek/Bobcat Traffic Light Mid-Block Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Traffic Light Maintenance (Annual) Amount $4 million to $4.25 million $500,000 $500,000 $15,000 $3 million to $3.5 million $500,000 $3.25 million to $3.5 million $500,000 $350,000 $6,000 to $8,000 Lee Engineering Recommendation Total Costs Construction: $4.35 million Annual Operations: $23,000 Page 20 of 186 6-Phase Project 1. Traffic Watch & Review 2. Identify Key Objectives 3. Develop Solutions 4. Town Council Debrief 5. Community Input & Surveys 6. Final Presentation to Council 1. Page 21 of 186 Beginning July 29 Focus Groups July 30 & July 31 Online Survey July 29 Public Input Page 22 of 186 Town Council Workshop Anticipated September 9, 2024 Final Presentation Page 23 of 186 Questions/Discussion Page 24 of 186 social media | email | website Page 25 of 186 ARIZONA NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA TEXAS 3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1660, Dallas, TX 75234 (972) 248-3006 | www.leeengineering.com Page 1 of 15 July 16, 2024 Mr. Matt Cox Director of Community Development Town of Trophy Club 1 Trophy Wood Drive Trophy Club, TX 76262 Re: School Area Evaluation, Trophy Club, Texas – Preliminary Findings and Recommended Improvements Dear Mr. Cox: Lee Engineering has completed a preliminary review of the existing conditions near Byron Nelson High School, Medlin Middle School, and Samuel Beck Elementary School in the Town of Trophy Club, Texas. This study includes the following intersections:  Bobcat Boulevard at Byron Nelson High School Driveways 1-4  Bobcat Boulevard at Marshall Creek Road  Bobcat Boulevard at Parkview Drive  Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive Bobcat Boulevard is a four-lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (mph). Between the High School Drive 4 and Trophy Club Drive, Bobcat Boulevard is undivided. Bobcat Boulevard does not continue east past Trophy Club Drive. Byron Nelson High School has four access driveways on Bobcat Boulevard. Marshall Creek Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Medlin Middle School has one access driveway on Marshall Creek Road. Parkview Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway with no posted speed limit. Medlin Middle School has three access driveways on Parkview Drive. Samuel Beck Elementary School has four access driveways on Parkview Drive and no access elsewhere. Trophy Club Drive is a four-lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. A vicinity map of the study area is shown in Figure 1 and the existing intersection lane configurations are shown in Figure 2. Note that all of the study intersections appear to operate with two-way stop control despite the presence of stop bars on all approaches at all intersections along the south side of the high school. Page 26 of 186 Page 2 of 15 Figure 1: Vicinity Map Byron Nelson High School Medlin Middle School Samuel Beck Elementary School Study Intersection Page 27 of 186 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 HS DRIVE 2 HS DRIVE 3 MARSHALL CREEK RD PARKVIEW DRHS DRIVE 4OFF-SITE DWYTROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DRBLVDBOBCAT BLVD BOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection One-Way STOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOP Figure 2Existing Intersection Lane Configurations Intersection Observed at Crossing Guard Intersection Observed at Crossing Guard Intersection Observed at Crossing Guard STOP Stop-Controlled Approach Lane Configuration Page 28 of 186 Page 4 of 15 Field Visit Observations Based on a field visit to the study intersection, the following observations are made: AM Peak Hour  High school arrival time occurs before arrival time for the middle school, with minimal overlap between the two arrival periods.  The crossing guards present at the intersections of Bobcat Boulevard with Parkview Drive and with Marshal Creek Road appear to be essential to getting pedestrians across the street and allowing traffic to clear the intersections.  The crossing guard at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive is essential to keep traffic moving.  High school students were observed crossing to the businesses on the south side of Bobcat Boulevard and then back to the high school.  A number of heavy vehicles, specifically dirt and gravel haulers serving sites off of Trophy Park Drive, add to congestion within the study area.  Long vehicle queues were observed on the eastbound approach of Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard in the morning school period. PM peak Hour  The high school dismissal period occurs before dismissal for the middle school; however, there is some overlap between the two school dismissals.  Exiting vehicles from the high school experience long delays from the easternmost driveway (identified as High School Driveway 4 in this study). There were also some pedestrians observed crossing at this drive, which the presence of a crossing guard would help. Note that eastbound vehicle queues from Trophy Club Drive extend to this driveway on Bobcat Boulevard.  LEE observed high school students being picked up from vehicles parked on Roseville Drive east of the high school (approximately 300 feet east of High School Driveway 4).  Some high school students were observed crossing to the commercial area south of Bobcat Boulevard for pickup.  The pick-up for the middle school creates significant congestion in the area. Queues associated with the pick- up queue back up onto Bobcat Boulevard.  Middle school students were observed to cross in large groups to Independence Park for pick-up. There is a marked school cross walk on Parkview Drive between the school exit driveway and Independence Park.  Some middle school students also cross school driveways to be picked up from the curb on Parkview Drive south of the school rather than on campus.  Overall, the existing crossing guards are essential for pedestrians and vehicles throughout the PM peak hour.  Dismissal congestion was cleared by 4:35 PM. Existing and Projected Volumes Existing turning movement volumes were collected during the AM and School PM peak hours on Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at the above study intersections. The peak hour volumes and corresponding peak time periods at each intersection are shown in Figure 3. Pedestrian and bicycle movements are shown in Figure 4. Page 29 of 186 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 7:30 (3:45)272 (24)375 (203)6 (89) 48 (130)56 (13)284 (389)HS DRIVE 2 7:45 (3:45) HS DRIVE 3 7:30 (3:45)164 (34)376 (394)382 (284)153 (133) 115 (103)222 (300)2 (2)7 (88) 5 (24)350 (95)213 (279)MARSHALL CREEK RD 7:30 (4:00)307 (345)77 (103)321 (275) 219 (52)352 (362)158 (285)PARKVIEW DR7:45 (3:45)192 (153) 411 (471) 216 (114) 374 (462)164 (111)166 (128)HS DRIVE 47:30 (4:00)OFF-SITE DWY8 (1) 386 (557) 158 (44)77 (106)1 (0)139 (71)37 (45) 460 (523) 467 (61)64 (73)3 (0)6 (5)245 (234)304 (111)117 (209)535 (466)TROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DR7:30 (4:00)373 (495) 55 (69)BLVDBOBCAT BLVD BOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection AM Peak Hour (School PM Peak Hour) Tuesday, March 26, 2024. Turning movement volumes collected on Existing (2024) Peak Hour Vehicular Traffic Volumes Figure 3 Page 30 of 186 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 7:30 (3:45) HS DRIVE 2 7:45 (3:45) HS DRIVE 3 7:30 (3:45) MARSHALL CREEK RD 7:30 (4:00)PARKVIEW DR7:45 (3:45)HS DRIVE 47:30 (4:00)OFF-SITE DWYTROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DR7:30 (4:00)BLVDBOBCAT BLVD BOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection Existing (2024) Peak Hour Pedestrian Volumes0 (3)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (2) 0 (6) 1 (0) 0 (0) 13 (6) 3 (30) 1 (0) 3 (2)0 (3)2 (8)0 (0)1 (1)8 (6)7 (26)5 (2)4 (4)3 (10) 4 (3) 1 (1) 4 (2) 0 (29) 2 (6) 0 (5) 0 (4)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (1)1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (4) 5 (2) 0 (2) 0 (0) 2 (4) 1 (0) 0 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 14 (1) 0 (19) 0 (0) 0 (0)0 (2)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (5)0 (0)0 (0)0 (2)0 (4)0 (0)0 (0)3 (17)2 (33)0 (0)0 (3)0 (7) 11 (0) 1 (3) 2 (3) 1 (4) 4 (2) 0 (2) 2 (0)11 (1)3 (2)0 (1)0 (0)AM Peak Hour Peds (School PM Peak Hour Peds) Tuesday, March 26, 2024. Pedestrian volumes collected on AM Peak Hour Bikes (School PM Peak Hour Bikes) Figure 4 Page 31 of 186 Page 7 of 15 Intersection Capacity Analysis The Level of Service (LOS) of an intersection is a qualitative measure of capacity and operating conditions and is directly related to vehicle delay. The LOS criteria for unsignalized and signalized intersections are shown in Table 1. LOS is given a letter designation from A to F, with LOS A representing very short delays and LOS F representing very long delays or over-capacity conditions. LOS D is typically considered the minimum acceptable condition. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Level-of-Service (LOS) Average Delay (seconds/vehicle) Unsignalized Signalized A ≤ 10.0 ≤ 10.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 10.1 to 20.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 20.1 to 35.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 55.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 55.1 to 80.0 F > 50.0 or Volume exceeds Capacity > 80.0 or Volume exceeds Capacity SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2016 Capacity analyses were conducted for the study intersection for Existing peak hour traffic conditions. The following scenarios were analyzed:  Table 2 - Existing traffic control  Table 3 – Pretimed signalization with pedestrian phase assumed at the three intersections with traffic control officers to simulate this operation. Again, these intersections include: o Bobcat Boulevard at Marshall Creek Road o Bobcat Boulevard at Parkview Drive o Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive o For the purposes of this analysis, High School Driveway 4 was also analyzed with simulated officer control. Although there is no current crossing guard or police officer at this location, it was analyzed to determine potential improvements gained by officer control.  Table 4 – Installation of traffic signal control at the above three intersections with coordination along Bobcat Boulevard. Operation at the adjacent school driveways is also shown, as installation of traffic signal control results in additional gaps in traffic along Bobcat Boulevard.  Table 5 – Installation of traffic signal control with coordination at High School Driveway 4 along with the signalization in Table 4.  Table 6 – Installation of single-lane roundabouts at the above four intersections. Note that a southbound right turn by-pass lane was assumed on Trophy Club Drive in order for the roundabout to operate acceptably. Similarly, a westbound right turn by-pass lane was assumed on Bobcat Boulevard at High School Driveway 4 in order for the roundabout to operate acceptably. The stop-control and signalized capacity analysis was performed using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition methodologies in the Synchro software package. The roundabout capacity was performed using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition methodologies in the SIDRA software package. Printouts of the traffic analysis results are provided as an attachment to this letter. Page 32 of 186 Page 8 of 15 Table 2: Capacity Analysis Results – Existing Traffic Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 1 High School Driveway 1 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 25.6 D 0.32 33 27.8 D 0.66 118 SB LT 11.5 B 0.43 55 9.8 A 0.04 3 2 High School Driveway 2 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB LT 22.9 C 0.53 78 18.5 C 0.40 48 WB RT 10.3 B 0.20 18 10.4 B 0.17 15 3 High School Driveway 3 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 27.3 D 0.09 8 20.9 C 0.39 45 SB LT 10.9 B 0.27 28 8.6 A 0.04 3 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) EB LT 296.3 F 1.49 423 88.5 F 0.60 70 EB RT 16.1 C 0.55 85 16.1 C 0.49 68 NB LT 9.2 A 0.18 18 10.3 B 0.32 35 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) WB LT 10.6 B 0.28 28 10.2 B 0.15 13 NB LT 439.0 F 1.74 368 164.7 F 1.07 193 NB RT 13.1 B 0.29 30 14.4 B 0.24 23 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT 15.1 C 0.36 43 9.5 A 0.06 5 WB LT 8.7 A 0.05 3 9.4 A 0.06 5 NB 43.2 E 0.51 63 15.0 B 0.19 18 SB 1487.7 F 4.03 743 202.0 F 1.23 275 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) EB LT 2300.7 F 4.91 238 289.7 F 1.20 155 EB RT 24.5 C 0.73 158 18.9 C 0.69 140 NB LT 19.9 C 0.75 178 10.5 B 0.44 58 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Table 3: Capacity Analysis Results – Simulated ‘Traffic Control Officer’ Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB LT 31.4 C 0.58 170 28.9 C 0.17 56 EB RT 6.4 A 0.57 43 8.8 A 0.58 66 NB LT 34.1 C 0.51 157 42.0 D 0.57 251 NB T 32.7 C 0.57 157 36.4 D 0.36 158 SB 32.3 C 0.66 138 39.3 D 0.79 185 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB 40.3 D 0.26 210 34.7 C 0.63 226 WB LT 43.2 D 0.22 150 44.1 D 0.33 86 WB T 38.8 D 0.22 128 48.2 D 0.66 173 NB LT 37.1 D 0.19 149 39.2 D 0.52 120 NB RT 8.0 A 0.19 50 10.3 B 0.38 44 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With ‘Crossing Guard’ EB LT 94.1 F 0.97 177 31.0 C 0.44 32 EB T 5.0 A 0.27 40 13.9 B 0.42 216 WB 29.3 C 0.97 130 15.1 B 0.68 78 NB 25 C 0.56 38 14.8 B 0.37 43 SB 100.5 F 1.07 201 28.6 C 0.60 124 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB LT 37.0 D 0.24 57 36.9 D 0.21 67 EB RT 18.7 B 0.73 119 20.9 C 0.72 209 NB LT 75.1 E 1.04 467 37.3 D 0.83 397 NB T 17.3 B 0.11 38 18.6 B 0.19 66 SB 34.6 C 0.90 132 47.6 D 0.86 154 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Page 33 of 186 Page 9 of 15 Table 4: Capacity Analysis Results – Installation of Traffic Signal Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 1 High School Driveway 1 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 19.6 C 0.25 25 16.1 C 0.48 65 SB LT 10.2 B 0.38 45 8.8 A 0.03 3 2 High School Driveway 2 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB LT 17.8 C 0.45 58 14.0 B 0.30 33 WB RT 9.3 A 0.17 15 9.3 A 0.14 13 3 High School Driveway 3 (WB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) WB 24.0 C 0.08 8 15.9 C 0.30 30 SB LT 10.4 B 0.26 25 8.1 A 0.04 3 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With Signal EB LT 48.4 D 0.73 201 49.3 D 0.38 73 EB RT 16.6 B 0.65 121 19.2 C 0.66 126 NB LT 6.6 A 0.30 81 2.3 A 0.40 24 NB T 5.0 A 0.17 80 0.7 A 0.13 14 SB 12.0 B 0.24 113 8.0 A 0.22 109 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With Signal EB 14.7 B 0.39 92 11.5 B 0.52 127 WB LT 7.6 A 0.48 48 5.6 A 0.27 27 WB T 4.4 A 0.18 37 4.9 A 0.22 52 NB LT 35.6 D 0.43 165 31.4 C 0.27 123 NB RT 3.8 A 0.27 37 4.5 A 0.20 33 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT 15.1 C 0.36 43 9.5 A 0.06 5 WB LT 8.1 A 0.04 3 8.2 A 0.04 3 NB 32.3 D 0.42 48 11.4 B 0.13 10 SB 1109.9 F 3.24 695 46.0 E 0.72 125 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) With Signal EB LT 48.1 D 0.43 62 45.7 D 0.45 66 EB RT 10.6 B 0.61 38 23.3 C 0.87 229 NB LT 17.2 B 0.79 235 5.6 A 0.56 121 NB T 2.1 A 0.05 13 2.2 A 0.08 23 SB 14.7 B 0.45 146 10.8 B 0.20 95 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Table 5: Capacity Analysis Results – Installation of Traffic Signal Control at High School Driveway 4 Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT 38.4 D 0.73 123 12.0 B 0.13 32 EB T 6.9 A 0.25 52 13.4 B 0.31 148 WB 25.3 C 0.90 240 20.2 C 0.47 218 NB 22.1 C 0.50 40 13.9 B 0.45 33 SB 32.8 C 0.62 174 17.9 B 0.36 117 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) Page 34 of 186 Page 10 of 15 Table 6: Capacity Analysis Results – Installation of Roundabout Control Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) Single-Lane Roundabout EB 17.5 C 0.73 281 8.6 A 0.40 53 NB 12.2 B 0.62 171 9.4 A 0.57 120 SB 7.9 A 0.43 66 10.1 B 0.51 95 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) Single-Lane Roundabout EB 13.4 B 0.66 226 10.0 A 0.57 114 WB 11.3 B 0.61 122 9.3 A 0.53 99 NB 10.3 B 0.46 74 8.5 A 0.33 39 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB 11.2 B 0.62 129 10.5 B 0.58 112 WB 9.7 A 0.57 96 7.1 A 0.47 79 NB 8.2 A 0.16 16 7.8 A 0.14 14 SB 10.9 B 0.41 56 8.5 A 0.28 31 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) Single-Lane Roundabout with SB RT Bypass Lane EB 10.9 B 0.55 120 11.8 B 0.61 161 NB 11.5 B 0.66 165 10.2 B 0.60 134 SB T 10.4 B 0.42 56 7.6 A 0.30 33 SB RT 12.6 B 0.52 85 5.7 A 0.14 14 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) As shown, with only stop-control, the left turn movements on the approaches of Marshall Creek Road and Parkview Drive operate poorly during the AM and School PM peak hours. Similarly, the eastbound left turn of Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive operates with significant delay. In addition, southbound High School Driveway 4 operates well above capacity with significant queuing. With the simulated crossing guard/traffic control officer, those three intersections generally appear to operate at acceptable levels of service. The northbound left turn from Trophy Club Drive operates above capacity with significant queuing during the AM peak hour due to heavy traffic volumes for this movement. In addition, while a crossing guard/traffic control officer would improve operation for the southbound approach of High School Driveway 4, this would result in the eastbound left turn and the westbound approach to be approaching capacity during the AM peak hour. With installation of traffic signal control, the three public street intersections are predicted to operate at acceptable levels of service. The stop-controlled high school driveways also experience improvement with additional gaps in traffic due to upstream signals. However, the southbound High School Driveway 4 still operates with significant delay, particularly during the AM peak hour. Operation would be improved at High School Driveway 4 with traffic signal control, as shown in Table 5. Roundabout control generally results in better delay and level of service than traffic signal control at the above four intersections and could be considered as a viable option along Bobcat Boulevard. As noted previously, while single lane roundabouts could accommodate the existing traffic, right turn by-pass lanes would be needed at two locations:  On southbound Trophy Club Drive at Bobcat Boulevard  On westbound Bobcat Boulevard at High School Driveway 4 Page 35 of 186 Page 11 of 15 Preliminary Signal Warrant Analysis Preliminary signal warrant analysis was conducted for the three public street intersections and for High School Driveway 4. The traffic signal warrant analysis presented in this letter is based on the traffic signal warrants contained in Chapter 4C, “Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies,” of the 2011 Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Nine warrants are included in the manual for warranting a traffic signal installation. These warrants are: Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume; Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Vehicular Volume; Warrant 3 – Peak Hour; Warrant 4 – Pedestrian Volume; Warrant 5 – School Crossing; Warrant 6 – Coordinated Signal System; Warrant 7 – Crash Experience; Warrant 8 – Roadway Network; Warrant 9 – Intersection Near a Grade Crossing For the purposes of this study, Warrant 1, Warrant 2, Warrant 3, Warrant 5, and Warrant 7 were evaluated. Based on the predicted traffic volumes at these intersections, Bobcat Boulevard would be considered the Major Roadway and the other roadways would all be considered the Minor Roadway. However, at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive, Bobcat Boulevard would be considered the Minor Roadway. The Texas MUTCD recommends considering the effects of right turn volumes on the minor street approach if the movement enters the major street with minimal conflict, primarily with the presence of a right turn lane. However, for this preliminary analysis all right turn volumes were included and the minor street approaches were evaluated as two- lane approaches where applicable. High School Driveway 4 is a single-lane approach. Finally, this analysis was performed for four (4) hours of the day at each intersection based on the collected traffic data. In order to fully evaluate traffic volume warrants, additional data should be collected. The analysis volumes are included as an attachment to this letter along with the volume warrant results for each intersection. Additionally, a description of each of the above warrants is included as an attachment for reference. A summary of the warrant results is shown in Table 6. Highlighted cells indicate values which exceed the threshold value. Table 7: Preliminary Traffic Signal Warrant Results Intersection Vehicle Volume Warrants - Hours Met Warrant 5 Warrant 7 Warrant 1A Warrant 1B Warrant 1C Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Max Peds/Hr Required Gap (sec) Adequate Gaps/Hr Correctable Crashes/Yr Marshall Creek at Bobcat 3 1 3 3 2 52 17 - 0 Parkview at Bobcat 3 3 4 3 1 38 17 - 1 HS Drive 4 at Bobcat 3 4 3 3 1 57 19 - 1 Bobcat at Trophy Club 4 2 4 4 2 13 18 - 4 Minimum Required to Meet: 8 8 8 4 1 20 60 5 Based on the volume warrants, all intersections are anticipated to meet traffic thresholds for Warrant 3, the Peak Hour Warrant. However, this warrant is typically applicable for “unusual cases such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time”, per the Texas MUTCD. It is unclear whether a high school would qualify for this warrant. The intersection of Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive is predicted to meet Warrant 2, the Four-Hour Warrant. The other three intersections meet thresholds for Warrant 2 for three hours of the day, and it is possible that an additional hour may be met with additional traffic data collected. Similarly, it is possible that Warrant 1 could be met at one or more intersections with additional data collection. Page 36 of 186 Page 12 of 15 Warrant 5 was evaluated based on the collected pedestrian volumes. This warrant requires a minimum of 20 school pedestrians crossing the major road in an hour, which is met at Marshall Creek Road, Parkview Drive, and High School Driveway 4. This warrant also requires that the number of gaps in traffic on the major road exceeds the number of minutes in the evaluated time period. However, gap data was not collected as part of this study. Additionally, this warrant recommends consideration of alternative remedial measures such as a crossing guard before considering a traffic signal. Warrant 7 was evaluated based on available crash data from TxDOT’s online C.R.I.S. query tool for each intersection. Based on available data, none of the study intersections are anticipated to meet the crash warrant. Based on these results, installation of traffic signal control should be considered at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. It is recommended to collect 24-hour turning movement data and perform a full traffic signal warrant analysis. Similarly, consider conducting a full traffic signal warrant analysis at the other intersections. Preliminary Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Analysis A pedestrian hybrid beacon is used to warn and control vehicular traffic at an unsignalized location to assist pedestrians crossing the roadway at a marked crosswalk. A pedestrian hybrid beacon may be considered at marked crosswalk locations that do not meet traffic signal warrants or where a decision is made to not install a traffic signal. The need for a pedestrian hybrid beacon should be considered when the point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street, when plotted on Figure 4F-1 (or 4F-2 when applicable) of the Texas MUTCD, falls above the curve for the appropriate length of crosswalk. Based on the posted speed limit on Bobcat Boulevard (30 mph) the reduced warrant threshold was not used for this warrant. This warrant requires a minimum of 20 pedestrians per hour, so the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive would not meet this threshold based on the data in Table 6. Figure 5 shows the results of this analysis for the other three intersections in Table 6. Figure 5: Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guidelines (Figure 4F-1 from the Texas MUTCD) Crossing distance on Bobcat Boulevard at High School Driveway 4 is approximately 50 feet from center of curb ramp to center of curb ramp. At Parkview Drive and at Marshall Creek Road, the full crossing distance is approximately 75 feet, although it is possible that the median could act as a pedestrian refuge on the west side of each roadway. Based on these distances and the results in Figure 5, a pedestrian hybrid beacon could be considered at all three locations. Additionally, thresholds would also be met if pedestrians were relocated to a new mid-block crossing on Bobcat Boulevard, particularly if pedestrians from multiple intersections were relocated. Page 37 of 186 Page 13 of 15 Suggested Mitigation Based on the results of this analysis, the following mitigation measures are recommended:  Marshall Creek at Bobcat: Install a roundabout. A single-lane roundabout was predicted to accommodate the existing traffic volumes, but the design could be modified as desired.  Mid-Block between Marshall Creek and Parkview: Install a pedestrian hybrid beacon (HAWK signal) on Bobcat Boulevard midway between Marshall Creek and Parkview. Concurrent with this installation, pedestrians should be directed to utilize the mid-block crossing rather than crossing at the intersections.  Parkview at Bobcat: Continue with existing crossing guards/traffic control officers.  High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat: Station a crossing guard/traffic control officer at this location. Install a westbound right turn lane on Bobcat at the driveway. Reconfigure the crosswalk to be on the west side of the intersection rather than the east to better facilitate the westbound right turn and southbound left turn. Reconfigure the southbound approach to provide two southbound lanes (10’ left turn and 10’ right turn) with a 14’ inbound lane.  Bobcat at Trophy Club: Install traffic signal control. The resulting operation is shown in Table 8. Note that some results may differ from previous tables due to different arrival patterns in the model. Additionally, pedestrians crossing Bobcat Boulevard were relocated from Marshall Creek and Parkview to the proposed mid-block crossing. Table 8: Capacity Analysis Results – Recommended Mitigation Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Delay1 LOS V/C Queue2 Delay LOS V/C Queue 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) With Roundabout (Single-Lane) EB 17.5 C 0.73 281 8.6 A 0.40 53 NB 12.2 B 0.62 171 9.4 A 0.57 120 SB 7.9 A 0.43 66 10.1 B 0.51 95 Mid-Block Pedestrian Signal EB 4.0 A 0.26 75 4.0 A 0.25 74 WB 12.1 B 0.22 157 17.1 B 0.24 185 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With 'Crossing Guard' EB 6.8 A 0.47 71 9.0 A 0.50 86 WB LT 13.3 B 0.53 66 7.3 A 0.25 23 WB T 9.8 A 0.46 45 9.3 A 0.50 45 NB LT 21.9 C 0.48 95 19.8 B 0.35 74 NB RT 6.0 A 0.38 38 6.4 A 0.29 31 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) With ‘Crossing Guard’ EB LT 46.6 D 0.62 180 43.6 D 0.21 66 EB T 10.9 B 0.28 104 15.0 B 0.40 156 WB 20.3 C 0.73 194 31.3 C 0.72 213 NB 24.0 C 0.52 42 13.6 B 0.31 46 SB 21.3 C 0.46 92 28.1 C 0.37 119 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) With Traffic Signal EB LT 39.9 D 0.43 68 50.7 D 0.45 101 EB RT 4.8 A 0.54 45 43.2 D 0.86 221 NB LT 20.7 C 0.74 276 5.8 A 0.58 121 NB T 2.1 A 0.05 13 2.2 A 0.08 37 SB 16.3 B 0.52 132 9.3 A 0.19 88 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle 2 95th Percentile Queue in Feet (based on an assumed 25 ft/veh) For reference, the spacing between these intersections is shown in Table 9. Table 9: Spacing Between Intersections on Bobcat Boulevard Roadway Segment Approx. Distance High School Driveway 3 to Marshall Creek 820’ Marshall Creek to Mid-Block Crossing 210’ Mid-Block Crossing to Parkview 215’ Parkview to High School Driveway 4 530’ High School Driveway Dwy 4 to Trophy Club 600’ Page 38 of 186 Page 14 of 15 Based on the results above, predicted queues are not anticipated to extend to adjacent intersections. Additionally, most of the predicted 95th percentile left turn queues are predicted to be accommodated by existing left turn lane storage lengths, where applicable. However, the northbound left turn queue on Trophy Club Drive at Bobcat Boulevard is predicted to exceed the existing storage length of approximately 160 feet during the AM peak hour. As part of the improvements at this location, it is recommended to lengthen the northbound left turn lane on Trophy Club Drive. This should be possible with the existing median width. For reference, the delay values for the proposed mitigation are compared to the existing operation in Table 10. For ease of comparison, only the operation for the overall approach is shown. Existing conditions include a simulated crossing guard at the three locations where one is currently present. High School Driveway 4 existing condition is just two-way stop control. Table 10: Capacity Analysis Results – Comparison of Existing to Recommended Mitigation Intersection Critical Approach/ Movement Existing (2024) Volumes AM Peak School PM Peak Existing Operation Mitigated Operation Existing Operation Mitigated Operation Delay (LOS)1 Delay (LOS) Delay (LOS) Delay (LOS) 4 Marshall Creek Road (EB) at Bobcat Boulevard (NB/SB) EB 16.6 (B) 17.5 (C) 12.0 (B) 8.6 (A) NB 33.2 (C) 12.2 (B) 38.9 (D) 9.4 (A) SB 32.3 (C) 7.9 (A) 39.3 (D) 10.1 (B) 5 Parkview Drive (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB 40.3 (D) 6.8 (A) 34.7 (C) 9.0 (A) WB 40.4 (D) 11.1 (B) 47.3 (D) 8.9 (A) NB 22.6 (C) 14.0 (B) 25.8 (C) 13.8 (B) 6 High School Driveway 4 (SB)/ Off-Site Dwy (NB) at Bobcat Boulevard (EB/WB) EB LT / EB 15.1 (C) 21.1 (C) 9.5 (A) 17. 1 (B) WB LT / WB 8.1 (A) 20.3 (C) 8.7 (A) 31.3 (C) NB 32.5 (D) 24.0 (C) 11.4 (B) 13.6 (B) SB 1146.4 (F) 21.3 (C) 82.8 (F) 28.1 (C) 7 Bobcat Boulevard (EB) at Trophy Club Drive (NB/SB) EB 21.0 (C) 8.7 (A) 22.9 (C) 44.1 (D) NB 64.7 (E) 17.4 (B) 31.5 (C) 4.7 (A) SB 34.6 (C) 16.3 (B) 47.6 (D) 9.3 (A) 1 Average Delay in Seconds per Vehicle (Level of Service) As shown, for most approaches the recommended mitigation is predicted to improve the average delay compared to existing conditions. Some approaches experience significant improvement, including the southbound High School Driveway 4 approach and both approaches of Trophy Club Drive at Bobcat Boulevard. The recommended lane configurations and traffic control are shown in Figure 6 for reference. If you have any questions, please contact me or Kristen Novak at (972) 248-3006. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services and are available to address any additional comments or concerns. Sincerely, Joseph Short, P.E., PTOE President Lee Engineering TBPE Firm F-450 Attachments Synchro Output Sheets SIDRA Output Sheets Signal Warrant Data and Description Page 39 of 186 TBPE FIRM NO. F-450 PHONE: 972-248-3006 DALLAS, TX 75234 3030 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1660 HS DRIVE 1 HS DRIVE 2 HS DRIVE 3 MARSHALL CREEK RD PARKVIEW DRHS DRIVE 4OFF-SITE DWYTROPHY CLUB DRTROPHY CLUB DRBLVDBOBCAT NOT TO SCALEN LEGEND Study Intersection One-Way Figure 6and Traffic Control Recommended Intersection Lane Configurations Lane Configuration Stop-Controlled Approach Recommended Change signal control. Install traffic turn lane. westbound right Install left turn lane. northbound existing Lengthen guard to remain. Existing crossing crossing. new mid-block pedestrians to Redirect hybrid beacon. pedestrian and install median refuge crossing with Install mid-block YIELDYIELD YIELDcrossing. new mid-block pedestrians to Redirect roundabout. single-lane Install Yield-Controlled Approach STOP YIELD Signalized Intersection Roundabout (northbound) lane). 14' inbound turn lane, and one lane, one 10' right one 10' left/through driveway to include Stripe southbound intersection. west side of east side to Bobcat from crosswalk on Relocate officer here. or traffic control crossing guard Locate a STOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOP Page 40 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Future Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 14 0 0 14 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65 Heavy Vehicles, % 17 25 2 2 8 2 Mvmt Flow 9 74 437 86 418 577 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1633 276 0 0 537 0 Stage 1 494 - - - - - Stage 2 1139 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 7.4 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.67 3.55 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 79 657 - - 987 - Stage 1 538 - - - - - Stage 2 238 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 44 648 - - 974 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 44 - - - - - Stage 1 531 - - - - - Stage 2 134 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 25.6 0 4.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 257 974 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.323 0.43 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 25.6 11.5 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.3 2.2 - Attachment 1 - Page 1 of 78 Page 41 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Future Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 225 169 3 326 0 0 562 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 613 163 562 0 - - - Stage 1 332 - - - - - - Stage 2 281 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 424 853 632 - 0 0 - Stage 1 699 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 741 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 421 853 632 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 421 - - - - - - Stage 1 695 - - - - - - Stage 2 741 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.5 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 421 853 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.534 0.198 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 22.9 10.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 3.1 0.7 - Attachment 1 - Page 2 of 78 Page 42 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Future Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 7 1 296 486 228 522 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1258 391 522 0 0 782 0 Stage 1 541 - - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 163 608 670 - - 832 - Stage 1 548 - - - - - - Stage 2 445 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 118 608 670 - - 832 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 118 - - - - - - Stage 1 546 - - - - - - Stage 2 323 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.3 0 3.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 178 832 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.094 0.274 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.3 10.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 1.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 3 of 78 Page 43 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 49.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 219 321 158 352 307 77 Future Vol, veh/h 219 321 158 352 307 77 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 16 16 0 0 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 175 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 267 391 193 429 374 94 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1041 266 484 0 - 0 Stage 1 437 - - - - - Stage 2 604 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 226 732 1075 - - - Stage 1 619 - - - - - Stage 2 508 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 179 710 1059 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 179 - - - - - Stage 1 499 - - - - - Stage 2 500 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 129.7 2.8 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1059 - 179 710 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.182 - 1.492 0.551 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 - 296.3 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 16.9 3.4 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 4 of 78 Page 44 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 50.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 411 192 216 374 166 164 Future Vol, veh/h 411 192 216 374 166 164 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 17 2 0 17 2 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 125 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 462 216 243 420 187 184 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 695 0 1300 358 Stage 1 - - - - 587 - Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 897 - ~ 153 638 Stage 1 - - - - 519 - Stage 2 - - - - 447 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 882 - ~ 107 626 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 107 - Stage 1 - - - - 511 - Stage 2 - - - - 318 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.9 227.3 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 107 626 - - 882 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.743 0.294 - - 0.275 - HCM Control Delay (s) $ 439 13.1 - - 10.6 - HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 14.7 1.2 - - 1.1 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 5 of 78 Page 45 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 182.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Future Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 16 0 10 19 0 25 10 0 19 25 0 16 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 203 495 10 47 590 599 8 4 82 99 1 178 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1214 0 0 524 0 0 1331 2233 297 1690 1939 636 Stage 1 - - - - - - 925 925 - 1009 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 406 1308 - 681 930 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 - - 1039 - - 113 42 699 ~ 61 65 421 Stage 1 - - - - - - 290 346 - 257 316 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 593 228 - 407 344 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 556 - - 1020 - - 38 21 670 ~ 28 33 405 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 38 21 - ~ 28 33 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 181 216 - 159 256 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 270 185 - 217 215 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.3 0.6 43.2 $ 1487.7 HCM LOS E F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 184 556 - - 1020 - - 69 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.509 0.364 - - 0.047 - - 4.032 HCM Control Delay (s) 43.2 15.1 - - 8.7 0.6 -$ 1487.7 HCM Lane LOS E C - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.5 1.7 - - 0.1 - - 29.7 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 6 of 78 Page 46 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 89.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 373 535 117 245 304 Future Vol, veh/h 55 373 535 117 245 304 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 4 4 0 0 6 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 69 466 669 146 306 380 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1919 353 692 0 - 0 Stage 1 502 - - - - - Stage 2 1417 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.88 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.88 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.88 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.54 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 58 643 899 - - - Stage 1 568 - - - - - Stage 2 186 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 14 637 894 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 14 - - - - - Stage 1 142 - - - - - Stage 2 185 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s $ 317 16.4 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 894 - 14 637 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.748 - 4.911 0.732 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 19.9 -$ 2300.7 24.5 - - HCM Lane LOS C - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.1 - 9.5 6.3 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 7 of 78 Page 47 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Future Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 3 0 22 1 3 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 12 2 23 2 33 2 Mvmt Flow 119 173 519 17 1 32 271 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 293 0 0 536 558 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - - - Stage 2 224 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 7.14 - - 6.44 4.76 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.94 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.94 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.57 3.42 - - 2.52 2.53 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 674 - - 657 822 - Stage 1 528 - - - - - - Stage 2 777 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 298 658 - - 788 788 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 298 - - - - - - Stage 1 517 - - - - - - Stage 2 729 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.8 0 1.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 441 788 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.662 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.8 9.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - D A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 4.7 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 8 of 78 Page 48 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Future Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Mvmt Flow 173 134 3 390 0 0 369 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 586 200 369 0 - - - Stage 1 396 - - - - - - Stage 2 190 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 441 808 838 - 0 0 - Stage 1 649 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 823 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 437 804 838 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 437 - - - - - - Stage 1 646 - - - - - - Stage 2 819 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 437 804 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.395 0.166 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 18.5 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.9 0.6 - Attachment 1 - Page 9 of 78 Page 49 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Future Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 30 353 120 1 43 499 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 763 249 0 0 473 479 0 Stage 1 419 - - - - - - Stage 2 344 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 6.44 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.52 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 341 751 - - 720 1080 - Stage 1 632 - - - - - - Stage 2 689 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 323 742 - - 1058 1058 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 323 - - - - - - Stage 1 628 - - - - - - Stage 2 657 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.9 0 0.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 367 1058 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.386 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.9 8.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.8 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 10 of 78 Page 50 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 275 285 362 345 103 Future Vol, veh/h 52 275 285 362 345 103 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 11 39 39 0 0 11 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 175 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 57 302 313 398 379 113 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1311 324 531 0 - 0 Stage 1 475 - - - - - Stage 2 836 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 150 672 1033 - - - Stage 1 592 - - - - - Stage 2 386 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 95 623 995 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 95 - - - - - Stage 1 391 - - - - - Stage 2 372 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.6 4.5 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 995 - 95 623 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.315 - 0.602 0.485 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - 88.5 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS B - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - 2.8 2.7 - - Attachment 1 - Page 11 of 78 Page 51 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 16.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 471 153 114 462 128 111 Future Vol, veh/h 471 153 114 462 128 111 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 67 44 0 67 44 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 125 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 506 165 123 497 138 119 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 738 0 1218 447 Stage 1 - - - - 656 - Stage 2 - - - - 562 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 864 - 173 559 Stage 1 - - - - 478 - Stage 2 - - - - 534 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 809 - ~ 129 501 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 129 - Stage 1 - - - - 447 - Stage 2 - - - - 424 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 94.9 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 129 501 - - 809 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.067 0.238 - - 0.152 - HCM Control Delay (s) 164.7 14.4 - - 10.2 - HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.7 0.9 - - 0.5 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 12 of 78 Page 52 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 25.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Future Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 56 9 0 10 56 0 9 10 0 57 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 605 1 49 568 66 5 0 79 115 0 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 691 0 0 662 0 0 1197 1547 369 1165 1514 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 758 758 - 756 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 789 - 409 758 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.56 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.53 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 900 - - 922 - - 141 113 628 148 119 573 Stage 1 - - - - - - 365 413 - 364 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 400 - 588 413 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 - - 873 - - 96 87 589 ~ 107 92 512 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 96 87 - ~ 107 92 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 326 369 - 325 357 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 415 345 - 476 369 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 1 15 202 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 443 851 - - 873 - - 157 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.191 0.056 - - 0.056 - - 1.225 HCM Control Delay (s) 15 9.5 - - 9.4 0.4 - 202 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.2 - - 0.2 - - 11 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 13 of 78 Page 53 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 04/19/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 21.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 495 466 209 234 111 Future Vol, veh/h 69 495 466 209 234 111 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 6 6 0 0 8 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 125 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 2 2 2 3 2 Mvmt Flow 76 544 512 230 257 122 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1473 204 387 0 - 0 Stage 1 326 - - - - - Stage 2 1147 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.88 6.94 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.88 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.88 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.54 3.32 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 115 803 1168 - - - Stage 1 698 - - - - - Stage 2 261 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 63 792 1159 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 63 - - - - - Stage 1 387 - - - - - Stage 2 259 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 52 7.3 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1159 - 63 792 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.442 - 1.204 0.687 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - 289.7 18.9 - - HCM Lane LOS B - F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.3 - 6.2 5.6 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 14 of 78 Page 54 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Future Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 14 0 0 14 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65 Heavy Vehicles, % 17 25 2 2 8 2 Mvmt Flow 9 74 437 86 418 577 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1633 276 0 0 537 0 Stage 1 494 - - - - - Stage 2 1139 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 7.4 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.67 3.55 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 79 657 - - 987 - Stage 1 538 - - - - - Stage 2 238 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 44 648 - - 974 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 44 - - - - - Stage 1 531 - - - - - Stage 2 134 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 25.6 0 4.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 257 974 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.323 0.43 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 25.6 11.5 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.3 2.2 - Attachment 1 - Page 15 of 78 Page 55 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Future Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 225 169 3 326 0 0 562 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 613 163 562 0 - - - Stage 1 332 - - - - - - Stage 2 281 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 424 853 632 - 0 0 - Stage 1 699 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 741 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 421 853 632 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 421 - - - - - - Stage 1 695 - - - - - - Stage 2 741 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.5 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 421 853 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.534 0.198 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 22.9 10.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 3.1 0.7 - Attachment 1 - Page 16 of 78 Page 56 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Future Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 7 1 296 486 228 522 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1258 391 522 0 0 782 0 Stage 1 541 - - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 163 608 670 - - 832 - Stage 1 548 - - - - - - Stage 2 445 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 118 608 670 - - 832 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 118 - - - - - - Stage 1 546 - - - - - - Stage 2 323 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.3 0 3.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 178 832 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.094 0.274 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.3 10.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 1.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 17 of 78 Page 57 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Future Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 19.0 19.0 18.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 28.8% 28.8% 23.8% 23.8% 22.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 21.0 21.0 17.0 17.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.57 0.51 0.57 0.66 Control Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 LOS C A C C C Approach Delay 16.6 33.2 32.3 Approach LOS B C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 18 of 78 Page 58 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 391 193 429 468 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.57 0.51 0.57 0.66 Control Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.4 6.4 34.1 32.7 32.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 116 0 107 124 105 Queue Length 95th (ft) 170 43 157 157 138 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 464 690 376 752 710 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.57 0.51 0.57 0.66 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 19 of 78 Page 59 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Future Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 20.0 20.0 17.0 17.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 28.8% 25.0% 25.0% 21.3% 21.3% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 21.0 18.0 18.0 15.0 15.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.22 0.22 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.56 0.42 Control Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 LOS D D D D A Approach Delay 40.3 40.4 22.6 Approach LOS D D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 10 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 36.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 20 of 78 Page 60 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 678 243 420 187 184 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.56 0.42 Control Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.3 43.2 38.8 37.1 8.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 124 111 86 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 210 m150 m128 149 50 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 935 398 796 331 441 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.56 0.42 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 21 of 78 Page 61 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 140.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Future Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 16 0 10 19 0 25 10 0 19 25 0 16 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 203 495 10 47 590 599 8 4 82 99 1 178 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1214 0 0 524 0 0 1331 2233 297 1690 1939 636 Stage 1 - - - - - - 925 925 - 1009 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 406 1308 - 681 930 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 - - 1216 - - 145 43 *954 ~ 72 70 421 Stage 1 - - - - - - 376 410 - 257 316 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 593 228 - 549 408 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 556 - - 1194 - - 49 22 *915 ~ 35 36 405 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 49 22 - ~ 35 36 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 234 256 - 159 264 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 279 190 - 305 255 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.3 0.6 32.5 $ 1146.4 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 222 556 - - 1194 - - 84 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.422 0.364 - - 0.04 - - 3.312 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.5 15.1 - - 8.1 0.5 -$ 1146.4 HCM Lane LOS D C - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 1.7 - - 0.1 - - 28 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 22 of 78 Page 62 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 9 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Future Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 2 4 4 8 12 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 2 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 31.0 31.0 14.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 18.8% 18.8% 38.8% 38.8% 17.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 13.0 13.0 29.0 29.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Control Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 LOS D B E B C Approach Delay 21.0 64.7 34.6 Approach LOS C E C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 10 (13%), Referenced to phase 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.04 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 23 of 78 Page 63 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 10 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 466 669 146 686 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Control Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.0 18.7 75.1 17.3 34.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 82 ~368 25 93 Queue Length 95th (ft) m57 119 #467 38 #132 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 282 642 641 1270 760 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.73 1.04 0.11 0.90 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 24 of 78 Page 64 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Future Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 3 0 22 1 3 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 12 2 23 2 33 2 Mvmt Flow 119 173 519 17 1 32 271 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 293 0 0 536 558 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - - - Stage 2 224 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 7.14 - - 6.44 4.76 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.94 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.94 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.57 3.42 - - 2.52 2.53 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 674 - - 657 822 - Stage 1 528 - - - - - - Stage 2 777 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 298 658 - - 788 788 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 298 - - - - - - Stage 1 517 - - - - - - Stage 2 729 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.8 0 1.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 441 788 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.662 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.8 9.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - D A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 4.7 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 25 of 78 Page 65 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Future Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Mvmt Flow 173 134 3 390 0 0 369 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 586 200 369 0 - - - Stage 1 396 - - - - - - Stage 2 190 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 441 808 838 - 0 0 - Stage 1 649 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 823 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 437 804 838 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 437 - - - - - - Stage 1 646 - - - - - - Stage 2 819 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 437 804 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.395 0.166 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 18.5 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.9 0.6 - Attachment 1 - Page 26 of 78 Page 66 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Future Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 30 353 120 1 43 499 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 763 249 0 0 473 479 0 Stage 1 419 - - - - - - Stage 2 344 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 6.44 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.52 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 341 751 - - 720 1080 - Stage 1 632 - - - - - - Stage 2 689 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 323 742 - - 1058 1058 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 323 - - - - - - Stage 1 628 - - - - - - Stage 2 657 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.9 0 0.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 367 1058 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.386 0.042 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.9 8.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.8 0.1 - Attachment 1 - Page 27 of 78 Page 67 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Future Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 27.0 27.0 16.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 21.3% 21.3% 33.8% 33.8% 20.0% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 15.0 15.0 25.0 25.0 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.31 0.31 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.58 0.57 0.36 0.79 Control Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 LOS C A D D D Approach Delay 12.0 38.9 39.3 Approach LOS B D D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 28 of 78 Page 68 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 302 313 398 492 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.58 0.57 0.36 0.79 Control Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.9 8.8 42.0 36.4 39.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 0 170 113 114 Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 66 251 158 #185 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 331 519 553 1105 625 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.58 0.57 0.36 0.79 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Attachment 1 - Page 29 of 78 Page 69 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Future Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 12 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 19.0 19.0 14.0 14.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 33.8% 23.8% 23.8% 17.5% 17.5% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 25.0 17.0 17.0 12.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.52 0.38 Control Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 LOS C D D D B Approach Delay 34.7 47.3 25.8 Approach LOS C D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 30 of 78 Page 70 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 671 123 497 138 119 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.52 0.38 Control Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.7 44.1 48.2 39.2 10.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 164 65 140 64 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m226 m86 m173 120 44 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1067 376 752 265 312 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.52 0.38 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 31 of 78 Page 71 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Future Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 56 9 0 10 56 0 9 10 0 57 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 605 1 49 568 66 5 0 79 115 0 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 691 0 0 662 0 0 1197 1547 369 1165 1514 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 758 758 - 756 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 789 - 409 758 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.56 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.53 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 900 - - 1195 - - 234 148 *876 *248 156 573 Stage 1 - - - - - - 609 577 - *364 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 400 - *824 577 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 - - 1131 - - 161 117 *822 *191 123 512 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 161 117 - *191 123 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 544 516 - *325 365 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 424 353 - *696 516 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0.8 11.4 52.4 HCM LOS B F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 651 851 - - 1131 - - 255 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.13 0.056 - - 0.043 - - 0.754 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 9.5 - - 8.3 0.2 - 52.4 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - - 5.4 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 32 of 78 Page 72 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 9 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Future Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Turn Type Prot Perm Split NA NA Protected Phases 2 4 4 8 12 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 2 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 19.0 30.0 30.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 23.8% 23.8% 37.5% 37.5% 13.8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 17.0 17.0 28.0 28.0 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.35 0.35 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Control Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 LOS D C D B D Approach Delay 22.9 31.5 47.6 Approach LOS C C D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 33 of 78 Page 73 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 10 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 544 512 230 379 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Control Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.9 20.9 37.3 18.6 47.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 143 230 41 78 Queue Length 95th (ft) m67 209 #397 66 #154 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 368 757 619 1238 443 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.72 0.83 0.19 0.86 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 34 of 78 Page 74 of 186 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Future Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 45.0 31.0 31.0 7.0 11.0 17.0 Total Split (%) 17.5% 56.3% 38.8% 38.8% 8.8% 13.8% 21% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.5 43.0 29.0 5.0 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.54 0.36 0.06 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.27 0.97 0.56 1.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 LOS F A C C F Approach Delay (s/veh) 30.6 29.3 25.0 100.5 Approach LOS C C C F Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 38.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 35 of 78 Page 75 of 186 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 505 1236 94 278 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.27 0.97 0.56 1.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 94.1 5.0 29.3 25.0 100.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 92 26 130 6 ~112 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#177 40 m130 38 #201 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 210 1897 1274 169 261 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 0.27 0.97 0.56 1.07 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 36 of 78 Page 76 of 186 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 7.0 35.0 28.0 28.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 8.8% 43.8% 35.0% 35.0% 12.5% 18.8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.0 33.0 26.0 8.0 13.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.41 0.33 0.10 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.68 0.37 0.60 Control Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 LOS C B B B C Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.1 15.1 14.8 28.6 Approach LOS B B B C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 37 of 78 Page 77 of 186 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Traffic Control Officer H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Additional officer.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 606 683 84 192 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.68 0.37 0.60 Control Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 31.0 13.9 15.1 14.8 28.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 154 47 2 57 Queue Length 95th (ft) m32 216 m78 43 124 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 110 1459 1004 226 319 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.42 0.68 0.37 0.60 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 38 of 78 Page 78 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Future Vol, veh/h 6 48 284 56 272 375 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 14 0 0 14 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65 Heavy Vehicles, % 17 25 2 2 8 2 Mvmt Flow 9 74 437 86 418 577 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1633 276 0 0 537 0 Stage 1 494 - - - - - Stage 2 1139 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 7.4 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.67 3.55 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 90 *917 - - 1121 - Stage 1 672 - - - - - Stage 2 238 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 54 *905 - - 1106 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 54 - - - - - Stage 1 663 - - - - - Stage 2 146 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 19.6 0 4.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 329 1106 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.253 0.378 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 19.6 10.2 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 1.8 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 39 of 78 Page 79 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Future Vol, veh/h 153 115 2 222 0 0 382 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 225 169 3 326 0 0 562 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 613 163 562 0 - - - Stage 1 332 - - - - - - Stage 2 281 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 506 *1011 632 - 0 0 - Stage 1 812 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 741 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 503 *1011 632 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 503 - - - - - - Stage 1 807 - - - - - - Stage 2 741 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.2 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 503 1011 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.447 0.167 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 17.8 9.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 2.3 0.6 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 40 of 78 Page 80 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Future Vol, veh/h 7 5 1 213 350 164 376 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 7 1 296 486 228 522 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1258 391 522 0 0 782 0 Stage 1 541 - - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 183 747 670 - - 889 - Stage 1 627 - - - - - - Stage 2 445 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 136 747 670 - - 889 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 136 - - - - - - Stage 1 625 - - - - - - Stage 2 331 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 24 0 3.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 206 889 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.081 0.256 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 24 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 1 - Attachment 1 - Page 41 of 78 Page 81 of 186 Timings 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Future Volume (vph) 219 321 158 352 307 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Detector Phase 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 43.0 23.0 23.0 57.0 34.0 Total Split (%) 43.0% 23.0% 23.0% 57.0% 34.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 20.7 30.3 65.8 70.3 56.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.30 0.66 0.70 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.65 0.30 0.17 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 LOS D B A A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 29.5 5.5 12.0 Approach LOS C A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 86 (86%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:NBSB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 42 of 78 Page 82 of 186 Queues 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 391 193 429 468 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.65 0.30 0.17 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.4 16.6 6.6 5.0 12.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 160 94 19 22 68 Queue Length 95th (ft) 201 121 81 80 113 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 681 728 764 2489 1931 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.54 0.25 0.17 0.24 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 43 of 78 Page 83 of 186 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Future Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Turn Type NA D.P+P NA Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 5 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 5 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 43.0 28.0 71.0 29.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 43.0% 28.0% 71.0% 29.0% 28.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max Max None Act Effct Green (s) 51.1 62.0 66.5 24.5 35.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.62 0.67 0.25 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.48 0.18 0.43 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 LOS B A A D A Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.7 5.6 19.8 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 87 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 44 of 78 Page 84 of 186 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 678 243 420 187 184 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.48 0.18 0.43 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.7 7.6 4.4 35.6 3.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 148 42 37 101 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 118 m48 37 165 37 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1724 683 2353 433 849 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.36 0.18 0.43 0.22 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 45 of 78 Page 85 of 186 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals 5:01 pm 04/19/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 136.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Future Vol, veh/h 158 386 8 37 460 467 6 3 64 77 1 139 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 16 0 10 19 0 25 10 0 19 25 0 16 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 203 495 10 47 590 599 8 4 82 99 1 178 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1214 0 0 524 0 0 1331 2233 297 1690 1939 636 Stage 1 - - - - - - 925 925 - 1009 1009 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 406 1308 - 681 930 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 - - 1227 - - 147 43 *949 ~ 74 70 421 Stage 1 - - - - - - 381 414 - 257 316 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 593 228 - 558 411 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 556 - - 1204 - - 50 22 *910 ~ 36 37 405 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 50 22 - ~ 36 37 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 237 258 - 159 264 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 279 191 - 310 256 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.3 0.5 32.3 $ 1109.9 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 223 556 - - 1204 - - 86 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.42 0.364 - - 0.039 - - 3.235 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.3 15.1 - - 8.1 0.5 -$ 1109.9 HCM Lane LOS D C - - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 1.7 - - 0.1 - - 27.8 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 46 of 78 Page 86 of 186 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Future Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 29.0 46.0 46.0 71.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 29.0% 46.0% 46.0% 71.0% 25.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.3 43.7 77.2 81.7 42.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.44 0.77 0.82 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.61 0.79 0.05 0.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 LOS D B B A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.5 14.5 14.7 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 5 (5%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 14.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 47 of 78 Page 87 of 186 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 466 669 146 686 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.61 0.79 0.05 0.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.1 10.6 17.2 2.1 14.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 47 177 6 88 Queue Length 95th (ft) 62 38 235 13 146 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 425 889 966 2862 1533 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.52 0.69 0.05 0.45 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 48 of 78 Page 88 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 1: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 1 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Future Vol, veh/h 89 130 389 13 1 24 203 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 22 3 0 22 1 3 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 125 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 12 2 23 2 33 2 Mvmt Flow 119 173 519 17 1 32 271 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 293 0 0 536 558 0 Stage 1 550 - - - - - - Stage 2 224 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 7.14 - - 6.44 4.76 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.94 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.94 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.57 3.42 - - 2.52 2.53 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 454 *921 - - 954 1013 - Stage 1 697 - - - - - - Stage 2 777 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 420 *899 - - 984 984 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 420 - - - - - - Stage 1 683 - - - - - - Stage 2 735 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 0 1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 614 984 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.476 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.1 8.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 2.6 0.1 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 49 of 78 Page 89 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 2: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 2 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Future Vol, veh/h 133 103 2 300 0 0 284 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Mvmt Flow 173 134 3 390 0 0 369 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 586 200 369 0 - - - Stage 1 396 - - - - - - Stage 2 190 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 6.44 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.52 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 577 *980 838 - 0 0 - Stage 1 805 - - - 0 0 - Stage 2 823 - - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 571 *976 838 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 571 - - - - - - Stage 1 801 - - - - - - Stage 2 819 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.9 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1WBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 571 976 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.302 0.137 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 14 9.3 - HCM Lane LOS - B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.3 0.5 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 50 of 78 Page 90 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 3: Bobcat Blvd & HS Drive 3 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Future Vol, veh/h 88 24 279 95 1 34 394 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 30 353 120 1 43 499 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 763 249 0 0 473 479 0 Stage 1 419 - - - - - - Stage 2 344 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 6.44 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.52 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 434 *980 - - 958 1225 - Stage 1 782 - - - - - - Stage 2 689 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 1 - - 1 1 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 414 *969 - - 1208 1208 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 414 - - - - - - Stage 1 777 - - - - - - Stage 2 660 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.9 0 0.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 472 1208 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.3 0.037 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.9 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.2 0.1 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 51 of 78 Page 91 of 186 Timings 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Future Volume (vph) 52 275 285 362 345 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Detector Phase 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 35.0 32.0 32.0 65.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 35.0% 32.0% 32.0% 65.0% 33.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.6 21.1 79.9 85.3 66.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.21 0.80 0.85 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.66 0.40 0.13 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 LOS D B A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.0 1.4 8.0 Approach LOS C A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 24 (24%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:NBSB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 8.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd Attachment 1 - Page 52 of 78 Page 92 of 186 Queues 4: Bobcat Blvd & Marshall Creek Rd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 302 313 398 492 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.66 0.40 0.13 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 19.2 2.3 0.7 8.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 67 8 5 56 Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 126 24 14 109 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 396 791 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 125 Base Capacity (vph) 539 657 955 3018 2254 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.46 0.33 0.13 0.22 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 53 of 78 Page 93 of 186 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Future Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Turn Type NA D.P+P NA Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 5 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 5 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 50.0 19.0 69.0 31.0 19.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 19.0% 69.0% 31.0% 19.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max Max None Act Effct Green (s) 51.9 60.0 64.5 26.5 34.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.60 0.65 0.27 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.27 0.22 0.29 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 LOS B A A C A Approach Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.0 18.9 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 83 (83%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 10.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 54 of 78 Page 94 of 186 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 671 123 497 138 119 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.27 0.22 0.29 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 11.5 5.6 4.9 31.4 4.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 110 24 54 70 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 27 52 123 33 Internal Link Dist (ft) 396 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1702 562 2282 469 682 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.17 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 55 of 78 Page 95 of 186 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd 05/07/2024 Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals 5:30 pm 04/19/2024 Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Future Vol, veh/h 44 557 1 45 523 61 5 0 73 106 0 71 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 57 0 56 9 0 10 56 0 9 10 0 57 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 250 - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 605 1 49 568 66 5 0 79 115 0 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 691 0 0 662 0 0 1197 1547 369 1165 1514 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 758 758 - 756 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 789 - 409 758 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.56 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.53 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 900 - - 1239 - - 250 153 *855 *266 163 573 Stage 1 - - - - - - 651 603 - *364 414 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 400 - *804 603 - Platoon blocked, % - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 - - 1173 - - 173 121 *802 *204 129 512 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 173 121 - *204 129 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 582 539 - *325 366 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 426 354 - *677 539 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0.8 11.4 46 HCM LOS B E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 650 851 - - 1173 - - 269 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.13 0.056 - - 0.042 - - 0.715 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 9.5 - - 8.2 0.2 - 46 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - 0.1 - - 5 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Attachment 1 - Page 56 of 78 Page 96 of 186 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Future Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 47.0 47.0 73.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 27.0% 47.0% 47.0% 73.0% 26.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 30.9 76.8 81.3 55.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.31 0.77 0.81 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.56 0.08 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 LOS D C A A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 26.0 4.5 10.8 Approach LOS C A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 8 (8%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 13.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 57 of 78 Page 97 of 186 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 544 512 230 379 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.56 0.08 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 23.3 5.6 2.2 10.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 165 64 11 47 Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 229 121 23 95 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 390 922 1123 2875 1876 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.59 0.46 0.08 0.20 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 58 of 78 Page 98 of 186 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Future Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 3 1 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 2 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 16.0 62.0 46.0 46.0 15.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 16.0% 62.0% 46.0% 46.0% 15.0% 23.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 53.0 57.5 41.5 7.2 23.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.58 0.42 0.07 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.50 0.62 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 LOS D A C C C Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 68 (68%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 23.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 59 of 78 Page 99 of 186 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 505 1236 94 278 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.50 0.62 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.4 6.9 25.3 22.1 32.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 41 316 7 115 Queue Length 95th (ft) 123 52 240 40 174 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 279 2028 1377 238 448 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 0.90 0.39 0.62 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 60 of 78 Page 100 of 186 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 0 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm NA NA NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 2 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 10.0 66.0 56.0 56.0 18.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 9.1% 60.0% 50.9% 50.9% 16.4% 23.6% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 57.9 61.5 53.5 6.3 30.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.56 0.49 0.06 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.47 0.45 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 LOS B B C B B Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.3 20.2 13.9 17.9 Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 61 of 78 Page 101 of 186 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Signals H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Signalization 2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 606 683 84 192 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.47 0.45 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 12.0 13.4 20.2 13.9 17.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 113 165 0 48 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 148 218 33 117 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 Base Capacity (vph) 363 1978 1463 283 529 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.47 0.30 0.36 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 62 of 78 Page 102 of 186 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Future Volume (vph) 411 216 374 166 164 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 22.0 15.0 15.0 13.0 13.0 Total Split (%) 44.0% 30.0% 30.0% 26.0% 26.0% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 13.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.26 0.26 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.53 0.46 0.48 0.38 Control Delay (s/veh) 6.7 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 6.8 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 LOS A B A C A Approach Delay (s/veh) 6.8 9.6 14.0 Approach LOS A A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 9.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 63 of 78 Page 103 of 186 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 678 243 420 187 184 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.53 0.46 0.48 0.38 Control Delay (s/veh) 6.7 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 6.8 11.6 8.5 21.9 6.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 51 41 33 48 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 m66 m48 95 38 Internal Link Dist (ft) 180 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1448 460 920 389 486 Starvation Cap Reductn 186 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.53 0.46 0.48 0.38 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 64 of 78 Page 104 of 186 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 467 3 1 Future Volume (vph) 158 386 37 460 467 3 1 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 22.0 52.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 9.0 19.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 22.0% 52.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 9.0% 19.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 17.5 50.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.50 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 0.73 0.71 0.52 0.82 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 LOS D B C A C D Approach Delay (s/veh) 22.3 20.3 24.0 49.1 Approach LOS C C C D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 24.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 65 of 78 Page 105 of 186 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 505 637 599 94 278 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 0.73 0.71 0.52 0.82 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.3 11.4 32.0 7.9 24.0 49.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 131 93 181 30 7 126 Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 107 194 49 42 #184 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 150 Base Capacity (vph) 309 1764 875 844 181 340 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 0.73 0.71 0.52 0.82 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Attachment 1 - Page 66 of 78 Page 106 of 186 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Future Volume (vph) 55 373 535 117 245 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 29.0 46.0 46.0 71.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 29.0% 46.0% 46.0% 71.0% 25.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.3 50.8 77.2 81.7 35.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.51 0.77 0.82 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.54 0.74 0.05 0.52 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 LOS D A C A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 8.7 17.4 16.3 Approach LOS A B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 79 (79%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 14.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 67 of 78 Page 107 of 186 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 466 669 146 686 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.54 0.74 0.05 0.52 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.5 4.3 20.7 2.1 16.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 29 197 6 102 Queue Length 95th (ft) m63 28 276 13 132 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 425 871 908 2862 1324 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.54 0.74 0.05 0.52 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 68 of 78 Page 108 of 186 Timings 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 628 540 Future Volume (vph) 628 540 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 4 8 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 80.0 80.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 80.0% 80.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 75.5 75.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 13.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.5 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 14.2 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 4.0 14.2 Approach LOS A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.26 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 8.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 69 of 78 Page 109 of 186 Queues 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 683 587 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 13.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.5 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 14.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 146 Queue Length 95th (ft) 75 171 Internal Link Dist (ft) 143 180 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 2671 2671 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1597 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.55 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 70 of 78 Page 110 of 186 Timings 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Future Volume (vph) 471 114 462 128 111 Turn Type NA Split NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 6 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total Split (s) 21.0 16.0 16.0 13.0 13.0 Total Split (%) 42.0% 32.0% 32.0% 26.0% 26.0% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 19.0 14.0 14.0 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.28 0.28 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.35 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 7.6 9.8 19.6 6.4 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 9.0 7.6 9.8 19.8 6.4 LOS A A A B A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.0 9.3 13.6 Approach LOS A A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 9.9 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 71 of 78 Page 111 of 186 Queues 5: Parkview Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 671 123 497 138 119 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.35 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 7.6 9.8 19.6 6.4 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 9.0 7.6 9.8 19.8 6.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 63 12 45 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 86 m22 67 74 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 176 523 340 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 1333 495 990 389 416 Starvation Cap Reductn 142 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 32 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.25 0.50 0.39 0.29 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 72 of 78 Page 112 of 186 Timings 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 61 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 44 557 45 523 61 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6 12 Permitted Phases 8 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 44.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 21.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 14.0% 44.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 15.0% 21.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 42.0 28.0 28.0 13.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.41 0.72 0.14 0.31 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 LOS D B C A B C Approach Delay (s/veh) 17.8 31.3 13.6 32.3 Approach LOS B C B C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 25.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 73 of 78 Page 113 of 186 Queues 6: Off-Site Dwy/HS Drive 4 & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 606 617 66 84 192 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.41 0.72 0.14 0.31 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.0 15.6 34.0 5.8 13.6 32.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 126 186 1 3 78 Queue Length 95th (ft) m66 157 213 23 46 151 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 603 280 279 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 150 Base Capacity (vph) 212 1486 857 470 272 353 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.23 0.41 0.72 0.14 0.31 0.54 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 74 of 78 Page 114 of 186 Timings 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Future Volume (vph) 69 495 466 209 234 Turn Type Prot pm+ov D.P+P NA NA Protected Phases 6 7 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 6 7 7 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 9.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 43.0 43.0 73.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 27.0% 43.0% 43.0% 73.0% 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Min None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 27.4 76.8 81.3 59.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.27 0.77 0.81 0.59 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.58 0.08 0.19 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 LOS D D A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 43.9 4.7 9.2 Approach LOS D A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 6:EBL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 19.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 75 of 78 Page 115 of 186 Queues 7: Trophy Club Dr & Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 544 512 230 379 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.87 0.58 0.08 0.19 Control Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 49.0 43.2 5.8 2.2 9.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 243 64 11 42 Queue Length 95th (ft) m100 311 121 23 88 Internal Link Dist (ft) 603 321 332 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 390 900 1094 2875 1992 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.60 0.47 0.08 0.19 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Attachment 1 - Page 76 of 78 Page 116 of 186 Timings 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Ø12 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 620 590 Future Volume (vph) 620 590 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 4 8 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 80.0 80.0 20.0 Total Split (%) 80.0% 80.0% 20% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 75.5 75.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 16.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.6 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 17.1 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) 4.0 17.1 Approach LOS A B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.25 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 10.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Bobcat Blvd Attachment 1 - Page 77 of 78 Page 117 of 186 Queues 18: Bobcat Blvd Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour with Mitigation H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\Synchro\Mitigation2.syn Synchro 11 Report Lee Engineering Lane Group EBT WBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 674 641 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 4.0 16.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.6 Total Delay (s/veh) 4.0 17.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 182 Queue Length 95th (ft) 74 185 Internal Link Dist (ft) 144 176 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 2671 2671 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1547 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.57 Intersection Summary Attachment 1 - Page 78 of 78 Page 118 of 186 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [4. 2024 AM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Attachment 2 - Page 1 of 12 Page 119 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [4. 2024 AM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Bobcat Approach 3 L2 158 3.0 193 3.0 0.616 12.2 LOS B 6.7 171.3 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 8 T1 352 3.0 429 3.0 0.616 12.2 LOS B 6.7 171.3 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 Approach 510 3.0 622 3.0 0.616 12.2 LOS B 6.7 171.3 0.69 0.69 0.94 31.0 North: SB Bobcat Approach 4 T1 307 3.0 374 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 33.7 14 R2 77 3.0 94 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 32.8 Approach 384 3.0 468 3.0 0.428 7.9 LOS A 2.6 65.6 0.48 0.34 0.48 33.5 West: EB Marshall Creek Approach 5 L2 219 3.0 267 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 28.6 12 R2 321 3.0 391 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 27.9 Approach 540 3.0 659 3.0 0.728 17.5 LOS C 11.0 281.0 0.85 1.12 1.60 28.2 All Vehicles 1434 3.0 1749 3.0 0.728 13.0 LOS B 11.0 281.0 0.69 0.76 1.07 30.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:08:44 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 2 of 12 Page 120 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [4. 2024 PM - Marshall Creek at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Bobcat Approach 3 L2 285 3.0 313 3.0 0.567 9.4 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 8 T1 362 3.0 398 3.0 0.567 9.4 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 Approach 647 3.0 711 3.0 0.567 9.4 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.33 0.15 0.33 31.9 North: SB Bobcat Approach 4 T1 345 3.0 379 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.5 0.64 0.59 0.74 32.6 14 R2 103 3.0 113 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.5 0.64 0.59 0.74 31.7 Approach 448 3.0 492 3.0 0.511 10.1 LOS B 3.7 94.5 0.64 0.59 0.74 32.4 West: EB Marshall Creek Approach 5 L2 52 3.0 57 3.0 0.400 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 32.9 12 R2 275 3.0 302 3.0 0.400 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 31.9 Approach 327 3.0 359 3.0 0.400 8.6 LOS A 2.1 53.1 0.61 0.54 0.61 32.0 All Vehicles 1422 3.0 1563 3.0 0.567 9.5 LOS A 4.7 120.2 0.49 0.38 0.52 32.1 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:10:36 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 3 of 12 Page 121 of 186 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [5. 2024 AM - Parkview at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Parkview Dr at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:15:15 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 4 of 12 Page 122 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [5. 2024 AM - Parkview at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Parkview Dr at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Parkview Approach 3 L2 166 3.0 189 3.0 0.457 10.3 LOS B 2.9 73.6 0.68 0.72 0.84 31.3 18 R2 164 3.0 186 3.0 0.457 10.3 LOS B 2.9 73.6 0.68 0.72 0.84 30.4 Approach 330 3.0 375 3.0 0.457 10.3 LOS B 2.9 73.6 0.68 0.72 0.84 30.9 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 216 3.0 245 3.0 0.610 11.3 LOS B 4.8 122.0 0.61 0.45 0.62 31.3 6 T1 374 3.0 425 3.0 0.610 11.3 LOS B 4.8 122.0 0.61 0.45 0.62 31.2 Approach 590 3.0 670 3.0 0.610 11.3 LOS B 4.8 122.0 0.61 0.45 0.62 31.2 West: EB Bobcat Approach 2 T1 411 3.0 467 3.0 0.664 13.4 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.72 0.74 1.05 31.1 12 R2 192 3.0 218 3.0 0.664 13.4 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.72 0.74 1.05 30.3 Approach 603 3.0 685 3.0 0.664 13.4 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.72 0.74 1.05 30.9 All Vehicles 1523 3.0 1731 3.0 0.664 11.9 LOS B 8.8 225.7 0.67 0.62 0.84 31.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:19:27 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 5 of 12 Page 123 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [5. 2024 PM - Parkview at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Parkview Dr at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Parkview Approach 3 L2 128 3.0 138 3.0 0.329 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.6 0.63 0.61 0.63 32.0 18 R2 111 3.0 119 3.0 0.329 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.6 0.63 0.61 0.63 31.1 Approach 239 3.0 257 3.0 0.329 8.5 LOS A 1.5 38.6 0.63 0.61 0.63 31.6 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 114 3.0 123 3.0 0.534 9.3 LOS A 3.9 99.0 0.48 0.31 0.48 32.6 6 T1 462 3.0 497 3.0 0.534 9.3 LOS A 3.9 99.0 0.48 0.31 0.48 32.5 Approach 576 3.0 619 3.0 0.534 9.3 LOS A 3.9 99.0 0.48 0.31 0.48 32.6 West: EB Bobcat Approach 2 T1 471 3.0 506 3.0 0.573 10.0 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.49 0.30 0.49 32.7 12 R2 153 3.0 165 3.0 0.573 10.0 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.49 0.30 0.49 31.8 Approach 624 3.0 671 3.0 0.573 10.0 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.49 0.30 0.49 32.5 All Vehicles 1439 3.0 1547 3.0 0.573 9.4 LOS A 4.4 113.5 0.51 0.35 0.51 32.4 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:18:35 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 6 of 12 Page 124 of 186 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [6. 2024 AM - HS Dwy 4 at Bobcat w RT Lane (Site Folder: General)] High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout with WB Right Turn Lane Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Monday, July 15, 2024 3:28:14 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 7 of 12 Page 125 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [6. 2024 AM - HS Dwy 4 at Bobcat w RT Lane (Site Folder: General)] High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout with WB Right Turn Lane Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Driveway Approach 3 L2 6 3.0 8 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 33.3 8 T1 3 3.0 4 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 33.2 18 R2 64 3.0 82 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 32.3 Approach 73 3.0 94 3.0 0.161 8.2 LOS A 0.6 15.9 0.65 0.65 0.65 32.4 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 37 3.0 47 3.0 0.565 10.1 LOS B 3.7 95.8 0.56 0.42 0.56 32.5 6 T1 460 3.0 590 3.0 0.565 10.1 LOS B 3.7 95.8 0.56 0.42 0.56 32.5 16 R2 467 3.0 599 3.0 0.527 9.3 LOS A 3.3 85.3 0.52 0.38 0.52 32.0 Approach 964 3.0 1236 3.0 0.565 9.7 LOS A 3.7 95.8 0.54 0.40 0.54 32.3 North: SB HS Driveway 4 Approach 7 L2 77 3.0 99 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 31.3 4 T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 31.3 14 R2 139 3.0 178 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 30.5 Approach 217 3.0 278 3.0 0.409 10.9 LOS B 2.2 55.9 0.70 0.76 0.88 30.8 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 158 3.0 203 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 31.5 2 T1 386 3.0 495 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 31.5 12 R2 8 3.0 10 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 30.6 Approach 552 3.0 708 3.0 0.619 11.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.38 0.57 31.5 All Vehicles 1806 3.0 2315 3.0 0.619 10.2 LOS B 5.0 129.1 0.57 0.45 0.59 31.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, July 15, 2024 3:28:16 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 8 of 12 Page 126 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [6. 2024 PM - HS Dwy 4 at Bobcat w RT Lane (Site Folder: General)] High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout with WB Right Turn Lane Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Driveway Approach 3 L2 5 3.0 5 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 33.6 8 T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 33.5 18 R2 73 3.0 79 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 32.5 Approach 79 3.0 86 3.0 0.144 7.8 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.64 0.64 0.64 32.6 East: WB Bobcat Approach 1 L2 45 3.0 49 3.0 0.471 7.5 LOS A 3.1 79.4 0.25 0.11 0.25 33.8 6 T1 523 3.0 568 3.0 0.471 7.5 LOS A 3.1 79.4 0.25 0.11 0.25 33.7 16 R2 61 3.0 66 3.0 0.050 3.1 LOS A 0.2 5.0 0.14 0.05 0.14 35.1 Approach 629 3.0 684 3.0 0.471 7.1 LOS A 3.1 79.4 0.24 0.10 0.24 33.8 North: SB HS Driveway 4 Approach 7 L2 106 3.0 115 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.9 4 T1 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.8 14 R2 71 3.0 77 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.0 Approach 178 3.0 193 3.0 0.278 8.5 LOS A 1.2 30.5 0.64 0.64 0.64 31.5 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 44 3.0 48 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 32.3 2 T1 557 3.0 605 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 32.3 12 R2 1 3.0 1 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 31.4 Approach 602 3.0 654 3.0 0.583 10.5 LOS B 4.4 112.4 0.56 0.39 0.56 32.3 All Vehicles 1488 3.0 1617 3.0 0.583 8.7 LOS A 4.4 112.4 0.44 0.31 0.44 32.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Monday, July 15, 2024 3:34:54 PM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 9 of 12 Page 127 of 186 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [7. 2024 AM - Trophy Club at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Attachment 2 - Page 10 of 12 Page 128 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7. 2024 AM - Trophy Club at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Trophy Club Approach 3 L2 535 3.0 669 3.0 0.655 11.5 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.44 0.22 0.44 30.2 8 T1 117 3.0 146 3.0 0.655 11.5 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.44 0.22 0.44 30.2 Approach 652 3.0 815 3.0 0.655 11.5 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.44 0.22 0.44 30.2 North: SB Trophy Club Approach 4 T1 245 3.0 306 3.0 0.417 10.4 LOS B 2.2 55.7 0.67 0.74 0.87 32.5 14 R2 304 3.0 380 3.0 0.517 12.6 LOS B 3.3 85.4 0.72 0.85 1.10 30.5 Approach 549 3.0 686 3.0 0.517 11.6 LOS B 3.3 85.4 0.70 0.80 1.00 31.4 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 55 4.0 69 4.0 0.552 11.0 LOS B 4.7 120.0 0.66 0.65 0.84 31.8 12 R2 373 3.0 466 3.0 0.552 10.9 LOS B 4.7 120.0 0.66 0.65 0.84 30.9 Approach 428 3.1 535 3.1 0.552 10.9 LOS B 4.7 120.0 0.66 0.65 0.84 31.1 All Vehicles 1629 3.0 2036 3.0 0.655 11.4 LOS B 6.4 165.0 0.59 0.53 0.73 30.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:27:14 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 11 of 12 Page 129 of 186 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [7. 2024 PM - Trophy Club at Bobcat (Site Folder: General)] Marshall Creek Rd at Bobcat Blvd Single-lane Roundabout Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour Site Category: (None) Roundabout Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: NB Trophy Club Approach 3 L2 466 3.0 512 3.0 0.600 10.2 LOS B 5.2 133.8 0.41 0.21 0.41 31.0 8 T1 209 3.0 230 3.0 0.600 10.2 LOS B 5.2 133.8 0.41 0.21 0.41 30.9 Approach 675 3.0 742 3.0 0.600 10.2 LOS B 5.2 133.8 0.41 0.21 0.41 31.0 North: SB Trophy Club Approach 4 T1 234 3.0 257 3.0 0.303 7.6 LOS A 1.3 33.2 0.58 0.55 0.58 33.9 14 R2 111 3.0 122 3.0 0.144 5.7 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.52 0.46 0.52 33.8 Approach 345 3.0 379 3.0 0.303 7.0 LOS A 1.3 33.2 0.56 0.52 0.56 33.9 West: EB Bobcat Approach 5 L2 69 4.0 76 4.0 0.607 11.9 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.67 0.65 0.88 31.4 12 R2 495 3.0 544 3.0 0.607 11.8 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.67 0.65 0.88 30.6 Approach 564 3.1 620 3.1 0.607 11.8 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.67 0.65 0.88 30.7 All Vehicles 1584 3.0 1741 3.0 0.607 10.1 LOS B 6.3 160.8 0.54 0.44 0.61 31.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: LEE ENGINEERING LLC | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:29:46 AM Project: H:\T2124.01 - School Area Eval-Traffic Flow_Control Devices\SIDRA\Bobcat Blvd roundabout test.sip9 Attachment 2 - Page 12 of 12 Page 130 of 186 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT – PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS A descripƟon of the evaluated warrants is provided below. Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 1 is based on the volumes from both approaches on the major street and the higher approach volume on the minor street. It also uses the number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach. Either Condition A or Condition B of this warrant must be met for Warrant 1 to be satisfied. The Texas MUTCD allows for the use of a reduced warranting threshold (70%) for intersections where the posted or 85th-percentile speed exceeds 40 mph or if the intersection is located in a community with a population under 10,000. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis. Condition A of Warrant 1 is met when, for each of any eight (8) hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to the intersection during the same eight hours. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 600 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 200 vph (higher volume approach) Condition B of Warrant 1 applies to operating conditions where the major street traffic is so heavy that it creates excessive delay or hazardous conditions for minor street traffic when entering or crossing the major street. The warrant condition is met when, for each of any eight hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to an intersection. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 900 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 100 vph (higher volume approach) A combination of Conditions A and B may be applied at locations where Conditions A and B are not satisfied. The same eight hours of the day are not required to be used for meeting both conditions. Under the combination warrant, the warranting thresholds are: Major Street: 480 vph and 720 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (total for both directions) Minor Street: 160 vph and 80 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (higher volume approach) Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Volumes Warrant 2 is satisfied when the volumes for any four (4) hours of an average day, when plotted on Figure 4C-1 (or 4C-2 when applicable) of the Texas MUTCD, fall above the curve for the appropriate number of lanes. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis and Figure 4C-1 was utilized for all four intersections. Warrant 3 – Peak Hour Volume Warrant 3 is intended for application when traffic conditions are such that for at least one (1) hour of the day, the minor street traffic experiences undue delays entering or crossing the major street. Warrant 3 is satisfied when either of the following conditions is met: 1. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day: a. The delay experienced by the traffic on the minor-street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds 4 vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach, and b. The volume on the same minor-street approach equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes, and c. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. Attachment 3 - Page 1 of 7 Page 131 of 186 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT – PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS A descripƟon of the evaluated warrants is provided below. Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 1 is based on the volumes from both approaches on the major street and the higher approach volume on the minor street. It also uses the number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach. Either Condition A or Condition B of this warrant must be met for Warrant 1 to be satisfied. The Texas MUTCD allows for the use of a reduced warranting threshold (70%) for intersections where the posted or 85th-percentile speed exceeds 40 mph or if the intersection is located in a community with a population under 10,000. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis. Condition A of Warrant 1 is met when, for each of any eight (8) hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to the intersection during the same eight hours. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 600 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 200 vph (higher volume approach) Condition B of Warrant 1 applies to operating conditions where the major street traffic is so heavy that it creates excessive delay or hazardous conditions for minor street traffic when entering or crossing the major street. The warrant condition is met when, for each of any eight hours of an average day, the warranting volumes exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor street approach to an intersection. The warranting threshold for an approach with two or more lanes on the major street and an approach with two or more lanes on the minor street is: Major Street: 900 vph (total for both directions) Minor Street: 100 vph (higher volume approach) A combination of Conditions A and B may be applied at locations where Conditions A and B are not satisfied. The same eight hours of the day are not required to be used for meeting both conditions. Under the combination warrant, the warranting thresholds are: Major Street: 480 vph and 720 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (total for both directions) Minor Street: 160 vph and 80 vph for Conditions A and B, respectively (higher volume approach) Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Volumes Warrant 2 is satisfied when the volumes for any four (4) hours of an average day, when plotted on Figure 4C-1 (or 4C-2 when applicable) of the Texas MUTCD, fall above the curve for the appropriate number of lanes. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis and Figure 4C-1 was utilized for all four intersections. Warrant 3 – Peak Hour Volume Warrant 3 is intended for application when traffic conditions are such that for at least one (1) hour of the day, the minor street traffic experiences undue delays entering or crossing the major street. Warrant 3 is satisfied when either of the following conditions is met: 1. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day: a. The delay experienced by the traffic on the minor-street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds 4 vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach, and b. The volume on the same minor-street approach equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes, and c. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. Attachment 3 - Page 2 of 7 Page 132 of 186 2. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15- minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (or Figure 4C-4) for the existing combination of approach lanes. As further specified in the Texas MUTCD: “This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.” It is unclear if traffic characteristics at these intersections fall under the unusual cases identified above. A school does tend to attract or discharge a large number of vehicles over a short time. However, schools are not specifically mentioned in the Texas MUTCD. However, Warrant 3 graphs were evaluated for reference. Since the posted speed limits (30 mph) on the major roads (Bobcat Boulevard and/or Trophy Club Road) are less than 40 mph, the reduced warranting threshold was not utilized for this analysis and Figure 4C-3 was utilized for all four intersections. For the delay portion of Warrant 3, delay was estimated using Synchro traffic analysis software, as presented in the letter. Based on this analysis, all four intersections are anticipated to meet the delay portion of Warrant 3 during the AM peak hour. Additionally, all intersections except at Marshall Creek Road are anticipated to meet delay thresholds during the School PM peak hour. See the estimated delay values for each intersection below for reference. Intersection Delay in Vehicle-Hours for Minor Street Approach AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Hour Marshall Creek at Bobcat 19.5 2.5 Parkview at Bobcat 20.8 6.3 High School Dwy 4 at Bobcat 89.7 9.9 Bobcat at Trophy Club 37.7 8.1 Warrant 5 – School Crossing This warrant applies at an established school crossing where a traffic engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of school children at the school crossing shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic during the period when the children are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period and there are a minimum of 20 school children during the highest crossing hour. This warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 300 feet, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict progression. It is recommended to consider implementing other remedial measures prior to signal installation, such as warning signs/flashers, school speed zones, crossing guards, and grade-separated crossings. Each of the four intersections has at least one marked crosswalk on the major roadway. As identified in Table 6 of the letter, there are enough pedestrians crossing to satisfy this warrant at all intersections except the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive. As previously noted, gap studies were not performed as part of this work effort. For reference, the length of gap required is based on average walking speed (assumed 3.5 ft/sec), pedestrian start-up and clearance time (assumed 5 seconds) and crossing distance. The crossing distance is impacted by whether a median exists such that a pedestrian can stop in the median to wait for additional gaps in traffic and thus make a two-stage crossing. At the intersections at Marshall Creek Road and at Parkview Drive, there is a median present and the crossing may be completed in two stages. When treated as a two-stage crossing, the crossing distance across Bobcat Boulevard at the crosswalk is approximately 42 feet from the center of curb ramp to center of the median. In this case, pedestrians would require a 17-second gap in vehicular traffic to cross each leg of Bobcat Boulevard. At the High School Driveway 4 intersection, there is no median and the crossing distance across Bobcat Boulevard at the crosswalk is approximately 50 feet from the center of curb ramp to center of curb ramp. In this case, pedestrians would require a 19-second gap in vehicular traffic to cross the entirety of Bobcat Boulevard. In order to evaluate whether an adequate number of gaps exists, a gap study would be required on Bobcat Boulevard. However, as noted above, this warrant recommends other measures before traffic signal installation. These locations are already within a 20-mph reduced speed school zone and there are crossing guards present during school peak hours. Attachment 3 - Page 3 of 7 Page 133 of 186 Warrant 7 – Crash Experience The warrant is satisfied when: 1. Adequate trial of less restrictive remedies with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and 2. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by traffic signal control, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and 3. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1, or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 80 percent columns. Lee Engineering obtained all available crash reports that have occurred at these intersections between 2014 and present from TxDOT’s online C.R.I.S. Query tool. As noted in Table 6 of this letter, none of the intersections had five or more crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period. The highest number of crashes occurred at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive, where four (4) crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control occurred within a 12-month period. A summary of all available crash data is shown below for reference. The highest number of crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period are highlighted for each intersection. Crash ID Crash Type Potentially Correctible by Signal? Crash Date Crash Severity Light Condition Pavement Surface Condition Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard 13703655 Right Turn No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard 14352739 Right Angle YES 2/27/2015 Not Injured Daylight Slush 16538943 Fixed Object No 7/15/2018 Fatal Injury Daylight Dry 17355925 Fixed Object No 10/21/2019 Not Injured Daylight Dry 17969728 Right Angle YES 11/13/2020 Not Injured Daylight Dry High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard 15331510 Pedestrian YES 9/15/2016 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 16418931 Rear End No 5/16/2018 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19152169 Fixed Object No 10/5/2022 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 19507546 Fixed Object No 4/23/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19892782 Right Angle YES 11/6/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive 13698685 Sideswipe No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow 13757587 Fixed Object No 2/8/2014 Not Injured Daylight Dry 13836908 Left Turn YES 5/10/2014 Possible Injury Daylight Dry 15543732 Rear End No 1/15/2017 Not Injured Daylight Wet 16849370 Right Angle YES 1/10/2019 Suspected Minor Injury Dark, Lighted Dry 18785601 Rear End No 2/28/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19165980 Left Turn YES 10/8/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19458297 Right Angle YES 3/26/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19600321 Right Angle YES 6/14/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19705873 Right Angle YES 8/16/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19855903 Left Turn YES 11/4/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 20159027 Left Turn YES 4/23/2024 Not Injured Daylight Dry Warrant Volume Data The following four pages include traffic volume data and applicable graphs for Warrants 2 and 3 for each intersection. Attachment 3 - Page 4 of 7 Page 134 of 186 Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Marshall Creek Road and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Marshall Creek Rd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 306 260 566 357 0 357 11 - - Y - - - 8:00 513 376 889 428 0 428 20 Y - Y Y Y Y 15:00 449 334 783 317 0 317 16 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 647 448 1,095 327 0 327 46 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 1,915 1,418 3,333 1,429 0 1,429 93 3 1 4 3 3 2 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 5 of 7 Page 135 of 186 Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Parkview Drive and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Parkview Drive Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 514 425 939 238 238 12 Y Y Y Y Y - 8:00 546 550 1,096 342 342 14 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 415 457 872 170 170 7 - - Y Y - - 16:00 624 576 1,200 239 239 38 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,099 2,008 4,107 989 0 989 71 3 3 4 4 3 1 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 6 of 7 Page 136 of 186 High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of High School Driveway 4 and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd High School Driveway 4 Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 485 535 1,020 30 91 91 1 - Y - Y - - 8:00 484 814 1,298 84 207 207 22 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 468 439 907 48 219 219 13 Y Y Y Y Y - 16:00 602 629 1,231 78 177 177 53 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,039 2,417 4,456 240 694 694 89 3 4 3 4 3 1 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 7 of 7 Page 137 of 186 Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive are shown below. Hour Begin Trophy Club Drive Bobcat Blvd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 345 504 849 318 318 0 Y - Y Y Y - 8:00 554 467 1,021 448 448 9 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 540 268 808 414 414 0 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 675 345 1,020 564 564 13 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 2,114 1,584 3,698 1,744 0 1,744 22 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 8 of 7 Page 138 of 186 Warrant 7 – Crash Experience The warrant is satisfied when: 1. Adequate trial of less restrictive remedies with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and 2. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by traffic signal control, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and 3. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1, or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 80 percent columns. Lee Engineering obtained all available crash reports that have occurred at these intersections between 2014 and present from TxDOT’s online C.R.I.S. Query tool. As noted in Table 6 of this letter, none of the intersections had five or more crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period. The highest number of crashes occurred at the intersection of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive, where four (4) crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control occurred within a 12-month period. A summary of all available crash data is shown below for reference. The highest number of crashes susceptible to correction by traffic signal control within a 12-month period are highlighted for each intersection. Crash ID Crash Type Potentially Correctible by Signal? Crash Date Crash Severity Light Condition Pavement Surface Condition Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard 13703655 Right Turn No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard 14352739 Right Angle YES 2/27/2015 Not Injured Daylight Slush 16538943 Fixed Object No 7/15/2018 Fatal Injury Daylight Dry 17355925 Fixed Object No 10/21/2019 Not Injured Daylight Dry 17969728 Right Angle YES 11/13/2020 Not Injured Daylight Dry High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard 15331510 Pedestrian YES 9/15/2016 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 16418931 Rear End No 5/16/2018 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19152169 Fixed Object No 10/5/2022 Suspected Minor Injury Daylight Dry 19507546 Fixed Object No 4/23/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19892782 Right Angle YES 11/6/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive 13698685 Sideswipe No 2/6/2014 Not Injured Daylight Snow 13757587 Fixed Object No 2/8/2014 Not Injured Daylight Dry 13836908 Left Turn YES 5/10/2014 Possible Injury Daylight Dry 15543732 Rear End No 1/15/2017 Not Injured Daylight Wet 16849370 Right Angle YES 1/10/2019 Suspected Minor Injury Dark, Lighted Dry 18785601 Rear End No 2/28/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19165980 Left Turn YES 10/8/2022 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19458297 Right Angle YES 3/26/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19600321 Right Angle YES 6/14/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19705873 Right Angle YES 8/16/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 19855903 Left Turn YES 11/4/2023 Not Injured Daylight Dry 20159027 Left Turn YES 4/23/2024 Not Injured Daylight Dry Warrant Volume Data The following four pages include traffic volume data and applicable graphs for Warrants 2 and 3 for each intersection. Attachment 3 - Page 9 of 7 Page 139 of 186 Marshall Creek Road at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Marshall Creek Road and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Marshall Creek Rd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 306 260 566 357 0 357 11 - - Y - - - 8:00 513 376 889 428 0 428 20 Y - Y Y Y Y 15:00 449 334 783 317 0 317 16 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 647 448 1,095 327 0 327 46 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 1,915 1,418 3,333 1,429 0 1,429 93 3 1 4 3 3 2 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 10 of 7 Page 140 of 186 Parkview Drive at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Parkview Drive and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd Parkview Drive Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 514 425 939 238 238 12 Y Y Y Y Y - 8:00 546 550 1,096 342 342 14 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 415 457 872 170 170 7 - - Y Y - - 16:00 624 576 1,200 239 239 38 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,099 2,008 4,107 989 0 989 71 3 3 4 4 3 1 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 11 of 7 Page 141 of 186 High School Driveway 4 at Bobcat Boulevard The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of High School Driveway 4 and Bobcat Boulevard are shown below. Hour Begin Bobcat Blvd High School Driveway 4 Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? EB Volume WB Volume Total Volume NB Volume SB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 485 535 1,020 30 91 91 1 - Y - Y - - 8:00 484 814 1,298 84 207 207 22 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 468 439 907 48 219 219 13 Y Y Y Y Y - 16:00 602 629 1,231 78 177 177 53 Y Y Y Y Y - TOTAL 2,039 2,417 4,456 240 694 694 89 3 4 3 4 3 1 3 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 12 of 7 Page 142 of 186 Bobcat Boulevard at Trophy Club Drive The four-hour volumes and volume warrant results for the intersecƟon of Bobcat Boulevard and Trophy Club Drive are shown below. Hour Begin Trophy Club Drive Bobcat Blvd Pedestrians Crossing Major Meets Warrants? NB Volume SB Volume Total Volume EB Volume WB Volume Max Volume 1A 1B 1-Combo 2 3 A B 7:00 345 504 849 318 318 0 Y - Y Y Y - 8:00 554 467 1,021 448 448 9 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15:00 540 268 808 414 414 0 Y - Y Y Y - 16:00 675 345 1,020 564 564 13 Y Y Y Y Y Y TOTAL 2,114 1,584 3,698 1,744 0 1,744 22 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 The applicable graph for Warrant 2 is shown below. The applicable graph for Warrant 3 is shown below. Attachment 3 - Page 13 of 7 Page 143 of 186 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: July 22, 2024 FROM: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary AGENDA ITEM: Consider approval of the June 24, 2024, Town Council work session and regular meeting minutes. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Town Council held a work session and regular meeting on June 24, 2024. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Minutes 06.24.2024 ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Move to approve the June 24, 2024, Town Council work session and regular meeting minutes. Page 144 of 186 Town of Trophy Club Town Council Meeting Minutes June 24, 2024, 6:00 p.m., Work Session and Regular Meeting 1 Trophy Wood Drive, Trophy Club, Texas 76262 CALL WORK SESSION TO ORDER Mayor Tiffany called the work session to order at 6:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Steve Flynn, Mayor Pro Tem Stacey Bauer, Council Member Place 1 Jeff Beach, Council Member Place 2 Dennis Sheridan, Council Member Place 3 LuAnne Oldham, Council Member Place 5 With the following member absent: Rhylan Rowe, Council Member Place 4 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Brandon Wright, Town Manager Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Jason Wise, Fire Chief April Duvall, Director of Finance Matt Cox, Director of Community Development Denise Deprato, Director of Human Resources Chase Ellis, Director of Parks and Recreation Jill Lind, Director of Communications and Marketing WORK SESSION ITEM 1. Presentation and discussion of legal concerns regarding regulating short -term rental properties. (Dean Roggia, Town Attorney and Brandon Wright, Town Manager) Town Manager Wright and Town Attorney Roggia gave a presentation on the comprehensive process of adopting and implementing short -term rental (STR) regulations as follows and answered questions from the Town Council: Page 145 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 2 Page 146 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 3 Following discussion staff was directed to: 1. Review Rental Registration Ordinance: Staff to provide recommended language updates for the existing rental registration ordinance. 2. Identify Potential Rental Properties: Initiate a project aimed at identifying potential rental properties within Trophy Club. 3. Create Nuisance/Police Report Summary: Develop a summary of nuisance and police reports specific to rental properties once these properties have been identified. ADJOURN Mayor Tiffany adjourned the work session at 6:54 p.m. CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Tiffany, assisted by Mayor of the Day Isabella Ramos, called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Chaplain David Impwi, Chaplain at Methodist Southlake Medical Center, led the invocation. PLEDGES Mayor Pro Tem Flynn led the Pledge of Allegiance to the American and Texas Flags. Mayor Tiffany presented Isabella Ramos with a Proclamation proclaiming June 24, 2024, Isabella Ramos Mayor of a Day. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. Page 147 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 4 COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT 2. Trophy Club Stars and Stripes Tiffany Nimphius, Mindi Bone, and Kelly Castonguay gave a presentation on the Trophy Club Stars and Stripes program noting the following: • The program began in 2012 with the planting of 11,000 flags along the primary streets throughout town. It has since grown significantly, now including over 40,000 flags planted by approximately 175 volunteers. • They emphasized the importance of the volunteers, expressing a huge thank you to all of them, as the program would not be in place without their support. • They reviewed the planned activities, volunteer opportunities, and promotional strategies to maximize community participation and enjoyment. • The dedication and efforts of the volunteers were highlighted as the cornerstone of the program's success, ensuring its continued impact on the community. 3. Working for You . . . Trophy Club a) Update from Town Council Members Council Member Oldham expressed her gratitude to all community volunteers serving on boards, commissions, or corporations. She highlighted that these groups, composed of resident volunteers, play a crucial role in advising on important issues and shaping policies for the town. To join, one must be a resident and a qualified voter of Trophy Club. She encouraged residents ready to take on leadership roles to apply. Council Member Oldham shared information from a Dallas Morning News article written by Dave Leberman regarding the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA), a new state data and privacy law that goes into effect on July 1. This law allows residents to request, edit, and delete data kept on them by large companies. She encouraged residents to learn their rights under this new legislation. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn thanked Chase Ellis, Director of Parks and Recreation, for the successful pickleball public engagement pop-up event held on June 22nd at Harmony Park, which allowed the community to share their input on the future of pickleball. He encouraged residents to attend the next event scheduled for June 29th, 4 – 6 p.m., at Independence Park. Mayor Tiffany stated that she and Matt Cox, Director of Community Development, attended a North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) luncheon on June 14th. The luncheon highlighted the upcoming 2026 World Cup in North Texas, noting its significant economic impact, equivalent to hosting nine Super Bowls over a 38-day period. Page 148 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 5 b) Update from Town Manager Town Manager Wright provided the following updates: • Pickleball public engagement pop up event held on June 22 nd at Harmony Park was successful with another event scheduled on June 29th, 4 – 6 p.m., at Independence Park. • Fourth of July Planning o Patriot 5K and 1 Mile Fun Run starts at 7:15 AM o Parade of Patriots follows at 10:00 a.m. o Fireworks Celebration starts at 6:00 p.m. • Upcoming Boards and Commissions Meetings o July 15, 2024, 6:00 p.m., Parks and Recreation Board o July 15, 2024, 7:00 p.m., Economic Development Corp. Board Town Secretary Dixon provided an overview of the Town’s updated Boards and Commission webpage and portal. c) Quick Civic Tip Town Attorney Dean Roggia provided an overview of the signature authority of the mayor and town manager as outlined in the Town’s Charter. CONSENT AGENDA 4. Consider approval of the Town Council meeting minutes for the May 28, 2024, regular meeting; June 6 and 7, 2024, Town Council retreat; and the June 10, 2024, regular meeting. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) 5. Consider a developer's agreement between the Town of Trophy Club and Beldonia Town Homes, LLC for the Beldonia Townhomes and authorizing the Mayor or her designee to execute same on behalf of the Town. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) Council Member Beach moved to approve Consent Items 4-5. Mayor Pro Tem Flynn seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Sheridan, Tiffany, Oldham, Flynn NAYES: None ABSENT: Rowe VOTE: 6-0-1 Page 149 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. Case PD-AMD-24-002 PD-30 Amendment Multi-tenant Monument Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending Planned Development District (PD-30) to allow a multi-tenant monument sign with CEVMS display located at 2200-2300 SH 114 on Lot 2, Block A, of the Trophy Club Town Center Addition, of the C. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 823, Denton County, Texas. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) Mayor Tiffany opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Staff presentation: Matt Cox, Director of Community Development, gave a presentation noting the following: o The proposed multi-tenant monument sign with CEVMS does not fit in the Freestanding Development Identification Sign category in PD-30 due to the tenant advertising. o As proposed, the structure is angled southeast to 114 and specified to be 35’ tall and 17’ wide, 20 tenant panels, and one CEVMS 128 sq. ft. panel. Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) Chair Briggs advised that the P&Z unanimously recommended approval at its June 6, 2024, meeting. Mr. Arrouas, Director of Operations for the applicant, answered questions from the Town Council. No one spoke in favor. The following spoke in opposition: o Paul Jablonski, 104 Greenhill Trail S., Trophy Club, TX 76262 Mayor Tiffany closed the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. The Town Council discussed the size of the CEVMS display sign on the monument sign, the overall height of the monument sign, and expressed that the wording for Trophy Club Town Center should be at the top of the sign. The Council also raised concerns about the overall size of the display, believing it does not align with the community's aesthetic. Council members recognized the importance of supporting local businesses and their advertising efforts but emphasized the need to balance effective advertising with maintaining the town's character and appeal. The consensus was in favor of sending the item back to the P&Z with these concerns. Mayor Tiffany moved to remand Case PD-AMD-24-002 PD-30 Amendment Multi- tenant Monument back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council Member Beach seconded the motion. Page 150 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 7 VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Sheridan, Tiffany, Oldham, Flynn NAYES: None ABSENT: Rowe VOTE: 6-0-1 INDIVIDUAL ITEMS 7. Consider a resolution casting the Town of Trophy Club's vote appointing a candidate to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers. (Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary) Ms. Dixon explained that the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers includes two members appointed jointly by all participating municipalities. Each municipality is asked to vote for one of the nominees, Jim Carter or Greg Kohn. Council Member Sheridan moved to approve Resolution No. 2024-11 casting the Town of Trophy Club's vote appointing Jim Carter to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. The caption of the resolution reads as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, CASTING THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB’S VOTE TO APPOINT A CANDIDATE AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE DENCO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Sheridan, Tiffany, Oldham, Flynn NAYES: None ABSENT: Rowe VOTE: 6-0-1 8. Consider authorizing the Town Manager to pay Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC $43,215.12 for services rendered to lower a main power line required by the Indian Creek/Fair Green Storm Drainage Project. (Matt Cox, Director of Community Development) Council Member Beach moved to authorize the Town Manager to pay Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC $43,215.12 for services rendered to lower a main power line required by the Indian Creek/Fair Green Storm Drainage Project. Council Member Sheridan seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Sheridan, Tiffany, Oldham, Flynn NAYES: None ABSENT: Rowe VOTE: 6-0-1 Page 151 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 8 9. Consider rescinding the previous Town Council motion on November 13, 2023 expanding the community pool amenities through Phase 2 of the Community Pool Project and authorizing the Town Manager to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with Parkhill for public engagement, the development of pool amenity options, schematic design, and construction cost analysis services in the amount of $101,759. (Chase Ellis, Director of Parks and Recreation) Chase Ellis, Director of Parks and Recreation, explained that on November 8, 2022, the Town Council approved a $4 million community pool renovation project, initially managed by Halff & Associates. Phase 1, included upgrades to mechanical systems, restrooms, concessions, office areas, and splash pad amenities. Director Ellis advised that before commencing Phase 2, the Town terminated the agreement with Halff & Associates and initiated a new RFQ process. After evaluating and interviewing four firms, Parkhill was selected and recommended by the Park Board on May 20, 2024. He explained to proceed with Parkhill, the Town Council needed to rescind their November 13, 2023, action which would allow for full project design, funding allocation, and additional community input, ensuring high-quality amenities that meet residents' needs and expectations. Chris Tribble, Senior Advisor of Parkhill provided a presentation on his firm and example community projects. Director Ellis answered questions from the Town Council regarding costs, community engagement and steps for future approvals of the project. Council Member Sheridan noted that the community input had come from the Parks Board, which had unanimously approved the original plan. He raised concerns about the recent Parks Board discussions, which included more amenities than just the meeting room and slide. He expressed concern about revisiting previously approved decisions. While he objected to spending additional money, he did not oppose ending the original contract. Mayor Tiffany praised the pickleball initiative as a successful example of community engagement and suggested using a similar approach for the pool project. She emphasized the importance of gathering input from those who do not usually attend park board meetings and highlighted that projects like the bobcat and pickleball explorations set a precedent for future community involvement. Additionally, she advocated hiring the consultant to help the town progress, adding that an upfront investment would help avoid future problems. Council Member Oldham praised the presentation and the community engagement efforts but opposed reversing the prior decision due to concerns about additional costs and redundancy. She objected to spending more taxpayer dollars to redo work. She added that while she supports community engagement, she did not want to reimagine the entire pool project. Page 152 of 186 Town Council Meeting Minutes – June 24, 2024 Page 9 Council Member Beach moved to rescinding the previous Town Council motion on November 13, 2023 expanding the community pool amenities through Phase 2 of the Community Pool Project; and to authorize the Town Manager to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with Parkhill for public engagement, the development of pool amenity options, schematic design, and construction cost analysis services in the amount of $101,759. Council Member Bauer seconded the motion. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Bauer, Beach, Tiffany, Oldham NAYES: Sheridan, Oldham ABSENT: Rowe VOTE: 4-2-1 ADJOUNMENT Mayor Tiffany adjourned the Town Council meeting 8:52 p.m. ____________________________ Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Page 153 of 186 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: July 22, 2024 FROM: Patrick Arata, Chief of Police AGENDA ITEM: Consider a consolidated radio communications interlocal agreement between the Denton County Sheriff’s Office and the Town of Trophy Club for the use of a radio communication system for FY 2025. (Patrick Arata, Police Chief) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Town of Trophy Club utilizes an interlocal agreement with Denton County to provide consolidated radio communication services to the Trophy Club Police Department and Trophy Club Fire Department. The county-wide radio system provides constant and consistent radio communication services to the Town of Trophy Club and surrounding municipalities to ensure radio interoperability during emergencies. This annual agreement will cover the period from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025. Under the agreement, Denton County has the responsibility of maintaining, operating, and controlling the communication system. The Town is responsible for purchasing, maintaining, supporting, and programming radios. The Police and Fire Department will maintain Tier 3 support on the radios through Denton County, which provides additional subscriber services including radio programming once per year and preventive maintenance every two years. The Trophy Club Police Department has 46 radios and the Trophy Club Fire Department has 35 radios. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Trophy Club's fees are based on the number of radios utilized by the Police Department and the Fire Department. Under the Tier 3 user rate, each radio has a monthly fee of $6. With the current number of radios in use, the Trophy Club Police Department's fees will be $3,312, and the Trophy Club Fire Department's fees will be $2,520. Trophy Club's total annual amount is $5,832. This amount is covered through the departments' operating budgets in the General Fund. Half of the Trophy Club Fire Department fee is paid for by Trophy Club Municipal Utility District #1. LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney Roggia has reviewed the interlocal agreement as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2024-25 Trophy Club FD & PD Consolidated Radio Communications Contract 2. 2024-25 Trophy Club FD & PD Consolidated Radio Communications Worksheet Page 154 of 186 ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the consolidated radio communications interlocal agreement between the Denton County Sheriff’s Office and the Town of Trophy Club for the use of a radio communication system for FY 2025. Page 155 of 186 1 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 INTER-LOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN DENTON COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB FOR THE USE OF THE DENTON COUNTY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM This Inter-Local Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the County of Denton, Texas (“the County”) and the Town of Trophy Club, a Texas home rule municipality, (“Trophy Club”), both entities being located in Denton County, Texas (collectively, the “Parties” or separately as an “Agency” or “Party”). The Parties execute this agreement as hereinafter provided, pursuant to the Texas Governmental Code, Chapter 791, known as the Inter-Local Cooperation Act: WHEREAS, Denton County and Trophy Club are political subdivisions within the State of Texas, each of which engages in the provision of governmental services for the benefit of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the Agencies are duly organized and operating under the laws of the State of Texas engaged in the provision of municipal government and/or related services for the benefit of the citizens of Agencies; and WHEREAS, the Inter-Local Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, as amended “the Act” provides authority for local governments of the State of Texas to enter into Inter-local agreements with each other for the purpose of performing governmental functions and services as set forth in the Act; and WHEREAS, the County owns, operates, and maintains the radio-communications system, exclusive of the radios owned individually by each User Agency (“System”) for the purpose of providing radio communications in support of its governmental operations; and WHEREAS, Trophy Club wishes to use certain portions of the System for its governmental operations; and WHEREAS, the use of the System in the provision of governmental services benefits the public health and welfare, promotes efficiency and effectiveness of local governments, and is of mutual concern to the contracting Parties; and WHEREAS, Trophy Club and the County have current funds available to satisfy any fees and costs required pursuant to this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, the sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: Page 156 of 186 2 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 I. DEFINITIONS “Assignee” means the Agency’s employee assigned to a specific Subscriber Unit. “Communications System” or “System” means a wide area, multi-agency digital trunked radio system compliant with P-25 interoperability standards to be used jointly by the City of Lewisville, the City of Denton, Denton County, and other Infrastructure Members, if any, primarily for providing public safety dispatch and communications for fire, emergency medical and police services and such other governmental services as may be agreed from time to time by the Parties. “Coordinating Committee” means the committee that is responsible for making recommendations to the Infrastructure Management Committee on the administration and operation of the Communications System. “Infrastructure Management Committee” means the committee that is responsible for the administration and operation of the Communications System. “Infrastructure Member” means the parties and other entities which have built Infrastructure connected to the Communications System in accordance with the system requirements and consent of the Denton County Sheriff. “Subscriber Units” means mobile radios, portable radios or any similar devices used for communicating over the Communications System. “Talk Group” means a specific group of Subscriber Units allowed to communicate privately within that group over shared infrastructure resources. “Technical Committee” means the committee that advises the Coordinating Committee on technical issues related to the operation of the Communications System. “User” means any entity with which the City of Denton, the City of Lewisville, Denton County, or other Infrastructure Member has entered into a contractual agreement for the provision of radio communication services through the Consolidated Communications System. II. TERM Page 157 of 186 3 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 2.1 This Agreement is for a period of a one (1) year term, beginning on the 1st day of October, 2024, and ending on the 30th day of September, 2025, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 7.1. 2.2 It is the intention of the Parties for this to be a long term enterprise which will be renewed with a new inter-local agreement each year subject to approval by each Party’s governing body. III. OBLIGATIONS OF TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB 3.1 Trophy Club shall use the System in accordance with this Agreement to provide integration of communications by Trophy Club between its Users on the System for governmental operations. 3.2 When using the System, Trophy Club shall abide by all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including any regulations of the Denton County Radio Communications System. When Trophy Club uses the System for interoperability with Talk Groups (hereinafter defined) other than those provided by this Agreement, Trophy Club will also abide by the User rules of those Talk Groups. 3.3 Trophy Club must provide a written request to the Denton County Radio System Manager (“System Manager”) or his designee, to activate radios (“Subscriber Units”) on the System. Such request must include the model and serial number of the Subscriber Unit, the name of the Assignee, and identifying Talk Groups required in the Subscriber Unit. 3.4 Trophy Club is responsible for furnishing its own Subscriber Units, which must be compatible with the APCO P-25 Phase 2 TDMA Digital System, and for maintenance of the Subscriber Units. Trophy Club is responsible for all programming of Agency-owned Subscriber Units. 3.5 Trophy Club shall be solely responsible for obtaining a technical services support contract and a maintenance contract for all Agencies-owned dispatch infrastructure equipment, either from the manufacturer of the equipment or from a manufacturer-authorized service provider. The County shall not be responsible for maintenance of any of Trophy Club’s Agency-owned equipment. 3.6 Depending on the equipment that will be purchased and installed by Trophy Club, the Agencies shall be solely responsible for entering into such Software Update Agreements and/or Software Maintenance Agreements from the manufacturer as necessary to ensure that the equipment owned by the Agencies will be maintained and upgraded to meet the requirements of the System when the County performs System upgrades. Page 158 of 186 4 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 3.7 Trophy Club shall be solely responsible for having periodic maintenance (PM) performed on its Subscriber Units at least every two years which shall include tuning and alignment of the Subscriber Units and updating the Subscriber Units with the latest firmware available. 3.8 The County shall not be liable to Trophy Club for the lack of interoperability between the Subscriber Units and the System if Trophy Club fails to perform the required PM and/or obtain the software and/or firmware upgrades recommended by the County and/or the manufacturer of the Subscriber Units necessary to communicate through the System as set forth in Sections 3.5, 3.6, and 3.7 above. IV. OBLIGATIONS OF THE COUNTY 4.1 The County will allow Trophy Club to use County provided Talk Groups, which are a primary level of communication for Users on the System (“Talk Group”), comparable to a channel on a conventional radio system, for the exclusive use of Trophy Club. Talk Groups will be established for Trophy Club by the County. 4.2 The System Manager will not activate radios on the Trophy Club Talk Groups nor make changes to the Trophy Club radios without first receiving authorization from the designated representative of the Agencies, unless, in the opinion of the County, such action is necessary to eliminate harmful interference. 4.3 The County is solely responsible for: (1) Coordinating Talk Groups among System Users; (2) Grouping of Talk Groups to allow transmitting and receiving on all associated Talk Groups as required by the Agencies; and (3) The operation, maintenance, and control of the System V. FEES 5.1 The fees payable for the term of this Agreement are set out in Exhibit A which is attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein for all purposes. 5.2 The County may increase the fees each October 1st, the beginning of each County fiscal year, by an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the previous year’s fees. The County will provide ninety (90) days’ notice to Trophy Club before increasing the fees. Page 159 of 186 5 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 5.3 Based on the fees described above, the County will calculate the annual fee due based upon the total number of Subscriber Units and submit an invoice to the Agencies on or before October 1st of each year. This amount is subject to change when the Agencies add or delete the number of Subscriber Units in service. The Agencies must notify the System Manager in writing of any addition or deletion of Subscriber Units. 5.4 Fees for Additions - The amount owed for annual fees for additions of Subscriber Units will be prorated for the year added, invoiced immediately, and amounts will be due within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice for the addition(s). 5.5 Deletions - No refunds for deletions will be made for the Agencies deletion of Subscriber Units during the period of the Agreement. The fees for the upcoming fiscal year will be calculated based on the number of Subscriber Units in service on the radio system as of May 1st of the current contract year. 5.6 In the event a new Inter-Local Agreement is not executed prior to the expiration of this Agreement, and the Sheriff’s Office continues to provide access to the Radio Communications System, the Agencies shall reimburse and compensate the County for access to the Denton County Radio Communications System at the rate set by the Denton County Sheriff and approved by the Denton County Commissioners Court for the next fiscal year. VI. PAYMENT DUE 6.1 Trophy Club agrees to pay the County the annual fees specified under Article V within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice. Should Trophy Club add Subscriber Units or Talk Groups to the Service within a Term, Trophy Club agrees to pay the additional fee(s) due within thirty (30) days of invoice. All payments for expenses incurred as a result of the performance of the Agreement shall be made only from current revenues legally available to each respective Party. VII. TERMINATION 7.1 Either Party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ninety (90) days advance written notice. The Agencies shall pay for all fees incurred through the effective date of termination. If the County permanently discontinues the operation of its System, this Agreement shall terminate on the date of discontinuance without further notice, and the County will reimburse the Agencies the pro-rated amount of the fees previously paid by the Agencies for the use of the System for the then current fiscal year. VIII. Page 160 of 186 6 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 RELEASE AND HOLD HARMLESS TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, EACH PARTY AGREES TO WAIVE ALL CLAIMS AGAINST, TO RELEASE, AND TO HOLD HARMLESS THE OTHER PARTY AND ITS RESPECTIVE OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, IN BOTH THEIR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CAPACITIES, FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, CLAIMS, SUITS, DEMANDS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS, FEES, INCLUDING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION OR SETTLEMENT, OR CAUSES OF ACTION WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OR INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON OR FOR LOSS OF, DAMAGE TO, OR LOSS OF USE OF ANY PROPERTY ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT. IN THE EVENT THAT A CLAIM IS FILED, EACH PARTY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF LIABILITY. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 791.006(a-1) OF THE ACT, THE ASSIGNMENT OF LIABILITY IN THIS AGREEMENT IS INTENDED TO BE DIFFERENT THAN THE LIABILITY OTHERWISE ASSIGNED UNDER SUBSECTION 791.006(a) OF THE ACT. IX. IMMUNITY In the execution of this Agreement, neither of the Parties waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to have waived any immunity or any legal or equitable defense otherwise available against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. By entering into this Agreement, the Parties do not create any obligations, express or implied, other than those set forth herein, and this Agreement does not create any rights in parties who are not signatories to this Agreement. X. ASSIGNMENT Trophy Club agrees to retain control and to give full attention to the fulfillment of this Agreement. Trophy Club cannot assign or sublet this Agreement without the prior written consent of the County. Further, the Agencies cannot sublet any part or feature of the work to anyone objectionable to Denton County. Trophy Club also agrees that the subletting of any portion or feature of the work, or materials required in the performance of this Agreement, does not relieve Trophy Club from its full obligations to the County as provided by this Agreement. XI. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between Denton County and Trophy Club and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either Page 161 of 186 7 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 written or oral, between Denton County and Trophy Club. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by Denton County and Trophy Club. XII. NOTICES Unless notified otherwise in writing, all notices are required to be given to either Party in writing and delivered in person or sent via certified mail to the other Party at the following respective addresses: County: 1 Denton County Judge Denton County Commissioners Court 1 Courthouse Drive, Ste 3100 Denton, Texas 76201 2 Denton County Sheriff Denton County Sheriff’s Office 127 N. Woodrow Lane Denton, Texas 76205 3 Assistant District Attorney Counsel to the Sheriff 127 N. Woodrow Lane Denton, Texas 76205 Name of Agency: Town of Trophy Club Contact Person Brandon Wright, Town Manager Address 1 Trophy Wood Dr. City, State, Zip Trophy Club, TX 76262 Telephone 682-237-2900 Email bwright@trophyclub.org XIII. AUTHORITY TO SIGN The undersigned officers and/or agents of the Parties hereto are the properly authorized officials or representatives and have the necessary authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Parties. XIV. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be contrary to the law or Page 162 of 186 8 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 contrary to any rule or regulation having the force and effect of the law, such decisions shall not affect the remaining portions of the Agreement. However, upon the occurrence of such event, either Party may terminate this Agreement by giving the other Party thirty (30) days written notice. XV. VENUE This Agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the Parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to conflict of law principles. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall be enforceable in Denton County, Texas, and if legal and necessary, exclusive venue shall lie in state court in Denton County, Texas. XVI. INTERPRETATION OF AGREEMENT Although this Agreement is drafted by the County, this is a negotiated document. Should any part of this Agreement be in dispute, the Parties agree that the Agreement shall not be construed more favorably for either Party. XVII. REMEDIES No right or remedy granted herein or reserved to the Parties is exclusive of any right or remedy granted by law or equity; but each shall be cumulative of every right or remedy given hereunder. No covenant or condition of this Agreement may be waived without the express written consent of the Parties. It is further agreed that one (1) or more instances of forbearance by either Party in the exercise of its respective rights under this Agreement shall in no way constitute a waiver thereof. XVIII. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The Parties each bind themselves, their respective successors, executors, administrators, and assigns to the other Party to this contract. Neither Party will assign, sublet, subcontract or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party. No assignment, delegation of duties or subcontract under this Agreement will be effective without the written consent of all Parties. EXECUTED duplicate originals on the dates indicated below: Page 163 of 186 9 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 SIGNED AND AGREED BY THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS: BY: _______________________________________ Date:___________________________ Brandon Wright, Town Manager Town of Trophy Club 1 Trophy Wood Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 682-237-2900 Approved as to content: _____________________________ Jason Wise, Fire Chief _____________________________ Patrick Arata, Chief of Police Attest: _____________________________ Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Approved as to form: _______________________________ Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Page 164 of 186 10 | Page Radio Communications System Agreement/Town of Trophy Club Fire & Police Departments 2024-25 APPROVED BY THE DENTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS: BY: ________________________________________ Date:________________________ Andy Eads, County Judge Denton County Commissioners Court 1 Courthouse Drive, Ste 3100 Denton, Texas 76201 (940)349-2820 Approved as to content: _____________________________ Denton County Sheriff’s Office Approved as to form: _____________________________ Assistant District Attorney Counsel to the Sheriff Page 165 of 186 Exhibit A Denton County Sheriff’s Office Consolidated Radio Communications System Agreement FY24-25 Agency Payment Worksheet/Invoice Agency: Town of Trophy Club Payment Contact Person: Brandon Wright, Town Manager and/or Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary Phone Number: 682-237-2900 Email(s): bwright@trophyclub.org and/or tdixon@trophyclub.org Address: 1 Trophy Wood Drive City, State, Zip Trophy Club, TX 76262 Agency Should Include this Worksheet with Each Payment Sent to Denton County. Make checks payable to: Denton County Mail payments to: Consolidated Radio Communications Systems Agreement Payments Denton County Sheriff’s Office Attn: Sherry Cochran 127 N. Woodrow Lane Denton, Texas 76205 Tier 3 Includes Tier 1 User + add on of Subscriber Services (program once per year and PM radios every two years) - $6 each per month 35 FD Radio Subscribers = $2,520.00 46 PD Radio Subscribers = $3,312.00 Total Amt Per Year = $5832.00 BILLED ANNUALLY Please sign and date below. _________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Agency Representative Title Date Page 166 of 186 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: July 22, 2024 FROM: Matt Cox, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM: Consider an ordinance amending the FY 2024 Budget to increase construction inspection fee revenue and professional engineering services in the Community Development Department by $68,000 for additional construction inspection services related to Trophy Club residential developments. (Matt Cox, Community Development Director) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The attached budget amendment represents the second proposed adjustment of the FY 2023-2024 Annual Budget. According to Section 9.06 of the Town Charter, “If during or before the fiscal year the Town Manager certifies that there are available for appropriation revenues in excess of those estimated in the budget, the Council by ordinance may make supplemental appropriations for the year up to the amount of such excess.” Transfers such as these are presented to the Town Council throughout the fiscal year in an effort to resolve variances from the Annual Budget and reallocate resources to cover unanticipated expenditures. Upon approval, there will be a $68,000 increase in General Fund revenues, raising the total revenue from $14,465,015 to $14,533,015, as well as an increase in General Fund (Community Development) expenditures raising the total from $14,435,126 to $14,503,126. The Community Development Engineering Budget will increase by $68,000, resulting in a total engineering services line item amount of $110,000. Originally approved at $42,000, this increase is related to additional construction inspection services for new developments including Willow Estates, Cypress Estates, Oak Estates, Triple Crown, and the Beldonia (formerly the Trophy) Townhomes. Construction inspection fees are collected from developers and utilized to pay the Town's engineering fees to Teague, Nall & Perkins, Inc. The Town anticipates collecting approximately $68,000 in construction fee revenues from developers for the above-mentioned projects. In turn, this budget amendment will increase both General Fund revenues and General Fund expenditures by $68,000 resulting in a budget-neutral amendment since the additional expenditures are absorbed by offsetting revenues from the developers. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: This budget amendment will result in an increase in General Fund revenues from $14,465,015 to $14,533,015 as well as an increase in General Fund expenditures from Page 167 of 186 $14,435,126 to $14,503,126. The overall increase in both General Fund revenues and General Fund expenditures is $68,000 resulting in a budget-neutral amendment. LEGAL REVIEW: Town Attorney, Dean Roggia, has reviewed the ordinance as to form and legality. ATTACHMENTS: 1. FY23-24 Budget Amendment #2 - Ordinance with Exhibit 2. FY24 Approved Budget - Community Development ACTIONS/OPTIONS: Staff recommends that the Town Council move to approve the ordinance amending the FY 2024 Budget to increase construction inspection fee revenue and professional engineering services in the Community Development Department by $68,000 for additional construction inspection services related to Trophy Club residential developments. Page 168 of 186 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, AMENDING THE TOWN’S ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OCTOBER 1, 2023, AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2024, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2023-15, AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2024-11, BY PROVIDING FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GENERAL FUND; PROVIDING THAT EXPENDITURES FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANNUAL BUDGET, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Trophy Club, Texas (the “Town”), is a home rule municipality acting under its Town Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Town Council previously adopted its budget for the fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2023, and ending on September 30, 2024 (the “Annual Budget”); and WHEREAS, the Annual Budget was adopted by Ordinance No. 2023-15 on September 11, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Annual Budget was amended by Ordinance No. 2024-11 on May 28, 2024; and WHEREAS, after the Town Council’s approval of the Annual Budget, unexpected needs have arisen which require amendment of the Annual Budget; and WHEREAS, Town Charter Sec. 9.13 and Section 102.010 of the Texas Local Government Code allow the Town to amend its Annual Budget as deemed necessary for any municipal purpose; and WHEREAS, the Town is also allowed to amend its Annual Budget for emergency appropriations to meet a pressing need for public expenditure to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as a result of unusual and unforeseen conditions; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that an amendment to the Annual Budget pursuant to this Ordinance is a public necessity and in the best interest of the public health and general welfare of the Town and its citizens. Page 169 of 186 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. All of the above premises are hereby found to be true and correct factual and legislative determinations of the Town and are hereby approved and incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2. The Annual Budget of the Town for the fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2023, and ending on September 30, 2024, as adopted by Ordinance No. 2023-15, and as amended by Ordinance 2024-11, is hereby amended to provide for adjustments to the General Fund, as shown in Exhibit “A,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, and expenditures for said fiscal year shall be made in accordance with the Annual Budget, as amended. SECTION 3. The expenditures and amendments authorized by this Ordinance are necessary to meet unusual and/or unforeseen conditions or circumstances that could not have been included in the original budget through the use of reasonably diligent thought and attention. SECTION 4. A true and correct copy of this Ordinance showing the approved budget amendments shall be filed with the Town Secretary and in the office of the County Clerk as required by Section 102.009 of the Local Government Code. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other provisions of ordinances of the Town, except where the provisions of this Ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Town Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance should be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, or sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the Town Council without incorporation in this Ordinance of such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. Page 170 of 186 SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, this 22nd day of July, 2024. APPROVED: Jeannette Tiffany, Mayor ATTEST: Tammy Dixon, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dean Roggia, Town Attorney Page 171 of 186 Exhibit “A” Town of Trophy Club Budget Amendment No. 2 Page 172 of 186 Department Line Item Line Item Description Budget Total  Recommended Change  Amended Budget Section 1General Fund Revenue01‐000‐41327Construction Inspections‐$                               (68,000)$                    (68,000)$                      Total General Fund Revenue:‐$                      (68,000)$           (68,000)$             Community Development01‐522‐60500Engineering 42,000$                         68,000$                     110,000$                     Total Community Development:‐$                      68,000$            68,000$              Total Revenue Increase(68,000)$           Total Expenditure Increase68,000$            FY24 BUDGET AMENDMENT #2:Page 173 of 186 Community Development FY 2021 ACTUAL FY 2022 AMENDED BUDGET FY 2022 ACTUAL FY 2023 AMENDED BUDGET FY 2023 ESTIMATE FY 2024 KWdED FY 2025 PROJECTED FY 2026 PROJECTED Personnel Salaries $ 280,257 $ 273,470 $ 254,178 $ 243,196 $ 283,272 $ 231,890 $ 236,528 $ 241,259 Merits - 3,948 - 11,485 - - - - Overtime 2,547 5,000 - 5,000 595 5,000 5,100 5,202 Longevity 1,928 963 963 1,031 1,275 1,746 1,780 1,816 Stipend 1,875 - - - - - - - Certification 1,450 900 1,412 1,500 2,634 3,000 3,060 3,121 Cell Phone Stipend - 1,800 1,715 1,350 1,736 1,350 1,800 1,800 Retirement 38,878 27,062 32,839 31,871 36,688 31,260 31,885 32,523 Medical Insurance 21,503 11,404 18,010 18,173 13,973 9,880 10,078 10,279 Dental Insurance 1,372 1,525 1,607 1,937 1,637 1,554 1,585 1,617 Vision Insurance 178 166 266 223 273 383 391 399 Life Insurance & Other 1,498 1,480 1,349 1,678 1,506 1,185 1,209 1,233 Social Security Taxes 17,607 13,022 15,390 14,797 11,382 14,672 14,965 15,264 Medicare Taxes 4,118 3,046 3,600 3,461 2,662 3,431 3,500 3,570 Unemployment Taxes 1,557 756 158 882 73 882 900 918 Workers' Compensation 3,028 3,419 3,886 2,099 2,099 1,742 1,777 1,813 Pre-Employment Physicals/Testing 45 - 45 - - - - - Total Personnel 377,841$ 347,961$ 335,417$ 338,683$ 359,805$ 307,976$ 314,559$ 320,814$ Services/Supplies Professional Outside Services $ - $ - $ - $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,640 $ 33,293 Engineering 79,211 90,000 59,747 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,840 43,697 Plan Review Services 10,173 10,000 - 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,080 4,162 Health Inspections 7,255 7,000 11,664 14,000 14,000 18,000 18,360 18,727 Inspection Services 36,890 10,000 19,210 18,000 18,000 24,000 24,480 24,970 Advertising 1,296 1,500 2,219 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,530 1,561 Legal Notices 147 - 946 - - - - - Printing 35 600 102 600 600 600 612 624 Abatements 765 2,000 935 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,040 2,081 Schools & Training 1,575 4,000 1,456 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,080 4,162 Communications/Pagers/Mobiles 2,793 4,000 1,368 4,000 1,949 2,000 2,040 2,081 Vehicle Maintenance 1,774 4,000 4,824 4,000 4,000 3,000 3,060 3,121 Dues & Membership 1,664 1,500 170 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,530 1,561 Travel & Per Diem 84 2,000 1,701 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,040 2,081 Meetings 23 250 142 250 250 500 510 520 Plat Filing Fees - 350 - 350 350 850 867 884 Inspection Fees - 145 145 145 145 145 148 Office Supplies 1,046 1,000 1,107 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,020 1,040 Postage 445 500 451 500 500 500 510 520 Publications/Books/Subscriptions 1,031 2,000 1,525 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,060 3,121 Fuel 1,215 4,000 2,850 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,080 4,162 Uniforms 914 2,000 1,558 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,040 2,081 Miscellaneous Expense - 500 182 500 500 500 510 520 Vehicles - - 10 - - 2,000 2,040 2,081 Total Services/Supplies $ 148,336 $ 147,200 $ 112,312 $ 151,345 $ 149,294 $ 151,095 $ 154,114 157,196$ Total Expenditures $ 526,177 $ 495,161 $ 447,729 $ 490,028 $ 509,099 $ 459,071 $ 468,673 478,010$ TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS AAnnual Program of Services FY24 Adopted Budget 29 Page 174 of 186 TOWN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: July 22, 2024 FROM: Tamara Smith, MSL, Assistant to the Town Manager AGENDA ITEM: Presentation and discussion regarding an update from the arts commission ad hoc committee on the development of an arts commission in Trophy Club. (Tamara Smith, Assistant to the Town Manager) BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: On September 25, 2023, a resolution was passed to establish an ad hoc committee focused on arts and culture in Trophy Club. The committee's objective was to research, develop, and establish an arts commission in the community. In January 2024, the Town of Trophy Club secured a consultant, Margie Reese, to facilitate this initiative. Ms. Reese brings a wealth of experience in the arts, boasting a thirty-year career as an arts advocate and professional in arts management. She spent years working for the City of Dallas and City of Los Angeles in cultural affairs and has also worked with non-profit organizations like the Ford Foundation. Her efforts have centered on leveraging resources from both public and private sectors to enhance arts education opportunities for children and their families. Additionally, she has played a pivotal role as a strategic consultant, contributing to numerous community cultural plans for local arts agencies nationwide. Following Ms. Reese's guidance, the arts ad hoc committee has conducted several meetings and organized a series of input sessions involving town staff and members of the public. During the committee's meetings, the following purposes were completed: 1. Facilitation of workshops and discovery sessions 2. Drafting initial strategic directions 3. Developing a framework 4. Conducting a series of community conversations 5. Presenting preliminary findings Ms. Reese will present an update on the process and accomplishments to date. Feedback from the Town Council will be incorporated into the draft documents. A final report will then be reviewed by the ad hoc committee and Town staff. BOARD REVIEW/CITIZEN FEEDBACK: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount for the facilitator fee for the arts and cultural ad hoc committee is $14,400. This amount is being paid for by the Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund, which can be utilized to support Trophy Club's arts program. Page 175 of 186 LEGAL REVIEW: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Calendar 2. Formation Concept 7_16.2 ACTIONS/OPTIONS: This agenda item is being presented for discussion and feedback purposes only. No action will be taken by the Town Council during this Town Council Meeting. Page 176 of 186 Work Plan – Town of Trophy Club To date: 4/30/24 Task Completion Date Presentation Format Reviewers Set remaining summer meeting May 3 Complete additional community interviews May 10 Preliminary document workshop Week of May 26 In person Full Committee Insert City agreements: -Use and projections of HOT Funds; -Pro Forma schedule of programs; FY24/25 actions By May 28 Virtual Town Manager/staff Develop full Preliminary document draft May 30 Digital submission Town Manager Full Committee Edit and present second draft of full document and recommendations July 16 Digital report Town Manager Full Committee Brief Mayor and Town Manager on Final Draft Report July 22 In person Committee Chair Town Manager Finalize Report and recommendations By August TBD Full Committee Final presentation as requested By August Digital Follow up as requested TDB Thru Sept. 13 MJR 4/30/4 Page 32 of 32Page 177 of 186 MJR PARTNERS Observations and Opportunities Creating an Arts and Culture Commission for The Town of Trophy Club, Texas Update on activities and work plan Presented to the Mayor and Town Council July 22, 2024 Margie J. Reese, Facilitator Ad Hoc Arts and Culture Committee Members: Candace Dillard Chairperson Wanda Brewster Committee Member Melissa Eason Vice Chairperson Jean Frazier Committee Member Janet Greedy Committee Member Beth Ann Sands Committee Member Carol Tombari Committee Member margie.reese@gmail.com Page 178 of 186 2 margie.reese@gmail.com Observations and Opportunities Creating an Arts and Culture Commission for The Town of Trophy Club, Texas July 22, 2024 Background and Introduction Through the Town Manager's O1ice, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Trophy Club are considering new ways to formalize and provide civic-funded arts and culture services for the public's benefit. To achieve this goal, The Town Manager contracted with Margie J. Reese, Arts Management Consulting Services, to engage in conversations and work sessions to explore possibilities for formalizing the city’s role in supporting arts programming to enhance civic pride and further establish the Town’s identity. Margie Johnson Reese has a 45-year portfolio in arts management. She was Executive Director and General Manager for Cultural A1airs in Dallas and Los Angeles. The Ford Foundation appointed her as their Media, Arts, and Culture Program O1icer based in Lagos, Nigeria. Returning to the United States, she accepted the task of creating an arts council for Wichita Falls, Texas. She served as Executive Director of that agency and hired and trained her successor. She is currently Consultant-in-Residence for Mid-America Arts Alliance, based in Kansas City, MO, and the Western States Arts Federation (WESTAF) in Denver, CO. Margie contributes to arts policy nationwide, advising on grantmaking, cultural planning, public art, and change management. She is a Board Member Emeritus at Americans for the Arts in Washington, D.C. Since March 2024, facilitated in-person and virtual conversations with members of the Ad Hoc Arts and Culture committee, Trophy Club artists, and Town sta1. Those discussions inform the following report. The conversations were structured to allow interviewees to think out loud about definitions of art, heritage, and culture. With help from the Ad Hoc Arts and Culture Committee members, input from residents was also gathered around a few baseline questions to gather observations, ideas, and aspirations that would be helpful in creating a system to support arts and cultural programs in the Town of Trophy Club. The following report summarizes the listening process, proposes a Concept Model for creating a local arts agency in the Town of Trophy Club, and suggests a series of initiatives for consideration. Page 179 of 186 3 margie.reese@gmail.com Concept Model Arts and Culture Commission for The Town of Trophy Club, Texas The Ad Hoc Arts and Culture Committee investigated the role and potential structure of an arts agency for Trophy Club. They discussed and adopted the following Concept Model, which is presented to the Town Council and leadership for consideration. Based on the strong interest in the arts expressed by interviewees, including resident artists and educators, The Town of Trophy Club is well positioned to successfully create an agency within the Town Manager’s o1ice to support, promote, and coordinate the arts for the benefit of the public. Proposed Advisory Body The Trophy Club Arts and Culture Commission The Trophy Club Arts and Culture Commission (the Commission) is the agency that promotes arts and cultural activities as essential components of community development, enriching the lives of residents and visitors to our community. Proposed Mission Statement The mission of the Trophy Club Arts and Culture Commission is to promote, present, and support high-quality, accessible arts and cultural activities that benefit the public. The Work of the Commission The Trophy Club Arts Commission is an advisory body to the Mayor, Town Council, and Town Manager. It promotes lifelong learning through various creative activities, inviting residents of all ages to explore the arts and discover their creative potential. The primary role of the Commission is to: 1. Advise on the allocation of public funding 2. Present and promote accessible arts and cultural programming 3. Solicit and manage grants and encourage private-sector investment in the arts 4. Support arts education 5. Establish protocols for commissioning Public Art Projects Page 180 of 186 4 margie.reese@gmail.com Recommendations for launching the Arts and Culture Commission Four initiatives are proposed for consideration: Initiative One - Invest in Public Art and Historic Markers 1) Develop and adopt measures to maintain existing and future objects of art in public places and, 2) Develop criteria for Determining Historical Significance. Several key criteria must be considered to determine whether a property is historic. The following are some of the most often-used guiding principles: • Age of the Property: Age is often one of the first considerations when evaluating a property for historical significance. Properties that are 50 years or older are typically considered historic. However, the age of a property alone does not guarantee its historical significance. • Architectural Style and Rarity: Another important consideration is the style and rarity of a property’s architecture. Properties that show a unique or innovative architectural design or represent a particular style or period are usually considered historic. • Association with Important Events, people, or architectural movements: Properties directly associated with significant events, people, or architectural movements are typically considered historically substantial—for example, a property associated with a famous historical figure or a significant historical event. (For example: the original Fire Station in Trophy Club should be preserved) • Uniqueness and Cultural Significance: Properties that are unique in terms of their design, materials, construction techniques, or cultural significance are also often considered historically significant. Even for a planned or newly created community like Trophy Club, strategic foresight is important to prevent the loss of significant traces of the community’s origin story. Page 181 of 186 5 margie.reese@gmail.com Initiative Two-Art in Public Places Projects Public art enhances the visual attractiveness of communities, gives cities local distinctiveness, and could further attract investment, boost cultural tourism, create local employment, maximizes the use of land and spaces, and gives a community a stronger sense of place and identity. • The Town of Trophy Club should consider drafting criteria for designating local historic sites, existing structures, art on public and private property, and designation of historic markers. Launching this process now can connect the area's history to Texas history, and provide background information for educational purposes. Resource: Texas Historical Commission https://thc.texas.gov/preserve/preservation- programs/historical-markers The Town of Trophy Club should commission a historian/researcher to document the full story of the Town’s unique history and connection to Texas history. Solicit recommendations for the project from the Texas Historical Commission. Estimated project cost: $6,500-$10,000 Potential funding resource: The Summerlee Foundation – “Texas History Program Since 1988, the Texas History Program has embraced a broad and diverse group of projects from all regions of Texas. These projects have included the disciplines of archaeology, archives, libraries, media, museums, middle and secondary schools, higher education, preservation, publications, and scholarly research”. https://summerlee.org/texas-history-program-overview/ Submit the Letter of Intent to the Sumerlee Foundation before the next deadline of September 30, 2024. Estimated project cost: No cost • Draft a Public Art Procedures statement. This statement should frame a process for launching a public art program in the Town of Trophy Club. No cost • Determine a reasonable budget to commission an artist or artist team to design and facilitate an inaugural temporary or permanent public art activity informed by community participation. Estimated project cost (TBD) Page 182 of 186 6 margie.reese@gmail.com Public Art Projects continued • Commission local artist(s) to produce a community-informed temporary or permanent work of art to be sited in a public/accessible space. (Budget to be determined) • Create a Public Art Information page on the city’s website to build public awareness of the value of public art in building local identity. No cost • Collaborate with the Parks Department to develop a Sculpture Trail as part of the Park Department Master Plan. Estimated Project cost to be reserved for art projects over a 3–5-year period: $50,000 up to $250,000, depending on project size and intended impact. Examples of public art Street art in Abu Dhabi in the UAE Page 183 of 186 7 margie.reese@gmail.com Ai Weiwei – Forever Bicycles, 2014, 1,254 bicycles. The Contemporary Austin – Museum Without Walls Program Austin, Texas, 2017, photo: Brian Fitzsimmons/The Contemporary Austin. Skate (Fiberglass) Paul Quilter, artist Salt Lake City, Uta Page 184 of 186 8 margie.reese@gmail.com Initiative Three - Trophy Club Artist Grants and Awards A fully developed Arts Grants Program is not recommended at this point. However, as a foundational step, it is important to build visibility for local professional artists. Therefore, the proposed Fellowship program would demonstrate to the public the artists' roles in civic development and public participation. The Trophy Club Artist Fellowship The Trophy Club Artist Fellowship (TCAF) program would provide monetary awards to outstanding professional artists (i.e., those individuals who, by education, experience, or natural talent, engage in a particular art form or discipline) who live in The Town of Trophy Club or within a designated adjoining community. This program is proposed as a three-year initiative to be evaluated annually by the Trophy Club Arts Commission and Town Manager to determine need and impact. Trophy Club Arts Fellows would present or culminating exhibitions and activities; or offer programs, classes, or workshops as appropriate to their artistic practice. The schedule of these activities would be agreed upon with the Trophy Cub Arts Commission at the time of the award. The term of the Fellowship is 12 months. Fellows will meet quarterly with City staff and/or the Arts Commission to report on activities and progress. Collaborative ventures among the TCAF are encouraged. Fellows could be paired with “host city departments” to design and facilitate arts and cultural programming that supports strategic departmental plans. Estimated Project Cost (to be determined): Fellowship awards should be between $5,000 to $8,000 per award. Proposed categories for Fellowships: • Visual Art • Crafts Film and Photography • Dance Instruction • Music Performance (Instrumental or Vocal) • Theatre o Acting or Directing o Instruction • Literary Arts o Children’s Literature/Young Adult Literature o Poetry Page 185 of 186 9 margie.reese@gmail.com Eligibility • Fellowship applicants may be individual artists, ensembles of artists, or organizations based in The Town of Trophy Club that provide arts programs to the public. They must be professional, practicing artists working in their chosen discipline. • Fellowship applicants must be at least 18 years of age and be residents of The Town of Trophy Club. • Applicants may apply for only one fellowship each fiscal year. • Those not eligible to apply include past fellowship and partial fellowship recipients, minors (individuals under 18 years of age), full-time students (elementary, secondary, college, or university), full-time Town of Trophy Club employees, Commission or staff members, or members of their families. Applications for consideration must be submitted to the Trophy Club Arts Commission for review. The primary evaluation criterion is based on the work samples and references submitted with the application. Initiative Four - Trophy Club Presents This initiative might be launched following several stages of community engagement and will require some investigation regarding community interests and possible venues. The goal is to begin building audiences for presenting guest artists, touring exhibitions, or creating an artist residency program. Organizations like the Greater Dallas Youth Orchestras and Dallas Black Dance Theatre might be considered as potential guest artists. Storytellers and poets are interesting resources for multi-generational audiences. The Trophy Club Park is an inviting space for “presenting” puppetry artists, storytellers, or writing coaches that would encourage adult groups to write the “great American novel. Estimated Project Costs: Project Coordinator - (TBD) Budget for presenting activities –$ 38,000 These ideas are suggested directions for the Town Council to consider and are drafted for discussion purposes only. Margie J. Reese MJR PARTNERS Page 186 of 186